FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

How do musculoskeletal disorders impact on quality of life in Tanzania? Results from a community-based survey

Por: Grieve · E. · Deidda · M. · Krauth · S. J. · Biswaro · S. M. · Halliday · J. E. B. · Hsieh · P.-H. · Kelly · C. · Kilonzo · K. · Kiula · K. P. · Kolimba · R. · Msoka · E. F. · Siebert · S. · Walker · R. · Yongolo · N. M. · Mmbaga · B. · McIntosh · E. · NIHR Global Health Group · Biswaro
Objectives

There are little available data on the prevalence, economic and quality of life impacts of musculoskeletal disorders in sub-Saharan Africa. This lack of evidence is wholly disproportionate to the significant disability burden of musculoskeletal disorders as reported in high-income countries. Our research aimed to undertake an adequately powered study to identify, measure and value the health impact of musculoskeletal conditions in the Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania.

Design

A community-based cross-sectional survey was undertaken between January 2021 and September 2021. A two-stage cluster sampling with replacement and probability proportional to size was used to select a representative sample of the population.

Setting

The survey was conducted in 15 villages in the Hai District, Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania.

Participants

Economic and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires were administered to a sample of residents (aged over 5 years old) in selected households (N=1050). There were a total of 594 respondents, of whom 153 had a confirmed musculoskeletal disorder and 441 matched controls. Almost three-quarters of those identified as having a musculoskeletal disorder were female and had an average age of 66 years.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Questions on healthcare resource use, expenditure and quality of life were administered to all participants, with additional more detailed economic and quality of life questions administered to those who screened positive, indicating probable arthritis.

Results

There is a statistically significant reduction in HRQOL, on average 25% from a utility score of 0.862 (0.837, 0.886) to 0.636 (0.580, 0.692) for those identified as having a musculoskeletal disorder compared with those without. The attributes ‘pain’ and ‘discomfort’ were the major contributors to this reduction in HRQOL.

Conclusions

This research has revealed a significant impact of musculoskeletal conditions on HRQOL in the Hai district in Tanzania. The evidence will be used to guide clinical health practices, interventions design, service provisions and health promotion and awareness activities at institutional, regional and national levels.

Personalised Exercise Rehabilitation FOR people with Multiple long-term conditions (PERFORM): findings from a process evaluation of a randomised feasibility study

Por: Brown · S. E. · Simpson · S. A. A. · Greaves · C. · Daw · P. · Dean · S. G. · Evans · R. A. · Withers · T. M. · Ahmed · Z. · Barber · S. · Barwell · G. · Doherty · P. J. · Gardiner · N. · Ibbotson · T. · Jani · B. · Jolly · K. · Mair · F. · Manifield · J. R. · McIntosh · E. · Miller · D. · O
Objective

The number of people living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs or ‘multimorbidity’) is growing. Evidence indicates that exercise-based rehabilitation can improve health-related quality of life and reduce hospital admissions for a number of single long-term conditions. However, it is increasingly recognised that such condition-focused rehabilitation programmes do not meet the needs of people living with MLTCs. The aims for this study were to (1) evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the newly developed Personalised Exercise Rehabilitation FOR people with Multiple long-term conditions (PERFORM) intervention; (2) assess the feasibility of study methods to inform progression to a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) and (3) refine our intervention programme theory.

Design

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients receiving and healthcare practitioners delivering the PERFORM intervention, to seek their experiences of the intervention and taking part in the study. Interviews were analysed thematically, informed by Normalisation Process Theory and the programme theory.

Setting

Three UK sites (two acute hospital settings, one community-based healthcare setting).

Participants

18 of the 60 PERFORM participants and 6 healthcare professionals were interviewed.

Intervention

The intervention consisted of 8 weeks of supervised group-based exercise rehabilitation and structured self-care symptom-based support.

Results

All participants and staff interviewed found PERFORM useful for physical and mental well-being and noted positive impacts of participation, although some specific modifications to the intervention delivery and training and study methods were identified. Scheduling, staffing and space limitations were barriers that must be considered for future evaluation and implementation. Key intervention mechanisms identified were social support, patient education, building routines and habits, as well as support from healthcare professionals.

Conclusions

We found the PERFORM intervention to be acceptable and feasible, with the potential to improve the health and well-being of people with MLTCs. The findings of the process evaluation inform the future delivery of the PERFORM intervention and the design of our planned full RCT. A definitive trial is needed to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN68786622.

Personalised exercise-rehabilitation for people with multiple long-term conditions (PERFORM): a randomised feasibility study

Por: Evans · R. A. · Simpson · S. A. · Manifield · J. R. · Ahmed · Z. · Barber · S. · Barwell · G. · Brown · S. E. · Daw · P. · Dean · S. G. · Doherty · P. J. · Fraser · H. · Gardiner · N. · Greaves · C. · Ibbotson · T. · Jani · B. · Jolly · K. · Mair · F. · McIntosh · E. · Megaritis · D. · Mille
Objective

Existing exercise-based rehabilitation services, such as cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation, are traditionally commissioned around single long-term conditions (LTCs) and therefore may not meet the complex needs of adults with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) or multimorbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the newly developed personalised exercise-rehabilitation programme for people with multiple long-term conditions (PERFORM) and the trial methods.

Design

A parallel two-group mixed-methods feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) with embedded process and economic evaluation.

Setting

Three UK sites (two acute hospital settings, one community-based healthcare setting).

Participants

60 adults with MLTCs (defined as the presence of ≥2 LTCs) with at least one known to benefit from exercise therapy were randomised 2:1 to PERFORM intervention plus usual care (PERFORM group) or usual care alone (control group).

Intervention

The intervention consisted of 8 weeks of supervised group-based exercise rehabilitation and structured self-care symptom-based support.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Primary feasibility outcomes included: trial recruitment (percentage of a target of 60 participants recruited within 4.5 months), retention (percentage of participants with complete EuroQol data at 3 months) and intervention adherence (percentage of intervention group attending ≥60% sessions). Other feasibility measures included completion of outcome measures at baseline (pre-randomisation), 3 months post-randomisation (including patient-reported outcomes, exercise capacity and collection of health and social care resource use) and intervention fidelity.

Results

Target recruitment (40 PERFORM group, 20 control group) was met within the timeframe. Participants were 57% women with a mean (SD) age of 62 (13) years, body mass index of 30.8 (8.0) kg/m2 and a median of 4 LTCs (most common: diabetes (41.7%), hypertension (38.3%), asthma (36.7%) and a painful condition (35.0%)). We achieved EuroQol outcome retention of 76.7% (95% CI: 65.9% to 87.1%; 46/60 participants) and intervention adherence of 72.5% (95% CI: 56.3% to 84.4%; 29/40 participants). Data completion for attendees was over 90% for 11/18 outcome measures.

Conclusions

Our findings support the feasibility and rationale for delivering the PERFORM comprehensive self-management and exercise-based rehabilitation intervention for people living with MLTCs and progression to a full multicentre RCT to formally assess clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN68786622.

❌