Diabetes is one of the most common long-term health conditions worldwide, placing a huge economic burden on health services. Diabetes self-management education and support programmes can support people with diabetes to manage their condition; however, uptake of face-to-face services remains low. Digital self-management tools are becoming increasingly available. MyWay Diabetes is a digital platform that offers a comprehensive self-management and education programme accessible through a mobile app and website and allows patients to access their personal healthcare records. Following successful implementation in Scotland, MyWay Diabetes is now being rolled out in three geographical areas in England. We plan to undertake three qualitative studies, as part of a larger mixed-methods research programme, to assess whether MyWay Diabetes is acceptable across diverse patient groups and healthcare professionals and gather views of patients who do not currently use the digital service.

We will conduct three online focus group studies. (1) One focus group with healthcare professionals (n=6–10) to understand their perceptions of implementing MyWay Diabetes in their local regions. (2) Up to four focus groups with existing users of MyWay Diabetes (n=24–40) across the three geographical areas in England to explore their acceptability of the platform. (3) Up to three focus groups with people living with diabetes who do not currently use MyWay Diabetes (n=18–30). Data will be collected using online videoconferencing and analysed thematically using template analysis.

Ethical approval was granted by South Central – Berkshire Research Ethics Committee (ref: 25/SC/0125) and The University of Manchester Proportionate Research Ethics Committee (ref: 2025-23064-42006). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, MyWay Digital Health platforms and national bodies. The evidence from this broader mixed-methods evaluation will inform decisions for platform improvement and regional and national commissioning across the National Health Service in England.

Breast cancer is a global concern, especially for women of African descent, with rising cases in Ghana. While awareness and diagnostic screening have improved, studies in Ghana and many African countries have prioritised breast self-examinations, with limited focus on mammography.

Our study explores beliefs and attitudes towards mammography screening among mothers at Teshie Community in Ghana.

The study methodology was qualitative and an exploratory design was used. Convenience sampling was used to select 30 participants until saturation was reached. Indepth, one-on-one interviews were conducted with a semistructured interview guide with probes until saturation was reached. Then data were audiotaped audiotaped, transcribed and coded. Content analysis was done to generate themes and subthemes.

Most participants, 93%, had not undergone mammography screening. Only two individuals (7%) had experienced mammography screening. The study identified two major themes: beliefs and perceptions regarding mammography, and attitudes towards mammography screening. Participants generally displayed limited knowledge of mammography screening, along with mixed attitudes and varying degrees of motivation. Notably, many participants enjoyed strong spousal support for mammography screening.

It was recommended that nurses should create awareness of mammography to increase the knowledge of women and the general population about mammography, as this is believed to increase the uptake of mammography screening.

Blood flow restriction therapy (BFRT) has gained attention for its capacity to induce substantial muscle hypertrophy and strength gains even when employing relatively minimal loads. Strength training is of significant importance in the rehabilitation of patients experiencing shoulder pain, which may arise from a multitude of sources, including rotator cuff injuries, tendinopathies or postsurgical recovery. However, traditional resistance training can be challenging for these individuals due to the presence of pain and functional limitations. In this regard, BFRT in conjunction with low-load strength training may prove an efficacious alternative. The integration of BFRT into rehabilitation protocols for shoulder pain could provide a viable pathway to improving muscle strength and facilitating recovery while minimising the risk of exacerbating pain or injury. The primary objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the effects of training with BFRT of the upper limb on shoulder strength.

A comprehensive database search will be conducted across multiple platforms, including PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane Central, PEDro and Google Scholar, using predefined key terms without any language restriction. The particular focus of the study will be clinical trials with a controlled group that assess the impact of BFRT on upper extremity, neck and trunk muscles in both healthy individuals and patients. The primary outcome measure will be shoulder strength and power in different directions. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias 2 tool will be employed for the purpose of evaluating the risk of bias inherent to the studies in question. A meta-analysis will be conducted using Stata software. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be employed to evaluate the quality of evidence for the primary outcomes.

The previously published papers will be used for all analyses in this study. Results will be disseminated through professional networks, presentations at conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. No ethics approval is required.

CRD42024605189.