FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Lobeglitazone and the risk of renal progression in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study

Por: Hong · S.-h. · Lee · H. · Lee · S.-y. · Sung · Y.-A. · Hong · Y. S. · Song · D. K. · Jung · H. · Kim · M.-h.
Objective

To evaluate the effect of lobeglitazone on renal disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using longitudinal real-world data.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Hospital-based Common Data Model database.

Participants

A total of 14 712 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who visited the Diabetes Center of Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital between 2013 and 2019 were identified. A 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to compare patients treated with lobeglitazone plus metformin with those receiving metformin monotherapy, sulfonylurea plus metformin, or a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor plus metformin.

Interventions

Treatment with lobeglitazone plus metformin compared with metformin monotherapy, sulfonylurea plus metformin or DPP4 inhibitor plus metformin.

Primary outcome measures

Renal progression, defined as initiation of renal replacement therapy, a sustained ≥30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline, or doubling of serum creatinine with a concurrent eGFR ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m².

Results

The HR of renal progression was 0.84 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.21) in the lobeglitazone plus metformin compared with metformin monotherapy, 1.00 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.27) compared with sulfonylurea plus metformin group, 1.10 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.44) compared with DPP4 inhibitor plus metformin group after adjusting for multiple variables. Subgroup analyses demonstrated significant interactions by sex in the comparison with metformin monotherapy (P for interaction=0.0179) and by glycaemic control in the comparisons with sulfonylurea plus metformin (P for interaction=0.0161) and DPP4 inhibitor plus metformin (P for interaction=0.0006), suggesting potential heterogeneity in treatment effects.

Conclusions

Lobeglitazone showed renal outcomes comparable to those of other antidiabetic medications, with a possible heterogeneity in treatment effects according to sex and glycaemic control.

Sustaining Dignity at Life's End: A Meta‐Ethnographic Study of Nurses' Insights

ABSTRACT

Aim

To systematically synthesise nurses' perspectives on dignified death, providing a culturally informed and comprehensive understanding.

Design

Meta-ethnography.

Methods

This study was conducted using Noblit and Hare's approach, which included reciprocal translation, refutational synthesis, and line-of-argument synthesis. Methodological rigour and credibility were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist. The review included peer-reviewed qualitative studies published in English or Korean that focused on nurses' or nursing students' views on dignified death in end-of-life care.

Data Sources

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Web of Science in August 2023, with an updated search in August 2024. Seventeen qualitative studies published between 2010 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria.

Results

Four interconnected themes emerged: A death that embraces humanity, a death that preserves personal identity, a death that facilitates connection and reconciliation, and a death that affirms acceptance and spiritual serenity. These themes, including eight sub-themes, highlight cultural influences shaping nurses' approaches to dignified death.

Conclusion

The findings emphasise the influence of cultural context in shaping end-of-life care and support the development of culturally sensitive nursing education and guidelines to enhance care quality.

Implications for the Profession and Patient Care

This research provides culturally grounded strategies to improve end-of-life care and strengthen nurses' competencies in delivering holistic support.

Impact

This study highlights cultural variations in nurses' approaches to balancing autonomy, family expectations, and spiritual needs, offering practical insights for holistic, patient-centred, and culturally sensitive care.

Reporting Method

This review complies with the Equator and improving reporting of meta-ethnography (eMERGe) guidelines.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

A Conceptual Analysis of Psychological Burnout Among Nurses Providing Terminal Care

ABSTRACT

Aim

To analyse the concept of psychological burnout among nurses in the context of terminal care.

Design

Concept analysis.

Methods

The study was conducted according to the eightstep conceptual analysis procedure suggested by Walker and Avant.

Data Sources

Articles published in English or Korean between January 2014 and 2024 were reviewed in March 2024. A total of eight search engines were used for the literature review, including PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and PsycINFO. A total of 19 articles were finally selected for the analysis based on criteria.

Results

The attributes of psychological burnout among nurses providing terminal care are depletion of energy, emotional numbness, disengagement, sense of powerlessness and emotional repression. Seven antecedents and six consequences of the concept were identified in this study.

Conclusion

The result of this study provides a foundation for the development of tailored interventions and further research related to the occurrence of psychological burnout among nurses providing terminal care. Additionally, considering the characteristics of terminal care, we suggest additional studies to confirm the attributes of burnout in this context across various cultural and religious backgrounds.

Implication for the Profession and/or Patient Care

This study helps clarify the concept of psychological burnout among nurses in terminal care and informs the development of various interventions, educational programmes and related policies.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patients or public contribution.

Trajectories of Nursing Care During the Critical and Intensive Phases After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study

ABSTRACT

Aim

To examine the trajectories of nursing care during the critical and intensive phases after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, using standardised electronic nursing records.

Design

Retrospective observational study.

Methods

The electronic nursing records of 122 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft from a tertiary hospital were collected between September 2021 and September 2023. Among the 287,360 extracted nursing statements, the 427 most frequent statements were mapped to SNOMED CT. Nursing data were categorised into pre- and postoperative phases, and a heatmap was used to visualise daily nursing care trends during the first 8 days post-surgery.

Results

In total, 287,360 nursing statements were extracted and semantically mapped, with 90.9% linked to pre-coordinated SNOMED CT concepts. The results showed that in the acute postoperative phase, clinical priorities included respiratory management and surgical drain care. As recovery progressed, priorities expanded to include pressure injury prevention, safety monitoring, and effective interdisciplinary communication.

Conclusions

The analysis using standardised nursing records identified dynamic care patterns after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and supports the development of disease-specific, evidence-based nursing practice guidelines.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

Support for evidence-based nursing care for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Impact

This study addressed the limited development of nursing-focused clinical practice guidelines by demonstrating how real-world nursing data can be leveraged to develop disease-specific, evidence-based guidance. By mapping electronic nursing records to international standard terminology, the study advanced a methodological approach for systematically capturing and analysing nursing care trajectories over time. The findings reveal dynamic patterns of nursing interventions during postoperative care and provide empirical support for developing standardised, data-driven nursing guidelines, ultimately strengthening evidence-based practice in acute and critical care settings.

Reporting Method

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.

Patient or Public Contribution

This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

A pilot study on the acoustic effects of a pseudo-palatal plate on speech: Implications for articulatory rehabilitation devices

by Seong Tak Woo, Sungdae Na

Intraoral palatal plates used in electropalatography (EPG) and tongue-interface systems are designed to monitor articulatory movement with minimal disruption to speech. However, their presence may subtly influence acoustic characteristics by altering tongue mobility and intraoral airflow. This study examines the acoustic effects of a pseudo-palatal plate during the articulation of consonants and vowels. Speech samples from healthy adults were recorded with and without the plate and analyzed using spectral and phonatory measures, including Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), second formant (F2) slope, jitter, shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), and quadrilateral vowel space area (qVSA). MFCC-based correlation coefficients and F2 slopes remained highly consistent across conditions, indicating minimal impact on consonant articulation. Shimmer (−0.72%), HNR (+2.5 dB), and qVSA (−24.1%) exhibited directionally consistent changes, with qVSA trending toward reduction; however, overall variation was limited. Vowel formant structures and consonant production were preserved mainly, suggesting that the palatal plate did not significantly impair vocal function. These findings support the interpretation that observed acoustic shifts are more consistent with filter-level effects than with changes at the glottal source. Although palatal plates may introduce minor acoustic variations, their impact on speech production appears minimal, reinforcing their suitability for therapeutic and assistive use, provided that acoustic considerations are addressed during design and clinical implementation.

Needling Therapy for Burn Injury and Related Complications: A Scoping Review of Experimental and Clinical Studies

ABSTRACT

Needling therapy may be a novel alternative therapeutic intervention for burn injuries and related complications. This scoping review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the evidence status of needling therapy for burns and their complications. Studies on needling therapy for burns and related complications were retrieved from inception to 1st June 2024. Nine databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CNKI, CiNii, RISS, KISS, DBpia and OASIS) were searched without any language or study-type restrictions. The study design, details of the needling therapy, and results of needling for burn injuries (or related complications) were evaluated. Of the 1475 articles screened, 46 studies (comprising 16 experimental studies, 12 case studies, four observational studies, 13 randomised controlled trials, and one systematic review) were included in the final analysis. Most studies (71.7%) investigated the acute-phase burn wound healing process, while the remaining studies (28.3%) focused on the modulation of burn-related complications. Experimental studies demonstrated that needling therapy activates phases of the wound healing process including the inflammation, proliferation, and remodelling phases and modulates the cholinergic anti-inflammatory response in burn-related acute symptoms. Clinical studies exhibited a significant heterogeneity regarding treatment period, patient population, and needling type across different study designs. Experimental studies have primarily focused on the wound healing process itself, whereas clinical studies have investigated short-term outcomes related to burn complications, with great heterogeneity observed in the methods of needling employed. Further studies are required to strengthen research gaps between experimental and clinical research, with proper treatment and evaluation periods to demonstrate the effectiveness of needling therapy for burns and associated complications.

Trial Registration: INPLASY202450102

Association between cumulative radiation dose and haematological parameters among Korean radiation workers: a retrospective cohort study

Por: Sung · H. · Cha · E. S. · Lee · D. N. · Park · S. · Jang · W. I. · Cho · M. · Ko · Y.-J. · Ju · S. D. · Kim · J.-H. · Seo · S.
Objective

To evaluate the association between cumulative radiation dose and haematological parameters among radiation workers and compare the prevalences of abnormalities in blood counts with those in the general population.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Nationwide radiation dose registry in Korea, linked with occupational health examination data. Cumulative doses were estimated using annual personal dose equivalent (Hp(10)) records from 1984 onward.

Participants

The study included 20 414 radiation workers, comprising 17 651 men (86.5%) and 2763 women (13.5%), with baseline survey data, dosimetry records and at least one complete blood count (CBC) record between 2014 and 2019.

Primary and secondary outcomes

The primary outcome was the continuous haematological parameters, including white blood cell (WBC), platelet (PLT) and haemoglobin (Hb) counts, in relation to cumulative radiation dose. Associations were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models incorporating repeated measurements and adjusting for age, smoking status and body mass index. The secondary outcome was the prevalence of abnormal blood counts among radiation workers.

Results

Most haematological parameters among radiation workers were within normal ranges. In male workers, cumulative radiation dose was associated with increased Hb levels (β=0.5 mg/dL per 1 mSv; 95% CI 0.006 to 0.9) after adjusting for age, smoking status and body mass index. No significant associations were observed between cumulative dose and WBC or PLT counts in either sex. Overall, compared with the general population, radiation workers had significantly lower standardised prevalence ratios for abnormal WBC and PLT counts.

Conclusion

No substantial adverse changes in haematological parameters were found among radiation workers exposed to prolonged low-dose radiation. The findings suggest that cumulative doses at occupational levels may not substantially affect CBC profiles, although continued monitoring and follow-up are warranted.

Associations between oral health behaviours, oral health, salivary biomarkers and clinical phenotype in individuals with alcohol use disorder: protocol for a longitudinal observational study

Por: Maki · K. A. · Xu · S. · Wallen · G. R. · Gerrard · C. · Sung · C. · Papneja · S. · Tuason · R. T. S. · Ramchandani · V. A. · Diazgranados · N. · Barb · J. J.
Introduction

Binge drinking in the previous month was reported in 23.5% of US adults, and 28.1 million adults met criteria for Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) in 2023. Individuals with AUD face increased risks of oral health problems, including caries, periodontal disease and mucosal lesions. Poor oral hygiene, nutrition and dental care all contribute to these conditions, but individuals with AUD are often under-represented in oral health surveys. Understanding relationships between oral health behaviours, attitudes and general health is crucial for designing future interventions. This pilot aims to explore the relationship between oral and systemic health in subjects with AUD, focusing on oral health behaviours, salivary biomarkers and clinical phenotype, including systemic biomarkers of inflammation, to inform future research on oral–systemic interactions in AUD.

Methods and analysis

This protocol has two parts. Part 1 involves cognitive interviews to assess the content validity and interpretability of the Oral Health Behaviours Assessment (OHBA) questionnaire. Part 2 will collect biological and behavioural data from treatment-seeking patients with AUD and matched controls (age, sex and smoking status), including saliva, blood, dental exams, and health behaviour and symptom measures. Inpatients with AUD will provide biospecimens and answer symptom severity questionnaires at admission and again at the dental exam visit (7–12 days later), while controls will provide a single set of measures at their dental exam visit. Oral health will be assessed through structured dental and periodontal examinations, radiographs and validated questionnaires (including the OHBA). Additional data will include alcohol use history, psychiatric and medical history assessments, dietary recall, and measures of stress, sleep and mood to capture potential moderators of oral–systemic relationships. Biomarkers of inflammation and stress will be quantified from saliva and blood using immunoassays. Primary outcomes will compare oral health, salivary biomarkers and clinical measures between AUD and controls, while secondary outcomes will evaluate within-subject changes in patients with AUD during inpatient treatment and early abstinence.

Ethics and dissemination

This clinical protocol was approved by the National Institutes of Health Institutional Review Board (IRB #002005). Prior to enrolling, participants will be informed of the study purpose, risks and benefits, and study procedures, and evaluated for understanding prior to signing consent. Part 1 of the protocol is currently active and recruiting participants for cognitive interviews. The study findings will be disseminated through journals and conferences related to addiction medicine, psychology, immunology, neuroscience and dentistry. We expect the results of the pilot study will inform future research on oral health and salivary bioscience while also providing treatment-seeking patients with AUD targeted information on the importance of oral health behaviours for maintaining oral and systemic health.

Trial registration number

NCT06684483; preresults.

Clinical impact of prophylactic antibiotics in kidney transplantation: A retrospective observational cohort study with historical comparison

by Sang Ah Lee, Jin-Myung Kim, Hye Eun Kwon, Youngmin Ko, Joo Hee Jung, Sung Shin, Young Hoon Kim, Sung-Han Kim, Hyunwook Kwon

Purpose

Optimal perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in kidney transplantation remains undefined despite routine antibiotic administration to prevent infections. In this retrospective observational cohort study with historical comparison, we compared the clinical efficacy of 6 days of ampicillin/sulbactam vs. a single dose of cefazolin.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 2322 kidney transplantation recipients at a single center, with the evaluation period spanning from 2015 through 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the perioperative antibiotic regimen received: 971 patients received ampicillin/sulbactam, and 1351 received cefazolin. This study focused on evaluating the impact of these regimens on postoperative infection incidence and the 6-month acute rejection (AR) rates.

Results

The cefazolin group exhibited a tendency toward higher urinary tract infection rates within 1 month after transplantation (3.4% vs. 2.2%, p= = 0.078). There were no significant differences in surgical site infections between the groups. The 6-month AR rates were significantly lower in the cefazolin group than in the ampicillin/sulbactam group (5.1% vs. 7.9%, p= = 0.009). Cefazolin was also confirmed to be significantly associated with reduced 6-month AR rates in the multivariable logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval [0.45-0.89], p= = 0.009).

Conclusion

In this study, we observed that a single dose of cefazolin as perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis may lead to higher rates of postoperative urinary tract infections, but it could potentially lower the incidence of acute rejection within six months.

Effect of fascial closure using barbed sutures on incisional hernias in midline laparotomy for gynecological diseases: A multicenter randomized controlled trial (KGOG 4001)

by Yong Jae Lee, Nam Kyeong Kim, Kidong Kim, Chel Hun Choi, Keun Ho Lee, Jong-Min Lee, Kwang Beom Lee, Dong Hoon Suh, Sunghoon Kim, Min Kyu Kim, Seok Ju Seong, Myong Cheol Lim

Objective

To identify the effect of fascial closure using barbed sutures on the incidence of incisional hernia in patients undergoing elective midline laparotomy for gynecological diseases.

Methods

In this multicenter, non-blind randomized controlled trial conducted from February to December 2021, patients with a BMI 2 and aged >18 years, scheduled for midline laparotomy, were randomly assigned to receive either barbed (experimental) or non-barbed sutures (control) for fascial closure. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence rate of incisional hernia up to 1-year post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included incisional hernia up to 2-years post-surgery, wound complications, and postoperative pain assessed by Brief Pain Inventory-Korean scores, and Numeric Rating Scale.

Results

Out of 174 patients (experimental, 86; control, 88), 36 were excluded due to dropout or loss to follow-up, leaving 138 patients (experimental, 67; control, 71) included in the analysis. The groups were balanced in terms of cancer surgeries, mean wound length, and mean surgery time. The cumulative incidence rates of incisional hernia up to 1-year (0.0% vs. 1.4%; p > 0.999) and 2-years (0.0% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.496) post-surgery did not differ significantly between the experimental and control groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of wound dehiscence 4 weeks post-surgery, cumulative incidences of wound dehiscence and wound infection up to 4 weeks post-surgery, or postoperative pain scores between the groups.

Conclusions

Fascial closure using barbed sutures resulted in no cases of incisional hernia up to 2-years post-surgery, but did not demonstrate a significant reduction in incisional hernia rates compared with the non-barbed suture.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04643197

Rethinking Male Privilege and Gendered Authority in Nursing Leadership: A Sociological Analysis

ABSTRACT

Aim(s)

To critically examine how male privilege operates within nursing leadership by applying sociological theories that highlight the paradox of men's advancement in a female-majority profession.

Design

This position paper adopts a critical sociological lens to explore how gendered power structures continue to shape leadership in nursing.

Methods

Three interrelated sociological frameworks (tokenism, the glass escalator, and hegemonic masculinity) are applied to analyse how men, despite being numerically underrepresented, often reach leadership roles and hold institutional authority disproportionately. Literature from gender studies, nursing sociology, and workforce research is synthesised to trace patterns of privilege and exclusion.

Results

The analysis demonstrates that male nurses often benefit from symbolic visibility, access to informal mentorship, and alignment with leadership norms that prioritise traits such as assertiveness and autonomy. Although some men encounter initial marginalisation, their minority status can enhance perceived legitimacy and accelerate advancement. However, these dynamics are not uniformly experienced. Intersections of race, sexuality, and citizenship significantly shape how male privilege is accessed and constrained.

Conclusion

Male privilege in nursing leadership is sustained by deeply rooted power structures. Addressing these disparities requires more than increasing male representation; it demands a redefinition of leadership values, and a critical review of the assumptions embedded in professional advancement.

Implications for the Profession

Identifying the structural and cultural mechanisms that support male advancement can inform more equitable leadership development, guide inclusive policy design, and challenge taken-for-granted assumptions about competence and authority in nursing.

Patient or Public Contribution

This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Prognostic role of effective radiation dose to immune cells in esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation

by Yoo Kyung Choi, Seok Hyun Son, Hong Seok Jang, In-Ho Kim, Sea-Won Lee, Soo-Yoon Sung

Background

Radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer can induce lymphopenia, potentially worsening outcomes. This study examines the association between clinical outcomes and the effective dose to the immune cells (EDIC), a measure of lymphocyte radiation exposure.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The EDIC was calculated based on the mean lung dose, mean heart dose, and integral total body dose using established models. Patients were stratified into high (n = 42) and low (n = 65) effective dose to the immune cells (EDIC) groups using a cut-off value of 4.28 Gy. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), were assessed.

Results

The 5-year OS and PFS rates were significantly lower in the high EDIC group than in the low EDIC group (51.9% vs. 66.6%, p = 0.043; 20.8% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified high EDIC as an independent predictor of poorer OS (hazard ratio (HR): 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–3.86, p = 0.024) and PFS (HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.04–2.78, p = 0.034). Similarly, the 5-year LRFS and DMFS rates were significantly lower in the high EDIC group than in the low EDIC group (24.1% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.003; 29.0% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.018, respectively).

Conclusion

A higher EDIC is an independent predictor of poor survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing CCRT. Reducing radiation exposure to the immune system through optimized radiation planning and lymphocyte-sparing techniques may improve patient outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of quick-soluble gelatin microparticles for transarterial embolization of the lower urinary tract: Preclinical study in a rabbit urinary bladder embolization model

by Sunghoon Jeon, Keunho Kim, Cheolwon Choe, Juil Choi, Gun Lee, Chung-Do Lee, Hyeon-Jeong Moon, Jun-Gyu Park, Jin-kyung Kim, Namsoon Lee, Dongwoo Chang

Quick-soluble gelatin microparticles (QS-GMP) are emerging embolic agents under investigation for temporary vascular occlusion, offering reduced ischemic risk compared to permanent materials. The aim of this preclinical study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of QS-GMP for transarterial embolization in a rabbit model of urinary bladder embolization. Twelve male New Zealand White rabbits underwent bilateral umbilical artery embolization using QS-GMP. Animals were assigned to four time-points (immediately, 3, 7, and 14 days post-embolization), with comprehensive assessments including clinical observations, hematologic and serum biochemical analysis, angiography, and histopathology. The procedure was technically feasible in all animals without intraoperative complications. Temporary hematuria and a transient decrease in body weight were observed post-procedure, both of which resolved spontaneously. Complete occlusion of the cranial vesical artery and absence of bladder wall perfusion were achieved immediately after embolization, followed by full recanalization at 3 days. Angiographic imaging at 7 and 14 days revealed transient hypervascularization of the bladder wall. Histopathological analysis showed marked edema, epithelial necrosis, and inflammatory infiltration at 3 and 7 days, with full urothelial regeneration observed at 14 days. No signs of ureteral or renal injury, or adverse systemic responses were detected. These findings suggest that QS-GMP may serve as a feasible option for temporary arterial occlusion in future veterinary lower urinary tract applications, although further long-term evaluation is warranted.

High-Intensity Statin versus Upfront Equivalent-Dose Combination of Moderate-Intensity Statin with Ezetimibe Following Acute Myocardial Infarction (ROSUZET-AMI): protocol of a multicentre, open-label, randomised non-inferiority trial

Por: Choo · E. H. · Kim · C. J. · Hwang · B.-H. · Lee · K. Y. · Oh · G. C. · Lim · S. · Choi · I. J. · Kim · D.-B. · Kwon · O. S. · Lee · S. · Choi · Y. · Park · C.-S. · Park · M.-W. · Kim · H.-Y. · Lee · H. C. · Kang · T. S. · Sung · J. K. · Woo · S.-I. · Park · H. S. · Yun · K. H. · Chang · K. · On
Introduction

High-intensity statin therapy is recommended as a first-line strategy for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A combination of moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe at an equivalent dose to high-intensity statin may achieve similar LDL-C reduction with fewer side effects. This study evaluates the long-term efficacy and safety of this approach, initiated following AMI, compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy.

Methods and analysis

The ROSUZET-AMI trial is a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Patients with AMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were randomised 1:1 to receive either moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe (rosuvastatin 5 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg) or high-intensity statin monotherapy (rosuvastatin 20 mg). The primary endpoint is the composite of cardiovascular death, major coronary events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, documented unstable angina requiring hospitalisation and all coronary revascularisation events occurring at least 30 days after randomisation), or non-fatal stroke.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital (No. 2020-0424-0003). Informed consent is obtained from every participant before randomisation. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed journals, and the key findings will be presented at international scientific conferences.

Trial registration number

NCT04499859.

Association between normal systolic blood pressure maintenance and the risk of coronary artery calcification progression in asymptomatic non-diabetic and diabetic adults: a retrospective cohort study using data from the Korea initiatives on coronary arter

Por: Won · K.-B. · Choi · S.-Y. · Chun · E. J. · Park · S. H. · Sung · J. · Jung · H. O. · Chang · H. J.
Objectives

To assess the association of normal systolic blood pressure maintenance (SBPmaintain) with coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression in non-diabetic and diabetic subjects at low to intermediate cardiovascular risk.

Design

Retrospective cohort study with a mean follow-up of 3.3 years.

Setting

Data from the Korea Initiatives on Coronary Artery Calcification registry were analysed.

Participants

10 754 asymptomatic Korean adults (51.5±8.6 years; 84.5% male; 14.2% diabetes) were enrolled. Participants were divided into two groups: normal SBPmaintain (maintain (≥120 mmHg) at the time of follow-up CAC scan.

Main outcome measures

CAC progression was defined as a difference of ≥2.5 between the square roots () of the baseline and follow-up coronary artery calcium score (CACS) (transformed CACS). Annualised transformed CACS was defined as transformed CACS divided by the interscan period.

Results

Compared with non-diabetics, the incidence of CAC progression was higher in diabetics (28.4% vs 47.3%, pmaintain was inversely associated with an annualised transformed CACS (β: –0.18, 95% CI: –0.25 to –0.12, pmaintain showed a lower risk of CAC progression than ≥elevated SBPmaintain in non-diabetics; however, this association was not observed in patients with diabetes.

Conclusions

Maintaining normal systolic blood pressure was associated with a significantly attenuated CAC progression, especially in clinical conditions without established diabetes.

How Nursing Home Professionals Frame the Perspective on Residents' Safety Management: A Q‐Methodology Approach

ABSTRACT

Aim

To identify a frame of reference for resident safety management in nursing homes.

Design

Q-methodology.

Methods

This study was conducted using Q-methodology to identify shared perspectives about resident safety management among nursing home professionals. Data were collected from 13 May 2023, through 29 August 2023. Thirty-four professionals, including nurses, care workers, social workers and physical therapists, classified Q-samples into a normal distribution grid through Q-sorting. Data analysis was performed using the PQmethod programme. Q-factors were interpreted by integrating interview transcripts, demographic data and factor arrays that organised the analysis results.

Results

The analysis included the Q-sort of 33 professionals, with an average age of 46.03 years and 6.53 years of nursing home experience, after excluding one individual who did not fit any Q-factor. Four Q factors explaining 63% of the total variance were identified: constructing individualised possible risk trajectories, utilising ingrained safety principles, creating supportive safety environments and coordinating safety principles with individual needs.

Conclusion

Understanding the diverse subjectivities of professionals can help develop strategies that promote collaboration among nursing home professionals and support preventive safety management practices.

Implications for Profession and/or Patient Care

The frame of reference derived from nursing home professionals' perspectives suggests a resident-tailored framework.

Impact

This study supports the development of interprofessional education tailored to the specific needs of nursing home settings by identifying shared perspectives among nursing home professionals. The findings highlight the need for clear guidelines to help professionals balance resident autonomy with safety and assess the impact of family involvement.

Reporting Method

Reporting involved qualitative and quantitative approaches, in compliance with the MMAT criteria for mixed-method research.

Patient or Public Contribution

No Patient or Public Contribution.

Co-designing, evaluating and implementing online supportive care for endometriosis in Australia: study protocol for the hybrid type 1 effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation randomised controlled trial of the CodeEndo program

Por: Mikocka-Walus · A. · Naude · C. · Coitinho Biurra · Y. · Blake · L. · Bowring · J. · De Araugo · S. · Bassili · A. · Bennetts · S. K. · Hutchinson · A. M. · Ng · C. H. M. · Prasertsung · C. · Skvarc · D. · Aras · D. · Ciccia · D. · O · E. · Jacka · F. · Staudacher · H. M. · Varney · J. · A
Introduction

Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting up to 11% of people presumed female at birth by the age of 44 years, characterised by the growth of tissue similar to the lining of the uterus on other organs. Endometriosis significantly impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and imposes a substantial burden on both individuals and the healthcare system. International guidelines recommend the interdisciplinary management of endometriosis due to its significant biopsychosocial burden; however, research aimed at exploring psychological approaches for endometriosis is limited. This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of CodeEndo, an online co-designed interdisciplinary supportive care program, compared with a waitlist control (WLC), on HRQoL and biopsychosocial outcomes in people with a diagnosis of endometriosis.

Methods and analysis

A hybrid type 1 effectiveness and implementation randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to either the CodeEndo program (n=176) or WLC group (n=176) for 8 weeks. The primary outcome will be HRQoL, and secondary outcomes will include psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression, stress), self-efficacy, menstrual, bladder and gastrointestinal symptoms, pain, fatigue, sleep, exercise, diet, symptom bothersomeness and physical and psychological well-being, measured at 8 weeks post-randomisation (T2) and 6-month follow-up (T3). Cost-effectiveness will also be examined. Longitudinal qualitative individual interviews (up to n=40) will be conducted with participants who complete the CodeEndo program to explore benefits, barriers and facilitators of ongoing use. Additionally, the CodeEndo program will undergo evaluation by a group of endometriosis healthcare providers, who will assess potential barriers and facilitators to its real-world implementation. Various process evaluation strategies will also be measured to inform future implementation. Data analyses will incorporate mixed-effects regression models on an intention-to-treat basis, cost-consequences and cost-utility, dietary and qualitative thematic analysis.

Ethics and dissemination

This protocol received ethics approval from Deakin University Research Ethics Committee (DUREC Ref: 2024-157). Dissemination is expected to include peer-reviewed journal articles, reports, conference presentations as well as websites or social media platforms of relevant chronic pain organisations. Participants will be sent a summary of trial results.

Trial registration number

ACTRN12623000598684p.

Influence of Workplace Bullying and Bystander Types on Speaking Up for Patient Safety Among Hospital Nurses: A Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT

Aims

To explore the influences of workplace bullying experiences, witnessing workplace bullying and bystander types on Speaking up for patient safety (SUPS) among hospital nurses.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

A survey was conducted in September 2021 using a structured questionnaire about workplace bullying experiences, witnessing workplace bullying, bystander types, and SUPS. The questionnaire was administered to 200 bedside nurses from two tertiary university hospitals in South Korea.

Results

One hundred and ninety-nine responses were analysed. A hierarchical regression model, incorporating organisational factors, workplace bullying experiences, witnessing workplace bullying, and bystander types explained approximately 44.0% of the variance in nurses' SUPS. Witnessing workplace bullying and the perpetrator-facilitating bystander negatively influenced SUPS, whereas victim-defending bystander had a positive influence on SUPS.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that witnessing workplace bullying and the bystander types of nurses working on patient care units are more impactful on nurses' SUPS than individual experiences of bullying. Notably, the victim-defending and perpetrator-facilitating bystander types were identified as key factors influencing SUPS.

Implications for the Profession

Nurse managers should understand the roles of witnesses and bystanders working on a patient care unit, and how these roles may extend beyond traditional views of perpetrators and victims. Developing strategies to support and effectively manage witnesses and bystanders working on patient care units may promote positive SUPS behaviours among clinical nurses.

Impact

What problem did the study address?

Speaking up for patient safety (SUPS) in clinical settings is critical in maintaining and enhancing patient safety. However, a negative work environment, such as one that promotes workplace bullying may hinder nurses' willingness to engage in SUPS. Because many nurses involved in workplace bullying may be witnesses or bystanders rather than direct perpetrators or victims of such situations, this study explored the potential influences of workplace bullying, including the roles of witnesses and bystanders, on SUPS. What were the main findings?

SUPS was influenced more by witnessing workplace bullying and specific bystander types, namely victim-defending and perpetrator-facilitating bystanders, than by workplace bullying experiences. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?

These findings highlight the importance of addressing the roles of witnesses and bystanders in workplace bullying. Nurse managers should broaden their focus beyond perpetrators and victims to include the roles and views of all nursing staff within a department. By effectively managing witnesses and bystander types, they can foster an environment that enhances SUPS behaviours among nurses.

Reporting Method

This study adhered to STROBE guidelines.

Patient or Public Contributions

No Patient or Public Contribution.

Theory-based chatbot for promoting colorectal cancer screening in a community setting in Hong Kong: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Por: Hu · Y. · Lau · W. M. · Wang · Z. J. · Tang · R. S. Y. · Wu · X. · Mo · P. K. H. · Wong · S. Y. S. · Meng · M. L. H. · Dong · D. · Sung · J. J. Y. · Lam · T. Y. T.
Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Despite the organised CRC screening programme, the uptake rate of the population-based CRC screening was still low. Thus, we will conduct a randomised controlled trial in a community setting to evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-based chatbot in promoting CRC screening uptake.

Methods and analysis

A total of 500 eligible participants will be randomly assigned to a WhatsApp Messenger-initiated chatbot outreach group or a standard text reminder group at a ratio of 1:1. The intervention group will deliver Chinese culturally tailored education texts and videos developed based on the Health Belief Model and the Trans-Theoretical Model. The control group will deliver a standard text reminder of information about the Hong Kong organised CRC screening programme. In addition to the baseline assessment and postintervention assessment, all subjects will be followed up for 3 months and 6 months, respectively. The primary outcome will be the CRC screening uptake rate at the 3 month and 6 month follow-up. The secondary outcomes will be the intention to undergo CRC screening uptake, time interval to participate in and complete screening after recruitment, and reasons for not participating in screening at the 3 month and 6 month follow-up. Quantitative data will be analysed using Student’s t-test, Pearson’s 2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Qualitative data will be analysed by thematic analysis.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval of this trial was granted by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong-New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (2022.614). Written informed consent will be obtained from study participants before enrolment. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number

The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06192862).

Effect of stay in a postpartum care institution on postpartum depression in women

Childbirth is a major life experience for women. From conception to arrival of the newborn, the physical and mental experience has a great impact and influence on mothers (Swanson et al., 2011), which may lead to emotional or mental disorders post partum (Dolatian et al., 2013; Roy-Byrne et al., 2016). Postpartum depression is a common problem in women (Motzfeldt et al., 2013). In the 6 weeks after birth, serious intentions or behaviours that can harm the mother or baby may have adverse effects on child growth and development (O'Hara and McCabe, 2013; Bennett et al., 2016).
❌