This study explored the lived experiences of internet addiction among Taiwanese junior college students. Specifically, it examined their perceptions of addiction, experiences of excessive use and attempts to manage their online behaviours.

A descriptive phenomenological approach involving one-on-one, semi-structured, in-depth interviews was employed. Data analysis was conducted using Giorgi’s phenomenological method assisted by NVivo V.12.

The interviewees were from a junior college with two campuses in northern Taiwan.

Purposive and snowball sampling of 15 junior college students. All participants met the criteria for internet addiction using the Chen Internet Addiction Scale.

Three main themes and eight subthemes were identified: continuous provocation (childhood exposure and unexpected pandemic), continuous promotion (irresistible immersion and compensatory self-isolation) and continuous resistance (varied self-awareness, dilemmas, perceived insignificance and futility). This study also explored how junior college students with internet addiction repeatedly struggle to resist a seamless virtual world.

From the perspective of adolescents with internet addiction, early exposure to the internet, the boost of the pandemic, the growing demand, and negative beliefs and attitudes all contribute to the inability to overcome internet addiction. These findings offer valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of internet addiction, providing mental health professionals with a deeper understanding and establishing a foundation for the development of future intervention strategies.

HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention interventions are only modestly successful among youth, particularly for young people of colour and sexual and gender minority (SGM) youth. Even among disparate intervention modalities delivered with high fidelity, differences between intervention types have been minimal. One consistent theme has emerged: the role of the youth:provider relationship in predicting intervention response. In line with calls for examination of relational factors, the next essential step is a harmonised analysis to evaluate connections between the youth:provider relationship and co-occurrence of alcohol and cannabis use, in youth HIV/STI prevention intervention response.

Our team has completed six sizeable HIV/STI behavioural prevention studies, generating n=1136 independent youth (baseline M_age=17, range=13–24; 43% female; 21% SGM; 54% Hispanic; 9% African American; 7% Native American/Alaska Native) who received prevention programming and were followed at 1-, 3-, 6-, and/or 12 months. We will harmonise these studies and build a longitudinal mixed-effects machine learning model, with youth:provider relationship as a predictor of intervention response. Participant factors, provider factors and their interaction will be included in the model. Given high rates of alcohol and cannabis comorbidity, we will also examine syndemic outcomes (co-occurring HIV/STI risk behaviours, alcohol use and cannabis use). These data are crucial to informing next step HIV/STI and syndemic intervention programming with this age group.

This secondary analysis study is exempt from human subjects regulations under category 4(iii) as determined by the Institutional Review Board at UConn Health. Results will be disseminated via presentations at annual scientific conferences, submissions to peer-reviewed journals, to mental health and substance use providers, as well as community programmes for youth at high risk for HIV/STI and substance use.

This study aimed to investigate the association between smoking behaviours during early pregnancy and the risk and severity of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), with a particular focus on smoking status, smoking intensity and secondhand smoke exposure.

Secondary analysis of prospectively collected cohort data.

Multi-centre study conducted in South Korea (Korean Pregnancy Outcome Study) between March 2013 and January 2017.

From 4537 pregnant women initially enrolled, 3457 singleton pregnancies were included after excluding cases with transfer, loss to follow-up, twin pregnancies, miscarriages and pre-existing diabetes mellitus. All participants were women of Korean ethnicity.

Primary outcome was GDM and its subtypes (A1GDM: diet-controlled; A2GDM: insulin-requiring). Secondary outcomes were associations with active smoking (before pregnancy and during early pregnancy), smoking intensity dose–response relationships (pack-years) and secondhand smoke exposure among never-smokers.

Among 3457 participants, 231 women (6.7%) were diagnosed with GDM (198 A1GDM, 33 A2GDM). Active smoking before pregnancy (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.98, 95% CI 1.58 to 9.30) and during early pregnancy (aOR 9.90, 95% CI 2.97 to 29.45) were significantly associated with A2GDM, while no significant association was observed with A1GDM. A clear dose-response relationship was observed, with smoking intensity >4 pack-years markedly increasing A2GDM risk (aOR 20.68, 95% CI 6.75 to 59.39). Detailed pack-year analysis showed 4–6 pack-years (aOR 20.57, 95% CI 5.80 to 65.46) and >6 pack-years (aOR 25.98, 95% CI 3.21 to 146.45). Among never-smokers, secondhand smoke exposure showed a borderline association with overall GDM risk (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.81).

Maternal active smoking before and during early pregnancy, as well as higher smoking intensity, was associated with an increased risk of pharmacologically treated GDM (A2GDM). Although secondhand smoke exposure did not reach statistical significance, the trend suggested a potential association with GDM risk among never-smokers. These findings provide important evidence for public health strategies for prenatal care, as smoking cessation and environmental smoke avoidance during prenatal and early antenatal care in women reduce the risk of gestational diabetes.

Social media is a significant source of information for post-secondary students, who are usually at the age at which many common mental disorders first express themselves. Social media can have a role in the way post-secondary students identify and act on mental health issues.

Explore how the use of social media influences post-secondary students’ adoption of mental health labels.

We included empirical studies on mental health labelling in the context of social media use among post-secondary students published in English between January 1995 and April 2025.

The review includes references from five databases: Scopus, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE (to access APA PsycINFO), Web of Science and ProQuest Global Dissertations and Theses. Based on the included studies from the initial search, we built a complementary search strategy using Research Rabbit artificial intelligence.

We present a table listing characteristics of the studies and brief summaries of their findings. A narrative synthesis compiled the information from each study to answer the research questions.

The search identified 7551 references and 1099 additional records from Research Rabbit. 11 studies published since 2011 met the inclusion criteria with qualitative, mixed methods and quantitative designs, without major quality concerns. Approaches to measuring social media exposure varied, including platform reports of user activity and self-reported indicators. Individuals adopted labels themselves or received labels from peers or researchers. Most research focused on self-presentation and symptom disclosure rather than labelling itself. The accuracy of self-diagnosis was higher for common disorders and lower for complex conditions such as mania or panic disorders. Labelling varied across social media platforms. Online interaction revealed issues that students were reluctant to share face-to-face. Label use appeared to influence help-seeking and peer support, with effects shaped by social stigma.

The adoption of mental health labels via social media among post-secondary students remains largely unexplored. The concept of labelling and its operationalisation vary across research. Future studies should provide more formal definitions, investigate mechanisms driving labelling and assess its potential effects on human health.

Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) cause significant child morbidity and mortality. Periodical influenza vaccination and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prophylaxis can reduce this burden in risk groups. However, in the Caribbean, the optimal timing of these interventions is unclear due to a lack of epidemiological data. We aimed to investigate pathogens associated with RTI disease burden and pathogen specific seasonality in the Caribbean in the context of COVID-19 to achieve optimal timing of preventive measures.

We conducted a retrospective study using patient records and pathogen detection data from St. Maarten Medical Center from 1 September 2018 to 1 September 2023. We performed regression to associate pathogens with outcomes and seasonality.

RTI diagnoses accounted for 50.8% (N=7380) of outpatient cases and 28.0% (N=508) of inpatient cases. RSV and rhino/enterovirus were associated with more frequent oxygen requirement (OR 5.1 (95% CI 2.3 to 11) and OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.3), respectively) and tachypnoea/dyspnoea (OR 4.9 (95% CI 2.0 to 13) and OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.6 to 5.2), respectively) than other pathogens post-COVID-19. RSV consistently peaked during June/July and September/October, preceding RSV prophylaxis administration in October.

The overall burden on the healthcare system due to RTI visits and admissions was high. Higher disease severity was associated with RSV and rhino/enterovirus infections; therefore, universal RSV prophylaxis should be considered, and timing should be optimised based on seasonality.

Implantable neuromodulation therapies are offered to patients with certain refractory pain syndromes. These therapies are resource-intensive and effort-intensive and may be associated with significant adverse effects. Change in pain intensity score, an unidimensional measurement tool, is currently the most used eligibility criteria for patients to receive implanted neuromodulation devices. However, pain is a biopsychosocial phenomenon, and assessment of effectiveness of neuromodulation therapies using tools that incorporate multiple pain-related domains may be more relevant and accurate. Composite measures integrate multiple domains of patient well-being, enabling a clinically relevant assessment of treatment effects. This systematic review aims to evaluate the literature on the clinical utility and reliability of composite outcomes as a means to assess efficacy of implantable neuromodulation therapies for refractory pain.

We will search Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the WHO’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Searches will be limited to from inception of each database to 31 December 2025. Studies published in English will be considered eligible if they used composite outcomes to evaluate the efficacy and/or effectiveness of implantable neuromodulation therapies for treating refractory pain. The studies should investigate adult populations (aged ≥18 years) undergoing implantation for chronic refractory pain of moderate-to-severe intensity. Two reviewers will independently screen articles, extract data and review the risk of bias and the grade of evidence provided in the studies. Extracted data will include study details (author, year, country of origin), participant demographics (age, sex), sample sizes and intervention details. Outcome measures include pain intensity, physical health, mental health, quality of life, medication use and neuromodulation device explantation rates. Data will be collected at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-implantation where available. A meta-analysis will be formed if there is sufficient homogeneity in the studies and their data.

As this study is a systematic review using data that has already been published in scientific literature or is publicly available, ethics approval is not required. For dissemination, we plan to share the findings of our review through multiple academic and clinical channels. The completed review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal relevant to pain medicine or neuromodulation.

CRD42025631488.

To synthesise the current evidence about practices, preferences and challenges related to returning aggregate research results to participants, with implications for public health, health equity and policy development.

Scoping review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews framework.

Four electronic databases—PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Excerpta Medica Database (Elsevier), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (Elton B. Stephens CO(mpany)) and Cochrane Library (Wiley)—were from inception to February 2025.

English-language, peer-reviewed articles reporting practices or preferences for returning aggregate clinical research results to participants. Studies reporting only individual/incidental findings, opinion pieces and non-original research were excluded.

Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Study quality was assessed using a modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine scale. Thematic synthesis identified patterns in dissemination methods, participant preferences and implementation barriers.

Of 272 articles screened, 12 published between 2002 and 2019 were included. They employed cross-sectional, qualitative and mixed-methods design across North America, Europe, Africa and Australia. Half focused on cancer; others addressed malaria, autism, hypothyroidism, HIV prevention and preterm labour. Most (8/12) included patients; others also included researchers, caregivers or mixed stakeholders. Participants were predominantly middle-aged or older, female and well-educated. Only two studies assessed literacy, both using unvalidated self-reports. Eight studies explored preferences without returning results; four implemented disseminations via mailed reports, printed summaries, in-person discussions or digital platforms. Participants favoured mailed letters and face-to-face meetings over online methods. Six themes emerged: receiving results as respect; preference for personalised, timely formats; importance of cultural tailoring; emotional and ethical considerations; institutional barriers; and community engagement as a facilitator.

Returning aggregate research results to participants is ethically supported and strongly desired yet rarely practised. Bridging this gap requires clearer policy guidance, institutional support and equity-focused dissemination strategies. Health systems and researchers should adopt scalable, participant-centred approaches to fulfil ethical obligations and strengthen public trust in science.

To investigate whether systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) increases the risk of cataract development and to evaluate the impact of corticosteroid use and dosage on this risk.

Nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) database, which covers over 99.9% of the population.

The SLE cohort included 30 501 newly diagnosed adults from 2011 to 2020. For each patient with SLE, four individuals without SLE were selected from the NHI database using frequency matching by age (in 5 year intervals), gender and index year of diagnosis, resulting in a comparison cohort of 122 004 individuals.

The primary outcome was incident cataract. Secondary outcomes included risk stratification by age, sex, comorbidities and corticosteroid dose.

SLE patients had a higher incidence of cataracts than non-SLE individuals (adjusted HR (aHR) = 1.73, 95% CI 1.66 to 1.81). Stratified analyses showed elevated risks in women (aHR=1.74, 95% CI 1.66 to 1.83), men (aHR=1.68, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.86), and across age groups 20–49 years (aHR=2.32, 95% CI 2.11 to 2.56), 50–64 years (aHR=1.60, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.69), and ≥65 years (aHR=1.50, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.66). Analysis of corticosteroid exposure revealed that cumulative dose showed a trend towards increased risk at high exposure (adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.14, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.31), while average daily dose demonstrated a dose–response effect: 1–5 mg/day (aOR=1.31, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.52) and ≥5 mg/day (OR=2.48, 95% CI 2.16 to 2.86).

Adults with SLE have an increased risk of developing cataracts compared with matched controls, and higher average daily corticosteroid doses are associated with this risk. These findings highlight the need for careful monitoring of ocular complications in SLE patients.

To explore the association between the degree of coronary artery calcium (CAC) and the progression of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD).

A single-centre retrospective cohort study using a hospital-based database.

A total of 2898 patients who underwent coronary CT angiography and serial echocardiograms at ≥6 months apart were included. Initial echocardiography was performed within 6 months from the time of CCTA.

CAC was divided into four groups: 0, 1–99, 100–399 and ≥400 (Agatston units, AU). The progression of CAVD was defined in two ways: progression 1 as at least one grade of progression, progression 2 as at least moderate aortic stenosis (AS) at follow-up.

At the initial CAVD grade, patients with at least mild AS tended to increase with increasing CAC (p

CAC was significantly associated with the progression of CAVD. Particularly, CAC≥400 was linked to progression toward significant AS.

Infertility resulting from cancer treatment is known to be a major factor that reduces the quality of life of young cancer survivors. However, discussions and decision-making about fertility preservation before cancer treatment have been insufficient owing to barriers in the clinical field. In addition, selecting a fertility preservation option requires a complex decision-making process that considers not only medical information but also the patient’s values and preferences. Hence, an environment that more easily supports patient decision-making about fertility preservation needs to be created. Therefore, this protocol will develop and test a web-based decision aid (DA) for fertility preservation among young patients with cancer, considering patient preferences and values, evaluate acceptability and usability of the developed DA and assess its effectiveness.

This protocol outlines the development of a web-based DA for fertility preservation targeting females of reproductive age diagnosed with cancer. It includes alpha testing to evaluate the usability and acceptability of the DA, as well as beta testing to assess its effectiveness outside of clinical settings, both based on an online survey. The web-based DA for fertility preservation consists of three modules: 1) an information collection module, 2) an option suggestion module and 3) a value communication module. The information collection module collects information essential to select appropriate fertility preservation options. The option suggestion module returns all applicable fertility preservation options based on the patient’s characteristics, which are essential for determining the appropriate option, such as menarche status and desire for pregnancy. The value communication module provides information on the extent to which each fertility preservation option satisfies the patient’s values and preferences. After the development of the DA, a small group of young patients with cancer (n=10) and health providers (n=5) will be asked to use this web-based DA for fertility preservation and assess the acceptability and usability of this DA based on a survey (alpha-testing). By reflecting the feedback of acceptability and usability testing, the DA will be updated for improvement, and clinical field testing (beta-testing pilot trial) will be performed using the updated DA. Beta-testing will be conducted on young patients with cancer (aged 18–40 years) before they receive any curative cancer treatment (n=32). These patients with cancer will be randomly allocated to the DA group (intervention group) or the usual care group (control group). The DA group will use the web-based DA before treatment, and the control group will not have access to the web-based DA and will be asked to decide whether to consult a fertility preservation specialist. The primary outcome of the beta testing will be the level of decisional conflict, and the secondary outcomes will include knowledge, decision self-efficacy, decision readiness, depression severity, quality of life, counselling on fertility preservation and decision-making about fertility preservation. Outcomes, including decisional conflict, knowledge, decision self-efficacy, quality of life and depression severity, will be measured before the intervention (T0), 1 week after the intervention (T1) and 1 month after the intervention (T2). The readiness for decision-making will be assessed at T1 for the intervention group only. Counselling on fertility preservation and decision-making about fertility preservation will be assessed once after testing (T2) for both the intervention and control groups.

The study will be conducted in accordance with ethical standards and was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the National Cancer Centre, Korea (IRB No. NCC2024-0050). All study participants will provide written informed consent before participation. The results generated from this study will be presented at conferences or scientific meetings and disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

NCT07038174 (beta-testing phase).

To characterise neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) parents’ grieving process across time and to identify their perspectives on the healthcare providers’ actions that acted as facilitators or barriers to the grieving process in the short (3–9 months) and longer term (18–24 months).

Longitudinal mixed-methods study combining standardised grief and care satisfaction scales with qualitative data collected through semistructured interviews. The qualitative component was guided by an interpretive description approach, which is well-suited for generating clinically relevant insights into complex human experiences such as parental grief. Triangulating quantitative and qualitative data enhanced insight into how parental grief and perceptions of care evolved between 3–9 months and 18–24 months post loss.

Tertiary-level NICU hospital in British Columbia, Canada.

13 parents participated in the study, including 10 mothers and three fathers. Among them were two couples who participated as individuals. Their median age was 35 years (IQR: 32–38).

Quantitative data obtained through the application of the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) and care satisfaction scale and qualitative data collected through semistructured interviews. Data were collected at two points (3–9 months and 18–24 months post loss) to track parents’ grief over time.

The PGS scores indicated active grieving without complicated grief, while the Care Satisfaction Scale reflected high overall satisfaction with care. Thematic analysis identified two primary grieving stages: the initial traumatic event during NICU hospitalisation and the complex adjustment to life post loss. Key factors influencing parents’ coping mechanisms included respecting the infant’s dignity, enhancing communication and decision-making, preserving the bond between parents and the NICU team, nurturing enduring connections with the infant and aiding in finding meaning from the experience.

The study outlined the stages parents experience during and after infant loss, offering practical steps for NICU professionals to aid families in their healing process.

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a group of conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), masticatory muscles and associated structures, often leading to pain, dysfunction and a significant impact on quality of life. Epidemiological studies have estimated that up to 75% of the population in the USA exhibits at least one sign of TMD. Although conservative treatments, such as acupuncture and occlusal splints, have been recommended, evidence for their effectiveness remains inconclusive, and the combined effects of these interventions are not well understood.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an intraoral balance appliance (IBA) combined with standard Korean medicine care, compared to Korean medicine care alone, in patients with chronic, painful TMD with myalgia.

A single-centre, two-arm, parallel, practitioner-blinded and evaluator-blinded, randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio will be designed to test the interventions. 76 patients with TMD with myalgia will be recruited and randomised. The interventions will include manual acupuncture and physical therapy for both groups, with the addition of IBA in the treatment group for 3 weeks. The primary outcomes of the study will be the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and discomfort at the final visit at week 4. Secondary outcomes will include overall functional assessment of the TMJ using several scales, as well as evaluations of quality of life, patient satisfaction and AEs.

The recruitment started on 18 July 2024, and 37 patients were included as of 8 July 2025.

Ethical approval is obtained from the Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB number: KOMCIRB 2023-06-001). The result from this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations.

The protocol was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea, on 30 October 2023, CRiS number KCT0008906 prior to the initiation of the study, and was revised on 7 July 2025 (https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=30270&search_page=M&search_lang=&class_yn=).