To investigate the efficacy of two volumes of acute isometric wall squat exercise on pain sensitivity (primary outcome: pressure pain threshold (PPT)) and intensity (secondary outcome) in adults with knee osteoarthritis.

A parallel-group randomised controlled trial.

Outpatient physiotherapy clinics at hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

Participants (n = 90; mean (SD) age 49.0 (13.0) years) with chronic knee osteoarthritis, diagnosed by a specialist orthopaedic physician using radiographic evidence and clinical judgement, were recruited via two tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

Participants were stratified by sex and randomly allocated to one of three groups: isometric single-repetition wall-squat (ISO-SR; one repetition of a 3-min wall squat or to volitional fatigue at a 100° knee joint angle), isometric multiple-repetition wall-squat (ISO-MR; three repetitions of the same intervention) and control (quiet sitting for 7 min).

PPT was measured at the calf (primary site of interest), lumbar spine and forearm using a pressure algometer. Pain intensity was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Primary analyses compared changes between intervention and control groups. All participants were included in the ITT analysis.

The ISO-MR group had higher mean PPT ratings immediately postintervention in the calf (mean difference=9.4 (95% CI 5.6 to 13.2), p

Both the ISO-SR and ISO-MR exercises to volitional fatigue reduced pain sensitivity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Neither exercise volume changed clinical pain intensity.

ClinicalTrials.gov registry (ID: NCT05605444).

Preoperative administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but optimal dosing remains uncertain due to the narrow range of doses explored in prior studies. This study aims to define the dose–response of intravenous TXA in THA, focusing on perioperative haemoglobin drop to improve blood-sparing effect.

This monocentric, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding study will enrol 170 adults undergoing THA, aiming to randomise 150 patients. Participants will be allocated using a minimisation technique with a random component in equal proportions to receive either placebo or one of four intravenous TXA doses: 300 mg, 500 mg, 1000 mg or 3000 mg. Dose selection and sample size are based on a model-based meta-analysis that employed a maximum effect (Emax) model with a maximum effect of 40% and an ED50 (dose providing 50% of Emax) of 400 mg. The primary outcome will be the relative perioperative haemoglobin drop at postoperative day 3. Secondary outcomes include TXA exposure and perioperative fibrinolytic activity as measured by D-dimer levels. Only patients receiving the allocated study treatment will be analysed (modified intention-to-treat population). The dose–response relationship for the primary outcome will be analysed using non-linear mixed-effect models.

The study protocol was approved by the French ethics committee (Institutional Review Board Sud Méditerranée V) and the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM). Results will be disseminated at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

CTIS 2022-502532-38-01; NCT03822793.

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading contributor to disability globally. It has a substantial impact on the lives of those who experience it, and places considerable economic burden on healthcare systems. Despite these impacts, and the consistency of guideline recommendations, many individuals do not receive recommended LBP management. Structural barriers to accessing timely, evidence-based care, as well as public uncertainty about where to seek appropriate management, can influence the care individuals receive. Telephone and digitally based helplines assist to overcome many traditional barriers to accessing care and offer a scalable platform to improve the delivery of guideline recommended management for LBP. However, uptake of such services can be limited without targeted promotion and patient-centred design. This project aims to codesign, implement and evaluate an upgraded component of an existing Australian helpline service, tailored for people with back pain and supported by a media awareness campaign. This protocol outlines the codesign process, implementation and planned evaluation of the helpline.

This protocol uses three complementary frameworks—an iterative codesign process, the Practical Robust Implementation Sustainability Model, and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework—to guide the codesign and development, implementation and evaluation of an upgraded helpline for people with LBP. The codesign process involves key stakeholders, including consumers and clinicians, to inform the development and implementation of both the upgraded helpline service and the media campaign to raise awareness and uptake of the helpline. Data sources will include a pre–post cohort of helpline service users, routinely collected service data (eg, monthly call rate) and health system data to evaluate the broader population level impact (eg, rates of emergency department presentations for LBP in the Australian region targeted by the media campaign). Implementation evaluation will include Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance as well as internal and external environmental factors that influence the success of these outcome measures.

The project was approved by the University of Sydney’s Human Research Ethics Committee (HE001081). This project involves collaboration with consumers, clinicians and other stakeholders to interpret, translate and disseminate research findings to relevant audiences.

This study aimed to assess construct validity against commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), test–retest reliability and responsiveness of seven Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerised adaptive testing (CATs) in Dutch adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and assess their acceptability in healthcare providers and people with T2D.

A cross-sectional observational study in people with T2D and qualitative study involving both people with T2D and healthcare professionals.

Participants with T2D were recruited from the ongoing Hoorn Diabetes Care System cohort in the West-Friesland area of the Netherlands. Additionally, people with T2D and advanced chronic kidney disease were recruited at the outpatient clinics of Amsterdam University Medical Centre and ‘Niercentrum aan de Amstel’, both in the Amsterdam area of the Netherlands. The healthcare professionals involved in the qualitative part were recruited at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre.

314 people with T2D (age 64.0±10.8 years, 63.7% men).

Participants completed seven PROMIS CATs (assessing (1) Physical Function, (2) Pain Interference, (3) Fatigue, (4) Sleep Disturbance, (5) Anxiety, (6) Depression and (7) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities), and PROMs measuring similar constructs. After 2 weeks and 6 months, participants completed the CATs measures again, together with seven Global Rating Scales (GRS) on perceived change in each domain. Construct validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlations. Test–retest reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Measurement error was assessed by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Responsiveness was assessed by correlations between change scores on the PROMIS CAT and GRS. Acceptability was assessed through focus groups and interviews in healthcare providers and people with T2D.

Except for Fatigue, all PROMIS CAT domains demonstrated sufficient construct validity, since ≥75% of the results was in accordance with a priori hypotheses. All seven PROMIS CATs showed sufficient test–retest reliability (ICCs 0.73–0.91). SEM and MDC ranged from 2.1 to 2.7 and from 5.7 to 7.4, respectively. Responsiveness was rated as insufficient in this study design as there was almost no change in participants’ own rating of their health compared with 6 months ago according to a global rating of change.

During the focus groups and interviews, healthcare providers and people with T2D agreed that CATs could serve as a conversation starter in routine care, but should never replace personal consultations with a doctor. If implemented, participants would be willing to spend 15 min to complete the PROMIS CATs.

The PROMIS CATs showed sufficient construct validity and test–retest reliability in most domains in people with T2D. Responsiveness needs to be evaluated in a population with poorer diabetes control or in a study design with longer follow-up. The CATs are well accepted to be used in care to identify relevant topics, but should not replace personal contact with the doctor.

Value-based healthcare (VBHC) strives to improve the healthcare system by focusing on value of care, that is, patient relevant outcomes relative to the costs for achieving these outcomes. Within VBHC, patient participation is crucial to identify patient relevant outcomes and value improvement potential. However, patient participation in VBHC initiatives remains limited. Therefore, we aimed to improve patient participation within VBHC teams with the ultimate aim to develop a practical guide for patient participation in VBHC.

An action research study.

This study was conducted in seven collaborating Dutch hospitals from March 2023 to November 2024.

Seven VBHC teams were selected to participate in the cyclical action research steps, that is, orientation, planning, implementation, and evaluation, in which patient participation was implemented or improved. These included the following patient groups: prostate cancer, vulnerable elderly, breast cancer, diabetes, maternity care, colorectal cancer and chronic kidney disease.

Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Qualitative data included observations and minutes of meetings with the intervention teams. Quantitative data included responses to the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) by multiple members of the intervention (n=7) and control teams (n=94) at three time points (T1=6 months, T2=12 months, T3=end of study). Qualitative data were thematically analysed and quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Finally, the data were triangulated to create an overview of lessons learnt in improving patient participation.

Patient participation goals varied across teams, leading to diverse actions, such as establishing a diabetes patient panel and distributing questionnaires to patients with colorectal cancer. PPEET results show that 71% of intervention team members reported that patient participation had an impact on the team’s outcomes compared with 44% in control teams (T3). Furthermore, 80% of the intervention team members initially wanted training in patient participation (T1), which dropped to 29% at T3. Overall, 22 lessons in improving patient participation in multidisciplinary project teams were identified and compiled into a practical guide.

The action research process improved the process and impact of patient participation in the intervention teams. Furthermore, the results indicate that the action research process enhanced the team members’ knowledge and skills on patient participation. The practical guide developed in this study can be used to support implementation of patient participation in VBHC.

Pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) frequently accompanies rotator cuff tears, with tenotomy and tenodesis often being used to address this pathology. While meta-analyses report comparable functional outcomes between these techniques, tenotomy is linked to higher rates of Popeye deformity, whereas tenodesis is more technically demanding and might involve extra material. A novel self-locking tenodesis technique aims to reduce deformity risk while being a simpler alternative to the conventional tenodesis procedure; however, comparative evidence is currently limited.

This single-centre, patient-blinded randomised controlled trial will enrol 100 patients aged ≥40 years with reparable, non-traumatic, full-thickness supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus and/or subscapularis tendon tears undergoing arthroscopic repair from January 2025 until January 2027. Key exclusion criteria include massive or irreparable tears, advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis and prior shoulder surgery. Participants will be randomised to either 360 double lasso loop tenodesis or self-locking tenodesis. The primary outcome is the Constant score at 1 year, with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 10 points. Secondary outcomes include American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, simple shoulder value score, LHB score, cosmetic appearance, pain scores and radiographic tendon migration. Statistical non-inferiority will be assessed using a one-sided t-test.

The study protocol received approval from the National Ethical Review Board in France (CPP Sud-Est V) and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

NCT06774820.

Depressive symptoms are common in the growing geriatric surgical population and are associated with important patient-centred surgical outcomes, including postoperative delirium, discharge to postacute care facility and decline in functional status. Few interventions have been developed to address depressive symptoms in the perioperative setting.

We designed a feasibility and acceptability study of a nine-session problem-solving therapy (PST) telehealth perioperative intervention aimed at reducing postoperative functional decline and depressive symptoms among at-risk older adults undergoing major surgical procedures. Acceptability will be evaluated using a patient-centred five-question survey, assessing participant satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the perioperative intervention. A feasibility assessment will rely on objective measures including ease of participant recruitment, frequency and timing of delivery of intervention sessions and retention of participants throughout the duration of the intervention. With respect to the efficacy of the proposed PST intervention, the primary outcome of interest is postoperative functional status, as measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 at the 6-month postoperative time point. The secondary outcome of interest is the degree of depressive symptoms as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 at both 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. The broader goals of this study include: (1) assessing the feasibility of implementing a PST perioperative intervention for older surgical patients at risk of postoperative functional decline, (2) demonstrating the acceptability of the PST intervention and (3) assessing the preliminary impact of the PST intervention on postoperative functional status and depressive symptoms.

The study received ethical approval from the University of California San Francisco Institutional Review Board. Results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals with further dissemination at local institutional meetings and professional conferences.

NCT06174701.

Patients with fragility fractures are two times as likely to suffer future fractures as their peers who have not suffered a fracture. In addition, 40% of those who suffer fragility fractures do not recover their level of functioning in terms of activities of daily living after 1 year. The present study aims to verify the hypothesis that a semipersonalised home-based exercise intervention may improve patients’ independence and reduce the number of hospital admissions compared with usual care for a population that suffers fragility fractures.

This parallel-arm single-blinded randomised-controlled trial will take place at the University of Cordoba (Spain) between September 2022 and September 2024. Patients aged >50 years old who have undergone surgery for a fragility hip fracture and who were prefracture independent (Barthel index (BI)>60) will be invited to participate. Patients will be excluded if they present a different type of fracture, mild or greater cognitive impairment or contraindication to exercise training. Patients will then be randomised into exercise or usual care group. The former will receive a daily walking appointment (number of steps to be completed inside home, interspersed with sit-to-stand movements) with the total volume increasing weekly. The latter will receive the usual care. The outcomes, collected at baseline, at the end of training (3 months) and at follow-up (6 months) by blinded operators will include the BI and number of readmissions (primary outcomes) and quality of life, exercise capacity, strength, cognitive status, bone mineral density and laboratory biomarkers (secondary outcomes). Variables related to quality of life, cognitive status, laboratory markers and densitometry will also be analysed.

The research ethics committee of the province of Cordoba approved the project (number 326; date 28 July 2021). Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will receive a patient information document and the consent form and will be encouraged to ask any questions. The proposed research respects the fundamental principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, the Council of Europe Declaration on Human Rights and Biomedicine, the UNESCO Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, and the Oviedo Council on Human Rights and Biomedicine. The data obtained in this study will be confidential. They will be treated by the Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, on the Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights, keeping it strictly confidential and not accessible to unauthorised third parties, and the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on Data Protection (RGPD). Written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants. The study’s results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific congresses worldwide. The results will also be disseminated through patient advocacy group newsletters and social media platforms. Patient partners will help select the appropriate channels and develop plain-language summaries tailored to their communities’ needs.

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04934358 (registration date: 14 June 2021).

Effective haemorrhage control is crucial in cases of limb trauma involving arterial injury, such as shark attacks, to prevent potentially fatal outcomes. International first aid consensus recommends the use of arterial tourniquets (proprietary or makeshift) as a primary treatment for life-threatening external bleeding. Manual pressure applied directly over a major artery proximal to the injury, such as inguinal fist compression (IFC), is more accessible in a first-aid situation, but is currently not recommended due to limited evidence. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the application of IFC is superior to commercial windlass tourniquets (CWTs) in reducing blood flow in the femoral artery when performed by untrained bystanders.

Stopping Haemorrhage by Application of Randomised Compression or Tourniquet (SHARC-2) is a superiority, assessor-blinded, cross-over, randomised controlled trial conducted with healthy untrained adult volunteers in non-clinical settings. Participants will be rotated as providers and recipients of both IFC and CWT, with providers randomised to the order that they perform the techniques. Providers will be exposed to an educational infographic before applying that technique to a recipient behind a drop sheet. A sonographer, blinded to the technique, will measure the peak systolic velocity of blood flow in the superficial femoral artery using Doppler ultrasound at baseline and then during application of each technique for 5 min. The mean percentage reduction in peak systolic velocity will be compared between IFC and CWT groups.

Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Bond University Human Research Ethics Committee (BUHREC JF01036) on 23 January 2023. All participants will be provided with written informed consent prior to enrolment and the trial will involve healthy adult volunteers. To minimise risk, preintervention screening, sonographic assessment and postintervention follow-up will be implemented with adverse events monitored and reported in accordance with HREC guidelines. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences, local resuscitation forums and public health education initiatives. A lay summary will also be shared with relevant community groups and via social media platforms to enhance public accessibility.

ACTRN12624001054505.

There are substantial barriers to initiate advance care planning (ACP) for persons with chronic-progressive disease in primary care settings. Some challenges may be disease-specific, such as communicating in case of cognitive impairment. This study assessed and compared the initiation of ACP in primary care with persons with dementia, Parkinson’s disease, cancer, organ failure and stroke.

Longitudinal study linking data from a database of Dutch general practices’ electronic health records with national administrative databases managed by Statistics Netherlands.

Data from general practice records of 199 034 community-dwelling persons with chronic-progressive disease diagnosed between 2008 and 2016.

Incidence rate ratio (IRR) of recorded ACP planning conversations per 1000 person-years in persons with a diagnosis of dementia, Parkinson’s disease, organ failure, cancer or stroke, compared with persons without the particular diagnosis. Poisson regression and competing risk analysis were performed, adjusted for age, gender, migration background, living situation, frailty index and income, also for disease subsamples.

In adjusted analyses, the rate of first ACP conversation for persons with organ failure was the lowest (IRR 0.70 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.73)). Persons with cancer had the highest rate (IRR 1.75 (95% CI 1.68 to 1.83)). Within the subsample of persons with organ failure, the subsample of persons with dementia and the subsample of stroke, a comorbid diagnosis of cancer increased the probability of ACP. Further, for those with organ failure or cancer, comorbid dementia decreased the probability of ACP.

Considering the complexity of initiating ACP for persons with organ failure or dementia, general practitioners should prioritise offering it to them and their family caregivers. Policy initiatives should stimulate the implementation of ACP for people with chronic-progressive disease.

To assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a tailored exercise intervention compared with usual care for people aged 80 years and older with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis (OA) and comorbidities.

Two-arm, parallel-design, multicentre, pragmatic, feasibility RCT.

Four National Health Service outpatient physiotherapy services across England.

Adults aged 80 years and over with clinical hip and/or knee OA and ≥1 comorbidity.

Participants were randomised 1:1 via a central web-based system to be offered: (1) a 12-week tailored exercise programme or (2) usual care. Participants and outcome assessors were not blinded to treatment allocation.

(1) Ability to screen and recruit participants; (2) retention of participants at 14-week follow-up; (3) intervention fidelity (proportion of participants who received ≥4 intervention sessions as per protocol) and (4) participant engagement (assessed by home exercise adherence).

Between 12 May 2022 and 26 January 2023, 133 potential participants were screened, of whom 94 were eligible. The main reasons for ineligibility were symptoms not consistent with hip or knee OA (10/39, 25.6%) or already having had a physiotherapy appointment (8/39, 20.5%). 51 of 94 (54%) eligible participants were recruited. Participants had a mean age of 84 years (SD 3.5), 31 (60.8%) were female and 96.1% reported their ethnicity as White British (n=49/51). 45 of 51 participants (88%) provided outcome data at the 14-week follow-up time point. Four or more intervention sessions were attended by 13/25 (52%) participants. Home exercise log completion declined over time: 6/23 participants (26.1%) returned completed exercise logs for all 12 weeks. The median number of days home exercises were recorded each week was 5 (range 0–7).

This study demonstrated that a definitive trial would be feasible. Before proceeding, modifications to ensure recruitment of a diverse population and intervention fidelity should be addressed.

ISRCTN75983430.

The number of people living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs or ‘multimorbidity’) is growing. Evidence indicates that exercise-based rehabilitation can improve health-related quality of life and reduce hospital admissions for a number of single long-term conditions. However, it is increasingly recognised that such condition-focused rehabilitation programmes do not meet the needs of people living with MLTCs. The aims for this study were to (1) evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the newly developed Personalised Exercise Rehabilitation FOR people with Multiple long-term conditions (PERFORM) intervention; (2) assess the feasibility of study methods to inform progression to a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) and (3) refine our intervention programme theory.

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients receiving and healthcare practitioners delivering the PERFORM intervention, to seek their experiences of the intervention and taking part in the study. Interviews were analysed thematically, informed by Normalisation Process Theory and the programme theory.

Three UK sites (two acute hospital settings, one community-based healthcare setting).

18 of the 60 PERFORM participants and 6 healthcare professionals were interviewed.

The intervention consisted of 8 weeks of supervised group-based exercise rehabilitation and structured self-care symptom-based support.

All participants and staff interviewed found PERFORM useful for physical and mental well-being and noted positive impacts of participation, although some specific modifications to the intervention delivery and training and study methods were identified. Scheduling, staffing and space limitations were barriers that must be considered for future evaluation and implementation. Key intervention mechanisms identified were social support, patient education, building routines and habits, as well as support from healthcare professionals.

We found the PERFORM intervention to be acceptable and feasible, with the potential to improve the health and well-being of people with MLTCs. The findings of the process evaluation inform the future delivery of the PERFORM intervention and the design of our planned full RCT. A definitive trial is needed to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness.

ISRCTN68786622.

Existing exercise-based rehabilitation services, such as cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation, are traditionally commissioned around single long-term conditions (LTCs) and therefore may not meet the complex needs of adults with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) or multimorbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the newly developed personalised exercise-rehabilitation programme for people with multiple long-term conditions (PERFORM) and the trial methods.

A parallel two-group mixed-methods feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) with embedded process and economic evaluation.

Three UK sites (two acute hospital settings, one community-based healthcare setting).

60 adults with MLTCs (defined as the presence of ≥2 LTCs) with at least one known to benefit from exercise therapy were randomised 2:1 to PERFORM intervention plus usual care (PERFORM group) or usual care alone (control group).

The intervention consisted of 8 weeks of supervised group-based exercise rehabilitation and structured self-care symptom-based support.

Primary feasibility outcomes included: trial recruitment (percentage of a target of 60 participants recruited within 4.5 months), retention (percentage of participants with complete EuroQol data at 3 months) and intervention adherence (percentage of intervention group attending ≥60% sessions). Other feasibility measures included completion of outcome measures at baseline (pre-randomisation), 3 months post-randomisation (including patient-reported outcomes, exercise capacity and collection of health and social care resource use) and intervention fidelity.

Target recruitment (40 PERFORM group, 20 control group) was met within the timeframe. Participants were 57% women with a mean (SD) age of 62 (13) years, body mass index of 30.8 (8.0) kg/m² and a median of 4 LTCs (most common: diabetes (41.7%), hypertension (38.3%), asthma (36.7%) and a painful condition (35.0%)). We achieved EuroQol outcome retention of 76.7% (95% CI: 65.9% to 87.1%; 46/60 participants) and intervention adherence of 72.5% (95% CI: 56.3% to 84.4%; 29/40 participants). Data completion for attendees was over 90% for 11/18 outcome measures.

Our findings support the feasibility and rationale for delivering the PERFORM comprehensive self-management and exercise-based rehabilitation intervention for people living with MLTCs and progression to a full multicentre RCT to formally assess clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

ISRCTN68786622.

Current treatments for alcohol use disorders (AUD) have limited efficacy. A previous 28-day pilot trial of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) vs placebo found NAC to be feasible and safe, with evidence of improvement on some measures of alcohol consumption. Thus, the primary aim of the NAC-AUD study is to examine the therapeutic and cost-effectiveness of NAC vs placebo in improving treatment outcomes for AUD. We will also examine the (i) effect of NAC vs placebo on mood, markers of liver injury, cognition and hangover symptoms; and (ii) predictors of any response.

This double-blind trial will randomise participants with AUD to a 12-week regimen of either NAC (2400 mg/day) or placebo. All participants will receive medical management. The primary drinking outcome will be the number of heavy drinking days (HDDs) per week, validated by phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Secondary alcohol-related outcomes will include standard drinks per drinking day (SDDD) per week and absence of any HDDs. Other secondary outcomes will include markers of liver injury, depression, anxiety, craving, hangover symptoms, cognition and blood oxidative stress markers. We will also examine the cost-efficacy of NAC vs placebo.

Ethics approval for the study has been granted by The Sydney Local Health District Ethics Review Committee (X21-0342& HREC2021/ETH11614). There are no restrictions on publication from the sponsor or other parties.

NCT05408247.

International consensus guidelines support the initial administration of 30 mL/kg of intravenous fluids for haemodynamic resuscitation of newly diagnosed septic shock. Practice variation exists between the volume of fluids administered and timing of vasopressor commencement. The optimal approach in patients with septic shock is uncertain.

Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors In emergency Department Sepsis is a 1000-participant multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group clinical trial conducted in patients with septic shock presenting to the emergency department in participating sites in Australia, New Zealand and Ireland. Participants are randomised (1:1) to either restricted fluids and early vasopressors or a larger initial intravenous fluid volume and later vasopressors. The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital at day 90 postrandomisation. Secondary outcomes are all-cause mortality at day 90, time from randomisation until death (to day 90), days alive and at home at day 90 and ventilator-free, vasopressor-free and renal replacement-free days to day 28 postrandomisation and death or disability at 6-month and 12-month postrandomisation. Health-related quality of life will be assessed at day 180 and 12 months following randomisation.

The study was approved by Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC2020/ETH02874) on 21 January 2021. Patients will be enrolled under a waiver of prior consent. The patient or next-of-kin (or equivalent according to local jurisdiction) is approached at the first available opportunity and given a trial information sheet. According to local approvals, the patient or next-of-kin chooses to either continue in the trial or opt-out/decline continued participation. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic conferences.

NCT04569942

Patients with total hip arthroplasties and hemiarthroplasties are both subject to hip dislocations. Although the incidence of complications differs, both patient groups suffer immediate high pain and need acute treatment. The purpose of this study is to design a fast-track pathway for patients with a dislocated hip prosthesis primarily to reduce the time from arrival to reduction and the total hospitalisation time. The secondary aim is to investigate whether quicker prosthesis reduction influences subsequent hip function and quality of life, reduces pain experience immediately and in the long term, and increases patient satisfaction.

This is a prospective observational cohort study, initiated on 1 December 2024 and continuing for 2 years. During the first year, patients admitted to the University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, will follow the current standard treatment pathway. After 1 December 2025, a newly developed treatment pathway (fast-track) will be adhered to. Based on a sample size calculation, 120 patients will be included. The main clinical outcomes (time to reduction (primary outcome), total hospitalisation) are registered from patient files. The patients are followed up for 1 year to measure patient-reported outcomes.

The study is conducted as a treatment quality study and is locally approved by the Executive Board at the University Hospital of Southern Denmark. The results will be published in relevant national and/or international journals and presented at relevant congresses.

NCT06639334.