FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Impaired dynein function preserves spinal interneuron survival and positioning in an ALS-like mouse model

by Eleni Christoforidou, Jordan S. Rowe, Fabio A. Simoes, Raphaelle Cassel, Luc Dupuis, Peter Nigel Leigh, Majid Hafezparast

Impaired cytoplasmic dynein function has been implicated in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) pathogenesis, yet the contributions of spinal interneurons to disease phenotypes remain unclear. We tested the hypothesis that hypomorphic dynein function in cholinergic neurons disrupts the development, survival, or positioning of inhibitory interneuron populations in the lumbar spinal cord. Using ChAT-Cre recombination, we generated four mouse genotypes with graded reductions in dynein activity in ChAT+ cells: Dync1h1+/+ (wildtype), Dync1h1−/+ (hemizygous wildtype), Dync1h1+/Loa (heterozygous Loa mutation), and Dync1h1−/Loa (hemizygous Loa). At 52 weeks of age, lumbar spinal cords (L3–L6) were harvested, cryosectioned, and immunostained for ChAT, GAD-67, Parvalbumin, and Calbindin. Cell counts were performed on confocal images from eight sections per mouse (N = 3 male mice/genotype), and radial distances from the central canal were normalised to gray matter width. Angular distributions were analysed via circular statistics. There were no significant genotype-dependent differences in the numbers of ChAT+, GAD-67+, Parvalbumin+, or Calbindin+ cells, nor in ChAT+ subpopulations (motor neurons versus interneurons) or double‐positive interneuron subsets (e.g., ChAT+–GAD-67+, Parvalbumin+–GAD-67+, Parvalbumin+–Calbindin+). Radial positioning relative to the central canal was similarly preserved across all markers and genotypes. Circular‐median tests revealed statistically significant shifts in mean angle for ChAT+, GAD-67+, and certain double‐positive cells, but these amounted to only 5–10° displacements, translating to lateral shifts of ~10–20 µm, well within single laminar bands, and are unlikely to impact circuit connectivity. Despite substantial motor deficits and hallmark TDP-43 pathology previously seen in these models, impaired dynein function does not precipitate interneuron loss or gross migratory defects in the lumbar spinal cord. Instead, our findings suggest that the primary contributions of dynein to ALS-like phenotypes likely arise from functional disruptions in axonal transport, synaptic maintenance, and neuronal physiology rather than from structural alterations or loss of interneuron populations.

Co-STARS: a feasibility evaluation of a co-produced mental health literacy training package to reduce mental health inequities for Black young people in underserved communities - study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with an external pilot, pro

Por: Kumarendran · B. · Cherrington · E. · Bandyopadhyay · S. · Crowe · F. · Machaczek · K. K. · Brown · L. · Campbell · N. · Jordan · G. · Pope · M. A. · Antonovic · M. · Taylor · M. · W · N. · Mahamud · A. · Chandan · J. S. · Griffiths · S. L. · on behalf of the Co-STARS youth co-produc
Introduction

Severe mental illness such as psychosis is among the most disabling illnesses worldwide, disproportionately affecting minoritised ethnic groups and those in socioeconomic disadvantage. In the UK, people from Black ethnic backgrounds are more likely to experience a first episode of psychosis and to be detained under the Mental Health Act than White British people. There is a clear need for mental health services to improve cultural awareness and understanding of the broader social needs of minoritised groups, as well as the need to improve mental health literacy (MHL) within Black communities to empower individuals to seek timely mental health support. This protocol describes our programme of work which aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of Co-STARS, which is a co-produced, culturally appropriate tiered training package.

Methods and analysis

We co-produced a culturally appropriate, place-based, tiered MHL training package (Co-STARS) to deliver within underserved Black communities and via an e-learning package implemented among staff within mental health trusts. The training will be evaluated in stages. First, a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial will assess the feasibility and acceptability (defined as participants’ perceptions of the training’s relevance, usefulness and delivery) of a lived experience-led MHL training package delivered by Black young people with experience of mental ill health, to underserved communities in Birmingham, UK. Acceptability will be quantified through participation and completion rates and explored qualitatively via focus groups and interviews. Second, a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial will evaluate the feasibility of an e-learning training programme for mental health professionals. We will embed a process evaluation to explore change mechanisms and identify barriers and enablers for future implementation. Third, we will use realist-informed participatory systems mapping and novel epidemiological analyses to explore downstream effects (ie, improved care access for Black ethno-racial groups within the intervention areas). Last, a cost-effectiveness framework will be developed to assess whether the intervention is good value for money in future efficacy trials. In the cluster trial, eight clusters will be randomised to the intervention arm (face-to-face training in the community) and control arm (display of MHL materials) with pre- and post-assessments in 120 participants from 8 clusters, 3 weeks apart. In the stepped wedge trial, six clusters (clinical teams within NHS mental health trusts) including 120 NHS staff in total, will move from control phase to intervention phase in a stepped wedge manner, with pre-assessments and post-assessments.

Ethics and dissemination

This proposal was reviewed by the Research Governance of the University of Birmingham and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) grant reviewers. Ethics approval was granted by East of Scotland Research Ethics Service. The findings will be communicated in research conferences, stakeholder meetings, via social media, through publication in peer-reviewed journals and as a policy document.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN10517405.

Gender Differences in Disease Burden, Symptom Burden, and Quality of Life Among People Living With Heart Failure and Multimorbidity: Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT

Aim

Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalisation and often coexists with seven comorbid conditions on average. This study aimed to examine the gender differences in disease burden, symptom burden, and quality of life among older adults with heart failure and multimorbidity.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

This study utilised a baseline survey from an ongoing cohort study in 2022–2023. Adults aged ≥ 50 years with heart failure and more than one chronic condition were recruited from a university-affiliated hospital using an electronic patient portal. Disease burden was measured using a modified Disease Burden Impact Scale. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and EuroQoL-5D-5L assessed symptom burden and quality of life. Gender differences in baseline outcomes were examined using Pearson's Chi-square tests, Welch's t-tests, and multiple linear regressions.

Results

Among 353 participants who completed the baseline survey, the mean (±SD) age was 70 (±9.5) years, and 50.1% were women (mean age: 67 ± 9 vs. men: 72 ± 10). In adjusted models, women had 4.9 points higher disease burden (p = 0.003) and reported higher symptom scores of pain (p = 0.018), tiredness (p = 0.021), nausea (p = 0.007), and loss of appetite compared to men (p = 0.036). Women had significantly more moderate/severe problems in usual activities and pain/discomfort and 0.07 points lower EuroQoL index than men (p = 0.010).

Conclusions

There were gender differences in disease/symptom burdens and quality of life. Women living with heart failure and multimorbidity had higher burdens but lower quality of life.

Impact

Identifying gender differences among people with heart failure and multimorbidity can be the first step to explaining health disparities. Research should take more inclusive and equitable approaches to address these differences. Healthcare providers, including nurses, should implement targeted strategies for effective multimorbidity management by considering these differences and disparities in clinical settings.

Reporting Method

STROBE checklist, cross-sectional.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

Cover Image

Cover Image

The cover image is based on the article Moisture-Responsive Friction Adaptability: Rethinking the Conventional Skin Silicone Interfaces in Pressure Injury Prevention Dressing Designs by Amit Gefen et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70860.


The cover image is based on the article Moisture-Responsive Friction Adaptability: Rethinking the Conventional Skin Silicone Interfaces in Pressure Injury Prevention Dressing Designs by Amit Gefen et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70860.

Adapting substance use treatment for black adolescents in the US legal system: protocol for a mixed-method, exploratory, feasibility and acceptability study using the eight-step ADAPT-ITT framework

Por: Bryant · B. E. · Tolou-Shams · M. · Ezimora · I. · Zapolski · T. C. · DiClemente · R. · Jordan · A. · Becker · S. J. · Squeglia · L. M.
Introduction

This community-led research study protocol emphasises placing black youth impacted by the legal system, their families and their communities at the forefront of substance use treatment development research and decision-making. The study, the Cultural Adaptation of a Substance Use Treatment (CAST) Project, challenges traditional top-down approaches to treatment creation, advocating for a grassroots model that centres community knowledge, values and active participation.

Methods and analysis

The CAST project is a US-based mixed-methods study with an exploratory design that examines the impact of racial discrimination on substance use in black youth impacted by the legal system. The study participants are black youth impacted by the legal system (N=15), parents of black youth impacted by the legal system (N=10) and community members who serve black youth (N=10) (total N=35 study participants). Study participants from each group (youth, parents and community members) will participate in three separate focus groups, respectively, to provide feedback on the culturally responsive content needed to best support black youth impacted by the legal system around substance use and mental health. The eight-step Assess, Decision, Adaptation, Production, Topical Expert, Integration, Training, Testing framework will be used as a guide to inform adaptations to the Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (MET/CBT12) for black youth impacted by the legal system. Once the cultural adaptation process has been completed, the study will conclude with an open feasibility and accessibility trial of the culturally adapted MET/CBT12 manual. The primary outcomes of this study are the feasibility and acceptability of the culturally adapted manual, measured by treatment attendance and participant feedback. Secondary outcomes include reductions in substance use and discrimination distress, and improvements in mental health symptoms.

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of California, San Francisco (IRB Protocol Number: 23-40126). All study procedures will be conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined by the institutional review board. The results from this study will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences, community forums and policy briefs to support broader implementation of culturally adapted adolescent substance use interventions that address discrimination-related stress and substance use among black individuals impacted by the legal system.

Trial registration number

NCT06003725.

Moisture‐Responsive Friction Adaptability: Rethinking the Conventional Skin Silicone Interfaces in Pressure Injury Prevention Dressing Designs

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the frictional properties of the skin-contact interfaces of two multilayer prophylactic dressings under simulated perspiration conditions. The tested dressings were identical except for the skin-contact interface, which was either silicone-made or Hydrofiber-made, that is, AQUACEL Hydrofiber Technology. Using a standardised tribological ‘sled test’ setup and a skin-mimicking polymer substrate, we measured the static and kinetic coefficients of friction for each dressing interface type at varying moisture levels. The dressing with the Hydrofiber interface consistently demonstrated significantly lower static and kinetic coefficients of friction compared to the silicone-based dressing, across all moisture conditions. The Hydrofiber interface exhibited a sharp coefficient of friction reduction with minimal (5%) moisture accumulation, mimicking overnight perspiration under thermoneutral conditions. This dressing maintained the low coefficient of friction levels at a steady level of approximately 0.2 until full saturation. In contrast, the silicone interface retained high (> 1) coefficients of friction regardless of moisture. These findings highlight an important biomechanical advantage of Hydrofiber skin-contact materials in reducing frictional forces at the skin-dressing interface, especially in moisture-prone body areas, in a pressure injury prevention context. Friction-responsive skin-contacting dressing materials with low coefficients of friction, which remain low while they become moist due to perspiration accumulation, should be preferred for preventative dressings.

Key protective factors that mitigate the impact of childhood trauma on poor mental health in adulthood: a scoping review protocol

Por: Clarke · A. · Hallett · N. · Brown · Y. · Cunnington · C. · Dauvermann · M. R. · Jordan · G. · Reniers · R. · Taylor · J.
Introduction

A significant proportion of adults in England and Wales report experiencing childhood trauma, which is often associated with poor health and negative social outcomes including a significant increase in the risk of poor mental health outcomes in adulthood. This proposed scoping review adopts a broad definition of childhood trauma and applies both a salutogenic framework and ecological systems theory to explore how protective factors at five ecological levels can support mental well-being. The review will also examine how protective factors vary across different population groups and contexts.

Methods and analysis

The scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) protocol for scoping reviews. The databases that will be searched are Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Medline. Studies will be included if they include protective factors and involve adults aged 18 and over who have experienced childhood trauma, whether self-identified, retrospectively self-reported or measured using a validated instrument. Studies will be excluded if they focus on participants under the age of 18.

All search results will be uploaded to Covidence, duplicates removed, and titles/abstracts screened by at least two reviewers based on inclusion criteria. Full texts of potentially relevant sources will be imported into EndNote 21. Reasons for exclusions will be documented and disagreements resolved through discussion or a third reviewer. The full process will be reported using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. Data will be extracted by at least two reviewers using a tool developed by the team based on the JBI guidance. A best-fit framework analysis will be used, using a matrix developed by the researchers including the four salutogenic domains and the five levels of the ecological framework.

Ethics and dissemination

Formal ethical approval is not necessary for this scoping review as it does not involve the collection of primary data. The outcomes of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal articles, conference/seminar presentations, and developed into resources for stakeholders and collaborators.

Trial registration number

Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/CJRUY).

Moisture‐Responsive Thermal Conductivity Properties of Hydrofiber Versus Polyurethane Foam: Implications for Pressure Injury Prevention

ABSTRACT

Effective thermal management at the skin-dressing interface is essential in pressure injury prevention by means of prophylactic dressings. This study quantified the thermal conductivity of AQUACEL Hydrofiber Technology (AHT, hydrofiber) and polyurethane foam dressing materials under normothermic (32°C) and febrile (40°C) conditions across increasing moisture levels. Using a validated custom heat-flow meter system, dry hydrofiber exhibited significantly greater thermal conductivity than the polyurethane foam (0.43 ± 0.01 vs. 0.20 ± 0.01 W/m K at 32°C; p < 0.001). Upon hydration at 32°C, thermal conductivity values increased nonlinearly for both materials but to a much greater extent for the hydrofiber. At 15% moisture, the hydrofiber reached 4.73 ± 0.12 W/m K compared to the polyurethane foam at 1.03 ± 0.02 W/m K. At 40°C, hydrofiber achieved 3.39 ± 0.19 W/m K with only 10% moisture, indicating a temperature-responsive biphasic transformation. Overall, hydrofiber demonstrated a fivefold greater thermal conductivity response to moisture than the polyurethane foam. These findings highlight critical, material-dependent differences in heat dissipation under clinically relevant conditions. The superior moisture-responsive thermal conductivity of hydrofiber highlights its potential to improve heat dissipation at the skin-dressing interface under clinically relevant conditions and thereby mitigate local heat accumulation, contributing to skin protection. Thermal conductivity and thermal adaptability studies should be integrated into dressing efficacy research and be used for selection criteria for pressure injury prevention programs alongside mechanical and absorptive performance.

Research Capability and Influencing Factors Among Clinical Nurses: A Multicentre Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT

Aim

To evaluate the research capability of clinical nurses in China and identify the determinants associated with their capability.

Background

As nursing evolves into an increasingly independent discipline, the research capability of clinical nurses has become critical for the development of the profession, advancing evidence-based practice and improving patient care quality.

Methods

A multicentre cross-sectional survey was conducted using convenience sampling from September 2023 to February 2024, among clinical nurses in tertiary hospitals across three provinces in China. The Nursing Research Capability Self-Assessment Scale was used to assess the research capability of the nurses. Chi-square tests, one-way analysis of variance and multiple linear regression were used to examine factors associated with research capability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology was followed.

Results

A total of 1074 clinical nurses participated. The mean research capability score was 89.11 ± 27.69, reflecting a moderate level of research capability. However, two dimensions of research questions and literature review received lower scores. Multiple linear regression analysis identified that education level, professional title, administrative position and nursing job title (all p < 0.05) were independent predictors of research capability.

Conclusions

Clinical nurses exhibit moderate research capability, with notable deficiencies in formulating research questions and conducting literature reviews. Key factors influencing research capability include education, professional title, administrative position, and job title. Targeted training and development programmes should address these factors to enhance nurses' research competence and advance nursing science.

Investigating the effects of cannabinoids for the reduction of inflammation and sickle cell disease pain (CRISP); A protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study

by Jordan Bellis, Lydia Monk, Ritika Jhawar, Galia Pollock, Angela Liu, Charleen Jacobs-McFarlane, Brittany McCrary, Jeffrey Glassberg, Susanna Curtis

Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is a hemoglobinopathy affecting millions of people globally. Pain, both acute and chronic, affects over half of those living with SCD, but treatment of chronic pain is an ongoing challenge. While opioid treatments are widely used for chronic pain, it’s efficacy is limited, so alternatives must be explored. This protocol outlines a procedure for investigation of dronabinol, an FDA-approved synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), for the treatment of pain in patients living with SCD and chronic pain. The study is an 8-week, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study which aims to assess both the efficacy and safety of this opioid alternative to pain treatment. The study will also track biomarkers of inflammation as THC has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties, and inflammation is a driver of SCD pain and disease severity. Results from this study have the potential to further clinical understanding of cannabinoids for pain management in Sickle Cell Disease treatment and spark new questions for research.

Breaking barriers: feasibility of a cluster randomised trial evaluating an instrument for identifying and ameliorating adverse drug reactions

Por: Logan · V. · Hughes · D. · Turner · A. · Carter · N. · Jordan · S.
Objectives

We aimed to investigate the feasibility of a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the ADRe Profile in UK primary care. The ADRe Profile is a patient monitoring system to identify and address adverse drug reactions (ADR) and ADR-related issues to pre-empt clinical deterioration.

Design

A preliminary study to test the feasibility of an RCT.

Setting

General practices (GPs) in South-West Wales, UK.

Participants

20 patients aged >64 and prescribed >4 long-term medicines.

Interventions

Participants reported their health-related problems using the ADRe-Profile. Participants completed the profile independently initially, then with researcher support, capturing vital signs, clinical observations and patient-reported symptoms.

Main outcome measures

Feasibility was assessed based on recruitment, retention, adherence to protocols, potential for clinical impact and staff costs.

Results

We recruited two GP practices (0.94% of 213 contacted), and 20 patients aged >64 (51.3% of those approached). Retention was 100%. ADRe Profiles had a 98.29% completion rate, identifying 289 clinical problems, including pain (16 of 20 patients), dyspnoea (10/20), dizziness (8/20), bleeding/bruising (7/20) and falls (4/20). Most problems (90%) and vital signs (78%) recorded on ADRe Profiles were absent from existing patient records. Researchers recommended further investigations (164 instances) and interventions (126 suggestions). Despite the potential for clinical benefits, engagement from clinicians was limited. Cost estimates for ADRe administration ranged from £40 to £73, within the funding available from Health and Care Research Wales.

Conclusions

An RCT of the ADRe Profile was feasible, despite gatekeeping by clinicians. Recruitment of GP practices was challenging, with

Trial registration number

NCT04663360; Pre-Results.

Timely Implementation of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Clinical Care: Insights From Clinicians and Health Informatics Experts

ABSTRACT

Aim

To explore the optimal timing of patient-reported outcome assessment, defined as the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes at clinically meaningful points such as before or during encounters, treatment initiation and follow-up, and to identify the facilitators and barriers to timely use.

Design

A qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals across diverse US health systems.

Methods

Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes related to the timing and implementation of patient-reported outcomes assessments. Interviews were analysed iteratively to develop a coding framework and synthesise overarching themes.

Results

Fourteen healthcare professionals, including nurse practitioners, cardiologists and health informatics experts across seven U.S. health systems from academic and community hospitals, were interviewed in February 2024. Three major themes emerged: (1) value proposition of timely patient-reported outcome data collection (2) key facilitators for timely implementation and (3) multilevel barriers. The value proposition focused on the use of patient-reported outcomes for prevention and active disease management. Critical facilitators for the timely implementation of patient-reported outcomes included the involvement of research and clinical coordinators, strategies for pre-visit and on-site patient-reported outcome collection, the use of standardised templates within EHRs and the alignment of patient-reported outcome collection with patients' long-term treatment goals. Finally, multilevel barriers included time constraints, patient-level challenges (e.g., fatigue, literacy, language) and systemic issues (e.g., technical limitations, lack of reimbursement and unclear guidelines).

Conclusion

Timely collection and use of patient-reported outcomes is critical for improving symptom monitoring and supporting patient-centered clinical decision-making. However, multilevel barriers hinder consistent implementation across health care settings.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

Integrating patient-reported outcomes into clinical workflows can improve the patient-centeredness of patient-healthcare professional interactions, and provide a more holistic picture of a patient's health status. Addressing barriers to patient-reported outcome implementation, including lack of time, poor health literacy and workflow integration barriers, is crucial for improving clinical outcomes.

Reporting Method

This study adhered to the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) checklist, in accordance with EQUATOR Network guidelines.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public involvement: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.

Triadic relationships between pasture exposure, gastrointestinal parasites, and hindgut microbiomes in grazing lambs

by Jack Jefferson, Claire Reigate, Alessandra Giacomini, M. Jordana Rivero, Matthew Hitchings, Tamsyn Uren Webster, Konstans Wells

Livestock grazing in confined pastures often means grazing on a less diverse diet than under more natural conditions and increased exposure to gastrointestinal parasites prevailing in these pastures. However, how sward composition influences gut microbiome (GM) diversity and its relationship with parasite burden remains poorly understood. In this study, we analysed the faecal GM of weaned lambs grazing on two distinct sward types (perennial ryegrass and a mixed-species sward) over three consecutive months using 16S rRNA sequencing, in order to assess how microbial diversity and composition are related to environmental conditions and the gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) burden in naturally infected lambs. Sward type and sampling time explained some of the variation in GM alpha diversity and community composition (beta diversity), whereas individual lamb identity accounted for considerably more variation in microbial assemblages. Shifts in the relative abundance of bacterial genera such as Saccharofermentans, Anaerosporobacter, Butyrivibrio in relation to sward type and sampling time suggest mostly adaptive fluctuations in response to diet and pasture condition. Abundance shifts of Negativibacillus, and Candidatus Saccharimonas were also associated with GIN burden, which, in turn, was higher in lambs grazing on mixed swards compared to ryegrass. Our findings add to the growing understanding of how sheep microbiomes vary with pasture management and changes in parasite burden. We highlight that individual identity may shape gut microbiota, and that potential triadic interactions among gastrointestinal parasites, sward exposure, and the gut microbiome underscore the importance of considering host, parasite, and environmental factors collectively when evaluating microbiome dynamics in grazing livestock.

Identification of gestational diabetes mellitus in European electronic healthcare databases: insights from the ConcePTION project

Por: Molgaard-Nielsen · D. · Mitter · V. · Lupattelli · A. · Hoxhaj · V. · Andaur Navarro · C. L. · Hayati · S. · Lopez-Leon · S. · Morris · J. K. · Geldof · A. · Jordan · S. · Leinonen · M. K. · Martikainen · V. · Manfrini · M. · Cammarota · L. · Neville · A. · Barrachina-Bonet · L. · Cave
Objective

To develop and compare algorithms for identifying gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) across European electronic healthcare databases and evaluate their impact on the estimated prevalence.

Design

Multi-national cohort study using routinely collected electronic healthcare data

Setting

National and regional databases in five European countries (Norway, Finland, Italy, Spain and France), in primary and/or secondary care.

Participants

Pregnancy cohorts resulting in stillbirths or live births between 2009 and 2020, comprising 602 897 pregnancies in Norway, 507 904 in Finland, 374 009 in Italy, 193 495 in Spain and 116 762 in France.

Primary and secondary outcomes

The primary outcome was the prevalence of GDM identified using six algorithms: (1) Only diagnosis; (2) Diagnosis or prescription; (3) Two diagnoses or prescriptions (2DxRx); (4) Diagnosis including unspecified diabetes in pregnancy or prescription (DxRx broad); (5) Diagnosis excluding pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy or prescription; (6) Registration of GDM in a birth registry (BR).

Results

The strictest algorithm (2DxRx) resulted in the lowest GDM prevalence, while the broadest (DxRx broad) resulted in the highest, except in France where it was BR. In the Nordic countries, GDM prevalence varied only slightly by algorithm; greater variations were observed in other countries. The prevalence ranged from 3.5% (95% CI: 3.5% to 3.5%) to 4.6% (95% CI: 4.5% to 4.7%) in Norway; 12.1% (95% CI: 12.0% to 12.2%) to 15.8% (95% CI: 15.7% to 15.9%) in Finland, where prevalence was much higher than elsewhere. The prevalence ranged from 1.3% (95% CI: 1.3% to 1.3%) to 5.4% (95% CI: 5.3% to 5.5%) in Italy; 1.6% (95% CI: 1.5% to 1.7%) to 6.2% (95% CI: 6.1% to 6.3%) in Spain; and 1.7% (95% CI: 1.6% to 1.8%) to 5.8% (95% CI: 5.7% to 5.9%) in France.

Conclusions

In this multinational study, GDM prevalence ranged from 1.3% to 15.8% depending on the algorithm and database. Nordic countries showed smaller differences in prevalence between algorithms, while the other countries showed larger variations, likely due to differences in coding practices, healthcare systems and database coverage.

Developing service models for adult palliative and end of life care for people with a learning disability (The DAPPLE Project): protocol for a mixed-method study

Por: Tuffrey-Wijne · I. · Tilley · E. · Tyler · F. · Islam · Z. · Borgstrom · E. · Jordan · J. · Glover · G. · Wallace · L. · Roberts · C. · Giles · J. · Keagan-Bull · R. · Cresswell · A. · Anderson-Kittow · R.
Introduction

People with a learning disability face significant health and mortality inequalities as well as wider systemic inequities. Challenges in palliative and end of life care (PEOLC) include communication difficulties, lack of involvement in decision-making and multimorbidity. Early identification of PEOLC needs is challenging, impacting timely care planning. The study aims to (1) understand barriers and enablers to providing high-quality, accessible PEOLC for people with a learning disability, and identify effective service delivery models and interventions and (2) improve PEOLC quality and accessibility by developing robust guidance for health and social care services.

Methods and analysis

This is a mixed-methods study guided by the NHS England 2021 Ambitions Framework and adopting the Social Model of Disability. There are four workstreams: (1) a retrospective cohort analysis of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink; (2) a rapid scoping review; (3) field work in four study sites across England, involving (a) interviews with senior leaders and commissioners (n=up to 16) and informal stakeholder engagement conversations; (b) ethnographic case studies with people with a learning disability at the end of life (n=up to 20) and retrospective case reviews of people with a learning disability who have died (n=up to 40), using family and staff interviews and (c) development and piloting of methods for enabling systematic identification of PEOLC need, using experience-based co-design and (4) patient and public involvement (PPI) activities and a co-production group of 10 people with a learning disability to support data analysis and outputs. Data will be analysed using adapted framework analysis methodology. This is an inclusive, co-produced study with significant involvement of advisors and researchers with a learning disability as part of the study team.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval has been obtained for workstreams 1, 3a and 3b. Significant attention has been paid to ensuring informed consent, making adjustments for capacity. Accessible information and consent forms will be used, involving consultees and adhering to the Mental Capacity Act for participants who lack capacity. Data security will follow General Data Protection Regulation rules. Dissemination will include patient exemplars, guidance and various resources, engaging stakeholders through multiple formats.

Study registration

researchregistry10500.

Socioeconomic inequalities in outcomes, experiences and treatment among adults consulting primary care for a musculoskeletal pain condition: a prospective cohort study

Por: Peat · G. M. · Hill · J. C. · Yu · D. · Wathall · S. · Parry · E. · Bailey · J. · Thompson · C. · Jordan · K. P. · The MIDAS Patient Advisory Group · Brown · Dent · Haines · Haines · Southam · Maddison · Sandhu
Objectives

To estimate the direction and magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in outcome, experience and care among adults consulting for a musculoskeletal pain condition.

Design

Multicentre, prospective observational cohort with repeated measures at three waves (baseline, 3 months and 6 months after index consultation).

Setting

30 general practices in North Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent, England.

Participants

1875 consecutive, eligible, consenting patients, aged 18 years and over, presenting with a relevant SNOMED CT-coded musculoskeletal pain condition between September 2021 and July 2022.

Interventions

Standard care.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Primary outcome was patient-reported pain and function using the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ score, 0–56). Secondary outcomes were patient experience (overall dissatisfaction with consultation experience, dichotomised) and an indicator of care received (opioid prescription within 14 days of index consultation). Using multilevel models, we examined inequalities in primary and secondary outcomes by area deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation derived from patient residential postcode), before and after adjusting for sociodemographic and survey administration variables, clinical case-mix and selected practice-level covariates.

Results

Compared with patients from the least deprived neighbourhoods, patients from the most deprived neighbourhoods had significantly poorer MSK-HQ scores at baseline (mean 22.6 (SD 10.4) vs 27.6 (10.1)). At 6 months, the inequality gap in MSK-HQ score widened (difference in mean score after adjustment for all covariates: 1.94; 95% CI: –0.70 to 4.58). Opioid prescription was more common for patients living in the most deprived neighbourhoods (30% vs 19%; fully adjusted OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.08). Only 6% of patients overall reported being dissatisfied with their consultation. Analysis of multiply imputed data produced a similar pattern of findings to complete-case analysis.

Conclusions

Substantial inequalities in the chronicity, severity and complexity of musculoskeletal pain problems are already present at the time of accessing care. Inequalities in pain and function do not reduce after accessing care and may even widen slightly.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN18132064; Results.

Evaluation of a virtual reality-directed brain-gut behavioural treatment inpatient program for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: protocol for a pilot feasibility trial

Por: Gutermuth · B. · Jordan · A. · Hodish · G. · Sturgeon · J. A. · DeJonckheere · M. · Berinstein · J. A. · Sheehan · J. · Bishu · S. · Higgins · P. D. · Cohen-Mekelburg · S.
Introduction

Pain is one of the most bothersome symptoms that affects patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but is often inadequately treated. Inadequate pain control in the inpatient setting not only impacts patients’ experience but increases opioid use and hospital length of stay. Opioids are often considered first-line treatment for severe pain but are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in IBD. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are a non-opioid analgesic option, but concerns regarding their contribution to IBD flares have limited their use. Brain-gut behavioural therapies (BGBT), such as cognitive behavioural therapy, meditation and gut-directed hypnotherapy, are effective for pain management and have a role in the treatment of IBD symptoms. However, the use of BGBT in IBD is challenging, given limited access to behavioural health specialists, especially in the inpatient setting. Virtual reality (VR)-directed BGBT programmes can bridge this gap and enhance pain treatment for inpatients with IBD. Therefore, in this study, we aim to establish feasibility and acceptability for a VR-directed BGBT inpatient programme for patients with IBD.

Methods and analysis

We will recruit 40 patients with IBD who are hospitalised at Michigan Medicine and who endorse IBD-related pain. We will assess patient-reported outcomes (pain rating, IBD-specific symptoms, perceived stress, mood) before and after treatment, cumulative inpatient analgesic requirements and hospital length of stay. Our primary objective will be to establish intervention feasibility defined by the frequency and percentage of enrolled participants that use the VR-directed BGBT inpatient intervention in any capacity. Our secondary objective will be to evaluate intervention acceptability by conducting semistructured interviews with study participants. We will also explore the preliminary effectiveness of VR-directed BGBT on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilisation as compared with historic controls.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Michigan Medical School on 10 October 2023 (HUM00240999). All human subjects will be required to sign an informed consent document prior to study participation. Study findings will be reported through peer-reviewed publication.

Trial registration number

NCT06188793.

Metabolic Pathways Associated With Obesity and Hypertension in Black Caregivers of Persons Living With Dementia

imageBackground In the United States, Black adults have the highest prevalence of obesity and hypertension, increasing their risk of morbidity and mortality. Caregivers of persons with dementia are also at increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to the demands of providing care. Thus, Black caregivers—who are the second largest group of caregivers of persons with dementia in the United States—have the highest risks for poor health outcomes among all caregivers. However, the physiological changes associated with multiple chronic conditions in Black caregivers are poorly understood. Objectives In this study, metabolomics were compared to the metabolic profiles of Black caregivers with obesity, with or without hypertension. Our goal was to identify metabolites and metabolic pathways that could be targeted to reduce obesity and hypertension rates in this group. Methods High-resolution, untargeted metabolomic assays were performed on plasma samples from 26 self-identified Black caregivers with obesity, 18 of whom had hypertension. Logistic regression and pathway analyses were employed to identify metabolites and metabolic pathways differentiating caregivers with obesity only and caregivers with both obesity and hypertension. Results Key metabolic pathways discriminating caregivers with obesity only and caregivers with obesity and hypertension were butanoate and glutamate metabolism, fatty acid activation/biosynthesis, and the carnitine shuttle pathway. Metabolites related to glutamate metabolism in the butanoate metabolism pathway were more abundant in caregivers with hypertension, while metabolites identified as butyric acid/butanoate and R-(3)-hydroxybutanoate were less abundant. Caregivers with hypertension also had lower levels of several unsaturated fatty acids. Discussion In Black caregivers with obesity, multiple metabolic features and pathways differentiated among caregivers with and without hypertension. If confirmed in future studies, these findings would support ongoing clinical monitoring and culturally tailored interventions focused on nutrition (particularly polyunsaturated fats and animal protein), exercise, and stress management to reduce the risk of hypertension in Black caregivers with obesity.
❌