Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is a commonly employed surgical technique for the management of operable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This procedure, however, is dependent on the patient’s ability to tolerate surgery. In light of this, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as a viable alternative treatment strategy for patients who are inoperable or who refuse surgery. Considering the lack of randomised controlled trials and the increased risk of bias in observational cohort studies, this study protocol proposes an emulated target trial design to investigate the causal effect of SABR, in comparison to VATS, on overall survival in operable early stage NSCLC patients.

Data on NSCLC patients will be collected from routinely collected university hospital records linked with German cancer registry data. This study protocol was developed using the target trial methodology outlined by Hernan et al. The protocol establishes specific parameters for key trial components in order to mitigate bias in the analysis of observational data and to facilitate the calculation of causal estimands. The target trial design that would be emulated is a multicentre open-label two-parallel arm superiority randomised trial. Mediators and confounding variables were determined through the use of a directed acyclic graph. The statistical analysis aims to measure the per-protocol and intention to treat effect of SABR versus VATS within 3 months of diagnosis, on survival, through the difference in restricted mean survival times, using weighted non-parametric Kaplan-Meier curves.

The Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg with an approved addendum with Dnr 2023–112 has approved this study. The study uses anonymised routinely collected hospital and cancer registry data in accordance with applicable data protection regulations. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

Current expert consensus statements generally suggest cardiovascular risk assessment, including atrial fibrillation (AF) screening, on detection of covert brain infarctions (CBIs). However, evidence to guide management of CBI remains limited. In the absence of randomised clinical trials specifically targeting CBI populations, observational studies comparing individuals with and without CBI can provide insights into the prevalence and burden of cardiovascular risk factors.

We aimed to compare the burden of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors in participants with CBI to those without, and to explore the yield of AF screening in individuals with CBI.

A prospective population-based birth cohort study including men and women born in 1950 and resident in Akershus County, Norway.

The two hospitals serving the population of Akershus county, Norway.

Participants included in the Akershus Cardiac Examination (ACE) 1950 study who also underwent a subsequent MRI examination were eligible for this study.

Cardiovascular risk assessment was performed at study inclusion (2012–2015). Carotid ultrasound was used to quantify atherosclerosis through a carotid plaque score, and CHA₂DS₂-VA and Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) scores were calculated to estimate cardiovascular risk. Brain MRI was performed in a randomly selected, blood pressure-stratified subset of participants (2016–2024). CBI was defined as focal lesions consistent with ischaemia in the absence of clinical stroke. Participants with CBI were offered 72-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring for AF detection.

MRI was performed in 414 of 3706 (11%) participants in the ACE 1950 Study. The mean age at the time of the MRI examination was 70.2±2.3 years, and 165 (41%) were women. CBI was identified in 54 participants (13%), of whom 45 (83%) completed 72-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring. There were no differences in mean carotid plaque score, SCORE2 or CHA₂DS₂-VA score between participants with CBI compared with those with normal MRI findings. AF was detected in one (2%) participant with CBI.

In this community-based cohort of individuals in late midlife, individuals with CBI did not have an increased cardiovascular risk compared with those without, as indicated by SCORE2, CHA₂DS₂-VA score, age-appropriate carotid plaque burden and a low prevalence of AF.

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01555411.

Digital technology in primary healthcare service delivery can enhance accessibility, service delivery and health outcomes in rural populations. The objective of this systematic review is to review and synthesise the scope and impact of digital health technology innovations within rural primary healthcare settings.

Systematic review.

Articles published on PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE and CINAHL between January 2013 and October 2025 were searched using key search terms.

Patient, intervention, context, outcome model criteria guided article eligibility. Included articles were undertaken in rural populations, used digital health technology for treatment or management, explored the impact of digital health technology on rural primary healthcare and reported on healthcare outcomes. Included articles were in the English language and presented peer-reviewed primary research.

Extraction was performed using a bespoke standardised template by multiple reviewers. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Descriptive analysis and conventional inductive content analysis were applied to quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. The review is written in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement guidelines.

66 studies were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in the USA (n=26). Most studies focused on adult patient populations, with limited representation of Indigenous (In=3) and paediatric populations (n=2). Telemedicine/telehealth interventions using audio, video or both were the most common (n=36). Remote patient monitoring or point-of-care testing was integrated into 21 studies. Physical health conditions, particularly diabetes (n=17), cardiovascular diseases (n=11) and general primary healthcare concerns (n=13) were commonly reported. Others reported on areas including mental health, hypertension, obesity and pregnancy care.

Conventional inductive content analysis identified key themes: cost and time effectiveness, quality healthcare provision, consumer acceptance from both patients and practitioners, and healthcare service provider perspectives. Uptake barriers included staff workload and patient non-compliance, while facilitators encompassed process standardisation and practitioner acceptance and endorsement. Consumer acceptance was linked to satisfaction, willingness to engage and improved health outcomes and well-being.

Digital health interventions in rural primary healthcare offer significant potential to improve healthcare delivery, reduce costs and enhance patient access, satisfaction and health outcomes. However, careful consideration of factors such as feasibility, consumer and practitioner acceptance, and recognition of limitations is crucial for successful implementation. The review underscores the importance of flexible policies to support emerging digital healthcare solutions, including the integration of artificial intelligence. Overall, digital health interventions offer a promising avenue to improve healthcare outcomes in rural areas and should be prioritised for government funding and investment.

CRD42023477233.

To test the agreement and usability of a novel quality appraisal tool: A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews of Prognostic Factor studies (AMSTAR-PF).

Observational study.

14 appraisers of varied experience levels and backgrounds, including undergraduate, master’s and PhD students, postgraduate researchers, research fellows and clinicians.

Eight systematic reviews were rated by all reviewers using AMSTAR-PF.

Planned measures included intrapair and inter-pair agreement using Cohen’s and Fleiss’ kappa, time of use and time to reach consensus. Interrater agreement was an added measure, and Gwet’s agreement coefficient was calculated and presented due to its greater stability across agreement levels. The percentage of intrapair agreements identical or one category apart was also presented.

Interrater agreement averaged 0.59 (range 0.21–0.90), inter-pair agreement 0.61 (range 0.24–0.91) and intrapair agreement 0.75 (range 0.45–0.95) across the domains, with agreement for the overall rating 0.46 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.62) for interrater agreement, 0.46 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.74) for inter-pair agreement and 0.68 (range of averages 0.22–1.00) for intrapair agreement. The majority (60.7%) of intrapair ratings were identical, with 94.6% of final ratings either identical or only one category different for the overall appraisal. The time taken to appraise a study with AMSTAR-PF improved with use and averaged around 34 min after the first two appraisals.

Despite some variance in agreement for different domains and between different appraisers, the testing results suggest that AMSTAR-PF has clear utility for appraising the quality of systematic reviews of prognostic factor studies.

To characterise long-term trajectory of recovery in individuals with long covid.

Prospective cohort.

Single-centre, specialist post-COVID service (London, UK).

Individuals aged ≥18 years with long covid (hospitalised and non-hospitalised) from April 2020 to March 2024.

Routine, prospectively collected data on symptoms, quality of life (including Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) and EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), return to work status and healthcare utilisation (investigations, outpatient and emergency attendances). The primary outcome was recovery by self-reported >75% of ‘best health’ (EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale) and was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models over 4 years. Linked National Health Service England registry data provided secondary care healthcare utilisation and expenditure.

We included 3590 individuals (63.3% female, 73.5% non-hospitalised, median age 50.0 years, 71.9% with ≥2 doses of COVID-19 vaccination), who were followed up for a median of 136 (0–346) days since first assessment and 502 (251–825) days since symptom onset. At first assessment, 33.2% of employed individuals were unable to work. Dominant symptoms were fatigue (78.7%), breathlessness (68.1%) and brain fog (53.5%). 33.4% of individuals recovered to >75% of best health prior to clinic discharge (recovery occurred median 202 (94–468) days from symptom onset). Vaccinated individuals were more likely to recover faster (pre: HR 2.93 (2.00–4.28) and post: HR 1.34 (1.05–1.71) COVID-19 infection), whereas recovery hazard was inversely associated with FAS (HR 0.37 (0.33–0.42)), myalgia (HR 0.59 (0.45–0.76)) and dysautonomic symptoms (HR 0.46 (0.34–0.62)). There was high secondary care healthcare utilisation (both emergency and outpatient care). Annual inpatient and outpatient expenditure was significantly lower in hospitalised individuals while under the service. When compared with the prereferral period, emergency department attendances were reduced in non-hospitalised patients with long covid, but outpatient costs increased.

In the largest long covid cohort from a single specialist post-COVID service to date, only one-third of individuals under follow-up achieved satisfactory recovery. Fatigue severity and COVID-19 vaccination at presentation, even after initial COVID-19 infection, was associated with long covid recovery. Ongoing service provision for this and other post-viral conditions is necessary to support care, progress treatment options and provide capacity for future pandemic preparedness. Research and clinical services should emphasise these factors as the strongest predictors of non-recovery.

To identify stakeholder perceived challenges and facilitators for implementing a clean fuel and clean stove intervention to reduce household air pollution and hypertension in Lagos, Nigeria.

Qualitative study guided by the Exploration and Preparation phases of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework, using focus group discussions and in-depth semi-structured interviews with inductive and deductive thematic analysis.

Peri-urban communities across the five administrative divisions of Lagos State, Nigeria.

128 stakeholders from 32 communities, including community, religious, market and youth leaders, primary healthcare staff, and household decision makers. Approximately half were female.

This was a pre-implementation needs assessment that included demonstrations of the clean stove and fuel.

Thematic domains describing barriers and enablers to adoption and implementation, mapped to EPIS inner, outer, and bridging factors.

Stakeholders reported barriers that included stove stacking, upfront stove cost, concerns about long-term fuel price and availability, equipment durability and maintenance, safety, mistrust of new technology, and uncertainty about stove performance for dishes requiring high heat and long cooking times. Reported facilitators included payment flexibility and subsidies, opportunities to test the stove, perceived benefits of cleaner and faster cooking with less soot, endorsement by community leaders, and interest in local retail and distribution to improve access.

Implementation planning for clean fuel and clean stove programmes should address affordability, reliable fuel supply chains, durability and service, culturally relevant cooking needs, and trust building through community leadership. These findings inform adaptation strategies for scale-up in similar low-resource settings.

NCT05048147.

Severe pectus excavatum (PE) may impair cardiopulmonary and physical function. The effectiveness of surgical treatment to correct PE and restore physical function is widely debated due to a lack of high-quality comparative evidence. The RESTORE trial aims to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of corrective surgery for severe PE compared with conservative management for the first time in a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

RESTORE is a pragmatic, multicentre, RCT with an embedded observational cohort. 200 participants aged ≥12 years with severe PE will be recruited at around 12 National Health Service cardiothoracic surgical centres in England. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either surgery within 3 months of randomisation (intervention arm) or no surgery until after the primary outcome measurement at 1 year (comparator arm). The primary outcome is change in physical functioning from baseline to 1 year as measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical function score. The primary economic outcome is cost-effectiveness. The key secondary outcome is change in % predicted VO_2peak at 1 year measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Outcomes will be assessed at 1 year post-randomisation in the comparator arm and 1 year post-surgery in the intervention arm. The primary analyses will be undertaken on an intention-to-treat population using a linear mixed-effects model, adjusted for stratification variables via a binary covariate. Other secondary outcomes will include change from baseline of cardiopulmonary function (CPET and spirometry), health-related quality of life using the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) and SF-36v2 questionnaires, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and disease specific symptoms (Phoenix Comprehensive Assessment for Pectus Excavatum Symptoms and Pectus Excavatum Evaluation Questionnaire). Adverse events, complications from surgery and operative technical success (Haller and Compression Indices from preoperative and postoperative CT scans) will also be assessed. Health economic analysis will estimate the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year at 1 year.

The trial was approved by East of Scotland Research and Ethics Service (24/ES/0034). Participants who are ≥16 years of age will be required to provide written informed consent. For participants

ISRCTN11359779.

Binge drinking in the previous month was reported in 23.5% of US adults, and 28.1 million adults met criteria for Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) in 2023. Individuals with AUD face increased risks of oral health problems, including caries, periodontal disease and mucosal lesions. Poor oral hygiene, nutrition and dental care all contribute to these conditions, but individuals with AUD are often under-represented in oral health surveys. Understanding relationships between oral health behaviours, attitudes and general health is crucial for designing future interventions. This pilot aims to explore the relationship between oral and systemic health in subjects with AUD, focusing on oral health behaviours, salivary biomarkers and clinical phenotype, including systemic biomarkers of inflammation, to inform future research on oral–systemic interactions in AUD.

This protocol has two parts. Part 1 involves cognitive interviews to assess the content validity and interpretability of the Oral Health Behaviours Assessment (OHBA) questionnaire. Part 2 will collect biological and behavioural data from treatment-seeking patients with AUD and matched controls (age, sex and smoking status), including saliva, blood, dental exams, and health behaviour and symptom measures. Inpatients with AUD will provide biospecimens and answer symptom severity questionnaires at admission and again at the dental exam visit (7–12 days later), while controls will provide a single set of measures at their dental exam visit. Oral health will be assessed through structured dental and periodontal examinations, radiographs and validated questionnaires (including the OHBA). Additional data will include alcohol use history, psychiatric and medical history assessments, dietary recall, and measures of stress, sleep and mood to capture potential moderators of oral–systemic relationships. Biomarkers of inflammation and stress will be quantified from saliva and blood using immunoassays. Primary outcomes will compare oral health, salivary biomarkers and clinical measures between AUD and controls, while secondary outcomes will evaluate within-subject changes in patients with AUD during inpatient treatment and early abstinence.

This clinical protocol was approved by the National Institutes of Health Institutional Review Board (IRB #002005). Prior to enrolling, participants will be informed of the study purpose, risks and benefits, and study procedures, and evaluated for understanding prior to signing consent. Part 1 of the protocol is currently active and recruiting participants for cognitive interviews. The study findings will be disseminated through journals and conferences related to addiction medicine, psychology, immunology, neuroscience and dentistry. We expect the results of the pilot study will inform future research on oral health and salivary bioscience while also providing treatment-seeking patients with AUD targeted information on the importance of oral health behaviours for maintaining oral and systemic health.

NCT06684483; preresults.

Many patients receive oral anticoagulation for reduced stroke risk in atrial fibrillation or as treatment or prevention of venous thromboembolism. Oral factor Xa inhibitors (oral FXaI, eg, apixaban, edoxaban or rivaroxaban) are commonly prescribed for this indication. Dabigatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is similarly approved. In vitro and animal model evidence suggests that dabigatran also has direct effects on Staphylococcus aureus virulence and infection. Observational data have shown that dabigatran users are less likely to develop S. aureus bacteremia (SAB), and a small randomised controlled trial showed that dabigatran has anti-S. aureus effects when compared with low molecular weight heparins during bloodstream infection. We seek to answer whether dabigatran is superior to the oral FXaIs in achieving better SAB outcomes among patients who independently require oral anticoagulation. We report the intervention-specific protocol, embedded in an adaptive platform trial.

The S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial [NCT05137119] is a pragmatic, randomised, multicentre adaptive platform trial that compares different SAB therapies for 90-day mortality rates. For this intervention (‘Dabi-SNAP’), patients receiving therapy with an oral FXaI will be randomised to continue as usual or to change to dabigatran as of the next scheduled dose. All subjects will receive standard of care antibiotics and/or antibiotics allocated through other active domains in the platform. As the choice of anticoagulant may not demonstrate large differences in mortality, a ranked composite of death and adverse outcomes (Desirability of Outcome Ranking, or DOOR) was chosen as the primary outcome.

The study is conditionally approved by the research ethics board of the McGill University Health Centre: identifier 2025-10900. Trial results will be published open access in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a global infectious disease conference. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT06650501.

NCT0665050.

Prescribing high-dose antipsychotics is typically reserved for individuals with treatment-resistant severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and psychotic depression. It carries an increased risk of adverse drug effects, necessitating regular monitoring. Non-mental health specialist clinicians may not always be aware when the maximum recommended dose of antipsychotics is exceeded, leading to unintentional high-dose prescribing without recognising the need for additional monitoring or understanding the associated risks. Therefore, providing clinical decision support (CDS) tools to support clinicians and improve the appropriate prescribing of antipsychotics is important. The aim of this study is to understand current prescribing practices and assess the impact of high-dose antipsychotic prescribing on clinical outcomes among hospitalised patients. The findings from this study will shape a future project focused on developing an integrated computerised CDS tool.

This retrospective cohort study will examine antipsychotic prescribing among hospitalised patients using Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration data in Scotland from 2019 to 2023, in linkage with hospital records, Scottish Morbidity Records and primary care prescribing (Prescribing Information System). Patients will be grouped into those prescribed high-dose (exposed), defined as exceeding the 100% maximum recommended British National Formulary dose and normal-dose (unexposed) antipsychotics, followed from their first ever antipsychotic prescription date (index date) until the end of the study, study outcomes or death, whichever happens first. We will quantify high-dose antipsychotic prescribing, profile patient characteristics and use machine learning techniques to assess associations of high-dose antipsychotic prescribing with clinical outcomes, including harms and benefits, but will not attempt to establish causality.

The Health and Social Care Public Benefit and Privacy Policy Panel (HSC-PBPP) has granted ethical approval (ref. 2024-0239) following a Data Protection Impact Assessment, with data securely held and accessed in the National Safe Haven. The results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and will be shared with clinicians.

Cancer screening appointments are an opportunity to encourage positive behavioural changes. Up to 80% of cancer screening attendees are open to discussing physical activity during cancer screening, but some say this would deter them from future screening. This study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of individuals’ receptivity to physical activity advice at cancer screening.

Interview-based qualitative study.

The study was conducted from May 2017 to September 2018 in the UK. Participants were recruited using adverts on two university campuses, Facebook and a participant recruitment agency. To be eligible, participants had to have an upcoming cancer screening appointment within 2 weeks. There were 30 participants.

Participants recorded their receptivity to physical activity advice in the days before and after screening. Data-prompted semi-structured interviews explored these responses. Interviews were analysed using a thematic framework analysis.

Participants felt discussing physical activity at cancer screening would be relevant. However, participants experienced anxiety related to the screening process which could increase or decrease their receptivity. Participants felt if information was delivered in a judgemental way, it could negatively impact future screening participation.

Screening attendees’ receptivity could be influenced by the timing of a discussion and by their levels of anxiety throughout screening. Participants’ anxiety during screening can either reduce their ability to engage in a discussion or increase the relevance of the discussion. The communication style of the healthcare practitioner was key for why some screening attendees could be deterred from future cancer screening.

Type 2 diabetes is a prevalent chronic disease, associated with health complications, premature morbidity and significant healthcare costs. Optimal lifestyle behaviour control and patient self-management are crucial for improving diabetes control; however, they are difficult to achieve in primary care. There is limited research on the use of information from wearable devices to encourage behaviour change. This study will examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component health behaviour intervention in achieving clinically significant reductions in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among general practice patients with type 2 diabetes.

The study uses a cluster-randomised controlled design, with general practices randomly assigned to either the Wearables Integrated Technology (WEAR-IT) intervention (n=15) or usual care (n=15). To achieve a sample size of 375 participants, 12–13 patients per practice will be recruited. Patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes will be eligible to participate if they are aged 18–75 years; have had poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c≥7.5%), with the cognitive capacity and ability to access the intervention application via an iOS or Android smart device. The WEAR-IT self-management intervention combines information from wearable devices (physical activity, blood glucose and blood pressure) and the electronic medical record, with goal setting and coaching support. The intervention will be primarily delivered by the general practice nurse, with review and confirmation of goals by the general practitioner. Participants attending the usual care practices will receive standard care. Outcome measures, including HbA1c, lipids, blood pressure, quality of life, dietary and exercise behaviours and cost-effectiveness, will be collected at baseline, 6-month (primary endpoint) and 12-month post-randomisation. The primary analysis will compare the change in HbA1c between the intervention and control groups at 6-month follow-up, with long-term outcomes assessed at 12-month post-randomisation.

The study was approved by Bond University (BH00137). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and summaries to participating sites and patients.

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000957594).

Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy is a global health concern, contributing to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Despite its importance, limited data exist on vitamin D status and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and determinants of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women in their first and second trimesters in Gondar Town, Ethiopia, 2024.

A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted at the antenatal care unit of University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from January to March 2024.

Eligible participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Sociodemographic, behavioural and clinical data were collected through structured questionnaires and medical record reviews. Serum levels of vitamin D, calcium and alkaline phosphatase were analysed using the Beckman Coulter clinical chemistry analyser. Statistical comparisons between pregnant women in the first and second trimesters were performed using the independent t-test. Determinants of vitamin D deficiency were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

384 pregnant women in their first or second trimester.

The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (90 mm Hg) (AOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.70), lower dietary diversity (AOR 3.17, 95% CI 1.13 to 8.89), lower fish and fish oil consumption habit (AOR 3.01, 95% CI 1.03 to 8.77; AOR 12.27, 95% CI 1.50 to 100.42) were the key predictors associated with serum vitamin D defiency.

Nearly half of the pregnant women in Gondar Town exhibit vitamin D deficiency, showing a challenging public health concern. Thus, targeted interventions, such as dietary supplementation and lifestyle modifications, are urgently needed to address the problem and improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

To evaluate the patterns of abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) follow-up testing for the detection of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Australian general practices.

Retrospective, population-based observational study.

2 717 966 adults who visited a MedicineInsight participating general practice between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, had ≥1 serum creatinine measurement (with or without a UACR measurement) and did not have CKD at baseline.

‘Guideline-concordant follow-up’ was defined as having a record of a repeat eGFR or UACR testing (assessed separately) within 6 months following the abnormal (eGFR2; UACR≥2.5 mg/mmol in males, ≥3.5 mg/mmol in females) incident result. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient factors associated with receiving appropriate follow-up testing.

A total of 220 841 and 114 889 patients with an abnormal incident eGFR and UACR result, respectively, were identified. Nearly half (45.0%) of the patients with an abnormal eGFR result and over two-thirds (69.7%) of the patients with an abnormal UACR result did not have a follow-up test within 6 months. Patient factors associated with a higher likelihood of follow-up eGFR testing included indicators of poorer baseline health and greater CKD risk, such as comorbid diabetes (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.40) or more severe incident eGFR (adjusted ORs for eGFR categories 30–44, 15–29 and

In this large, population-based study, we observed substantial gaps in the follow-up of abnormal eGFR and UACR for the detection of CKD in primary care settings. Effective strategies to optimise follow-up testing for CKD detection are needed.

This project aims to comprehensively examine the incidence of suicidality, individual and population characteristics, and health pathways, for a cohort of Australian veterans using linked administrative data.

The cohort will comprise veterans who are clients of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) residing in Queensland between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2022. People currently serving in the Australian Defence Force, Australian Federal Police personnel, other DVA clients who are not veterans (eg, eligible dependents), and clients currently known to DVA who have requested that their data not be disclosed for research will be excluded. This cohort will be linked to DVA administrative data, the Queensland Hospital Admitted Patients Data Collection (QHAPDC), Queensland Hospital Non-Admitted Patients Data Collection, Emergency Data Collection (EDC), Consumer Integrated Mental Health and Addiction Application (CIMHAA), Queensland Death Register, National Death Index, Medicare Benefits Schedule, Centrelink (Data Over Multiple Individual Occurrences) database and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. These data will be linked for a period of at least 1-year preindex and postindex contact with DVA, such that the entire study period is expected to encompass at least 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2023.

This study received ethical approval from the Departments of Defence and Veterans’ Affairs Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC; Project ID: 556-23), and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare HREC (Project ID: EO2024/1/1461). This project also received Public Health Act approval (File reference: PHA 556-23). The project was ratified by the University of Queensland HREC (Project ID: 2024/HE002153). The findings of this project will be disseminated via a publicly available report, presentations and peer-reviewed publications.