Conectar
by Ayesha Bibi, Muhammad Hamza Afandi, Azra Mehmood, Usman Ali Ashfaq, Muhammad Shareef Masoud, Mohsin Ahmad Khan, Rashid Bhatti
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a very significant mortality rate and is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Jacaranda mimosifolia is reported to have potential antitumor activities against various human cancers. However, the effects of J. mimosifolia on HCC are yet elusive. This study aimed to investigate the anti-HCC potential of methanolic extract of J. mimosifolia leaves using in vitro and in vivo studies and a network pharmacology approach. The effect of J. mimosifolia extract was assessed on Huh-7.5 cells using MTT assay, wound healing assay, and DNA fragmentation assay. These experiments found that J. mimosifolia extract significantly suppressed Huh-7.5 cell proliferation, impaired cell migration, and induced cell apoptosis. The real-time PCR validated the upregulation of p53 and Bax, alongside the downregulation of AFP and GPC3 in Huh-7.5 cells after treatment with J. mimosifolia extract. In vivo experiments confirmed the hepatoprotective effects of J. mimosifolia extract in mice models with CCl4-induced hepatic injury. In addition, through network pharmacological analysis, J. mimosifolia was found to play a critical role against HCC via targeting multiple potential targets and pathways. Docking analysis identified apigenin and kaempferol with the lowest binding energy against PTGS2 and EGFR, respectively, while flavonol glycoside showed the lowest binding energy against MMP9. However, detailed research is needed to isolate the potential phytochemicals from J. mimosifolia against HCC.To investigate whether patient safety culture is associated with nurses' turnover intention and to examine correlational sequential pathways involving burnout and job satisfaction, drawing on Conservation of Resources theory.
A descriptive, correlational design.
This study used data collected during 2023 from a hospital-wide patient safety culture survey conducted in four hospitals in South Korea. The sample comprised 3082 nurses from diverse units. Relationships among patient safety culture, burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention were examined using a mediation model within a structural equation modelling framework (WLSMV estimator with probit link), controlling for age and hospital tenure.
Patient safety culture was associated with lower burnout and higher job satisfaction. Burnout was associated with lower job satisfaction and with a higher likelihood of turnover intention, whereas job satisfaction was associated with a lower likelihood of turnover intention. When burnout and job satisfaction were considered together, the association between patient safety culture and turnover intention was explained through these two factors rather than by a direct pathway.
Patient safety culture functions as an organizational resource that relates to reduced burnout and enhanced job satisfaction, which together relate to lower intention to leave.
Strengthening patient safety culture—alongside efforts to reduce strain and foster positive job attitudes—may support nurse well-being and improve retention, thereby supporting continuity and safety of patient care.
This study addresses persistent nurse turnover intention in hospitals and identifies patient safety culture as an organizational lever that operates through reduced burnout and improved job satisfaction. The findings can guide nurse leaders and policymakers in hospitals to implement culture-focused strategies that support staff well-being, enhance retention, and sustain safe patient care.
STROBE guidelines were followed.
No patient or public contribution.
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have become the leading cause of mortality globally, with a sharp rise in Iran due to lifestyle changes and urbanisation. Although many NCD risk factors are modifiable, limited understanding of their determinants hinders effective prevention. To address this, the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (PERSIAN) Cohort was established in 2014 to study NCDs nationwide. The Sabzevar PERSIAN Cohort Study (SPECS) is the first in northeastern Iran, aiming to investigate environmental and social factors influencing NCDs in a unique regional context.
SPECS enrolled 5174 adults (aged 35–70 years) in northeastern Iran between January 2018 and January 2019 through a census and an online registration process. The baseline data collection included demographic verification, informed consent, health questionnaires, anthropometric measurements and biological samples (blood, urine, hair, nails). The annual follow-up began in April 2019, with full reassessments every 5 years over a 15-year period. The data is gathered via an active and passive follow-up, supported by trained staff and registry linkages.
Of the 5174 participants, 4241 (81%) remained in the study. Among the cohort, 54.5% were female, with a mean age of 50.5 years. The majority were married (93.5%), and nearly half had at least high-school education (46.5%) and moderate socioeconomic status (49.4%). Drug abuse history (smoking/drugs) was reported by about 15% of the sample. The mean body mass index was 26.9 kg/m², and the average blood pressure was higher in males (118.1/74.0 mm Hg) than in females (111.5/70.2 mm Hg). The common conditions included hypertension (22.8%), kidney stones (22.4%), fatty liver (15.4%) and diabetes (13.8%). Cancer had the highest treatment rate (100%), while fatty liver had the lowest (70.1%). Stroke had the highest mean age of onset (51.2 years), and epilepsy the lowest (23.7 years). All health data were self-reported.
SPECS, part of the national PERSIAN cohort initiative, is the only adult NCD-focused study in Khorasan Razavi. Its 15-year follow-up aims to generate region-specific insights into the incidence of NCDs and their risk factors. The ethnically homogeneous sample enhances statistical power, and the findings may inform culturally tailored health policies. While self-reported data have limitations due to bias, high initial participation and access to free healthcare support long-term engagement, especially among lower-income groups.
by Hongjun Park, Beechui Koo, Jungwook Shin, Byoung Hyuck Kim, James J. Sohn
Approximately one-third of US adults have tattoos, yet the dosimetric impact of intradermal tattoo pigments during radiation therapy remains uncharacterized. Commercial tattoo inks contain unregulated metallic impurities including chromium, lead, and nickel, raising concerns about dose perturbations in tattooed skin. This work quantifies radiation dose perturbations induced by high-atomic-number (Z) tattoo pigments under clinically relevant radiotherapy conditions. Monte Carlo simulations (TOPAS) modeled layered skin phantoms with a 0.3-mm intradermal tattoo layer embedded at 1.25–1.55 mm depth. Three commercial inks were evaluated: carbon-based (black) and metal-containing (Fe-rich brown, Al-containing orange) at pigment loadings of 5–100 vol% within the tattoo layer, to establish upper-bound effects. Electron (6, 18 MeV) and photon (6, 18 MV) beams were simulated with standard clinical geometry (1 × 1 cm² field, SSD = 100 cm). Photon irradiation produced pronounced, depth-localized dose enhancement, with peak dose enhancement factor (DEF) reaching 2.5 for brown ink at 18 MV, a 62% mean increase relative to non-tattooed skin driven by high-Z–mediated secondary electron production. Electron beams exhibited energy-dependent behavior: 6 MeV produced modest enhancement (peak DEF ~ 1.07), while 18 MeV unexpectedly generated dose deficits (DEFSettings with insufficient human resources struggle to provide timely eye care services and information to the population. mHealth (mobile healthcare) is a promising solution; however, evidence on the effectiveness of interactive voice response (IVR) and real-time phone-based education remains scarce, despite their potential to be scalable and cost-effective. This study aims to implement the Virtual Baithak, an interactive mHealth platform, to improve eye-health literacy among older adults residing in rural India. The objectives are to (1) Develop and validate the Virtual Baithak for improving vision health and (2) Determine its effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability among the older adults.
This 3-armed, parallel, randomised controlled trial of 14 months duration will enrol 381 older adults (aged 60 years and above). Participants will be blinded and randomly (computer-generated) assigned to either of the three groups based on the intervention for eye-health education they receive: both IVR and group calls moderated by a healthcare professional, only IVR and usual care. The two intervention arms will receive the information weekly over a 3-month period through the Virtual Baithak platform, which will be designed for this study using a participatory research approach to develop the content. The primary study outcomes are digital health literacy and vision health knowledge scores, measured at baseline and 14 months. The secondary outcomes include m-health technology acceptance and usage practices. A mixed-method process evaluation will be conducted to assess the intervention feasibility and implementation, including in-depth interviews with participants. The qualitative data will be thematically analysed to explore factors that promote or restrain the implementation. The inferential statistical quantitative analysis will be performed using linear mixed models.
The study has been approved by the ‘Institute Ethics Committee,’ PGIMER, Chandigarh, India (PGI/IEC/2022/EIC000282 dated 18 February 2022). The results will be disseminated via presentations and/or publications at the national and international levels.
CTRI/2023/02/049383, dated 1 February 2023.
To determine whether a novel urine collection device (the ‘Pee-in-Pot (PiP)’) produces the same rates of reportable urine culture results as standard of care (SOC) urine collection. To determine whether the PiP produces comparable microscopy results to SOC urine collection. To estimate the carbon footprint of the PiP compared to SOC urine collection.
A prospectively designed, single-centre, paired comparison study.
A district general hospital in Southwest England, including antenatal clinical, accident and emergency, medical and surgical ward environments.
Adults aged 18 or over.
Urine passed through the PiP device before being decanted into a 10 mL boric acid tube for microscopy and culture, compared with the same urine contained only in a sterile plastic vessel before being decanted into a boric acid tube for microscopy and culture.
The proportion of positive urine culture results.
The proportion of heavy mixed growth culture results. Comparison of particle counts: all small particles, bacteria, red blood cells and white blood cells.
Microscopy was performed for 1353 paired samples, of which 808 paired samples both underwent culture. Overall, urine cultures were positive in 9.3% (75/808) and 10.0% (81/808) of PiP and control cases, respectively. Overall matching between PiP and control arms for reportable positive culture results was 98.5% (796/808), with a Cohen’s Kappa test coefficient () of 0.9149 (almost perfect agreement). There was no significant difference in the rate of positive urine culture results between testing arms for any organisms (margin of non-inferiority prospectively defined as ±2.5% for Escherichia coli positive cultures). For microscopy, there was agreement in meeting culture thresholds for 1308 of 1353 paired samples with a difference in culturing rates of 0.00517 (95% CI –0.0045 to 0.015, ie, high level of agreement). The estimated base case carbon footprint of PiP testing was 95g CO2e compared to 270g CO2e for SOC testing.
This study found the PiP to be non-inferior for routine urine microscopy and culture testing and to have a lower carbon footprint compared with SOC urine testing.
Burns are a major cause of morbidity in Yemen, and their prevention relies heavily on community knowledge and safe practices. Understanding gaps in awareness and behaviour is essential for designing effective interventions. This study assessed the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding burn prevention and first aid among a Yemeni community. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 380 participants using a structured questionnaire distributed via social media and community networks. Data were collected on demographics, educational level, occupation, residential area and KAP related to household, electrical and chemical burns. Associations between participant characteristics and burn-related KAPs were analysed. Participants were predominantly female (63.7%), aged 15–45 years (79.8%), urban residents (92.9%) and university-educated (82.1%). Healthcare workers comprised 50.8% of respondents. Knowledge of burn prevention and first aid was highest among university-educated and healthcare participants, with 84.6% correctly identifying initial burn management. Unsafe practices, such as applying honey or toothpaste and improper handling of chemical or electrical injuries, were more common among less-educated, rural and nonhealthcare respondents. Urban participants demonstrated better preventive practices, while cultural reliance on traditional remedies persisted across all groups. Among predominantly urban and educated populations in Yemen, knowledge and attitudes toward burn prevention and first aid are generally favourable; however, gaps persist, particularly in rural and less-educated communities. Cultural practices and misconceptions continue to limit optimal care. These findings underscore the urgent need for culturally sensitive, literacy-appropriate, community-based interventions to improve burn prevention, first aid practices and equitable health outcomes.
To explore the views of healthcare practitioners in Britain regarding the role of midwives and nurses in the delivery of medical and surgical abortion.
An observational study of the Shaping Abortion for Change study healthcare practitioner survey (2021–2022).
Relationships between healthcare practitioner type, participant characteristics, knowledge of and attitudes towards abortion, and views about nurses' and midwives' role in abortion care were examined using Pearson's Chi-squared tests of association and multivariable logistic regression.
Amongst 763 participants including doctors, nurses, midwives and pharmacists, 71.6% supported specialist nurses in sexual and reproductive health and abortion clinics and hospitals, expanding their roles to include prescribing abortion medications and surgical abortion methods. Support was lower for midwives (35.8%) and primary care nurses (32.5%). There was considerable support for all nursing and midwifery groups to be involved in adjacent tasks of abortion care. Differences in support by healthcare practitioner type persisted after adjustment for exposure variables.
There is strong support for specialist nurses to expand their role in abortion care. This change could be implemented following clarification of the legal position. Some healthcare practitioner groups are more reluctant to support broader involvement of nurses and midwives in abortion provision.
Expanding specialist nurses' role in abortion care could increase service capacity and improve patient access and experience. Understanding and addressing the concerns of healthcare practitioners opposing this change is critical for successful implementation and patient safety.
This study addresses the potential for nurse and midwife role expansion in abortion care. The findings highlight broad support for specialist nurses whilst identifying barriers to wider role expansion. The research informs policy discussions on workforce optimisation and access to abortion services across Britain.
This study adheres to the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies.
In the SACHA study, patient and public involvement was included at all stages to inform study design, recruitment, data collection and analysis.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) enhances wound healing by promoting angiogenesis and reducing hypoxia. However, the role of air-breaks—intermittent exposures to ambient air during HBOT—remains unclear. We investigated the effects of air-breaks on HBOT-mediated wound healing, particularly in combination with adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs). Full-thickness wounds were created in C57BL/6 mice (n = 36) and assigned to control, HBOT (1 h/day, 2 ATA for 11 days), or HBOT with a 10-min air-break groups. In a second experiment, we evaluated ASC treatment combined with HBOT and air-breaks. Wound healing was assessed via gross examination, histology and gene expression analysis of collagen type 1 alpha 1 (Col1a1), hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (Hif1a) and tumour necrosis factor (Tnf-α). Compared with HBOT alone, air-breaks significantly improved wound closure, epithelial regeneration and collagen deposition (p < 0.05). Gene analysis showed higher Col1a1 expression and lower Hif1a and Tnf-α levels in the air-break group. In ASC-treated wounds, air-breaks further accelerated healing, enhancing collagen synthesis and reducing hypoxia and inflammation. These findings suggest that incorporating air-breaks into HBOT protocols improves wound healing outcomes, both generally and in ASC-based therapies, by modulating collagen production, hypoxia and inflammation, and could optimise HBOT efficacy, particularly in cell-based regenerative therapies.
Commentary on: Liu Q, László KD, Wei D, et al. Suicide attempt and death by suicide among parents of young individuals with cancer: A population-based study in Denmark and Sweden. PLoS Med 2024;21:e1004322. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004322
Implications for practice and research Parents of children diagnosed with cancer have high stress rates and higher rates of suicide attempts, particularly in the early years after diagnosis. Healthcare providers working with parents of children diagnosed with cancer should be vigilant and appropriately respond to psychological distress, psychiatric symptoms and suicide risk in this population.
Parents experience significant psychological stress when a child is diagnosed with cancer. More research is needed regarding stress and suicidal behaviour in this population. The aim of this study was to investigate parents’ risk of suicide attempt and risk of death by suicide in relation to having a child...
Nursing leadership is crucial for empowering nurses to excel in their roles. Among various leadership approaches, strengths-based leadership is particularly effective in harnessing staff potential to meet current workplace demands. However, the benefits of this leadership style on nurses' work ability remain underexplored, and the underlying mechanisms driving this relationship have not been thoroughly investigated.
Based on the Self-Determination Theory and the Self-Validation Theory, this study aimed to examine: (1) whether nurse managers' strengths-based leadership (as perceived by bedside nurses) could foster nurses' work ability, and (2) the mediating role of a growth mindset in this association.
Structural equation modeling in AMOS software was conducted, analyzing cross-sectional data from 209 bedside nurses using the Strengths-Based Leadership Scale, the Growth Mindset Scale, and the Work Ability–Personal Radar Scale. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling from October to December 2024 across three tertiary public hospitals in Cairo and Mansoura, Egypt.
Strengths-based leadership was significantly associated with nurses' work ability. Growth mindset of nurses partially mediated the positive association between strengths-based leadership and their work ability.
This study emphasizes the role of strengths-based leadership, an underexplored yet significant leadership style in the nursing literature. It is the first study to examine the effect of strengths-based leadership on nurses' work ability, mediated by a growth mindset.
by Josefine Lampinen, Håkan Littbrand, Ingeborg Nilsson, Annika Toots, Yngve Gustafson, Jerry Öhlin, Henrik Holmberg, Birgitta Olofsson, Anita Ericsson, Mia Conradsson
BackgroundTo meet the complex needs of adults with dementia, a team-based, individualized rehabilitation approach may be required. This randomized controlled pilot trial evaluated the feasibility of a person-centred multidimensional interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for older adults with dementia, in terms of follow-up and response rates, and potential short- and long-term effects in adults with dementia on social participation, loneliness, and mental health.
MethodsParticipants (mean age (SD) 78.7 (±6.6) years), were randomized to an intervention group (n = 31) or usual care (n = 30). The rehabilitation program consisted of a 20-week rehabilitation period and two follow-ups after 5 and 14 months. An interdisciplinary team performed assessments and interventions based on the individual’s goals. Assessors blinded to group allocation performed structured assessments at baseline and after 5, 12, 24, and 36 months.
ResultsInitially, response rates in participants with dementia were high for all assessments in the areas of social participation, loneliness, and mental health. Response rates after 12 months decreased, particularly for cognitively demanding questions with multiple-choice options in the area of social participation. Overall, there were few statistically significant differences between the groups in the outcomes over 36 months, but some of the findings seemed potentially clinically meaningful in favor of the intervention group: increased frequency of active recreation and organized social activities outside the home, as reported by both participants with dementia and caregivers or staff; as well as experienced more frequent visits to family and friends; and short-term reduction in depressive symptoms.
ConclusionsAssessments made of loneliness and mental health in this study over three years seemed feasible. It seemed cognitively demanding for participants with dementia to answer questions regarding social participation over time; therefore it seemed worthwhile to also ask informal caregivers or staff to avoid data loss. The positive findings noted during assessments and potential effects indicate that it is relevant to proceed further to an adequately powered RCT and conducted in additional geographical regions.
Trial registrationISRCTN – The UK’s Clinical Study Registry: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN59155421
by Jacqueline Muts, Danée Knevel, Dick den Hertog, Rachel K. Wong, Timothy C.Y. Chan, Britt J. van Keulen, Johannes B. van Goudoever, Chris H.P. van den Akker
Background and aimsThe macronutrient composition of donor human milk (DHM) can vary substantially due to several factors such as maternal age, diet, and lactation duration. However, consistent macronutrient levels in DHM facilitate the administration of the required amounts to preterm infants. The current pooling strategy at most human milk banks combines milk from different batches from a single donor. This study aims to stabilize the macronutrient quality of DHM by pooling milk from different donors by utilizing machine learning prediction and optimisation techniques.
MethodsThe current pooling strategy is compared with a new theoretical approach that pools milk batches from up to 5 donors. To predict the crude protein and energy content, we used the following variables: body mass index, the donor’s diet (vegetarian or non-vegetarian), maternal age, full-term or preterm delivery, lactation stage, and volume pumped. These predictions are then used within an optimisation model to create milk pools that minimize the deviations from the target macronutrient levels (1.0 g protein/100 mL and 70 kcal/100 mL).
ResultsThe prediction model is based on 2236 created single-donor pools from 480 donors. Random forest regression models provided the most accurate predictions of macronutrient content. The new pooling strategy using multiple donors shows reduced deviations from target values compared to the current single-donor approach (average total absolute deviation 0.402 versus 0.664).
ConclusionThis study proves the potential of data-driven methods to improve operational efficiency in human milk banks, and improving the consistency of donor human milk.
This study aimed to explore the process of moral resilience among frontline healthcare professionals. By delving into experiences of handling moral challenges during a pandemic crisis, we aimed to understand dimensions of moral resilience, affecting factors and consequences. This understanding can inform the implementation of interventions to support healthcare professionals’ well-being and ability to deliver high-quality care, under both routine and extreme conditions.
A qualitative exploratory study was conducted using grounded theory methodology. Data were collected retrospectively through written narratives and individual interviews (September to November 2020).
General hospital wards allocated for patients with COVID-19 in two Swedish healthcare regions.
46 informants, comprising registered nurses, nursing assistants, physicians, managers and allied health professionals.
A conceptual model is presented that describes and explains the process of moral resilience among frontline healthcare professionals working in general hospital wards during a pandemic crisis. The model reveals a complex and dynamic iterative process, with components at both the individual and system levels being inevitably inter-related.
The findings emphasise that moral resilience within healthcare organisations is not solely dependent on individual qualities but also influenced by the working groups or teams, leadership and prevailing organisational structures. Supportive interventions should target workgroup dynamics and organisational culture while providing tailored support for individuals.
To describe (1) the proportion of deaths that were in recently hospitalised children and (2) causes of mortality among deceased children aged 0–59 months with preceding hospitalisations who enrolled in a mortality surveillance programme.
Descriptive study using prospectively collected data.
Eight Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) community and healthcare sites in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.
Deaths among children aged 0–59 months enrolled in CHAMPS 2016–2023.
None.
Deaths with antecedent hospitalisations within 180 days of death. Causes of death determined by expert panels who reviewed clinical data and histopathologic and microbiologic results from postmortem minimally invasive tissue sampling.
CHAMPS enrolled 8548 deaths; we excluded 3688 neonates who died before discharge or ≤24 hours of birth and 482 with unclear information on antecedent hospitalisations. Out of the 4378 remaining deaths, 16.7% (95% CI 15.7% to 17.9%) were deaths that occurred within 180 days of a hospitalisation (n=733/4378). Of these, 55.7% (95% CI 52.0% to 59.3%) occurred outside healthcare facilities. Among included deaths with minimally invasive tissue sampling completed (n=337), lower respiratory tract infections (41.2%, 95% CI 36.0% to 46.7%), sepsis (39.8%, 95% CI 34.5% to 45.2%) and undernutrition (n=92, 27.3%, 95% CI 22.7% to 32.4%) were most common causes of death among cases with antecedent hospitalisations. The greatest proportion of deaths with antecedent hospital admissions occurred among cases aged 1–11 months (48.0%, 95% CI 44.4% to 51.7%), compared with those aged 0–1 months (21.7%, 95% CI 18.8% to 24.9%) and those aged 1–5 years (30.3%, 95% CI 27.0% to 33.8%). Moreover, the greatest proportion of deaths with antecedent hospital admissions occurred among infants/children with weight-for-age Z-score of
We observed a high proportion of deaths with antecedent hospitalisations within 180 days among young children across eight sites in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Among those deaths, children aged 1–11 months and undernourished infants were over-represented, suggesting early follow-up as a potential point to focus targeted support and future research.
To shed new light on the management practice and needs for support, mentoring and continuous education of nurse managers (head nurses and assistant head nurses) during and since the COVID-19 pandemic to identify the innovative strategies they put in place to mobilise teams and foster a healthy work environment.
A multi-centre exploratory descriptive study with a qualitative descriptive exploratory design was used.
10 focus groups held between December 2021 and July 2022, five from a Canadian healthcare centre and five from a Swiss healthcare centre, were conducted with 35 nurse managers. The data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Six central themes emerged: (1) A difficult context to navigate: Continuous adaptation necessary to navigate through difficulties and a rapidly changing context, (2) Maintaining a visible presence and engaging in active listening with team members to promote commitment, motivation and mobilisation, (3) Frequent short meetings, instant and transparent communication, (4) Role legitimacy and recognition, along with continuous professional development, (5) Integration and cohesion among team members, and the quality of care and (6) Shared leadership: A key strategy to prioritise.
The present study offers unique insights into the innovative strategies nurse managers have put in place to ensure the optimal functioning of their care team, to foster a positive work climate, and to ensure the commitment, motivation and mobilisation of their teams. A shared leadership approach appears to be a key lever of action to optimally tackle the present and future needs and challenges of nurse managers.
This study highlights key managerial strategies that can be beneficial in all contexts or during future crises, ultimately helping healthcare organisations and nurse managers have a better understanding of their role and influence.
Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
No patient or public contribution.
To explore how nurse practitioners and physicians providing primary care for LGBTQ+ people experience and make sense of their practice.
Qualitative study using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 clinicians (four nurse practitioners, eight physicians) working in LGBTQ+-focused primary care across diverse U.S. regions. Interviews were online, audio-recorded via Zoom, and lasted 50–90 min. Reflexive notes were maintained. Analysis followed Smith and Nizza's six-stage Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) process from close reading to experiential statements, clustering to personal experiential themes, development of group experiential themes, and synthesis, supported by memoing and peer debriefing.
Four Group Experiential Themes: (1) Belonging, Affirmation, and the Power of LGBTQ+-Centred Spaces: clinicians practised as their full selves and modelled culturally safe care; (2) Personal Pain as Professional Purpose: personal histories of marginalisation informed a reparative ethic that fostered empathy, trust, and safety; (3) Expanding the Boundaries of Health Work: care routinely extended beyond clinic walls to advocacy, harm reduction, administrative support, and navigation of social determinants amid political precarity; (4) Resistance Within Broken Systems: persistent, invisible labour was required to navigate heteronormative and cisnormative infrastructures.
LGBTQ+-focused primary care operates as clinical practice and social justice work. Clinicians translate lived experience into reparative, relational care while constantly negotiating systemic constraints and policy volatility.
Embed LGBTQ+-affirming competencies and reflexivity in education; redesign digital/administrative systems for affirmed names/pronouns and streamlined access; resource and protect services and staff wellbeing in hostile policy climates.
Problem: Persistent inequities and under-recognised experiential labour in LGBTQ+ primary care. Main Findings: Belonging and affirmation; reparative ethic; expanded health work; daily systemic workarounds. Impact Audience: Nurses, physicians, educators, leaders, and policymakers. Reporting Method: COREQ.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
The research investigated the relationship between servant leadership (SL) and innovative work behavior (IWB) among nurses in Pakistan. It also formulates and hypothesizes a serial mediation model, integrating trust-in leadership (TL) and knowledge sharing (KS) as mediated variables.
Nurses' IWBs are critical for improving patient healthcare quality. Despite their significance, scant research has examined how leadership styles, especially SL, can trigger such behavior in nursing. The paper seeks to fill this gap by examining how SL can enhance innovation among nurses, while accounting for the mediating variables of TL and KS within the Pakistani healthcare system.
A quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted, involving 269 nurses from hospitals in Islamabad and Rawalpindi. A time-lagged approach to data collection was used to reduce common method bias. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) were employed to test the proposed hypothesized relationships using SPSS (version 27) and AMOS (version 23).
The hypotheses revealed a significant impact of the constructs. It was discovered that SL has both direct and indirect positive influences on IWB among nurses through TL and KS. Moreover, the findings support high serial mediation, implying that SL has a positive effect on IWB by first building trust, which then leads to knowledge sharing.
The paper contributes to the literature on servant leadership and innovative work behavior by examining mediating mechanisms within nursing teams in Pakistan. The paper also offers practical implications for nurse managers and hospital administrators on fostering a culture of innovation and trust among nurses.
The findings offer actionable insights for nursing management by demonstrating that adopting a servant leadership style can directly and indirectly enhance nurses' innovative work behaviors. By prioritizing trust-building and fostering a culture of knowledge sharing, nurse managers can stimulate innovation, which is critical for improving patient care quality and overall healthcare outcomes.
Dietary recommendations should be based on scientific evidence, and ideally, systematic reviews (SRs) are conducted as part of the guideline development process. The usability of SRs for decision-making is primarily determined by the quality of the evidence from available primary studies, as well as the quality of the SRs themselves. A comprehensive SR protocol ensures high-quality implementation and minimises bias, while making these protocols publicly accessible, promotes transparency and prevents redundancy. The PROSPERO database offers valuable insights into planned methodologies. The aim of this study is to investigate the completeness of reporting in SR protocols for diet- or nutrition-related trials, determine how this has changed over time, and examine the publication of completed SRs by comparing their content with those described in the corresponding protocols.
We developed a systematic search strategy for PROSPERO to identify nutrition- or diet-related SR protocols registered at two different time points (2019 and 2024). Following a screening process to identify eligible protocols, relevant predefined data will be extracted. Subsequently, a structured search will be conducted to identify potential journal publications of the selected protocols, as well as publications describing the results of the SRs, from which relevant predefined data will be also extracted. The methodology of the published articles will be compared with the corresponding a priori protocols registered in PROSPERO. The PROSPERO records registered in 2019 will be compared with those registered in 2024. The results will be evaluated by descriptive statistics, the reporting completeness of PROSPERO records will be assessed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), the planned use of any approaches to assess certainty of evidence will be investigated, and the adherence of published SRs to the methodological details outlined in their corresponding PROSPERO entries will be examined.
Since both databases and publications used in this study are publicly available, ethical approval is not required. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in an international, peer-reviewed journal.
The present study has previously been registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/8fsx7).
Malnutrition is a highly prevalent chronic condition that contributes to higher morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple comorbidities. While positive effects of nutritional therapy in the in-hospital setting have recently been demonstrated, the benefits of long-term nutritional therapy after hospital discharge remain uncertain. Herein, we outline the design and rationale of the EFFORTII trial, the largest nutritional trial to date to assess the effects of continued nutritional support after hospital discharge in medical patients, with particular attention to key design decisions regarding nutritional strategy, patient selection criteria and study endpoints.
The Effect of Continued Nutritional Support at Hospital Discharge on Mortality, Frailty, Functional Outcomes and Recovery (EFFORTII) is an investigator-initiated, non-commercial randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate whether ongoing, individualised nutritional therapy after hospital discharge—targeted to meet specific energy and protein requirements—offers a cost-effective approach to lowering mortality, minimising complications and maintaining functional status compared with standard care. Eligible participants are adult, chronically ill medical inpatients at risk of malnutrition. Patients in the intervention group receive individualised nutritional therapy delivered by an experienced dietitian through a combination of telemedicine and in-person consultations. The intervention aims to meet personalised nutritional targets, supported by a trained dietitian. Control group patients receive nutritional counselling at discharge, but no structured nutritional management during follow-up. We designed the trial as an event-driven trial with a target of 247 mortality events (primary endpoint), which will be assessed over approximately 5 years until event-driven endpoint is met. The minimum total sample size is at least 802 participants, based on the assumed treatment HR of 0.70. The main trial is enrolling patients across multiple sites in Switzerland. During the trial, additional sites in Spain joined the study, and their data will be analysed using a patient-level pooled approach.
This study involves human participants and was first granted ethical approval by the Ethics Committee Northwest- and Central Switzerland and then by all participating local ethics committees. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.
FreshRSS 