Conectar
To explore the topics and themes covered in published research studies in nursing about neurodegenerative disease, synthesise the available evidence, and discuss future directions.
Scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
A multi-step search strategy was applied across different databases to identify studies published in English or Italian up to September 2023. Data were analysed using a Nursing Data Matrix based on the nursing meta-paradigm and the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) 4D-framework. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by pairs of reviewers; data were extracted and thematically analysed to identify existing research questions and potential priorities.
Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, and Embase databases were searched for studies published from 2013 to 2023.
A total of 351 studies met inclusion criteria. The majority of studies originated from the United States (35%). Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease were the most studied conditions, while rare diseases were scarcely represented. Most studies focused on nursing care (39%), with limited attention to rehabilitation (0.8%) and cost-effectiveness (1%). Although 70% of articles included at least one nurse author, 22% lacked any nursing authorship despite addressing nursing-related topics. Thematic and matrix analyses revealed an uneven distribution of research, with a predominance of descriptive studies and limited work in discovery-oriented research.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of nursing research in neurodegenerative diseases, highlighting key themes and gaps. The findings informed the preliminary identification of new nursing research priorities in neurodegenerative diseases to guide future studies and enhance evidence-based nursing care.
The study highlights key trends and gaps in nursing research on neurodegenerative diseases, calling for a more inclusive, equitable, and comprehensive research agenda.
PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Review registration was done on Open Science Framework, and can be viewed at https://osf.io/tn5v9 (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TN5V9)
To identify interventions and strategies to prevent patient- and visitor-perpetrated violence against nurses working in acute hospital Emergency Departments. Design Scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and CINAHL to identify relevant studies published up to June 2024. The review included primary research studies employing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches. Eligibility criteria focused on interventions aimed at preventing physical and verbal violence in acute hospital emergency settings, explicitly targeting nurses. The selection process followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines, with independent screening and data extraction by two reviewer pairs. Data Sources PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched for studies published up to June 2024.
A total of 40 studies were included, covering interventions across 11 countries, mostly from the United States. Interventions were categorised as organisational, environmental, or individual-focused. Training programs were the most common strategy, followed by risk assessment tools, defense strategies, multidisciplinary briefings, and technology-assisted interventions. Most interventions (73%) were implemented before violent incidents, 23% during, and 5% after. Healthcare workers, particularly nurses, were the primary target group, highlighting the need for effective preventive strategies.
Violence prevention interventions in Emergency Departments focus on pre-incident strategies, mainly organisational and individual-focused. Limited attention has been given to environmental interventions despite their role in mitigating workplace violence. Further research is needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of these strategies.
Addressing workplace violence in EDs ensures a safer work environment, improves staff retention, and enhances patient care quality.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To adapt and validate the HSOPS 2 instrument for the Italian context and to describe the current patient safety culture amongst healthcare personnel working in Italian hospitals.
Cross-sectional study.
We adapted and validated the HSOPS 2 instrument following the COSMIN guidelines: we performed a forward-backward translation, calculated the content validity index, evaluated face validity, acceptability (percentage of participants responding to all items on the questionnaire and to every specific item), construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis), and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha for each dimension). We then performed a cross-sectional study following the guidelines of the original instrument: we categorised the responses into “positive,” “negative,” and “midpoints.” For each dimension we calculated the average percentage of positive responses. We repeated this process, dividing the responses by various sample characteristics (e.g., profession), and compared them using the chi-square test. Data were collected between April and November 2023.
A total of 633 hospital personnel participated in the survey, and 473 completed the questionnaire in its entirety. The dimensions of “teamwork”, “supervisor”, “manager”, or “clinical leader support”, and “communication about error” emerged as dimensions with higher percentages of positive responses, while those that received lower percentages were “hospital management support for patient safety”, “staffing and work pace”, and “response to error”. We identified statistically significant differences in many dimensions between gender, profession, and clinical inpatient units.
These findings provide a comprehensive overview of challenges and opportunities within the healthcare sector as regards patient safety culture and can inform the development of targeted interventions aimed at improving patient safety across healthcare organisations.
Proper assessment of safety culture, one of the main indicators of patient safety, can inform the development of effective strategies and interventions to enhance patient safety.
What problem did the study address? To effectively assess patient safety culture, it is essential to use valid and reliable tools. It is crucial to proactively assess patient safety culture in hospital personnel, whether employed in clinical units, in management, or in support services, to develop initiatives aimed at improving patient safety.
What were the main findings? The use of the adapted and validated version of the HSOPS 2 will produce valid and reliable evidence on patient safety culture. Perception of patient safety culture differs amongst respondents according to gender, profession, clinical setting. The dimensions of “hospital management support for patient safety”, “staffing and work pace”, and “response to error” were identified as those with the greatest need for improvement.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Patient safety heavily impacts care at every level; therefore, this study could have an impact on healthcare organisations as well as healthcare workers, patients, and their families. By making available an instrument that can contribute to a proper assessment of patient safety culture, this study might contribute to the development of appropriate strategies and targeted interventions to improve patient safety, quality of care and satisfaction while decreasing adverse events and related costs.
The COSMIN guidelines were used for the validation of the instrument; the STROBE reporting guidelines were used for the cross-sectional study.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 