Conectar
Although as many as 92% of survivors of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) report impacts to the head and/or non-fatal strangulation (NFS) that raise clinical suspicion of brain injury (BI), there are no evidence-based methods to document and characterise BI in this vulnerable population, limited clinical practice guidelines and insufficient understanding about long-term risks for conditions including Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). This leaves most survivors of IPV-caused BI (IPV-BI), overwhelmingly women, without adequate access to medical care and support, safe housing, back-to-school/work accommodations or follow-up care for long-term neurocognitive health. Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an established ADRD risk factor, little is known about the attributable risk of ADRD due to IPV-BI, particularly in women.
Our overarching objectives are to (1) use plasma biomarkers as novel tools to assist clinicians to improve diagnosis of IPV-BI at the acute, subacute and chronic stages in a manner sensitive to the needs of this vulnerable population and (2) raise awareness of the importance of considering IPV-BI as a potential ADRD risk factor. A prospective observational study funded by the US Department of Defense (HT9425-24-1-0462), Brain Canada (6200) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (523320-NWT-CAAA-37499) leverages collaborative research at multiple clinical sites in British Columbia to maximise equity, diversity and inclusion among participants, with a target enrolment of n=600 participants.
The Advocates, Academics, Survivors and Clinicians to END Intimate Partner Violence Biomarkers study, which is predicated on pre-specified research questions, represents one of the most significant community-based studies on plasma biomarkers affected by an IPV-BI incident. Of particular significance is the fact our study uses robust biomarker approaches being applied in the TBI and ADRD fields to determine how the biomarker profile after IPV-BI compares to typical TBI and the early stage of neurodegenerative disorders.
This study was approved by the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board (H24-01990, H22-02241 and H16-02792) and the Island Health Research Ethics Board (H22-03510). Upon publication of primary papers, de-identified data and biospecimens will be made widely available, including the US Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research (FITBIR) federated database. Our data and integrated knowledge translation activities with persons with lived experience of IPV-BI and those working in the healthcare sector will be synthesised into co-designed and implemented knowledge tools to improve outcomes for survivors of IPV-BI.
To explore patient perspectives on using a digital adherence technology (DAT) for tuberculosis (TB) treatment, specifically, the TB Treatment Support Tools (TB-TST) intervention, which integrates a mobile app designed to enhance patient-centred support, monitoring and communication, alongside a drug metabolite test.
Qualitative study conducted as part of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
Four public reference hospitals in Argentina. All patients in the intervention group were invited to participate; 33 patients in the intervention group and five treatment supporters were included.
Data collection and analysis: semistructured interviews were conducted. The normalisation process theory guided analysis to understand factors that enable or hinder the intervention’s integration into routine practice for TB treatment medication adherence.
Patients identified medication reminders, educational messages and direct communication with treatment supporters (TSs) as the most helpful components of the intervention. Many reported using the app to ask TSs questions they felt uncomfortable raising with physicians in person. Initially, many patients did not fully understand the purpose and use of the metabolite test. Over time, their understanding of the app improved, though some continued to misinterpret the test results. Motivation to adhere to TB treatment was primarily driven by a desire to protect family members and resume normal daily activities. Reported barriers to app use included time constraints due to work, technical issues, limited internet connectivity and the burden of medication side effects. While the intervention was generally perceived as supportive and user-friendly, patients suggested improvements such as faster response times from TSs, expanded availability and better technical reliability and internet access.
These findings highlight the importance of tailoring digital adherence interventions to meet the diverse needs of patients and reinforce the pivotal role of the TS as a trusted and accessible source of guidance throughout TB treatment.
NCT04221789;
FreshRSS 