Ovarian cancer patients often experience persistent symptoms such as fatigue and pain, impacting their quality of life. Current follow-up care, focused primarily on recurrence detection, may not adequately address these symptoms and can be burdensome. This study evaluates the feasibility of remote monitoring using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and measurements of weight and abdominal circumference as an alternative to standard hospital visits. We aim to assess feasibility (ie, usability and satisfaction) of this approach and identify implementation barriers and facilitators.

This study is a single-centre longitudinal observational pilot that uses both qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate the feasibility of an innovative remote monitoring system for ovarian cancer follow-up care (Controle op Afstand, CopA). It is accessible to both healthcare professionals in the electronic health record and patients through the patient portal. Instead of 3-monthly in-hospital visits, patients are invited to complete regular surveys assessing PROMS about symptoms and quality of life and home measurements of weight and abdominal circumference. Feasibility will be assessed by (1) analysing patient and healthcare professional (HCP) experiences with CopA with the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations questionnaire for HCPs, and the ‘Experienced Usability and Satisfaction with Self-monitoring in the Home Setting’ questionnaire for patients, (2) investigating implementation barriers and facilitators using qualitative method and (3) performing a process evaluation of the intervention, assessing components such as reach, fidelity and compliance, time to response and number of (tele)consultations during the study period. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis.

This study was reviewed by the Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (METC 2022.0256) and exempted it from further review as this study was not subject to the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subject Act. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed open-access publications, scientific conferences and targeted communication to patient organisations, healthcare providers and the wider public.

To investigate the attitudes of physicians towards addressing environmental sustainability in patient conversations, and to identify barriers and facilitators to doing so.

A qualitative, nation-wide study was conducted using semi-structured online focus groups and interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse transcripts, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Secondary and tertiary healthcare institutions in the Netherlands.

Participants were medical specialists and residents in obstetrics and gynaecology (OB-GYN physicians) in the Netherlands. Participants were purposefully identified to capture diverse demographics and practice settings.

Physicians’ attitudes towards discussing the environmental impact of healthcare and the health effects of environmental pollution with patients. Themes were identified and categorised using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

The study included 28 OB-GYN physicians working across 23 healthcare institutions in the Netherlands. Six themes were developed: (1) strong sense of urgency to reduce healthcare's environmental impact, (2) knowledge gaps impair communication about environmental impact to patients, (3) prioritisation of individual patient health over environmental concerns in decision-making, (4) perceived lack of patient interest in environmental outcomes, (5) system-level support facilitates discussions about environmental sustainability with patients and (6) limited perceived value in discussing the health effects of environmental pollution and climate change with patients.

OB-GYN physicians are supportive of discussing the environmental impact of healthcare services when clinically appropriate. Addressing knowledge gaps, providing evidence-based guidance and embedding sustainability into clinical guidelines and decision aids may facilitate the integration of environmental sustainability into patient-provider interactions.

To provide bottom-up guidance on improving post-COVID care using patients’ experiences with received care and their perceived health

Qualitative study design using focus group interviews

30 patients with post-COVID condition recruited through purposive sampling based on patient complexity and diversity

Three dimensions for potential improvements of post-COVID care were identified: (1) building, supporting and maintaining patient resilience, (2) redesigning healthcare pathways to meet patient needs and (3) embedding post-COVID care in health systems and organisations. A conceptual framework that could guide improvements in post-COVID care was developed.

This study revealed several opportunities for improving and implementing post-COVID care following a person-centred approach in multidisciplinary integrated care pathways with an integrative vision of health.