Conectar
Poverty can have profound negative impacts on parent, child and family health. Primary care providers are in a unique position to address child poverty. Some team-based models have integrated community support workers (CSWs) for social service system navigation assistance. The overall aim of this study is to rigorously test a poverty reduction intervention (navigation of financial supports) embedded in primary care. The primary objective is to compare parenting stress between CSW-supported, structured review of financial supports and social system navigation (intervention) and receipt of written summary of local resources (usual care).
This is a multisite pragmatic superiority randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation to the CSW-supported social system navigation versus no navigation. Parent–child dyads (80 parents of children aged Do you ever have difficulty making ends meet at the end of the month?’) will be recruited during a scheduled health supervision visit from primary care practices in Kingston, Ontario. Intervention group participants will have a structured review of financial supports with a trained CSW and will meet up to 6 times over 6 months. Outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. The primary outcome is the Parenting Stress Index Fourth Edition Short Form (PSI-4-SF) total score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include household income, food insecurity, parent mental health (depression and anxiety) and child health. An internal pilot study was used to obtain more reliable estimates of the SD of PSI-4-SF at 6 months to recalculate the sample size (if needed) and assess randomisation and completion rates. Qualitative interviews conducted 9 months after enrolment explore parent experiences with the CSW intervention.
Research ethics approval by Queen’s University Health Sciences REB. Results will be shared with the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit and academic forums.
Connecting Families (Registered 12 October 2021 at www.clinicaltrials.gov;
To explore Australian and New Zealand nursing and midwifery educators' planetary health knowledge, views, confidence and teaching practices.
A cross-sectional survey design.
An online survey was sent to Australian and New Zealand nursing and midwifery educators across the 45 Schools of Nursing and Midwifery between July and September 2023. The online survey consisted of 29 open- and closed-ended questions about nursing and midwifery educators' planetary health knowledge, views, confidence and teaching practices.
There was a total of 127 responses to the first open-ended question. A total of 97 nursing and midwifery educators then completed the remaining questions. While educators had mostly positive views about integrating planetary health into their teaching, they lacked the knowledge and/or confidence to do so effectively.
Australian and New Zealand nursing and midwifery educators acknowledge that planetary health should be included in nursing and midwifery curricula, but most reported a deficit in knowledge and/or confidence to integrate these complex concepts into their teaching. When considering planetary health, most educators focussed on climate change, which demonstrates their limited understanding of the concept of planetary health.
All nurses and midwives need to understand how the health of the planet and human civilization are interconnected and be prepared to address complex global health challenges now and in the future. Across the world, key healthcare organizations have called upon nursing and midwifery educators to prepare the healthcare workforce to practice in a more sustainable way, including supporting decarbonization of healthcare. However, our study has demonstrated that nursing and midwifery educators do not feel ready to respond due to a lack of required knowledge and/or confidence.
We used the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).
No patient or public contribution.
To achieve consensus on the knowledge and skills that undergraduate/pre-licensure nursing students require to steward healthcare towards a more sustainable future.
A two-phase real-time Delphi study.
Phase 1 included the generation of Planetary Health, climate change and sustainability knowledge and skill statements based on a review of relevant literature. Phase 2 consisted of a real-time Delphi survey designed to seek consensus on the proposed statements from a panel of 42 international experts.
Of the 49 survey statements, 44 (90%) achieved ≥75% consensus and 26 (53%) achieved ≥80% consensus. Three were removed and 32 were modified to improve clarity of language.
The knowledge and skills statements that emerged through this Delphi study can serve as a guide for incorporating Planetary Health, climate change and sustainability into nursing education programs.
Incorporating Planetary Health and climate change education into nursing programs has the potential to produce more environmentally conscious and socially responsible nurses.
The absence of consensus on the essential knowledge and skills expected of nursing students has hindered the advancement of curricula and impacted educators' confidence in teaching Planetary Health and climate change. This study has resulted in a meticulously crafted framework of knowledge and skill statements that will be beneficial to educators, the future nursing workforce, and, ultimately, the individuals and communities whom nurses serve.
This paper adheres to the Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) reporting guideline.
No patient or public contribution.
Urban green and blue space (UGBS) interventions, such as the development of an urban greenway, have the potential to provide public health benefits and multiple co-benefits in the realms of the environment, economy and society. This paper presents the protocol for a 5-year follow-up evaluation of the public health benefits and co-benefits of an urban greenway in Belfast, UK.
The natural experiment evaluation uses a range of systems-oriented and mixed-method approaches. First, using group model building methods, we codeveloped a causal loop diagram with stakeholders to inform the evaluation framework. We will use other systems methods including viable systems modelling and soft systems methodology to understand the context of the system (ie, the intervention) and the stakeholders involved in the development, implementation and maintenance phases. The effectiveness evaluation includes a repeat cross-sectional household survey with a random sample of 1200 local residents (adults aged ≥16 years old) who live within 1 mile of the greenway. The survey is complemented with administrative data from the National Health Service. For the household survey, outcomes include physical activity, mental well-being, quality of life, social capital, perceptions of environment and biodiversity. From the administrative data, outcomes include prescription medications for a range of non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory and mental health conditions. We also investigate changes in infectious disease rates, including COVID-19, and maternal and child health outcomes such as birth weight and gestational diabetes. A range of economic evaluation methods, including a cost-effectiveness analysis and social return on investment (SROI), will be employed. Findings from the household survey and administrative data analysis will be further explored in focus groups with a subsample of those who complete the household survey and the local community to explore possible mechanistic pathways and other impacts beyond those measured. Process evaluation methods include intercept surveys and direct observation of the number and type of greenway visitors using the Systems for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities tool. Finally, we will use methods such as weight of evidence, simulation and group model building, each embedding participatory engagement with stakeholders to help us interpret, triangulate and synthesise the findings.
To our knowledge, this is one of the first natural experiments with a 5-year follow-up evaluation of an UGBS intervention. The findings will help inform future policy and practice on UGBS interventions intended to bring a range of public health benefits and co-benefits. Ethics approval was obtained from the Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Research Ethics Committee prior to the commencement of the study. All participants in the household survey and focus group workshops will provide written informed consent before taking part in the study. Findings will be reported to (1) participants and stakeholders; (2) funding bodies supporting the research; (3) local, regional and national governments to inform policy; (4) presented at local, national and international conferences and (5) disseminated by peer-review publications.
FreshRSS 