FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

The Association Between Caregiving Context and the Health and Well‐Being of Carers and Their Care Recipients Living With Dementia: A Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT

Aim(s)

To examine the association between caregiving context and the health and well-being of community-dwelling people with dementia (functional ability, physical function, depression, quality of life and health-related quality of life) and their informal carers (health-related quality of life) at the pre-rehabilitation stage and the potential mediating role of caregiving context variables.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

Secondary analysis of baseline data from a randomised controlled trial of 130 dementia care dyads—the Interdisciplinary Home-based Reablement Programme (2018–2022). Bivariate analyses were applied to identify key caregiving context variables—co-residence, sole carer status, additional caring responsibilities, client-carer relationship and subjective carer burden (carer burden hereafter)—associated with health outcomes. Subsequently, multivariable linear regression models were developed. To examine carer burden, two models were run for each outcome: one with caregiving context variables and covariates, and the other adding carer burden. The mediating effects of the identified caregiving context variable were examined using post hoc mediation analysis.

Results

Spouse/partner carer relationship was significantly associated with better client well-being, including lower depressive symptoms and higher quality of life scores compared to adult child and other relationships. Higher carer burden was strongly associated with lower functional ability, more depressive symptoms, lower quality of life for clients and lower health-related quality of life for both clients and carers. Including carer burden in regression models explained the greatest variance across most models. Carer burden fully mediated the association between additional caring responsibilities and client functional ability, and partially mediated the association between other carers and client depression.

Conclusion

Carer burden needs to be carefully considered in supporting the health and well-being of dementia carer dyads.

Implications

Addressing carer burden and tailoring support to carers are essential for optimising health impacts for dementia carer dyads.

Reporting Method

STROBE checklist.

Patient or Public Contribution

None.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ACTRN12618000600246

Nurse‐Led Innovations for Optimising the Quality and Safety of Care for the Older Person in Residential Aged Care: A Warrant for Action

ABSTRACT

Aim

To canvas the contemporary contextual forces within the Australian residential aged care sector and argue for new research and innovation. There is a pressing need to provide systematised, high-quality and person-centred care to our ageing populations, especially for those who rely on residential care. This paper advances a warrant for establishing a new systematic framework for assessment and management that serves as a foundation for effective person-centred care delivery.

Design

Position paper.

Methods

This paper promulgates the current dialogue among key stakeholders of quality residential aged care in Australia, including clinicians, regulatory agencies, researchers and consumers. A desktop review gathered relevant literature spanning research, standards and guidelines regarding current and future challenges in aged care in Australia.

Results

This position paper explores the issues of improving the quality and safety of residential aged care in Australia, including the lingering impact of COVID-19 and incoming reforms. It calls for nurse-led research and innovation to deliver tools to address these challenges.

Conclusion

The paper proposes an appropriate holistic, evidence-based nursing framework to optimise the quality and safety of residential aged care in Australia.

Patient or Public Contribution

This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

❌