The rapidly growing population of older adults (individuals aged 65 years and older) presents a new set of challenges for healthcare providers in the emergency department (ED), given the prevalence of severe and life-threatening conditions among this group, such as chronic cancer, Alzheimer’s disease/dementia and congestive heart failure. ED encounters often represent a critical point in an older patient’s trajectory of care and can thus be an important opportunity for various interventions such as palliative care consultation. Therefore, identifying those who will benefit most from palliative care is of high importance, especially in determining the course of future treatment. Thus, we aim to conduct a systematic review assessing the efficacy of palliative care screening in the ED by assessing inpatient length of stay as the primary outcome and quality of life, percentage of hospitalisation and cost of care as secondary outcomes.

This study will use Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane as databases. The study population comprises adults aged 60 years and older, with no focus on any specific clinical specialty or disease. Patients who have not received palliative care screening will serve as the comparator. Only studies with an applicable comparator will be considered. Studies published from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2025 will be included.

All articles will be reviewed independently and in duplicate, and every author will participate in the review, data abstraction and conflict resolution process.

Ethical approval is not required as it is a protocol for a systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

CRD42024562389.

Perineal trauma is one of the most common complications of childbirth, impacting approximately 9 out of 10 women who undergo a vaginal delivery. Perineal trauma is a public health issue leading to increased maternal morbidity and decreased quality of life. Although race is being studied as a potential risk factor and predictor of perineal trauma, other contributing factors like racism and social determinants of health have not been adequately studied in the same context. We set out to synthesise the available peer-reviewed evidence evaluating the prognostic association between race and perineal trauma.

This systematic review and meta-analysis adheres to the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols) and PROGRESS (Prognosis Research Strategy) guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO. The review explores the association between racial status (non-Hispanic white vs non-white) and perineal birth trauma using the PECOTS (Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparator, Outcome, Timing and Setting) framework. We will search PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Embase. Peer-reviewed observational studies will be included. Data extraction and screening will be done in duplicate. Analyses will use random-effects models in R, reporting both unadjusted and adjusted risk differences. Risk of bias will be assessed using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions). Heterogeneity and certainty of evidence will be evaluated using I² and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation), respectively.

This is a systematic review based on previously published data, and therefore ethical approval is not required. The findings of this review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic conferences.

CRD42025590093.