Childhood obesity has surged globally, leading to various metabolic comorbidities and increased cardiovascular risks. Early intervention in lifestyle and feeding practices during infancy is crucial to mitigate these risks. This study evaluates the efficacy of a mobile web app-based intervention tool, named the Feeding, Lifestyle, Activity Goals (FLAGs) to promote healthier eating behaviours and lifestyle habits in infants from birth to 12 months.

This two-arm randomised controlled trial will enrol 220 caregiver-infant pairs per arm at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, with recruitment expected from January to December 2025. Eligible participants include women at ≥34 weeks’ gestation or up to 3 days post delivery with pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity (body mass index (BMI) >23 kg/m²) and/or a diagnosis of diabetes. Caregiver-infant pairs will be randomised to the FLAGs intervention or control group. Over 12 months, both groups will receive standard infant care. The intervention group will undergo regular assessments via the FLAGs web app built-in assessment tool, assessing infant feeding practices, sedentary behaviour and physical activity. The intervention group will also receive FLAGs personalised guidance and weekly digital nudges. Maternal and infant data will be collected at baseline and at 12 months. Primary outcomes are infant BMI, weight-for-length and body composition at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include lifestyle behaviours and eating habits assessed through validated questionnaires when the infants are 1 year old. We will perform both intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis.

Ethical approval has been obtained from the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (Ref: 2024/3224). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences, with de-identified data available on reasonable request. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT06457750).

NCT06457750.

To examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the substitution of surgical procedures in benign gynaecology in the Netherlands.

Quantitative longitudinal study evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Nationwide healthcare delivery was analysed across six benign gynaecological pathways from 2016 to 2022 using Vektis and Dutch Hospital Data (DHD), accessed via Statistics Netherlands (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek).

The study focused on six benign gynaecological pathways classified using Dutch Diagnosis Treatment Combinations (DTCs): heavy menstrual blood loss (G11), uterine fibroids (G15), endometriosis (G17), prolapse (G25), infertility treatment (F11) and first trimester pregnancy complications (Z12). All patients receiving care within these pathways between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022 were included. Exclusions applied to all patients under 18 years old and, only within the menstrual disorder pathway, patients over 51 years old to exclude most postmenopausal blood loss cases where no alternative treatment applies.

Cohorts from the initial pandemic year (2020) were compared with four prepandemic cohorts (2016–2019) and late-pandemic (2021) and postpandemic (2022) cohorts.

The primary outcome was the trend in the total number of patients in surgical and non-surgical procedure groups across cohort periods. Secondary outcomes included trends within individual pathways.

The analysis identified a significant reduction in benign gynaecological care during 2020, with an 18.3% (p

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted both surgical and non-surgical procedures within benign gynaecological pathways. Reduced care uptake during the pandemic waves was not recovered but instead forgone. The reduction in surgical procedures did not correspond with increased use of non-surgical alternatives. Future research should prioritise evaluating the long-term impacts of this disruption on patients and society.

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can lead to reduced lung function and worse clinical outcomes. Previous studies have reported associations between severe exacerbations and increased risk of hospitalisation and/or mortality. This meta-analysis examined the impact of moderate exacerbations on the risk of future exacerbations and all-cause mortality.

This meta-analysis included seven observational studies from the EXACOS (EXAcerbations of COPD and their OutcomeS)/AVOIDEX (Impact of AVOIDing EXacerbations of COPD) programme studies.

This meta-analysis used data from regional claims databases or electronic healthcare records from seven countries.

The individual studies included patients with a diagnosis of COPD and ≥12 months of data availability before (regarded as baseline) and after the index (ie, the date of the first COPD diagnosis), with postindex data considered the follow-up period.

The number of COPD exacerbations experienced during the baseline period (ie, the exposure variable) was used to categorise patients into the following groups: no exacerbations, one moderate exacerbation only or two or more moderate/severe exacerbations. Outcomes assessed included risk of COPD exacerbations and all-cause mortality during follow-up as a function of baseline exacerbations. For meta-analyses, all rate ratios (RRs) were log-transformed, and associations were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis models.

Among 2 733 162 patients with COPD, one moderate exacerbation was significantly associated with a twofold increased risk of future exacerbations compared with having no exacerbations during baseline, with pooled RRs (95% CIs) of 2.47 (1.47 to 4.14) at 1 year, 2.49 (1.38 to 4.49) at 2 years and 2.38 (1.30 to 4.34) at 3 years postindex. The pooled RR (95% CI) for all-cause mortality was 1.30 (1.05 to 1.62), indicating a 30% increase in risk following one moderate exacerbation versus no exacerbations.

Preventing moderate exacerbations in patients with COPD should be a priority that may improve patient trajectories and outcomes.

To estimate the impact of COVID-19 infection on the requirement for social care services among adults aged ≥50 years in North-West London.

Population-based matched cohort study using linked routinely collected electronic social care, primary care and hospital records (the Discover dataset).

Approximately 4.7 million people with a general practitioner record in North-West London.

150 654 adults aged ≥50 years with a first diagnosis of COVID-19 between January 2020 and February 2023 and 547 704 propensity score matched comparators without a COVID-19 diagnosis during the same period.

Social care use and associated costs overall and by specific type (care home, domiciliary care, respite care, social care assessments) stratified by age group, index year, diagnosis setting, severe COVID-19 risk status, frailty and care home admission prior to index. Overall survival was also assessed.

A total of 9174 (6.09%) individuals with COVID-19 required social care use (of any type) during follow-up, 2.54 times (95% CI 2.48 to 2.61; p

This increase in social care utilisation was observed for all age groups. Adults with COVID-19 had over four times higher social care costs than matched comparators (£1276 per person per year (pppy) vs £276 pppy; mean difference +£1000, 95% CI £947 to £1054, p

COVID-19 infection is associated with meaningfully higher social care requirements in the ≥50 years population. Reducing the need for social care use and the associated costs of care should be one of the goals of interventions to reduce the risk and severity of COVID-19 infection.

Social norms are often implicit informal rules that most people accept and abide by, and can influence how people behave, sometimes based on perceived rewards and/or sanctions. Social norms are propelled by some reference or population groups who exert a considerable amount of influence on behaviour because people value their approval or disapproval. Despite these observations, little research exists on the influence of social norms on diabetes risk-taking behaviours. We explored diet-related social norms and their influence on risk-taking behaviours for type 2 diabetes (T2D).

We conducted a multi-method qualitative study guided by the Social Norms Exploration Toolkit participatory tools. A total of 45 participants were interviewed for this study, including (10) T2D patients, (10) caregivers of T2D patients, (10) healthcare providers, (2) village health teams, (4) diabetes-free community members; (4) community influencers like cultural leaders and (5) family members. The study was conducted in eastern Uganda in the districts of Bugiri and Busia. Data were collected on health workers, caregivers, patients and community members using focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and non-participant observation. Data were manually analysed to identify emerging social norms and other information of interest following a thematic framework approach.

Most participants were aware that frequent consumption of fatty foods and sugary refined foods could increase one’s risk of getting T2D. The study highlights three themes: general awareness of T2D risk factors, common social norms influencing dietary behaviours and behavioural risk factors that are influenced by the social norms. The study highlights significant behavioural and social drivers of T2D, which include consumption of high-fat, high-sugar diets, limited exercise and stress. Gendered and cultural norms strongly influence dietary behaviours, with women preparing unhealthy foods to meet societal expectations, fearing sanctions like divorce or community stigma, while men’s dietary preferences were linked to respect and social status. Norms around staple food preferences and respect linked to weight further perpetuate T2D risk behaviours. Community influencers, family dynamics and cultural traditions reinforce these practices, underscoring the need for gender-transformative, culturally sensitive and community-centred interventions. However, healthcare providers and village health teams are critical for promoting healthier behaviours and reducing T2D prevalence.

Our deep-dive social norms diagnosis has revealed that even when people know the risk factors for T2D, they will still follow the social norm influence regarding lifestyles. Inclusive strategies that actively engage and reshape norms are therefore vital to reduce the prevalence of T2D.

Hospitals have been identified as one of the drivers accelerating climate change, and in response, they have recently been incorporating environmentally sustainable goals into their organisations. Given the significant role that healthcare workers play in pursuing hospitals’ environmental goals through such actions as energy conservation and waste reduction, the scoping review is intended to comprehensively map and summarise the literature on these workers’ green behaviours within hospital settings.

The scoping review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and will report findings according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. A comprehensive search for relevant sources published from database inception through 31 January 2025 will be conducted across seven electronic databases (PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Emerald Journals), using key terms such as "hospital," "healthcare workers" and "green behavior". We will include peer-reviewed journal articles focusing on healthcare workers’ green behaviours in hospitals and relevant grey literature in order to provide an extensive review. Articles that are not written in English or that are intervention-based will be excluded. The study selection process will be presented in a flow diagram, and the text will summarise the findings of eligible studies according to key characteristics.

The scoping review will not require ethical approval. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentation.

This protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YU345).

This study assessed the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and its relationship with clinical factors and comorbidities in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated in primary care settings.

Cross-sectional study design: This study assessed the HRQoL using a 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) tool in eight domains. The HRQoL scores ranged from 0% to 100% for each domain, with higher scores indicating better HRQoL. Linear regression was used to assess the association of HRQoL domain scores with clinical covariates and comorbidities.

A countrywide study was conducted on individuals with established T2DM (N=635) attending primary healthcare services for various conditions across nine federal states of Austria from 2021 to 2023.

A total of 635 individuals, aged above 50 years and diagnosed with T2DM, were recruited by the attending physician to evaluate their HRQoL in relation to T2DM and its associated comorbidities.

The mean SF-36 scores for physical functioning (69±28), role-physical (62±42), mental health (72±20), role-emotional (73±41), social functioning (79±25), bodily pain (67±28) and vitality (55±22) were satisfactory, except for general health (41±10). Age and body mass were inversely associated with physical, mental and social HRQoL (p

Our analysis showed that advanced age, obesity, depression, cardiovascular disease, chronic lung diseases and multimorbidity were associated with poor HRQoL of individuals with T2DM at the primary care level. These findings highlight the need for strengthening holistic management in primary care to address the diverse physical, social and emotional needs of individuals with T2DM.