FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

From Wage Dissatisfaction to Union Expectations: The Mediating Role of Union Perception Among Nurses

ABSTRACT

Aim

This study examines the relationships between wage satisfaction, union perceptions, expectations, and union membership among Turkish nurses, identifying factors associated with union participation.

Design

Sequential explanatory mixed-methods design.

Methods

This two-phase study (January–July 2023) included: (1) a quantitative survey of 210 nurses assessing wage satisfaction, union perceptions, and expectations, analysed using regression and PROCESS Macro (Model 4); and (2) qualitative interviews with 22 nurses, including 15 with union leadership experience, analysed through thematic analysis using MAXQDA.

Results

Quantitative findings indicated that wage satisfaction was associated with nurses' perceptions of unions but did not independently predict union expectations. The study hypothesises that union perception functions as a key mediating mechanism, translating wage dissatisfaction into expectations for union action. Qualitative findings supported this pattern, showing that although wage dissatisfaction was widespread, nurses' expectations were primarily shaped by perceptions of unions' transparency, political independence, democratic participation, and representational capacity rather than by wages alone.

Conclusions

Union participation among nurses is influenced by both economic conditions and normative evaluations of unions. While wage dissatisfaction provides an important contextual background, expectations and engagement are mainly driven by perceptions of union credibility, fairness, and representational effectiveness.

Implications for Profession and/or Patient Care

Nursing unions should prioritise transparent governance, democratic participation, and political independence to enhance trust, member engagement, workforce stability, and quality of care.

Impact

This study addresses persistent wage dissatisfaction alongside declining union membership and trust. The findings demonstrate that union engagement depends not only on economic dissatisfaction but also on perceived representational fairness. The results are particularly relevant for nursing unions, professional organisations, and policymakers aiming to strengthen union legitimacy and workforce engagement in healthcare systems.

Reporting Method

Compliant with COREQ guidelines and mixed-methods reporting standards.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

Evaluating Artificial Intelligence–Generated Nursing Care Plans: A Scenario‐Based Comparative Study of Accuracy, Completeness, Quality, and Readability

ABSTRACT

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of three generative artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT, Gemini and DeepSeek) to generate clinically accurate, comprehensive, and readable nursing care plans aligned with standardised nursing taxonomies (North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International, Nursing Interventions Classification, and Nursing Outcomes Classification). The study further explored variations in tool performance across different nursing specialties.

Design

A descriptive comparative design was used.

Methods

Ten expert-validated clinical scenarios representing five nursing specialties (Fundamentals of Nursing, Medical, Surgical, Paediatric and Psychiatric Nursing) were presented to the three artificial intelligence tools. Each tool responded to four standardised prompts based on the latest North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcomes Classification taxonomies. Outputs were assessed for quality, accuracy, completeness and readability by expert evaluators using validated scales.

Results

All tools produced nursing care plans of moderate-to-high quality. DeepSeek demonstrated slightly higher accuracy and completeness compared with Gemini and ChatGPT. Surgical nursing scenarios yielded the highest performance, likely reflecting the more protocolised and pathway-driven nature of perioperative care. However, all outputs were incomplete and written at a college-level readability, limiting accessibility for clinical use.

Conclusion

Generative artificial intelligence tools can support the production of structured nursing care plans requiring expert review and adaptation, particularly in less standardised clinical domains, but their limitations in completeness and readability indicate they should be regarded only as preliminary drafts requiring expert review and adaptation.

Impact

The study examined whether generative artificial intelligence can reliably assist in creating nursing care plans. All tools performed moderately well, with DeepSeek showing slight advantages, but outputs were incomplete and difficult to read. Findings are relevant to clinical nurses, educators, healthcare managers and policymakers worldwide who are exploring artificial intelligence in nursing workflows.

Reporting Method

This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

Patient or Public Contribution

This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.

Public-private mix for tuberculosis in urban health systems in least-developed, low-income and lower-middle-income countries and territories: a systematic review

Por: Vidyasagaran · A. L. · Teixeira de Siqueira Filha · N. · Kakchapati · S. · Hall · T. F. · Naznin · B. · Tajree · J. · Quayyum · Z. · Joshi · D. · Sibeudu · F. T. · Ogbozor · P. A. · Arize · I. N. · Shrestha · G. · Golder · S. · Ahsan · M. · Adhikary · S. · Agwu · P. · Elsey · H.
Objective

To evaluate the impact of public–private mix (PPM) models for tuberculosis (TB) on health, process and system outcomes, adopting the WHO’s definition of PPM, which is a strategic partnership between national TB programmes and healthcare providers, both public and private, to deliver high-quality TB diagnosis and treatment.

Design

Systematic review without meta-analysis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.

Data sources

EMBASE, MEDLINE, Health Management Information Consortium, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index, Emerging Sources Citation Index, CENTRAL, Database of Disability and Inclusion Information Resources, WHO Library Database and 3ie.

Eligibility criteria

We included all primary studies examining PPM models delivering TB services in urban health sectors in least-developed, low-income and lower–middle-income countries and territories.

Data extraction and synthesis

17 reviewers were involved in data extraction in COVIDENCE using a prepiloted template. All extractions were completed by a single reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Quality appraisal was carried out using the mixed-methods appraisal tool, covering mixed-methods, qualitative and quantitative study designs. Narrative synthesis was carried out by tabulating and summarising studies according to PPM models and reported in line with the synthesis without meta-analysis guidelines.

Results

Of the 57 included studies, covering quantitative (n=41), qualitative (n=6) and mixed-method (n=10) designs, the majority were from Southeast Asia (n=37). PPM models had overall positive results on TB treatment outcomes, access and coverage and value for money. They are linked with improved TB health workers’ skills and service delivery. Most outcomes tended to favour interface models, although with considerable heterogeneity. Inconsistent implementation of national TB guidelines, uncoordinated referrals and lack of trust among partners were identified as areas of improvement. Evidence was lacking on the involvement of informal providers within PPM models.

Conclusions

PPM models can be effective and cost-effective for TB care in urban low- and middle-income countries contexts, particularly when levels of mistrust between public and private sectors are addressed through principles of equal partnership. The evidence indicates that this may be more achievable when an interface organisation manages the partnership.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42021289509.

‘Thriving with bipolar disorder’: The co-design of a peer-delivered group psychoeducation program and single-arm pilot feasibility evaluation protocol

by Emma Morton, Andrew Kcomt, Erin E. Michalak

Background

Self-management strategies can be used by individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) to cope with symptoms and improve quality of life (QoL). Peer-facilitated psychoeducation has potential to diversify delivery of self-management information by capitalising on the expertise of individuals who live well with BD. This protocol describes the process of co-designing a novel peer-facilitated, QoL-focused, group psychoeducation program for people living with BD, and plans for its pilot evaluation.

Methods

Content from two web-based, self-directed psychoeducational interventions was adapted to inform a peer-facilitated group program, using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework. The resultant program contains eight weekly two-hour sessions on topics related to QoL in BD, and contains a combination of education, opportunities for peer-to-peer knowledge exchange, and activities that facilitate practice of self-management strategies. A single-arm pilot evaluation of this program is planned: individuals who self-identify as living with BD (~n = 40) will be recruited from the community. Four groups (~n = 10) will be delivered online by peer facilitators. The primary outcome will be feasibility (session attendance). Data will also be collected on fidelity, intervention acceptability, and impacts (QoL, mood symptoms, self-stigma, subjective recovery, self-efficacy, self-compassion, social support). A subset of participants (~n = 12) and peer facilitators (~n = 4) will be invited to participate in a feedback interview post-intervention.

Discussion

Recovery-oriented healthcare frameworks emphasise a focus on patient-valued outcomes and the development on a peer workforce. By evaluating this novel intervention, we hope to lay the groundwork for peer-facilitated programs specific to the priorities of individuals with BD, that may be embedded in clinical settings.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06878937

Development of a novel intervention using a person-based approach to support physical activity among families of children with cystic fibrosis in the UK

Por: Kovalenko · A. G. · Denford · S. · van Beurden · S. · Cockcroft · E. · Coxhead · V. · Tomlinson · O. W. · Powell · E. · Williams · C. A.
Objectives

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited condition, affecting approximately 150 000 people worldwide. Physical activity (PA) is an integral component in the management of CF. However, it is estimated that only a third of young people (with and without CF) achieve UK Chief Medical Officer guideline recommended levels of activity. The aim of this research was to use the person-based approach to develop an intervention supporting families with young people (aged 6–12 years) with CF to incorporate PA as a sustainable habit in their lives to increase the likelihood of sustained PA levels going into adolescence and adulthood.

Design

Using the person-based approach, intervention content was created and iteratively adapted. This was initially guided by relevant literature; the guiding principles, logic model and preliminary content were developed via co-production with patient and public involvement (PPI) representatives (n=8) with lived experience of CF. The intervention was further refined/optimised using qualitative think-aloud and retrospective interviews, the results of the preliminary evaluation are reported. Think-aloud interviews were rapidly analysed using a table of changes analysis and used to inform adaptations to content. Retrospective interviews were analysed thematically.

Setting

Community settings in the UK.

Participants

Participants included six families with a child with CF aged between 6 years and 12 years old.

Results

Intervention content consisted of nine sections and was delivered as a printable PDF file. Informed by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour framework and self-determination theory, content focused on promotion of PA as a family activity that is fun, enjoyable, quick and achievable. It promoted ‘movement to make you feel good"’ and in short bursts of activity. Promotion of PA as medicine was avoided. The final intervention was considered to be engaging and acceptable.

Conclusions

Qualitative methods and PPI facilitated the development of a family-focused intervention supporting the integration of PA into daily life. This was viewed as acceptable and engaging among families of people with CF. Future research now needs to explore the effectiveness of the intervention for increasing PA behaviour.

Occupational health risks and safety awareness among welders in Nepal, a qualitative study

Por: Koirala · B. · Rijal · B. · KC · S. · Nepal · S. · Khadka · A. · Karki · A. · Joshi · S. · Basnet · S. · Adhikari · U. · Neupane · R. · Karki · J. K.
Background

Globally, over 2.3 million people die each year as a result of diseases or injuries related to their jobs, and 313 million suffer from non-fatal ailments. Welding is one such profession, which is a hazard-prone job with several potential risks, including burns, electrocution and the potentially deadly risk of fume exposure. In Nepal, people taking the welding profession are aware of the risks associated with their jobs, but they often do not take preventive measures because of ignorance, perceived discomfort in their jobs and lack of knowledge about occupational safety laws and regulations. This increases the probability of accidents.

Objective

The objective of this study was to explore occupational health risks and safety awareness among welders and their adherence to occupational safety and health regulations in Nepal.

Design

A qualitative, cross-sectional study employing a thematic analysis approach was adopted.

Setting

The research was conducted in small-scale welding workshops located in a semiurban area in Bhaktapur District, central Nepal, reflecting the informal industrial sector.

Participants

26 male welders, aged 18–42 years, originally from nine districts across Nepal, participated, each from a different workshop, thus reaching 26 small-scale welding workshops. All were engaged in welding work at the time of the study. Participants were selected using snowball sampling. Most had not completed secondary education and had work experience ranging from 1 to 22 years.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

As a qualitative study, the primary outcome was the thematic exploration of welders’ experiences. The main themes included occupational health risks and injury management, personal protective equipment (PPE) use and barriers, access to healthcare and insurance, and awareness of occupational health and safety (OHS) policies and training opportunities.

Results

The study revealed significant occupational health risks, including eye burns, electric shocks and physical exhaustion among the welders. Further, the participating welders reported limited access to health insurance and inadequate awareness and access to PPE. Furthermore, awareness of safety policies is also low among welders. While support groups and associations exist, their support is often insufficient, thus perpetuating challenges in workplace safety.

Conclusions

This study provides a glimpse of the ground reality of welding workers in small-scale industries in Nepal, showing gaps and the need for safe occupational practices that must be addressed. Further study and work are needed to establish better occupational safety practices and improve the health and safety status of welders.

Surgical patients experiences with the Patients Safety Checklist (PASC): a qualitative interview study

Por: Harris · K. · Waehle · H. V. · Storesund · A. · Harthug · S. · Tangvik · R. J. · Monsen Lukcova · D. · Havik · W. · Humberset · A. · Stavang · E. · Hagerup · K. · Teigland Tepstad · A. · Sandsbakk Austarheim · A. K. · Healey · A. · Sevdalis · N. · Haugen · A. S.
Background

Engaging patients in surgical safety is challenging and has not been thoroughly investigated. Although surgical checklists and other safety protocols have been introduced across various surgical fields, preventable adverse events still occur, highlighting the need for additional research. A Patient’s Safety Checklist (PASC) has been developed and validated for use by surgical patients. Its effect on patient safety and patient outcomes is currently being investigated in a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (NCT03105713). In connection with this trial, we have examined elective patients’ experiences with using the PASC.

Methods

An exploratory qualitative study was conducted based on individual in-depth telephone interviews with 31 elective surgical patients. The interviews were carried out across three Norwegian hospitals including seven surgical specialties. The patients interviewed were part of the trial’s intervention arm and had used PASC. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, and reflective thematic analysis was applied.

Result

Three themes were identified in the data: patient awareness, patient actions and utility value. Patients perceived PASC to increase awareness around surgical information, preparations, what to speak up about and which information to seek and repeat. This awareness led to a series of actions, such as ensuring medication control, optimising their own health, contacting healthcare professionals, asking questions, and for some no actions were needed. Patients perceived PASC to have high utility value for their surgical preparation.

Conclusions

The PASC enhanced patients’ involvement in surgical care and safety by ensuring they received systematic, accurate, clear, and understandable information and instructions throughout the surgical pathway. It is one of the few existing interventions that specifically focuses on assisting patients in preparing for surgery and managing their recovery. Further research is needed on the implementation of PASC and its adaptation to other clinical settings.

Trial registration number

NCT03105713.

Impact of fibrinogen-to-erythrocyte suspension ratio on mortality and functional outcomes in major perioperative bleeding (Approximate Dose-Equivalent of Fibrinogen-to-Erythrocyte Suspension (ADEFES) study): protocol for a prospective observational study

Por: Demir · Z. A. · Kavak Akelma · F. · Akca · O. · Koltka · K. · Dincer · B. · Kocyigit · M. · Tuna · A. T. · Sayın · J. · Yıldırım Ar · A. · Kuvaki · B. · Aykut · A. · Sahin · A. S. · Aydın Güzey · N. · ADEFES Investigators · Yigit · Akyol · Akel · Argun · Aydın · Saracoglu · Canb
Introduction

Early and balanced replacement of blood products appears to be the key factor in improving outcomes of major bleeding patients including acute trauma, cardiac, obstetric and transplant surgery patients. Definitive clinical guidance regarding the optimal ratio of blood products, including those containing fibrinogen, is still lacking. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that increasing the fibrinogen content to erythrocyte suspension ratio improves the mortality and functional outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries with expected major bleeding.

Methods and analysis

The Approximate Dose-Equivalent of Fibrinogen-to-Erythrocyte Suspension (ADEFES) ratio is a multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study of patients undergoing major surgical procedures with expected major perioperative bleeding (ie, requiring packed red blood cells (PRBC)>4U/24 hours). For 5U of cryoprecipitate and 1.5 U of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), the approximate dose-equivalent for fibrinogen is considered as 1 gram of fibrinogen. Association of the ADEFES ratio at 24 hours will be assessed on the primary objective, which will consist of the composite of 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day bleeding-specific mortality and the ‘highly-dependent scores’ of Katz index of independence in activities of daily living.

Ethics and dissemination

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (approval no. E2-23-4265, dated 07 June 2023; Chair: Prof. Dr. F.E. Canpolat) and by the institutional review boards of all participating centres. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, as well as in compliance with national regulations on data protection and Good Clinical Practice standards. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to inclusion in the study.

The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific journals, presentations at national and international conferences, and communication with relevant stakeholders including clinical practitioners and healthcare institutions. If applicable, study outcomes will also be shared via institutional newsletters and digital platforms to reach a broader audience in the medical community.

Trial registration number

NCT06021184.

❌