Research indicates that leadership in the health professions can facilitate improvement of quality and efficiency of healthcare services. In the Philippines, leadership in the health professions plays a critical role in driving improvements in healthcare delivery and health professions education. Thus, the landscape of leadership in the health professions merits continuous exploration and deeper understanding. This scoping review aims to explore the landscape of leadership in the health professions in the Philippines. The scoping review will include published and unpublished research papers of any kind, such as primary research studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, letters, guidelines, websites, blogs and grey literature that report about leadership in the health professions in the Philippines. Exclusions are leadership studies on the health professions that discuss the professions outside the scope and context of the practice.

The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological framework for scoping review will be used in this review. A three-step search strategy will be used consisting of an initial search, full search and screening of reference lists. The databases that will be included are Cinahl Ultimate, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, JBI Evidence-based Practice Database, PubMed/Medline, ERIC, local journals and grey literature to determine pertinent sources about the topic. Sources searched will be screened by two independent reviewers and data will be extracted using a data extraction table. Disagreements will be resolved by a discussion through a third reviewer. The results of the search and the study inclusion process will be reported in full in the final scoping review and presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping review flow diagram. Search strategy using the included databases started in August to September 2025, data extraction will start by October 2025, data analysis will start by November 2025 and the review is expected to be completed by December 2025.

This study does not involve human participants and has been reviewed and classified for exempted review by the University of the Philippines Manila Research Ethics Board, which is a committee whose task is to make sure that research participants are protected from harm. The findings of the scoping review will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal.

To explore the challenges and opportunities in clinical skills teaching and learning among faculty, final-year medical students and patients at a private medical university in Pakistan, within the context of a low- and middle-income country (LMIC) medical education system.

An exploratory descriptive qualitative design using inductive thematic analysis utilising in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, framed within a metaphorical lens.

A single private-sector tertiary care teaching hospital and affiliated undergraduate medical college in an urban setting in Pakistan.

A total of 48 participants were included in the study: 12 clinical faculty members representing various disciplines and levels of experience, 16 final-year medical students and 10 house officers and 10 patients from adult inpatient wards. Participants were purposively selected to ensure maximum variation in perspectives.

Six key metaphorical themes emerged, each reflecting both the challenges and opportunities within the clinical learning journey: (1) The Safety Harness—simulation as an opportunity for structured, risk-free skill development, yet limited by authenticity; (2) The Underwater Life—the irreplaceable but unpredictable nature of bedside learning in fostering empathy and communication; (3) The Stormy Seas—systemic and cultural barriers such as patient availability, gender constraints and limited faculty resources; (4) The Ship—students navigating self-development amid evolving expectations, digital distractions and shifting motivations; (5) The Engine Room Tools—balancing diverse teaching modalities while seeking optimal time distribution between simulation and bedside learning; and (6) The Guiding Compass—the pivotal role of clinical teachers as mentors and professional exemplars. Triangulated perspectives revealed that while structured simulation and bedside experiences complement one another, significant institutional, ethical and pedagogical challenges persist, many amplified by the realities of resource-limited LMIC settings.

This study underscores the complexities of clinical teaching and learning in an LMIC context, highlighting the need for a balanced, context-sensitive model that integrates simulation with authentic bedside exposure, supported by mentorship and reflective practice. Addressing structural and faculty-related barriers is essential to advancing equitable, patient-centred clinical education in resource-constrained environments.

Chronic caregiving stress accelerates biological aging, reflecting disease risk and mortality; however, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Epigenetic clocks, which can be estimated from levels of DNA methylation in a subset of cytosine-phosphate-guanine loci in the genome, have been proposed as a promising biological age estimator. The objectives of this scoping review are to systematically scope the literature on the effects of stress on biological ageing measured by epigenetic clocks in family caregivers of patients diagnosed with cancer.

This review will be conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology based on Arksey and O’Malley’s and Levac et al’s framework and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for scoping reviews. Studies will be included if (1) the studies focus on unpaid family caregivers of patients diagnosed with cancer; (2) caregivers are adults (≥18 years of age) and (3) the study measured epigenetic clocks. The search will encompass literature and peer-reviewed literature in PubMed/MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley & Sons), Web of Science: Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics), CINAHL (EBSCOhost) and PsycInfo (American Psychological Association).

Since the scoping review methodology focuses on published literature, this study does not require ethical approval. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and plan to disseminate our work in conferences and scientific meetings.

Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KW7RT).

Heart failure clinics (HFCs) are associated with increased survival rates, lower hospitalisation and improved quality of life. This study investigated factors influencing patient access to multidisciplinary outpatient HFCs from the perspective of patients and cardiologists.

This was a qualitative study. A trained researcher conducted semistructured face-to-face interviews with patients and online interviews with cardiologists. Interviews, conducted between March and October 2023, were audio-recorded. Transcripts were cleaned (deidentification, translation verification) and analysed by two trained researchers independently using systematic text condensation in NVivo v12. Codes were derived from the transcripts and grouped and organised into themes. Two authors independently coded data, reconciling disagreements with the senior author, followed by respondent validation. Member checking ensued.

Outpatient multidisciplinary HFCs in Qatar.

A purposive sample of patients diagnosed with heart failure who had attended at least one HFC appointment at Qatar’s Heart Hospital were approached in person or via phone, and cardiologists with the authority to make referrals to these clinics via the electronic medical record system were emailed; interviews ensued until theme saturation was achieved.

26 individuals (14 patients and 12 cardiologists) participated in the interviews. Four major themes were identified: health system organisation (subthemes: benefits, HFC triage criteria, need/capacity), HFC referral processes (subthemes: electronic record system, patient communication and education), care continuity and communication (subthemes: patient navigators, clinician preferences) and access challenges (subthemes: transportation, costs).

Resources are needed to expand HFC capacity and coverage, leverage electronic medical record tools as well as telehealth, educate physicians and patients on referral guidelines and processes and engage primary care to ultimately improve patient outcomes.

This study aimed to analyse the number of myocardial infarction (MI) admissions during the COVID-19 lockdown periods of 2020 and 2021 (March 15th to June 15th) and compare them with corresponding pre-pandemic period in 2019. The study also evaluated changes in critical treatment intervals: onset to door (O2D), door to balloon (D2B) and door to needle (D2N) and assessed 30-day clinical outcomes. This study examined MI care trends in India during the COVID-19 lockdown period, irrespective of patients’ COVID-19 infection status.

Multicentre retrospective cohort study

Twenty-three public and private hospitals across multiple Indian states, all with 24/7 interventional cardiology facilities.

All adults (>18 years) admitted with acute myocardial infarction between March 15 and June 15 in 2019 (pre-pandemic), 2020 (first lockdown) and 2021 (second lockdown). A total of 3614 cases were analysed after excluding duplicates and incomplete data.

Number of MI admissions, median O2D, D2B and D2N times.

30-day outcomes including death, reinfarction and revascularisation.

MI admissions dropped from 4470 in year 2019 to 2131 (2020) and 1483 (2021). The median O2D increased from 200 min (IQR 115–428) pre-COVID-19 to 390 min (IQR 165–796) in 2020 and 304 min (IQR 135–780) in 2021. The median D2B time reduced from 225 min (IQR 120–420) in 2019 to 100 min (IQR 53–510) in 2020 and 130 min (IQR 60–704) in 2021. Similarly, D2N time decreased from 240 min (IQR 120–840) to 35 min (IQR 25–69) and 45 min (IQR 24–75), respectively. The 30-day outcome of death, reinfarction and revascularisation was 4.25% in 2020 and 5.1% in 2021, comparable to 5.8% reported in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement in Kerala study.

Despite the expansion of catheterisation facilities across India, the country continues to fall short of achieving international benchmarks for optimal MI care.