Conectar
Shoulder osteoarthritis most commonly affects older adults, causing pain, reduced function and quality of life. Total shoulder replacements (TSRs) are indicated once other non-surgical options no longer provide adequate pain relief. Two main types of TSRs are widely used: anatomic TSR (aTSR) and reverse TSR (rTSR). It is not clear whether one TSR type provides better short- or long-term outcomes for patients, and which, if either, is more cost-effective for the National Health Service (NHS).
RAPSODI-UK is a multi-centre, pragmatic, two-parallel arm, superiority randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of aTSR versus rTSR for adults aged 60+ with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff and bone stock suitable for TSR. Participants in both arms of the trial will receive usual post-operative rehabilitation. We aim to recruit 430 participants from approximately 28 NHS sites across the UK. The primary outcome is the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) at 2 years post-randomisation. Outcomes will be collected at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include the pain and function subscales of the SPADI, the Oxford Shoulder Score, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), complications, range of movement and strength, revisions and mortality. The between-group difference in the primary outcome will be derived from a constrained longitudinal data analysis model. We will also undertake a full health economic evaluation and conduct qualitative interviews to explore perceptions of acceptability of the two types of TSR and experiences of recovery with a sample of participants.
Ethics committee approval for this trial was obtained (London - Queen Square Research Ethics Committee, Rec Reference 22/LO/0617) on 4 October 2022. The results of the main trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and using other professional and media outlets.
To co-develop storyboards and scripts for multimedia resources to support the information needs of informal carers (carers) of older adults from Greek, Italian and Chinese (Cantonese- and Mandarin-speaking) Australian backgrounds during hospital-to-home transitions.
A modified experience-based co-design methodology was used to co-develop four storyboards and scripts with Greek, Italian and Chinese Australian carers and advocates from multicultural community-aged care organisations. To promote relevance, a Carer Advisory Group guided the research. The Carer Advisory Group, comprising 10 people, included carers and advocates from participating multicultural community-aged care organisations, a social worker from a large public health service, and policy representatives. Twenty-nine participants took part from June 2023 to April 2024. Data collection involved two rounds of co-development including 2 workshops, 9 small group interviews and 11 individual interviews. Round 1 focused on understanding participants' experiences of older adult care transitions, information needs and advice for other carers. This information was used to develop categories and example quotes to draft four storyboards reflecting participants' descriptions of the carer and patient journey during care transitions. Round 2 involved draft storyboards being presented to the same participants who advised on their acceptability. Certified interpreters and translators were used throughout data collection.
The co-developed categories, four storyboards and scripts are presented. Participants and the Carer Advisory Group agreed that the findings would be used to develop multimedia resources to support the information needs of carers and older adults from Greek, Italian and Chinese Australian backgrounds in care transitions.
The storyboards and scripts for multimedia resources are expected to improve access to information and services for carers and older adults from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. The storyboards and scripts are examples to guide policymakers and leaders in improving transitional care in Australia and internationally.
The reporting of the study has adhered to the COREQ guidelines.
Informal carers were involved in the Carer Advisory Group which provided guidance and consultation to each phase of the project. Their contributions included reviewing the ethics application prior to submission for ethical review, and reviewing storyboards and scripts to optimise the relevance for informal carers and older adults.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), an unknown aetiology type of interstitial lung disease (ILD), carries the poorest prognosis and is more common in males and the elderly. Gender differences in baseline presentation, lung function and comorbidities may have an impact on prognostic outcomes.
The aim of this study was to explore gender differences in clinical features, comorbidities and outcomes in IPF in a UK cohort.
This was a retrospective cohort study analysing data from the British Thoracic Society UK IPF ILD Registry from January 2013 to February 2024. We compared baseline characteristics between males and females, and a survival analysis in both genders was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
We identified 6666 IPF patients with a mean age at diagnosis of 74.1±8.1. Our cohort was predominantly male (5197, 78%), with a higher proportion of current and ex-smokers compared with females (69.9% vs 59.9%, p
Gender differences in baseline characteristics and prognostic factors were observed in IPF. A gender-based approach in managing IPF is warranted, and further studies are needed to clarify these differences and their impact on IPF management.
Nurses play an essential role in responding to severe viral disease which bring considerable challenges to their personal and professional well-being. This subsequently can affect the delivery of care and healthcare systems' organisational capacity to respond. Understanding nurses' experiences of these challenges will help inform healthcare policies.
To explore the experiences and coping strategies of nurses caring for patients during severe viral disease pandemics.
A mixed-methods systematic review informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology.
A mixed-methods systematic review. Five electronic databases Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, ASSIA and Scopus were searched on 4th April 2021. Results were reported in accordance with PRISMA. The findings were analysed and reported in the context of the Self-Regulatory Common-Sense Model.
In total, 71 peer-review primary research articles describing nurses' experiences of caring for patients during SARS, MERS, Swine flu H1N1, Avian influenza or SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 published in English from 2003 to 2021 were included. We found links between nurses' perception of the health threats, their emotional reactions, and coping strategies. Perceived health threats were influenced by organisational factors including frequent changes in clinical guidelines and workplace protocols, onerous workloads and working hours, unavailability of PPE, and lack of knowledge and training in pandemic management. These impacted nurses' physical, psychological and social well-being. Nurses also reported helpful and unhelpful coping strategies to manage the health threats.
It is vital for stakeholders, policymakers, government and healthcare institutions to recognise and monitor the wider impact on healthcare workers from health emergencies. In addition, support to develop and implement effective systems and individual mechanisms to offset the anticipated impact pre and post pandemics/epidemics is needed. Our findings can inform those strategies for similar future health emergencies.
Nurses are often the first point of contact in providing direct care to patients, hence they are at high risk of being infected. The findings from this review can help managers and policymakers in developing programmes to enhance resilience in the nursing workforce.
This was a literature review study.
FreshRSS 