Women who develop gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have a 60% lifetime risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), which is already elevated within the first decade following childbirth. Despite the impact of lifestyle interventions to reduce long-term T2D risk in women with previous GDM, successful implementation of lifestyle interventions remains a barrier. Metformin is recommended for adults at increased risk of developing T2D; however, there is limited evidence of tolerability in the early postpartum period. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) are effective at improving glycaemic status and body weight. However, GLP-1 RA have not been evaluated in the postpartum population. Finally, physical activity monitors may support behaviour changes related to physical activity to reduce long-term risk of T2D but are yet to be studied following GDM.

This will be a multicentre, randomised, open-label interventional pilot study. Using a 2x2 factorial design, we will examine the feasibility and acceptability of a pharmacotherapy intervention and a physical activity intervention in women with previous GDM at increased risk of developing T2D. Participants will be recruited from tertiary referral hospitals in Australia and will be randomised to receive either metformin alone or in combination with a GLP-1 RA and subsequently randomised to either a physical activity intervention involving activity monitor use, or usual care for 6 months, followed by a 6-month follow-up period. Primary feasibility outcomes include the acceptability and safety of the metformin and GLP-1 RA as measured through pill and injection counts, acceptability questionnaire and adverse events.

This trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Registration Number: ACTRN12624001253594). This trial has received ethics approval from the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval Number: 2024/ETH00042, protocol version v1.1, 28/02/2025).

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Registration Number: ACTRN12624001253594.

This systematic review aims to examine the association between maternal psychological distress (specifically perceived stress, clinical anxiety and depressive symptoms), measured exclusively during pregnancy, and child neurodevelopmental outcomes assessed within the first 3 years of life (0–36 months), including cognitive, language, socioemotional and behavioural development.

The review was conducted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024599742). It focused exclusively on studies assessing maternal distress during the prenatal period and its impact on cognitive, language, socioemotional and behavioural outcomes in infancy and toddlerhood.

A comprehensive search of six databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, EBSCOhost and PsycINFO, was conducted up to 10 April 2025, using structured combinations of keywords related to maternal stress and child development.

: Studies were included if they assessed psychological distress during pregnancy with validated tools and evaluated neurodevelopmental outcomes in children aged 0–36 months using standardised measures. Excluded were studies measuring distress only postnatally, animal models, non-original articles and studies without neurodevelopmental endpoints.

Data were extracted and reviewed independently by two authors using predefined criteria, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Exposures tool for non-randomised studies and Cohort Studies. Given study heterogeneity, a structured narrative synthesis with standardised effect summaries was used.

44 studies met the inclusion criteria. Across these, small, correlational associations linked higher maternal distress during pregnancy with modest differences in cognitive and language scores and with elevated risks of behavioural and socioemotional difficulties. Children exposed to higher distress more often showed attention problems, greater negative emotionality, lower verbal ability and weaker emotion regulation, with effects frequently attenuated after adjustment and selective attrition.

Maternal psychological distress during pregnancy is a context-sensitive correlate, not a proven cause, of early neurodevelopmental differences across cognitive, emotional and behavioural domains.

Internationally, the vision of a ‘Digital Trustworthy Evidence Ecosystem’ is being pursued with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as one element of such a system. Consequently, CPGs and CPG repositories need to be digitalised.

The objective of this prospective, before-after study is to evaluate the impact of digitalising a quality-assured CPG registry using the international data format standard ‘Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources’ (FHIR). This includes the architecture of the registry, the format of individual guidelines and application programming interfaces to import and export CPG content. The study is guided by a scoping review.

The primary outcome is the usability of the digitalised CPG registry and CPG content for different user groups comprising CPG developers, CPG administrators, health care professionals and patients—including at the point of care in in- and outpatient settings—and technical professionals as users of CPG content in digital applications.

For the before-after comparison, semi-quantitative (surveys) and qualitative (focus groups) methods are applied. All user groups will be involved in a baseline analysis to assess user expectations and technical requirements. According to the results, the digitalised guideline registry will be implemented. The intervention comprises the testing of the digitalised registry with guideline content by all user groups. Analysis of outcomes will include formative and summative evaluation. Final results and further research needs will be discussed in a World Café with all stakeholders.

The Ethics Committee of the Berlin chamber of physicians, in accordance with its code of conduct §15 section 1 (Eth-KB-24-11) confirmed that no ethical approval is needed for this study. The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (No: DRKS00034111). Results will be presented at national and international conferences, published in peer-reviewed journals and on the website of the funding institution.

German Clinical Trials Registry (No: DRKS00034111).

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common after cardiac surgery and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Lung-protective ventilation strategies have been proposed to reduce PPCs, but the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the use of alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) remain controversial.

In this investigator-initiated, multicentre, open, randomised, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial, elective cardiac surgery patients at risk of PPCs will be assigned to one of two intraoperative ventilation strategies: (1) an open-lung ventilation strategy with protective ventilation, moderate PEEP and RMs or (2) a standard protective ventilation with low PEEP and no RM. The primary outcome will be a composite of prolonged (>24 hour) postoperative mechanical ventilation, reintubation for any cause or hospital-acquired pneumonia within 7 days of surgery, or death within 28 days of surgery. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.

The VACARM (impact of intraoperatiVe moderAte positive end-expiratory pressure with reCruitment mAnoeuvres versus low positive end-expiRatory pressure on major postoperative pulMonary complications and death after on-pump cardiac surgery in high-risk patients) trial has been approved by an independent ethics committee for all study centres. Recruitment began in July 2021. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04408495.

This study aims at documenting the frequency of reported abuse, stigma and discrimination and exploring the perspectives for improving the quality of maternal-newborn care (QMNC) of migrant mothers’ reporting abuse, stigma or discrimination.

Mixed methods multicentre cross-sectional study.

All maternal facilities (tertiary and secondary levels of care, n=9) from Friuli-Venezia Giulia region, Northeast Italy, between November 2019 and January 2022 in Northeast Italy.

874 migrant and 3968 non-migrant women answering a validated WHO Standard-based questionnaire after birth.

Frequency of reported abuse, stigma and discrimination during facility-based childbirth was calculated and compared with those of non-migrant mothers. Thematic analysis was conducted on eight open questions, using WHO Standards as a framework for the analysis.

Among migrant women, 84 (9.6%) reported some type of abuse, stigma and discrimination, a frequency similar to non-migrant women (9.8%, p=0.880). The most frequently reported was verbal abuse (87.7%), followed by stigma and discrimination (15.1%). Most women (86.9%) provided at least one comment, with a frequency comparable to non-migrant women (p=0.076). Among a total of 327 comments, 104 (31.8%) were practical suggestions for improving QMNC. Experience of care was the domain with the highest frequency both of negative (64.9% of negative comments) and positive comments (51.7% of positive comments) and with the highest frequency of suggestions for improving QMNC (52.9% of suggestions). Overall, suggestions mainly focused on strengthening healthcare professionals’ communication skills, allowing companionship during childbirth, increasing healthcare professionals’ availability and timely support.

This study shows that both migrant and non-migrant mothers are exposed to abuse, stigma and discrimination during childbirth, and that both are willing to provide practical suggestions, which should be used for planning actions to improve QMNC.

Patients with acute psychiatric symptoms are often referred to the emergency department (ED) for medical evaluation to exclude medical causes before psychiatric admission. The absence of a prospectively validated medical screening tool leads to wide practice variation. This study aims to develop a new, evidence-based and consensus-based medical screening tool through a collaborative, interdisciplinary, international Delphi approach.

This modified Delphi study will include representatives from emergency medicine and psychiatry societies across four continents, as well as patient representatives with prior experience of medical screening in the ED. A minimum sample size of 24 participants is planned to account for potential dropouts. The Delphi procedure consists of four rounds. Round 1 will present current evidence and identify key items for the new medical screening tool. Round 2 will evaluate and refine statements from Round 1. Round 3 will seek consensus on the variables to be included in a medical screening tool. In Round 4, hypothetical clinical vignettes will be used to assess the agreement on the recommendations of the newly developed medical screening tool in order to test for content and construct validity. Surveys will be conducted via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), with participants rating statements on a 6-point Likert scale. Response stability will be evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and consensus defined as ≥80% agreement. Results will be reported according to the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document guidelines and the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 short form.

The Ethics Committee of Northwestern and Central Switzerland exempted the project from committee approval under the Human Research Act on 11 September 2024. Written consent will be obtained from all participants. Results of this study will be summarised as a medical screening tool which will be validated in a prospective, multicentre study in a second step.

NCT06936826.

The standard treatment for unresectable head and neck cancer typically involves radiotherapy (RT) alone or chemoradiotherapy (chemo-RT). Non-squamous cell carcinomas exhibit relatively low radiosensitivity, limiting the efficacy of conventional photon RT. Carbon-ion (C-ion) RT, characterised by high linear energy transfer (LET) and high relative biological effectiveness (RBE), has shown promising outcomes in treating radioresistant head and neck cancers. However, local recurrences still occur, and further improvements in treatment outcomes are needed. To enhance the local control rate, an increase in dose-averaged LET (LETd) to the tumour was considered.

Following a simulation study, a clinical trial was conducted to optimise LETd using only C-ion therapy, and its safety was confirmed. However, in this clinical trial, LETd could only be increased to approximately 70 keV/μm. To further escalate LETd, multi-ion therapy using ions heavier than carbon was developed. Simulation studies demonstrated that multi-ion therapy incorporating carbon, oxygen and neon ions could increase LETd up to 90 keV/μm, regardless of tumour size, while maintaining high-dose uniformity within the tumour. Based on these results, a clinical study was planned to evaluate the safety of escalating LETd from 70 keV/μm to 90 keV/μm using multi-ion therapy. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of escalating LETd to the tumour using multi-ion therapy for head and neck cancer, with the secondary goal of identifying the maximum tolerated LETd.

This is a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1 study focused on LETd escalation. A maximum of 18 patients with histologically confirmed inoperable head and neck malignancies will be enrolled. All patients will receive multi-ion therapy using helium, carbon, oxygen or neon ions, either alone or in combination, at an RBE-weighted dose ranging from 57.6 to 70.4 Gy, delivered in 16 fractions (4 fractions per week) over 4 weeks. The specific dose will be determined according to histology. LETd escalation will begin at 70 keV/μm and will increase by 10 keV/μm increments, reaching a maximum of 90 keV/μm. The safety of multi-ion therapy will be assessed based on the frequency and severity of dose-limiting toxicities, monitored up to 90 days after the initial irradiation. Patients will be followed up according to the protocol for 180 days after the initial multi-ion therapy irradiation.

The study protocol has been approved by the National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology Certified Review Board (#L24-002). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a scientific conference.

jRCTs032240451.

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a large-vessel vasculitis occurring in people aged over 50 years. Recent studies have shown that tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, is remarkably effective in treating GCA and allows significant dose sparing of glucocorticoids. However, it makes it difficult to monitor disease activity. Furthermore, treatment is often prolonged over 1 year due to the fear of relapse after stopping TCZ and/or the absence of an optimal discontinuation scheme.

This study aims at comparing two discontinuation regimens in a population of GCA patients who have been treated with TCZ for 12–36 months and have discontinued glucocorticoids for at least 12 weeks. Patients will be randomised with a 1:1 ratio between two arms: immediate discontinuation (cessation) versus gradual discontinuation of TCZ (162 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 12 weeks and then every 4 weeks for 12 additional weeks). Patients will be followed up for 78 weeks. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival after 26 weeks of follow-up. A total of 120 patients will be randomised (60 in each group) for a period of 3 years.

The trial was approved by an independent ethics committee (CPP Sud Ouest et Outre Mer IV) and the French health authority (French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety—ANSM) through the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) provided by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The informed consent complies with the ICH GCP guideline and regulatory requirements. Eligible patients may only be included in the study after providing informed consent. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

NCT06037460.

Preterm infants, particularly those born before 29 weeks of gestation, are at increased risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and other complications of prematurity. Substantial evidence suggests that respiratory tract colonisation with Ureaplasma species significantly contributes to pulmonary inflammation, impaired lung function and subsequent lung disease especially in very immature infants. Moreover, Ureaplasma exposure has been implicated in the pathogenesis of other inflammation-related sequelae of prematurity. Although representing a potentially actionable risk factor for adverse short-term and long-term neonatal outcome, controversies on Ureaplasma-associated morbidity remain and recommendations for screening practices in preterm infants are missing. The NEO-CONSCIOUS (Neonatal Colonisation and Infection with Ureaplasma in very immature preterm infants born Ureaplasma colonisation and infection in very preterm infants at high risk of adverse outcome, the extent of potentially accompanying inflammation and the impact on short-term and long-term morbidity.

This is a prospective observational multicentre study being conducted in level III neonatal intensive care units in Germany and Austria. In total, 400 infants born before 29 weeks of gestation are screened for Ureaplasma colonisation immediately after birth. In addition, biomarkers of systemic inflammation are determined on day 1 and day 28. The study infants are followed up until discharge and at 2 years corrected age. The primary outcome BPD and/or death is assessed at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. Secondary outcomes include systemic inflammation, secondary infections, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity and neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months corrected age.

The study has been approved by the ethics committees in Würzburg and Leipzig and the local ethics committees of all participating centres. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed international publications and conferences. The study is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00033001.

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00033001).

Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is widely used for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in pulmonary medicine. However, FB can cause respiratory and haemodynamic complications, especially in patients with pre-existing lung and/or cardiovascular comorbidities. Despite the range of oxygenation and ventilatory approaches available to prevent these risks, evidence regarding their real-world application and clinical impact is limited. The OxyFOB study aims to assess the prevalence and outcomes of various oxygenation and ventilatory support strategies used during FB across Europe.

The OxyFOB study is a large, prospective, international, observational cohort study which aims to involve over 10 000 FB procedures across European centres. Eligible participants include all adults undergoing FB for diagnostic, therapeutic or procedural indications. Data are collected via a standardised electronic case report form and encompass demographic information, procedural details and clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint is the prevalence of oxygenation and ventilatory support strategies: conventional oxygen therapy, high-flow oxygen therapy, continuous positive airway pressure, non-invasive ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes include periprocedural respiratory and haemodynamic events, patient comfort, dyspnoea and postprocedural complications. Statistical analyses include descriptive statistics, subgroup comparisons and multivariate logistic regression.

The study has received ethical approval from the coordinating centre (protocol n. 22/2022 on the 20 January 2022, by the ‘Comitato Etico Sezione Area Centro - Regione Calabria’) and all participating sites. Informed consent is given from all patients or their legal representatives. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international meetings. Data will be managed and made available on reasonable request to support further research.

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05681962. Registered January 2023.

Multimorbidity is prevalent and associated with complex treatment requirements. In order to assist general practitioners (GPs) addressing these requirements, the web application gp-multitool.de has been designed, which facilitates implementation of the German clinical practice guideline for multimorbidity. We will conduct a cluster-randomised clinical trial evaluating an intervention based on this tool. This protocol summarises methods and discusses ethics and dissemination of this study.

Participating patients are recruited by cooperating GP practices. Inclusion criteria are an age of 65 years or older, enrolment in any disease management programme and multimorbidity operationalised by two additional chronic conditions. To avoid postrandomisation selection bias, practices are randomised as clusters after baseline assessment of all participating patients from the respective practice. In our intervention, patients receive access to different assessments including patient preferences by email, fill out the electronic assessment forms on any device with access to the internet, receive a medication review and discuss the assessment results with their GPs. GPs in the control group do not have access to the digital tool and provide care as usual. The primary outcome is staying at least once for at least one night in hospital during the 12-month observation period. Secondary outcomes are contacts with GPs and outpatient specialists, self-reported health, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction and GP-reported and patient-reported quality of care. A sample size of 660 patients from 66 GP practices is needed. Data are analysed by mixed effects regression models.

Ethics approval was obtained by the ethics committee of the Medical Association of Hamburg (2022–1 00 786-BO-ff). Study results will be presented on scientific conferences and published in journal articles. In addition, healthcare professionals, patient representatives and the interested public will be informed about study results at a symposium.

The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06831994).

Cardiac surgery remains a high-risk procedure for bleeding despite advances in patient blood management. Conventional centrifugation-based autotransfusion devices primarily recover red blood cells, losing platelets and coagulation factors. The SAME autotransfusion device (i-SEP, Nantes, France) introduces an innovative filtration-based approach, recovering erythrocytes, leucocytes and platelets to enhance perioperative haemostasis. The main objective is to determine whether the filtration-based SAME device reduces significant perioperative bleeding compared with the centrifugation-based system in high-risk cardiac surgery patients.

The Centrifugation-based vs filtration-based intraOperative cell saLvage on qualiTy of peRioperAtive haemostasis iN cardiac surgEry (COLTRANE) trial is a multicentre, parallel-group, single-blinded, superiority-randomised clinical trial. Conducted over 19 months in 10 French hospitals, the study will target patients at high risk of bleeding undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery via sternotomy. A total of 570 patients (285 per group) are required to achieve 80% statistical power for detecting clinically significant differences. Eligible patients will be randomised to either a centrifugation-based or filtration-based autotransfusion group. Both groups will follow standardised perioperative and cardiopulmonary bypass management, with the devices used only intraoperatively. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with clinically significant perioperative bleeding defined as classes 2 to 4 of the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding. The secondary outcomes include device efficiency and safety, perioperative haemostasis, lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays, early postoperative morbidity and 30-day all-cause mortality. Ancillary studies will be performed to evaluate cell recovery and washing performance, the viscoelastic properties of retransfused blood (Quantra Qplus; Stago, Asnières-sur-Seine, France), and the effect of salvaged leucocytes on postoperative inflammation and immune function.

This trial has received a favourable opinion from the Committee for the Protection of Persons and authorisation from the French authorities (Comité de protection des personnes Nord Ouest, IDRCB: 2023-A02566-39). Protocol V.1.1 was approved on 22 January 2024. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06425614). The findings will be disseminated through oral communications at national and international scientific meetings and peer-reviewed journal publications. Individual participant data will be made available on reasonable request to qualified researchers, following review and approval by the study sponsor and ethics committee.

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06425614.