Conectar
Chronic diseases are a major global health burden, contributing to morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Self-care is essential for effective disease management, with health literacy (HL) and digital health literacy (eHL) playing a role in enabling individuals to engage in health-promoting behaviours. However, the relationship between HL and self-care remains inconclusive, necessitating further investigation to clarify its impact.
To synthesise evidence on the association between HL and self-care in chronic diseases and identify mediating and moderating factors influencing this relationship.
A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL, supplemented by manual reference checks and author correspondence.
This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines, including observational studies and RCTs assessing HL and self-care. Meta-analyses were performed using Fisher's Z transformation. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E and certainty of evidence was evaluated through GRADE.
A total of 138 studies were included, with 52 meta-analysed. Higher HL was associated with improved self-care behaviours, including medication adherence, disease monitoring and lifestyle modifications across chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, heart failure, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, asthma, coronary artery disease, arthritis and COPD. Psychological (self-efficacy, empowerment), cognitive (disease knowledge, decision-making) and social (healthcare communication, social support) factors mediated this relationship, while distress and depression moderated it. Meta-analysis revealed a moderate positive association between HL and self-care (r = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.26–0.31, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed consistent positive effects across conditions. No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test, p = 0.294). Risk of bias was high in 62 studies, while certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate.
HL positively influences self-care in chronic diseases, with its impact shaped by multiple mediators and moderators. Future interventions should integrate tailored education, digital tools and mental health support to enhance HL effectiveness.
PROSPERO (CRD42024488061, registered 20.01.2024).
To describe interventions to mitigate weight bias among practicing healthcare providers and examine their effectiveness.
An integrative review.
The framework of Whittemore and Knafl (2005) was utilised to identify and synthesise studies of weight bias interventions. Covidence reference management software facilitated screening using predetermined eligibility criteria that is, published in peer-reviewed journals, reported in English, and described outcomes for weight bias mitigation interventions among healthcare providers with a professional practice licence. We evaluated study quality using Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tools for qualitative and quantitative studies.
Five databases were searched (CINAHL, Embase, EBSCOhost, APA PsycINFO, and Scopus) in July 2024.
Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Four themes emerged: (1) active learning lessens weight bias more than passive learning, (2) multicomponent approaches yield better outcomes, (3) healthcare providers are willing to change their practices, and (4) explicit attitudes and beliefs are more amenable to change than implicit ones. Four sub-themes within theme one included the use of in-person workgroups; films, computer-based, and podcast delivery; written modules; and physical characteristic modifications, such as the use of an adiposity empathy suit. Intervention designs using a theory-based, active learning approach with repeated sessions were most successful at decreasing negative weight-biased attitudes and beliefs.
Interventions that effectively reduce weight bias among practicing healthcare providers vary, yet evidence suggests that weight bias mitigation is achievable. These interventions offer strategies to improve patient-centred care among patients living with obesity.
Healthcare providers often display weight bias. This review synthesises information on effective interventions for reducing bias, which may limit the subsequent negative patient outcomes associated with it.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was the structure used for this paper.
There were no patient or public contributions.
To translate, culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of Fundamentals of Care Framework and the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process.
Qualitative tool validation study.
The study followed internationally recommended procedures, including forward–backward translation, expert committee review, content validation through cognitive interviews and face validity testing with nurses and nursing students. Data were collected between January and October 2023.
Key terms were culturally and linguistically adapted to enhance clarity and contextual relevance, with changes informed by expert feedback. Content validation confirmed conceptual equivalence, and face validity testing demonstrated that Italian versions were perceived as clear, appropriate and applicable across clinical and educational settings.
Cultural adaptation of theoretical frameworks is essential for ensuring their relevance and usability in local contexts. The Italian versions of the Fundamentals of Care Framework and the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process will provide a robust, evidence-based foundation for person-centred care across education, research and clinical practice.
By making these tools accessible in Italian, this study supports the integration of fundamentals of care into national nursing education and practice, promoting international consistency in person-centred care. It lays the groundwork for curriculum reform, clinical implementation and global collaboration in nursing.
Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.
This study did not involve any patient or public contribution.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05177627
Cough, a prevalent and debilitating symptom of lung cancer, remains poorly managed. Accumulating evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for lung cancer cough necessitates systematic evaluation to assess their efficacy.
To synthesise evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for managing cough in lung cancer patients.
A systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline.
Nine databases were searched from inception to December 2024 to identify randomised controlled trials. Study quality was appraised using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomised Trials. Meta-analyses were performed for quantitative synthesis, with sources of heterogeneity examined using meta-regression and subgroup analyses.
Thirty-eight studies representing 2995 lung cancer patients were identified. These studies investigated acupuncture therapy, moxibustion, pulmonary rehabilitation, self-management intervention, physical exercises, psychoeducation support, mindfulness, and multicomponent interventions. Non-pharmacological interventions showed positive effects on cough severity and cough-related quality of life. Additional benefits were observed for expectoration, dyspnea, and general quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation showed a greater effect on cough severity than other non-pharmacological interventions.
Non-pharmacological interventions are promising in improving cough, expectoration, dyspnea, and general quality of life among lung cancer patients. Pulmonary rehabilitation showed the most promising effect. Future research should adopt objective cough measures in addition to self-reported measures.
Non-pharmacological interventions demonstrated potential effects in relieving cough and additional benefits in improving expectoration, dyspnea, and general quality of life among lung cancer patients. Healthcare professionals may adopt pulmonary rehabilitation for cough and related symptoms in lung cancer patients.
As the first meta-analysis addressing non-pharmacological interventions for lung cancer cough, this study provides evidence supporting their clinical efficacy for improving cough and associated symptoms among patients with lung cancer.
No patient or Public contribution.
PROSPERO CRD42024588729.
Informed consent is an essential component of surgical care; however, patients often struggle to fully understand procedures, associated risks and available alternatives. Factors such as preoperative anxiety, limited health literacy and the complexity of consent documents can further impair comprehension and information retention. The active informed consent (CIA) pathway, based on a Patient Educational Program that combines multimedia resources with a comprehension test, aims to enhance patient understanding, improve satisfaction and reduce medicolegal issues.
The study will be conducted as a multicentre, non-pharmacological, randomised controlled trial in three hospitals in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy). A total of 300 patients undergoing elective complex spinal surgery or robotic radical prostatectomy will be enrolled and randomised (1:1) to the experimental arm or to the standard informed consent arm, using block randomisation stratified by centre. Outcomes will include patient satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire), comprehension, psychological distress (Depression Anxiety Stress Scales), pain (Numeric Rating Scale), functional recovery (Oswestry Disability Index/International Prostate Symptom Score/International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form/International Index of Erectile Function) and medicolegal complaints. Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months (T2) and 6 months (T3), with extended monitoring of medicolegal outcomes for up to 5 years.
The study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of Emilia-Romagna (protocol CIA21, V.1.3 dated 14 December 2022). Participation is voluntary and does not affect standard care. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and communication with health authorities. If effective, the intervention may be implemented as a scalable model to improve patient empowerment and transparency in surgical consent.
Neoplastic foot ulcers are particularly challenging for dermatologists and specialists in hard-to-heal wounds because their location and comorbidities can delay accurate diagnosis. We performed a multicentre, retrospective study analysing clinical and histological data, focusing on neoplastic foot ulcers collected over the past 5 years. We evaluated patients' demographic characteristics, clinical features, histological diagnosis, tumour onset and ulcer site. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software, v.30. In total, 106 patients affected by foot skin ulcers were enrolled in the present protocol (52 women, 54 men). The mean age was 70.15 years. In most cases, the neoplastic ulcer was due to primary tumour ulceration. The dorsum of the foot was the most common site of neoplastic ulcers (66%). From a clinical perspective, most lesions were classified as ulcerated nodules (n = 58), ulcerated plaques (n = 8) or hypergranulating ulcers (n = 25), all with thickened, atypical edges. Histological diagnoses included melanoma (n = 45), non-melanoma skin cancers (n = 34), benign tumours (n = 18) and rarer malignancies (n = 9). A statistically significant correlation was found between histotype and clinical lesion type, and between age and histotype. The study provided preliminary data on the clinical and histological characteristics of neoplastic foot ulcers, warranting further exploration in a prospective, multicentre study.
The production of science is characterized by socio-political and technological forces that influence what knowledge is produced. In this context, empty reviews have received little attention, with debate ranging over the pros and cons of their publication. However, their dissemination may improve the ability to recognize and prioritize research gaps. The main aim of the study was to map empty reviews published in nursing science.
A scoping review in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley, Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework database in April 2025. Four databases and grey literature were searched; there were eligible scoping or systematic reviews defined as “empty” in the field of nursing. A modified framework of Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice, and Research recommendations was used to summarize the extracted data.
Fifteen empty reviews were identified. In terms of Patterns, the empty reviews were mainly published in high-income countries over the last 10 years and related to clinical practise and outcomes, education and training, organizational and human resources, and approaches to maternity care, mental health, and nursing education. In general, reporting guidelines were used, while funding was not documented. In terms of Recommendations, more primary studies, the development of tools and the strategic use of empty reviews to inform the funding and research agenda were suggested.
Empty reviews in nursing may indicate neglected or emerging areas that can help orient research agendas to ensure equity-oriented priorities and reduce the marginalization of under-investigated topics. Recognizing empty reviews as legitimate scholarly outputs supports transparent mapping of knowledge gaps, helping funders, institutions, and research programs direct resources to under-investigated areas. Dedicated registries that publicly report empty reviews, establish minimum reporting standards, and require explicit keywords in titles and abstracts would improve transparency and accessibility, and stimulate targeted primary research that can turn “empty” areas into active inquiry. From this perspective, empty reviews may attract research investment rather than be seen as methodological failures.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) are chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases characterised by pain, fatigue, mood disturbances, sleep problems and reduced quality of life. These symptoms are highly variable both between individuals and within individuals across days, reflecting the fluctuating nature of disease activity and daily functioning. Although physical activity is known to alleviate many of these symptoms, individuals with RA and SpA often encounter barriers that limit regular engagement. Capturing the dynamic interplay between symptoms and physical activity therefore requires methods that account for day-to-day and moment-to-moment variability. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA), especially when combined with actigraphy, enables real-time, context-sensitive monitoring of symptoms and physical activity in daily life. However, little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of such protocols in individuals with RA and SpA, for whom participant burden and adherence may represent significant challenges. This pilot study therefore aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a 14-day EMA protocol and to explore factors associated with objectively measured physical activity in individuals with RA and SpA.
50 adults diagnosed with RA or SpA will be recruited through rheumatology clinics or via advertisement. Eligible participants must be smartphone users without cognitive or physical impairments affecting participation. After providing consent, participants will complete baseline questionnaires regarding disease activity, quality of life, sleep, pain, fatigue, affective states and will attend a remote session with a member of the research team to learn how to use the mobile app. They will then complete a 14-day EMA protocol, during which data on patient-related outcomes (PROs), including pain, fatigue, sleep quality and affective states (i.e. positive and negative affects) will be assessed four times daily: upon awakening, 11:00, 15:00 and 20:30. Physical activity and sleep will be continuously monitored using both a wrist-worn and a thigh-worn device. Feasibility will be evaluated based on adherence to EMA prompts and actigraphy wear time. Acceptability will be assessed via a study-specific questionnaire and qualitative interviews conducted at the end of the protocol. Exploratory analyses will examine real-time, temporal and lagged relationships between PROs (pain, fatigue affective states), sleep and physical activity levels.
This study was approved by the French national ethics committee [Comité de protection des personnes Nord Ouest I, 2025-A01349-40] on 24/07/2025. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences.
To examine the emotional, cognitive and dispositional experience of children and adolescents undergoing Lokomat rehabilitation by integrating self-evaluation, therapist observations and physiological metrics across repeated sessions, with the aim of characterising how patient experience evolves throughout paediatric robot-assisted gait training.
Prospective observational study using a multidimensional assessment approach combining self-report, therapist ratings and physiological measures.
Inpatients undergoing robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) with the Lokomat at the Scientific Institute Eugenio Medea in Bosisio Parini (Italy).
42 children and adolescents (N=42; mean age 11.66±5.59 years) undergoing RAGT.
Robot-assisted gait therapy with the Lokomat. Participants underwent 30-minute therapy sessions as per routine rehabilitation protocols, with treatment durations ranging from 15 to 20 sessions, as prescribed by their referring clinician.
Participants completed ad-hoc questionnaires about emotional, cognitive and dispositional factors before and after therapy; therapists provided structured assessments of patient engagement and psychological states. Physiological data, such as heart rate variability (HRV) and electrodermal activity (EDA), were recorded using wearable sensors to capture physiological correlates of emotional and cognitive engagement.
The results showed that by the end of Lokomat therapy, patients displayed increased cognitive engagement and better emotional regulation, along with higher vagal activity (normalised high-frequency) and increased phasic EDA responses. According to the therapists, patients appeared more confident, calm and cooperative. Sympathetic activation observed during satisfaction ratings reflected the involvement of the autonomic nervous system in positive emotional experiences.
This study, therefore, emphasises a multidimensional approach to rehabilitation, which involves subjective patient self-assessments, therapist observations and physiological signals in an effort to capture a more comprehensive patient experience. The findings highlight the importance of personalised, patient-centred approaches and contribute new evidence on the psychological and physiological effects of RAGT in paediatric populations. Further research is warranted to confirm these results and explore their clinical implications.
The surge in postsecondary students reporting mental health concerns, coupled with increased utilisation of on-campus and hospital-based mental healthcare, highlights a need to understand effective service navigation. To address this system gap, the University of Toronto and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) leveraged their unique expertise and resources to develop the University of Toronto Navigation (UTN) service. UTN introduces care navigators to facilitate postsecondary student transitions from acute mental health services to community or campus mental healthcare. There has been limited implementation and evaluation of navigator models specific to the postsecondary context to date, which hinders scalability. This paper describes the study protocol of Navigation to Enhance Post-Secondary Students’ Acute Mental Health Care Transitions, a study that aims to collaborate with students, navigators and clinicians to evaluate the UTN service.
A one-stage, single-arm multimethods study design will be used to evaluate the UTN service. We will recruit 103 students following their UTN intake appointment. Students will complete quantitative measures assessing health outcomes, experiences of care and service utilisation at baseline and at three subsequent time points across a 6-month follow-up period. The quantitative data will be linked to administrative healthcare data. The primary evaluation outcome will be defined as attending an appointment with an appropriate care provider (in person or virtually) within 30 days of discharge from the hospital. We will conduct interviews with students and referring clinicians to gather perspectives regarding their experiences and satisfaction with the UTN service in greater depth.
Research ethics board approvals have been obtained from the University of Toronto and CAMH. Results will be disseminated through publications and presentations, and a toolkit will be cocreated to support implementation and adaptation of hospital-based navigator interventions in postsecondary contexts.
by Alyssa Howren, Quan L. Tran, Sadaf Sediqi, Saadiya Hawa, Douglas K. Owens, Eleni Linos, Titilola O. Falasinnu, Yashaar Chaichian, Julia F. Simard
BackgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune rheumatic disease whose epidemiology and clinical prognosis vary by race and sex. Observed disparities in SLE may be partly attributable to cognitive processes in clinical decision-making, which can influence diagnostic accuracy and clinical management. We aimed to examine variation in primary care physicians’ (PCP) diagnosis and management of SLE when all content of a clinical case is identical, apart from race and sex.
MethodsWe distributed an online randomized factorial survey from 04/11/2024–06/10/2024 to PCPs across the US. Participants were presented with one of four possible SLE vignettes – Black female, White female, Black male, White male – for which all other clinical content was identical. Block randomization was used to randomly modify the race (Black/White) and sex (female/male) of the SLE “case”. Primary outcomes were correct text-based responses for SLE diagnosis at initial case presentation and after reviewing additional lab results. Secondary outcomes were participants’ review time and planned next steps (treatment, referral, tests) as a proxy for cognitive bias and certainty, respectively. We calculated descriptive statistics for all outcomes stratified by assigned randomized factor and used chi-square tests to evaluate between-group differences.
Results1031 PCPs (42.7% women, mean age 52.1 ± 12.1 years) completed the case. At initial presentation, 63.9% of participants correctly identified SLE as a differential diagnosis. An initial diagnosis of SLE significantly differed by the race and sex of the case (p Conclusion
A patient’s race and sex may influence diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making for SLE in primary care. The observed variation in diagnostic accuracy, which aligns with the descriptive epidemiology of SLE, highlights the need for targeted interventions to ensure equitable diagnostic processes.
by Fang-Yi Chen, Chin-Chu Chen, Chuan-Chin Chiao
The regenerative capacity of mammalian RGC neurites after damage, such as glaucoma, is limited. Numerous studies have utilized herbal extracts to promote neural regeneration and exert neuroprotective effects in the hope of mitigating glaucoma. In the present study, we investigated the effect of extracts from the cicada fungus (Cordyceps cicadae) and the Lion’s mane mushroom (Hericium erinaceus) on neurite outgrowth of retinal explants and isolated RGCs. We also examined whether these extracts affect the number of apoptotic cells and neurite outgrowth activity of RGCs. The results showed that an aqueous extract of Cordyceps cicadae, an ethanol extract of Hericium erinaceus, and the purified compound Erinacine Sare able to promote neurite outgrowth in retinal explants. Given its role as a key bioactive compound, Erinacine S was further investigated on isolated RGCs, where it also significantly enhanced neurite outgrowth, demonstrating a direct effect on RGC regeneration. In addition, these extracts have no significant drawbacks in terms of cell apoptosis and RGC neurite outgrowth activity at specific concentrations. The present study thus demonstrates that while excessively high concentrations of these extracts may inhibit neurite growth, at moderate concentrations some extracts from Cordyceps cicadae and Hericium erinaceus have the potential of promoting neurite regeneration in the mammalian retina. Further research targeting the molecular mechanisms behind these effects may shed light on their potential application as a medicine or nutraceutical for facilitating neural regeneration.Cancer survivors often receive inadequate pain management, leading to impaired quality of life. Despite their importance, evidence on the global prevalence of chronic pain in cancer survivors remains insufficiently clear.
The systematic review and proportional meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled global prevalence of chronic pain among cancer survivors and to explore heterogeneity stratified by geographic region, cancer type, pain duration, and pain assessment tool.
Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched up to September 2024 for studies in English or Chinese. The review followed MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines with PROSPERO registration (CRDxx). Studies were included if they reported chronic pain prevalence in cancer survivors using validated instruments or solely reported chronic pain. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies. Pooled prevalence and 95% prediction intervals were calculated using a random-effects model with Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation. Subgroup analysis was used to explore heterogeneity. Leave-one-out analysis explored robustness. Funnel plot and Egger's test were used to examine publication bias.
In total, 36 studies involving 39,806 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of chronic pain among cancer survivors was 41% (95% CI: 34%–49%) after testing robustness, with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 99.32%). Subgroup analysis indicated significant group differences in prevalence rates by geographic region, cancer type, and pain duration (all p < 0.001).
These findings stress the need for more extensive and tailored chronic pain management in current clinical practice. Additional research on chronic pain outcomes among pediatric cancer survivors, cancer populations within Africa and South America, and those with cancer types other than breast cancer is needed.
PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024597090.
This study aimed to evaluate and rank the effectiveness of various acupoint stimulation therapies in alleviating cancer-related fatigue (CRF), a pervasive and distressing symptom among cancer patients.
CRF severely compromises patients' quality of life across treatment and survivorship stages. Despite growing interest in nonpharmacological interventions, comparative evidence on the efficacy of acupoint stimulation therapies remains limited.
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2370 participants was conducted. Databases searched included MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Airiti Library. Interventions included acupuncture, acupressure, oil acupressure, moxibustion, and transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS). Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) was used to rank therapies.
Oil acupressure (SUCRA: 73.6%), relaxing acupressure (73.4%), and acupuncture (72.7%) were the most effective interventions. Both professionally administered and self-administered therapies significantly reduced CRF, with no major differences in efficacy. Subgroup analyses revealed consistent effectiveness across cancer types, particularly breast and lung cancer, and treatment stages.
Acupoint stimulation therapies, especially acupressure and acupuncture, effectively reduce CRF and are suitable for integration into routine cancer care. Self-administered acupressure offers a practical, low-cost alternative, especially in resource-limited settings. Standardization of protocols and long-term studies are warranted to guide clinical implementation.
The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42024556455)
To assess the prevalence of malnutrition risk, especially of undernutrition, among patients admitted to the Internal Medicine and Orthopaedics wards at Michele and Pietro Ferrero Hospital, Italy, using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) tool, administered by trained nursing staff, and to evaluate the adherence to related care interventions.
Cross-sectional study.
We included 248 adult patients, screened by trained nurses for nutritional risk within 48 h of admission using the NRS-2002 tool, which takes into account patients' Body Mass Index, recent weight loss, reduced dietary intake, and disease severity. Information on nursing interventions was also collected.
We identified 36 subjects at risk of malnutrition with NRS ≥ 3. Prevalence was higher in Internal Medicine, reflecting differences in patient characteristics and clinical complexity. Patients at risk were older, had longer hospital stays, and higher risks of falls and pressure sores. Nursing interventions such as proper meal selection, administration of hypercaloric-hyperproteic supplements, and completion of food diary were implemented in most cases, although adherence was not complete. Post-training questionnaire showed that, overall, nurses integrated nutritional screening into practice, but areas for improvement were identified.
Results confirmed the high prevalence of malnutrition risk in hospitalised patients, especially in Internal Medicine. Proper training and empowerment can enable nurses to effectively identify and manage patients at intermediate risk of malnutrition.
Nurses can play key roles in hospital nutritional care by facilitating early identification and appropriate management of patients at malnutrition risk.
Malnutrition is very common among inpatients. Trained and empowered nurses can perform nutritional screening at admission to identify and early manage patients at risk, thereby helping to prevent increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs.
STROBE guidelines.
None.
The handover process is a critical component of patient safety, enabling effective communication and the transfer of responsibility among nurses. However, despite their critical role, it is often compromised by interruptions, lack of standardization, and variability in practice, which may reduce quality and nurse satisfaction. Existing tools primarily measure information transfer and efficiency but rarely incorporate nurses' perspectives on safety and satisfaction. This gap underscores the need for a validated instrument that comprehensively assesses handover quality from both a professional and safety perspective.
To develop and validate the Handover Quality Questionnaire (HAND-Q), a tool assessing nurses' satisfaction with handovers and their perceived impact on patient safety.
HAND-Q development included a conceptualization phase (literature review, expert discussions) and a validation phase (pilot and large-scale testing). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (EFA, CFA) assessed psychometric properties.
EFA revealed four factors: Satisfaction, Patient Safety, Care Pathway Safety, and Handover Content. CFA confirmed good model fit. Inter-factor correlations showed strong links between handover quality and safety, alongside discrepancies between satisfaction and objective standards.
The HAND-Q offers a practical tool to assess handover quality, support standardization, enhance patient safety, and inform training and digital solutions.
To examine the perceptions of nurses receiving the Ontological Coaching among Nurses (OCN) intervention in Singapore.
Descriptive qualitative.
Convenience sampling was used to recruit 34 nurses who received OCN intervention and three coaches who provided the intervention. Written informed consent was obtained, and semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were used to collect data, which were then transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
Three themes with nine sub-themes were identified. The main themes were: (1) From ‘Outlet to Confide’: Ontological Coaching as an Enhanced Sense of Fulfilment; (2) Mindset Readiness and Openness for Successful Coaching; and (3) Future Endeavours for Sustainable Coaching Practices.
The findings show that nurses benefitted on personal and professional fronts from receiving coaching. Further evaluations are required to see the potential of using coaching intervention for novice nurses.
As frontline key players in our healthcare system, nurses face a unique set of challenges that impact their psychological well-being. The impact is even more significant for early-to mid-career nurses, leading to poorer quality of life and high turnover rates. This paper highlighted the importance of resources made available to novice and mid-career nurses through coaching. The perceptions of nurses who received coaching intervention serve as a foundation for future studies examining the relevance of ontological coaching in the nursing profession. The nurses' recommendations reported in this paper include building awareness of coaching and incorporating flexibility into coaching programmes to help enhance their readiness to receive and engage with coaching for a more fulfilling coaching experience. Incorporating these recommendations can help inform future coaching-related interventional studies.
This study adhered to COREQ guidelines.
None.
We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial (the PHaCT study), including a process evaluation to assess the acceptability of a housing-led Critical Time Intervention (CTI) for prison leavers and the use of a trial design. This paper presents the process evaluation findings.
To explore the acceptability of both the intervention and the trial design to participants and those delivering the intervention, and to assess whether the intervention was delivered with fidelity.
A process evaluation following Medical Research Council guidelines. Data collection included semi-structured interviews with participants and CTI caseworkers and observations of intervention delivery. A thematic analysis of interviews and observations was conducted to understand the intervention’s implementation and contextual factors as well as the trial process acceptability.
Participants for the pilot trial were recruited from three prisons in England and Wales where the intervention was being delivered.
While 28 out of 34 trial participants consented to interviews, only one was completed. Seven caseworkers were interviewed.
A housing-led CTI to support people leaving prison at risk of homelessness, involving phased, time-limited support from caseworkers, starting prerelease and continuing postrelease, to help secure stable housing and build independence, without directly providing housing.
The intervention’s acceptability was primarily reflected through the positive feedback and success stories shared by CTI caseworkers, as well as observational data indicating high acceptance among service users. The trial design’s acceptability was challenged by concerns about randomisation and equipoise, with staff viewing randomisation as unethical due to limited support for vulnerable populations. The fidelity to the CTI intervention housing-led approach was adhered to as best as possible; stable housing was prioritised for service users before addressing other needs. Despite these efforts, both sites encountered significant challenges due to limited housing availability and complex systems for securing social housing, particularly for single men leaving prison.
This wider study faced significant challenges which impacted the process evaluation. Despite these issues, the evaluation provides important insights into the challenges of conducting trials on interventions for people leaving prison. The challenges experienced should inform future study designs with similar populations and in similar settings.
To determine whether a full-scale randomised control trial (RCT) assessing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a housing led Critical Time Intervention (CTI) is feasible and acceptable.
Pilot parallel two-arm individual level RCT, including process evaluation and embedded exploratory health economic evaluation.
Four prisons for men across England and Wales, UK.
Men leaving prison at risk of homelessness and intervention delivery staff.
CTI has four components: (1) pre-engagement phase: assessing the needs of the client and implementing a plan pre-discharge; (2) transition to community: forming relationships and goal setting; (3) try out: encouraging problem-solving and managing practical issues and (4) transfer of care: developing long-term goals and transferring responsibilities to community providers.
Progression criteria: recruitment, retention, acceptability of the processes (CTI and trial method) and fidelity of intervention delivery. We also assessed the completeness of primary, secondary and exploratory outcome measures and estimated intervention costs.
The recruitment progression criterion was met, with 92% (34/37) of approached individuals consenting to participate (target: 50%). However, the overall recruitment target of 80 was not achieved, and retention was low, only 18% (6/34) provided follow-up data, well below the 60% threshold. Retention was hindered by systemic challenges, including changes to prison release policies and reduced probation support. While the CTI model was acceptable to staff and service users, the trial design, particularly randomisation, was not. Intervention fidelity met the progression criteria. Baseline data collection for health economics and resource use was feasible, and intervention costs were estimated.
This pilot trial identified significant challenges to conducting a full-scale RCT of CTI in this context, particularly around retention, trial acceptability and systemic instability. While CTI remains a promising model, a traditional RCT design may not be viable in this setting without substantial structural and ethical adaptations.
by Marianna Cortesi, Federico Pendenza, Elizabeth Haddon, Andrea Schiavio
Creative arts activities and mind-body practices, such as yoga, have been shown to benefit mental health and well-being. Research in higher education highlights the mental health challenges faced by students and staff in tertiary education; however, most studies on the potential of creative arts and mind-body practices have been conducted in the United States, with limited research investigating their impact in the UK higher education context. This qualitative study seeks to examine students’ and staff members’ views on extra-curricular creative and mind-body practices provided by one UK university, exploring how engagement in such activities can impact their understanding and awareness of mental health and well-being. In addition, it intends to investigate potential barriers to engagement with such activities. Drawing on questionnaire responses from 25 students and 20 staff members, findings highlight the effectiveness of art-based interventions and mind-body practices in raising awareness and understanding of mental health and well-being, while also having the potential to positively impact individuals’ mental health and well-being. Although personal interests and time restrictions may limit engagement, such activities were found to foster community-building, a particularly relevant factor in the post-Covid era, as institutions seek to re-engage students and staff through in-person activities. These findings have therefore important implications for the implementation of similar interventions in higher education and beyond to promote mental health and well-being awareness in diverse communities.
FreshRSS 