Conectar
Pressure ulcers (PUs) (also termed pressure injuries [PIs]) remain a major patient safety issue, particularly in critical care and other high-risk healthcare settings. Nurses are central to PUs/PIs prevention; however, deficiencies in knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices among nursing staff may negatively affect patient outcomes. To systematically synthesise global evidence on nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to PUs/PIs prevention, and to identify factors influencing preventive performance. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, EBSCO, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Springer were searched for studies published between 2011 and 2025. Eligible studies were primary research articles examining registered nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and/or practices regarding PUs/PIs prevention, using cross-sectional, observational, or non-experimental designs. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, settings, samples, assessment instruments, and key outcomes related to knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices. Due to methodological heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed. Twenty-nine studies from diverse geographical regions were included, with sample sizes ranging from 28 to 950 nurses. Overall, nurses' knowledge of PUs/PIs prevention was frequently inadequate, particularly in prevention-specific domains. In contrast, attitudes toward prevention were generally positive across studies. Preventive practices, however, were often suboptimal. Commonly reported barriers included staff shortages, high workload, limited resources, and insufficient institutional support. Higher educational attainment, specialised clinical experience, recent training, and professional seniority were consistently associated with better knowledge, more positive attitudes, and improved preventive practices. Although nurses generally demonstrate positive attitudes toward PUs/PIs prevention, persistent gaps in knowledge and practice remain. These findings underscore the need for structured education programmes, simulation-based training, and strengthened organisational support to enhance adherence to evidence-based prevention strategies. Future research should employ experimental and longitudinal designs, standardised measurement tools, and broader international representation to support sustainable improvements in PUs/PIs prevention and patient safety.
This study aims to investigate the lived experiences of civilians in Lahore during the 2025 India–Pakistan conflict, focusing on psychological distress, social disruption, coping mechanisms and perceptions of national response and preparedness.
The study employs an exploratory phenomenological approach.
The study has been conducted in Lahore, the capital city of Punjab, the largest by population province of Pakistan. Lahore was selected as a research site due to its historical, strategic and political significance in Indo-Pak conflicts.
Data were collected from 10 participants aged 18 or above years, who lived in Lahore between April and May 2025, and were willing to discuss personal, social or psychological experiences related to the conflict. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted in Urdu, transcribed, and were thematically analysed using both manual and NVivo V.12 software-supported coding.
Seven inter-related themes were identified. Participants reported intense anxiety, hypervigilance and insomnia driven by hybrid warfare tactics, including misinformation, drone sightings and media sensationalism. Social life was disrupted through withdrawal from public, religious and communal activities. Coping strategies included religious faith, family cohesion, humour and expressions of national solidarity. Notably, many participants experienced psychosomatic symptoms such as palpitations, gastrointestinal distress and stress-induced fever. A prominent finding was the absence of civilian preparedness guidance, which amplified fear and uncertainty during the escalation.
The conflicts, although short lived and geographical restrained, casts a long psychological and social on civilians, marked by fear, uncertainty, social disruption and dissatisfaction with institutional preparedness. While some coping and resilience were evident, the findings highlight the need to strengthen civilian-focused public health responses during periods of conflict escalation, including mental health awareness, media literacy and community-level support within Pakistan’s emergency response frameworks.
To understand the experiences of burnout and coping strategies among healthcare professionals working in the emergency department of tertiary care public and private hospitals in Karachi.
A qualitative exploratory design was employed.
One public-sector and one private-sector tertiary care hospital located in Karachi, Pakistan were selected for this study. Audio-recorded in-depth interviews were conducted with a total of 15 healthcare professionals working in the emergency department, which were later transcribed verbatim and analysed inductively.
The findings of the study identified two major themes contributing to burnout: individual and organisational themes, along with coping strategies used by healthcare professionals. Individual-level subthemes included emotional distress, arising from ethical dilemmas and constraints within the work environment, and work-life imbalance, where participants experienced difficulty maintaining personal well-being due to professional demands. Organisational-level subthemes included lack of leadership support and recognition, role conflict, inadequate resources, excessive workloads and exposure to workplace violence, all of which contributed significantly to burnout. Healthcare professionals reported both adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies. Adaptive strategies included positive reframing, peer support and relaxation techniques, whereas maladaptive strategies involved venting frustration and, in some cases, substance use to manage prolonged stress.
The findings revealed that the experience of burnout is caused by a range of interdependent factors at the individual and organisational levels. Multifaceted interventions are needed to address these issues such as national and emergency department staffing policies, mental health support, resilience training, workload management, flexible scheduling and the promotion of work-life balance.
Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common cause of hospitalisation and decompensation in the hospital, is routinely managed by a wide variety of subspecialties, and requires a host of both technical and non-technical skills (NTS). Simulation-based training (SBT) exercises are an excellent means of training physicians and other healthcare professionals in both technical skills and NTS and are frequently used to teach and assess management of high-stress situations such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation and trauma situations. The manner in which SBT is used to train other types of clinical situations—and at what frequency—is less clear. The extent to which such training programmes are evaluated is also not clear. Here, we intend to characterise the body of literature describing SBT programmes for bedside management of GIB. In doing so, we will gain valuable insight into the current state of SBT as it relates to training healthcare professionals to handle complicated clinical situations.
Our review will follow the six-stage framework outlined by Arksey and O’Malley while considering elaborations and guidance made by Levac et al and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The protocol and review will be created in alignment with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses—scoping review checklist and explanatory paper. Using a carefully constructed search strategy, the following databases will be queried from their inception through 31 December 2025: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC. Following the initial database query and two-step screening process, included articles will be systematically examined and will serve as our data source. Our efforts will ultimately answer the following research question: How is simulation-based training currently used to teach bedside management of GIB to physicians (residents, fellows and attending physicians), and how are these simulation-based training exercises studied and evaluated?
Ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board is not required for this study since all investigations are being carried out on previously published manuscripts. Final results will be compiled and submitted for publication once the study has been completed and all data has been charted/analysed.
This study assessed the association between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure during pregnancy and stillbirth in Pakistan. We hypothesised that higher PM2.5 exposure is linked to increased stillbirth risk.
A cross-sectional study using secondary data from the 2017 to 2018 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (PDHS), combined with satellite-derived PM2.5 exposure data.
The study covered urban and rural areas across Pakistan, including all four provinces (Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan) and administrative regions (Gilgit-Baltistan (GB), Islamabad, Federally Administered Tribal Areas and Azad Jammu Kashmir).
The study included 9172 married women aged 15–49 with at least one birth in the past 5 years. Women with incomplete pregnancy outcome data were excluded.
PM2.5 exposure was estimated using satellite data, matching PDHS clusters with the nearest air quality point via MATLAB. Monthly average exposure was categorised into quartiles.
Stillbirth, defined as pregnancy loss at ≥28 weeks gestation.
Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between PM2.5 and stillbirth, adjusting for maternal age, gravidity, wealth index, birth interval, previous adverse pregnancy outcome and region of residence. The stillbirth rate in Pakistan for the most recent pregnancy was 17.0 (14.5–19.9) per 1000 births, with highest rates (28.9) in Baluchistan province. The mean level of PM2.5 exposure in Pakistan was 53.96 (SD 20.42; range 5.9–209.4) µg/m3. PM2.5 exposure was higher for urban (56.43) than rural (51.87) pregnancies, highest in Sindh (78.06) and lowest in GB (13.41) provinces. For every 1 µg/m3 average increase in PM2.5 during the pregnancy period, there was approximately 1% increase in stillbirth.
Increased PM2.5 exposure was strongly associated with stillbirth risk. This underscores the need for targeted public health interventions, such as government regulations, emission controls and clean energy initiatives to protect pregnant women in high-risk areas.
This study sought to explore decision making among caregivers of children with cancer in Pakistan, one of the largest lower middle-income countries in the world.
Cross-sectional survey study
This study was conducted in Pakistan at Indus Hospital and Health Network in Karachi and Children’s Hospital of Lahore. Children’s Hospital of Lahore is a public sector hospital, and Indus Hospital has a foundation-based funding structure. Both are larger tertiary care centers. Over 2,500 new patients are seen at these centers annually, this accounts for almost 50% of all children with cancer in Pakistan
Eligible participants included bedside caregivers, defined as a parent or family member involved in communication with the medical team, of children with cancer (
Primary outcome measures included caregiver priorities and experiences related to communication including decision-making role, involvement of the paediatric patient and decisional regret.
Participants included 200 caregivers of children
Findings from this study highlight the importance of exploring preferences for decision making and empowering bedside caregivers while respecting cultural norms. In the Pakistani context, it may be specifically important to consider gender roles and the inclusion of extended family members. Future work should investigate paediatric patient involvement in diverse settings.
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in critically ill patients is often undetected. However, it is unclear whether ultrasound surveillance for early detection of DVT in high-risk medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients improves patients’ outcomes. The DETECT trial (Diagnosing deep-vein thrombosis early in critically ill patients) evaluates the effect of twice-weekly bilateral lower limb ultrasound compared to usual care on 90-day mortality of critically ill adult patients admitted to medical, surgical and trauma ICUs.
The DETECT trial is an international, parallel-group, open-label, randomised trial, which will recruit 1800 critically ill adults from over 14 hospitals in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Eligible patients will be allocated to twice-weekly bilateral lower limb ultrasound or usual care. The primary outcome is 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include lower limb proximal DVT, pulmonary embolism and clinically important bleeding. The first patient was enrolled on 21 March 2023. As of 8 April 2025, 711 patients have been enrolled from 14 centres in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. The first interim analysis was conducted on 14 May 2025. We expect to complete recruitment by December 2026.
Institutional review boards (IRBs) of each participating institution approved the study. We plan to publish the results in peer-reviewed journals and present the findings at international critical care conferences.
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05112705, registered on 9-11-2021.
FreshRSS 