This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide an overview of the effectiveness of digital physiotherapy interventions on pain, physical functions and quality of life for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

A systematic search of electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane Library, was conducted on 19 February 2025.

We included randomised controlled trials which compared digital physiotherapy interventions to standard physiotherapy care for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Main outcomes included pain, physical functions and quality of life.

25 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 18 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The primary author conducted the initial search, selected articles and extracted data from eligible studies, which were independently checked by a second reviewer. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed by Cochrane ROB-2 tool. Quality of evidence was evaluated by the GRADE approach.

Overall, digital physiotherapy was associated with a small but statistically significant improvement in physical function (SMD=0.24, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.35); an overall meta-analysis was not performed for pain and quality of life due to considerable heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed both video-conferencing and app- or web-based physiotherapy significantly reduced pain (SMD=–0.53, 95% CI –1.06 to –0.01 and SMD=–0.47, 95% CI –0.70 to –0.25, respectively) and physical function (SMD=0.32, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.54 and SMD=0.30, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.50 respectively). Digital physiotherapy interventions with individualised exercise components also reduced pain (SMD=–0.43, 95% CI –0.66 to –0.21) and improved physical function (SMD=0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.43), when compared with non-exercise interventions.

There was moderate-quality evidence to support the use of digital physiotherapy interventions in improving pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Subgroup analyses revealed low-to-moderate quality evidence in using video-conferencing and app-/web-based physiotherapy and interventions with exercise components to treat patients with knee osteoarthritis. Overall, there were limited high-quality trials in drawing a robust conclusion. High ROB and huge heterogeneity were observed across studies. Further research should minimise the ROB and investigate the effect of different digital modalities, intervention components and length of follow-up.

This scoping review will evaluate and synthesise what is known about the impact of structural and social determinants of health on neurodegeneration among adults of African American or Black (AAB) racial identity with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary objective is to examine how structural factors, such as healthcare access, influence disparities in neurodegeneration following TBI. Given higher rates of TBI and worse outcomes among Black individuals compared with White individuals, this review seeks to fill the gap in research concerning underrepresentation of AAB populations.

Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence framework, this review will systematically search PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL Library (Wiley) for relevant studies. Eligible studies will involve adult human participants diagnosed with neurodegenerative conditions, including dementia and cognitive impairment, and with a history of TBI. Studies must include participants of AAB and non-Hispanic White (NHW) racial identity to facilitate comparisons. The review will focus on identifying potential factors contributing to disparities in neurodegeneration. Data synthesis will include narrative summaries, comparative tables and visualisations to highlight racial disparities in neurodegeneration risk and AAB representation in TBI research. This approach is its structured framework will evaluate the depth of racial inclusion across studies, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of how structural and social determinants shape outcomes.

As this review involves only previously published literature, institutional review board approval will not be required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and lay summaries.

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in the Caribbean, yet there is limited published information on the availability and utilisation of diagnostic imaging and treatment methods. Inequities in healthcare infrastructure, access to neuroimaging and acute treatment options may contribute to poorer outcomes following stroke, particularly in the low-resource settings that characterise most of the Caribbean region. The objective of this review is to map the literature on access to diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for adult stroke care in the Caribbean to identify potential limitations in acute treatment and examine how restricted access may impact outcomes. The resulting data can help inform strategies for improving access to stroke care in resource-limited communities.

We will apply a three-step strategy based on the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework: first, a limited search to identify relevant articles; second, selection of key search terms; third, implementation into a comprehensive search strategy. The query will range from 1 January 1995 to 1 June 2025 (date of final search). Search results will be extracted and screened by two independent reviewers, and findings will be presented in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We will consider studies focusing on ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in the Caribbean, emphasising access to diagnostic imaging, stroke centres, prehospital management and emergent treatment. Studies examining acute stroke management capacity within the region will be considered. Studies will be excluded if they: focus exclusively on primary stroke prevention, postacute care, longitudinal care pathways for stroke victims or paediatric populations; are unrelated to stroke diagnosis or treatment or are conducted outside the Caribbean.

This protocol aims to perform secondary analysis of previously published literature; therefore, ethical approval is not required. The results of this review will be disseminated through academic conferences and peer-reviewed publication.

Neutropenic fever (NF) has a crude mortality rate of 3–18%. International guidelines recommend that all patients with NF receive ultrabroad-spectrum antibiotics (UBSAs) within 1 hour of emergency department (ED) registration. However, over 70% patients presenting to hospital with suspected NF (sNF) cannot access absolute neutrophil count (ANC) result within 1 hour, do not have NF and do not require UBSAs. In ED and hospitalised patients with sNF, we hypothesise that the ASTERIC protocol effectively and safely reduces the use of UBSAs compared with standard care alone.

This pragmatic, parallel, multicentre, type 1, hybrid effectiveness-implementation, stepped-wedge, before-and-after, cluster randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate whether antibiotic prescribing can be safely reduced through implementing a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention (ASTERIC) in adult patients with sNF presenting to EDs. The sNF was defined as a fever with a single oral temperature of ≥38.3°C (101°F) within 24 hours before ED registration or a temperature of ≥38.0°C (100.4°F) sustained over a 1-hour period, following last chemotherapy or targeted therapy within 6 weeks for any solid tumour, or in any period following therapies against leucaemia, lymphoma, myelodysplastic syndrome, aplastic anaemia, multiple myeloma or recipient of HSCT. The study will involve eight hospitals in Hong Kong with variable baseline practice. We will include 704 adult patients (352 patients in pre-implementation and post-implementation periods, respectively) with sNF (tympanic temperature ≥38.3°C) and 48 staff participants (6 staff participants in each hospital). Healthcare professionals will receive a multifaceted stewardship intervention consisting of risk assessment tools, fast-track ANCs, a decision tool for patient management and antibiotic use, supported by an educational package and staff interaction programmes (ASTERIC protocol). Patients’ blood ANC, and cancer therapy and chronic illness therapy scores will be measured. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) and Proctor conceptual frameworks will be followed for evaluation of implementation. The main outcome measures are the mean total dose of UBSAs prescribed in 7 days and serious adverse events at 30 days. Data analysis will incorporate intention-to-treat, per-protocol and as-treated analyses for service outcomes (effectiveness, safety, quality of life assessments and cost-effectiveness) and mixed methods for implementation outcomes, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. We expect that the study results will inform health policy with improvement in hospital services in treating stable sNF, evidenced by improved safe antibiotic stewardship, early antibiotic de-escalation and reduced costs and length of stay.

The institutional review boards of all study sites approved this study. This study will establish the ASTERIC protocol safely improves antibiotic stewardship and clinical management in adult patients with sNF. We will disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and educational activities. All patients with sNF will be influenced by the new protocol which is agreed at hospital level. Randomisation is at hospital level, not patient level. Patient consent is sought for follow-up and data access, not for treatment. Staff consent is sought for interviewing.

NCT06794320.

Low back pain (LBP) is a common occupational health problem among academic staff, often associated with prolonged sitting, poor ergonomics and psychosocial stress. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of LBP and its associated factors among academic staff at a university in Ethiopia.

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among academic staff at the University of Gondar (Gondar, Ethiopia) using simple random sampling from March to April 2021.

A total of 607 workers participated in the study.

A self-administered, structured Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire was used to assess the occurrences of LBP over the past 12 months. Data were analysed using Stata (V.14), and associations between variables were examined using binary logistic regression. Results are presented as adjusted ORs (AOR) with 95% CIs, with statistical significance set at p

The prevalence of LBP in the last 7 days was 44.8% (95% CI 40.8% to 48.86%), and over the past 12 months it was 55.68% (95% CI 51.63% to 59.68%). A significant difference in 7-day prevalence was observed between female and male participants (39.86% vs 15.81%, respectively; ² = 0.887; p=0.02). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, being female was associated with higher odds of LBP (AOR=1.72; 95% CI 1.15 to 2.57; p=0.009), as was working more than 8 hours per day (AOR=1.45; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.10; p=0.038), physical inactivity (AOR=1.88; 95% CI 1.30 to 2.72; p=0.001) and prolonged standing during work hours (AOR=1.63; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.59; p=0.036).

The prevalence of LBP among academic staff is high. Targeted interventions are recommended to address LBP, focusing on gender-sensitive strategies to mitigate the additional burden on female staff, time management to reduce long working hours and workplace programmes to limit sedentary behaviour, encourage physical activity and improve ergonomic awareness.

Targeted biologic therapies have transformed outcomes for individuals with psoriasis, a common immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. The widespread use of these highly effective treatments has led to a growing number of individuals with clear or nearly clear skin remaining on continuous, long-term treatment. Personalised strategies to minimise drug exposure may sustain long-term disease control while reducing treatment burden, associated risks and healthcare costs. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a definitive pragmatic effectiveness trial of two personalised dose minimisation strategies compared with continuous treatment (standard care) in adults with well-controlled psoriasis receiving the exemplar biologic risankizumab.

This is a multicentre, assessor-blind, parallel group, open-label randomised controlled feasibility trial in the UK, evaluating two personalised biologic dose minimisation strategies for psoriasis. 90 adults with both physician-assessed and patient-assessed clear or nearly clear skin on risankizumab monotherapy for ≥12 months will be randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to (1) patient-led ‘as-needed’ treatment, where risankizumab is administered at the first sign of self-assessed psoriasis recurrence, (2) therapeutic drug monitoring-guided treatment, with personalised dosing intervals determined using a pharmacokinetic model or (3) continuous treatment as per standard care, for 12 months. Participants will be invited to submit self-reported outcomes and self-taken photographs every 3 months using a bespoke remote monitoring system (mySkin app) and will attend an in-person assessment at 12 months. They may also request additional patient-initiated follow-up appointments during the trial if needed. The primary outcome is the practicality and acceptability of the two personalised biologic dose minimisation strategies, assessed as a composite measure including recruitment and retention rates, adherence to the assigned strategies and acceptability to both patients and clinicians. The feasibility of collecting healthcare cost and resource utilisation data will also be evaluated to inform a future cost-effectiveness analysis. A nested qualitative study, involving semistructured interviews with patients and clinicians, will explore perspectives on the personalised biologic dose minimisation strategies. These findings will inform the design of a future definitive trial.

This study received ethical approval from the Seasonal Research Ethics Committee (reference 24/LO/0089). Results will be disseminated through scientific conferences, peer-reviewed publications and patient/public engagement events. Lay summaries and infographics will be codeveloped with patient partners to ensure the findings are accessible for the wider public.

ISRCTN17922845.

To estimate the healthcare costs associated with post-stroke dysphagia during acute hospitalisation and to identify factors influencing these costs in a tertiary hospital setting in Vietnam.

A cross-sectional study using clinical and billing data from hospital records.

The study was conducted at the Neurology Center of Bach Mai Hospital, a tertiary care facility in Hanoi, Vietnam, between June 2020 and January 2022.

A total of 951 patients aged ≥18 years with acute ischaemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI were included. Dysphagia was assessed using the Gugging Swallowing Screen.

Direct healthcare costs during hospitalisation were collected from the hospital billing system and categorised as medications, diagnostic imaging, medical supplies, accommodation, food, procedures and laboratory tests. All costs were converted to USD. Associations between patient characteristics and total healthcare costs were analysed using generalised linear models (Gamma distribution with log link), applying robust standard errors.

The median treatment cost was 10.08 million VND (436.24 USD) in the dysphagia group vs 6.37 million VND (275.78 USD) in the non-dysphagia group. Costs increased with dysphagia severity, reaching 22.64 million VND (979.49 USD) among patients with severe dysphagia. In multivariate analysis, dysphagia was associated with a 21% increase in costs (exp(β) = 1.21; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.33; p14, pneumonia, prolonged hospitalisation and higher educational level.

Post-stroke dysphagia substantially increases acute hospitalisation costs in Vietnam. Early screening, standardised management and preventive care for complications may improve outcomes and reduce costs.

The study was registered on the Research Registry website (https://www.researchregistry.com/) under the unique identification number: researchregistry8203.

Although low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is established as the primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, some individuals with LDL-C within desirable limits still develop coronary artery disease (CAD). Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) has emerged as a genetically determined independent risk factor for CVD. This study aims to investigate Lp(a) by determining its association with coronary artery stenosis severity, identifying its ethnic-specific genetic determinants and assessing its relationship with an energy-dense dietary pattern.

The PUTRA-CV study is a 3-year, multicentre, case-control observational study involving adult patients who have undergone coronary angiography. The primary outcome is the association between Lp(a) levels and the severity of angiographic CAD (assessed by Gensini or Syntax score). Secondary outcomes include the frequencies of Lp(a)-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs10455872 and rs3798220) and the association between dietary patterns and Lp(a) levels. Lp(a) will be measured using a particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric method, and SNPs will be genotyped using high-resolution melting. Dietary intake will be assessed using a validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Data will be analysed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise population characteristics. Bivariate analyses will use chi-square (2), independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. The independent association between Lp(a) and coronary artery stenosis severity will be determined using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for confounders. Empirically driven dietary patterns will be derived using reduced rank regression, and their association with Lp(a) will be assessed. For genetic analysis, allele frequencies of the LPA SNPs rs10455872 and rs3798220 will be calculated and compared between cases and controls.

Ethical approval has been obtained from the ethics committees of the Ministry of Health Malaysia (NMRR ID-24-00877-2ID-IIR), Universiti Putra Malaysia (JKEUPM-2024–246), Universiti Teknologi MARA (REC/07/2024-OT/FB/2) and Universiti Malaya Medical Centre (MREC ID NO: 2 02 453–13692). The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. In the USA, individuals who racially identify as African American or Black experience disproportionately higher rates of TBI and sustain worse prognosis compared with White patients; however, this population continues to be under-represented in contemporary translational research agendas. This protocol aims to comprehensively evaluate and synthesise what is currently known about the molecular epidemiology of TBI outcome among individuals of Black racial identity or African ancestry.

This review will use the established scoping review framework from the Joanna Briggs Institute. The search strategy will be implemented in PubMed (MEDLINE) and expanded to Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL Library (Wiley) databases in the final review. The date range will span from database inception to 20 July 2025 (date of final search). A two-stage screening process will be performed first at the title and abstract level before full-text assessment. Screening will be performed by two independent reviewers and discrepancies will be reconciled by a third reviewer. Articles that meet the following inclusion criteria will be considered: we will include human studies that investigate molecular and biochemical markers associated with TBI outcome. Studies must include individuals who are (A) of Black or African American racial identity, (B) of African ancestry and/or (C) performed in Sub-Saharan African countries. There is no eligibility criteria related to participant age, sex or gender. Eligible studies will be limited to English, Spanish or French. Data extracted from will be analysed and presented as written narrative, summary statistics of study characteristics and graphical or tabular displays.

Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. The results of this review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences.

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are a leading cause of global mortality, disproportionately affecting low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Physical inactivity, a key contributor to NCDs, is prevalent worldwide despite evidence supporting the health benefits of physical activity (PA). Cities, while often associated with barriers to PA, also present unique opportunities to enhance PA through systemic, context-sensitive interventions or so-called actions. However, evidence on effective city-level PA strategies, particularly in LMICs, remains limited. The CITY based interventions to stimulate active MOVEment for health (CITY-MOVE) project aims to accelerate, support and evaluate the implementation of PA actions at the city level by adapting the WHO Global Action Plan on Physical Activity into locally relevant strategies across six cities worldwide, accompanied by a cross-contextual evaluation framework to ensure transferability and scalability.

This multicase study examines 13 PA actions in six cities (Bogotá, Lima, Kampala, Antwerp, Rotterdam and Ljubljana) across three continents, addressing both early (design and implementation) and late (evaluation) action stages. Early-stage actions employ action research in Living Labs to codesign and implement PA initiatives with local stakeholders, while late-stage interventions focus on retrospective evaluations of implementation outcomes. The framework integrates the Medical Research Council guidance on complex interventions with the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions. Mixed methods are employed, including document review, interviews, participatory workshops and quantitative analysis of PA and NCD indicators. A cross-contextual Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework will synthesise findings to inform scalability and transferability of actions.

Ethics approvals were obtained from local review boards in the participating cities.

Dissemination will occur at three levels: local, regional and global. Locally, findings will be shared with city authorities, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and healthcare providers through Living Labs and policy dialogues. At the regional level, knowledge will be spread across cities in Europe, Latin America and East Africa through Communities of Practice and the use of tools like the MCDA framework. Globally, the project will contribute to the scientific community and international organisations such as the WHO and UN-Habitat, by sharing results through open access publications, conferences and global networks to ensure widespread dissemination and sustainability of the project’s impacts.

This study and its outcomes are publicly accessible on OSF (https://osf.io/mn8zd/) and ZENODO (https://zenodo.org/communities/citymove/).

Cortical spreading depolarisation (SD) is a pathological wave of depolarisation in the cortex. SDs occur frequently after severe acute brain injury, and SDs in clusters can contribute to secondary brain damage in patients with severe acute brain injury through hypoperfusion and upregulation of cerebral metabolism in vulnerable brain tissue. Ketamine appears to inhibit SDs both in vitro and in patient series of severe acute brain injury. The KETA-BID trial aims to examine the efficacy and safety of S-ketamine for SDs in severe acute brain injury, as well as the feasibility of the trial design.

This randomised, blinded feasibility and pilot trial includes adults (≥ 18 years) undergoing a supratentorial craniotomy or craniectomy for severe acute brain injury (ie, traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage or spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage). During surgery, an electrocorticography (ECoG) strip is placed adjacent to injured brain tissue. Patients are continuously monitored throughout their stay at the neurointensive care unit and the neurosurgical step-down unit. In the case of an SD, physiological optimisation of intracranial pressure, brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO₂), core temperature and blood glucose is initiated. Participants developing SD clusters are randomised for continuous infusion with S-ketamine or matching placebo in a 1:1 allocation with full blinding of the treatment allocation. Infusion rates (ie, dose) and duration of trial medication are adjusted following a dosing algorithm according to SD occurrence. Surviving participants are followed until 6 months after the injury with recording of functional outcome. The primary outcome is occurrence of SDs per hour of monitoring after randomisation.

The Scientific Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (H-21056972), the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT 2021-003716-12), as well as the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS 2024-515315-22-00) approved this trial. This trial will provide insight into both SD and the clinical effects of ketamine following severe acute brain injury, presenting a potential new treatment for these patients. The findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed publications.

NCT05095857.

Procedure-related pain should be minimised to prevent psychological trauma and the potential negative consequences on body physiology. Dressing changes in paediatric patients with burn injuries are frequently performed with analgesics alone where sedation is not indicated, especially in minor and superficial burns. It is hypothesised that distraction methods can be used in addition to pain alleviating medication to reduce the experience of pain in these patients.

With this research project, we aim to assess the effectiveness of a simple, inexpensive, non-electronic distraction method, a kaleidoscope, to reduce acute pain experienced in paediatric patients undergoing dressing changes in the outpatient clinic.

A randomised controlled trial will be performed at the Ngwelezana Tertiary Hospital, Empangeni, South Africa. Paediatric patients between the ages of 5 years and 12 years with minor and superficial partial thickness burn injuries who require dressing changes in the outpatient clinic, without sedation, will be randomised into two groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Fixed randomisation will be performed by a computer random number generator. The control group will receive standard practice of care which concerns a dressing change without any distraction methods, and the intervention group will receive distraction by use of a kaleidoscope as an additional method for potential pain alleviation. Patients in both groups will receive paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when indicated according to hospital protocol. The primary outcome will be the change in pain score from pre-procedural to pain score during the dressing change and will be analysed with a linear regression analysis. Additionally, subanalyses will be performed to evaluate potentially modifying factors on the treatment effect. This will also be evaluated with a linear regression analysis and correlated with caregiver and healthcare worker observational pain scores. Participants and assessors are not blinded to group assignment due to the nature of the intervention. To achieve a power of 80% and a level of significance of 5% for detecting at least a 1-point difference in change in pain scores between the intervention and control group, a sample size of 50 patients in each group is required.

This study evaluates a non-invasive adjunct to reduce pain in children who undergo a painful procedure. Ethical approval has been granted from the University of Kwazulu-Natal’s biomedical research and ethics committee and the ethics and research committee of Ngwelezana Tertiary Hospital prior to recruitment (ref no. BREC/00005194/2023). Written informed consent will be acquired from all study participants’ caregivers. Study findings will be presented orally to staff at the paediatric burn unit of Ngwelezana Tertiary Hospital (study location). The research methodology and results will be presented at scientific conferences and will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

NCT06591195.