FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Impact of intraoperatiVe moderAte positive end-expiratory pressure with reCruitment mAnoeuvres versus low positive end-expiRatory pressure on major postoperative pulMonary complications and death after on-pump cardiac surgery in high-risk patients: the VA

Por: Demaure · N. · Le Cunff · J. · Duchene · M. · Rozec · B. · Espitalier · F. · Cabon · J.-M. · Oilleau · J.-F. · Guerci · P. · Labaste · F. · Abou-Arab · O. · Guinot · P.-G. · Duval · P. · Besnier · E. · Flecher · E. · Leroyer · I. · Morcet · J. · Fougerou-Leurent · C. · Mansour · A. · Nesse
Introduction

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common after cardiac surgery and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Lung-protective ventilation strategies have been proposed to reduce PPCs, but the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the use of alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) remain controversial.

Methods/analysis

In this investigator-initiated, multicentre, open, randomised, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial, elective cardiac surgery patients at risk of PPCs will be assigned to one of two intraoperative ventilation strategies: (1) an open-lung ventilation strategy with protective ventilation, moderate PEEP and RMs or (2) a standard protective ventilation with low PEEP and no RM. The primary outcome will be a composite of prolonged (>24 hour) postoperative mechanical ventilation, reintubation for any cause or hospital-acquired pneumonia within 7 days of surgery, or death within 28 days of surgery. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Ethics and dissemination

The VACARM (impact of intraoperatiVe moderAte positive end-expiratory pressure with reCruitment mAnoeuvres versus low positive end-expiRatory pressure on major postoperative pulMonary complications and death after on-pump cardiac surgery in high-risk patients) trial has been approved by an independent ethics committee for all study centres. Recruitment began in July 2021. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04408495.

Propofol-based versus sevoflurane-based anaesthesia for deceased donor kidney transplantation: the VAPOR-2 study protocol for an international multicentre randomised controlled trial

Por: Huisman · G. J. J. · Berger · S. P. · Thyrrestrup · P. S. · Hausken · J. · Veelo · D. P. · Guirado · L. · Pol · R. · Jensen · L. L. · Tonnessen · T. I. · Bemelman · F. J. · Facundo · C. · THE VAPOR-2 STUDY GROUP · Tamasi · K. · Lunter · G. · Jespersen · B. · Leuvenink · H. G. D. · Str
Introduction

Ischaemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is inevitable in kidney transplantation and negatively affects patient and graft outcomes. Anaesthetic conditioning (AC) refers to the use of anaesthetic agents to mitigate IRI. AC is particularly associated with volatile anaesthetic (VA) agents and to a lesser extent to intravenous agents like propofol. VA like sevoflurane interferes with many of the processes underlying IRI and exerts renal protective properties in various models of injury and inflammation. We hypothesise that a sevoflurane-based anaesthesia is able to induce AC and thereby reduce post-transplant renal injury, reflected in improved graft and patient outcome, compared with a propofol-based anaesthesia in transplant recipients of a deceased donor kidney.

Methods and analysis

Investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, controlled and prospective clinical trial with two parallel groups. The study will include 488 kidney transplant recipients from donation after brain death (DBD) or donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. Participants are randomised in a 1:1 design to a sevoflurane (intervention) or propofol (control) group. The primary endpoint is the incidence of delayed graft function in recipients of DCD and DBD donor kidneys and/or 1-year biopsy-proven and treated acute rejection. Secondary endpoints include functional delayed graft function defined as failure of serum creatinine levels to decrease by at least 10% per day for three consecutive days; primary non-function is defined as a permanent lack of function of the allograft; length of hospital stay and postoperative complications of all kinds, estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 week and 3 and 12 months calculated with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula; readmissions at 3 and 12 months, graft survival and all-cause mortality at 12 months.

Ethics and dissemination

The study is approved by the local ethical committees and national data security agencies. Results are expected to be published in 2025.

Trial registration number

NCT02727296.

Centrifugation versus filtration-based cell salvage: impact on perioperative bleeding in cardiac surgery--the COLTRANE randomised clinical trial - study protocol

Por: Beurton · A. · Mansour · A. · Benard · A. · Pernot · M. · Brett · V.-e. · Batsale · C. · Aitgougam · A. · Cordon · A. · Mouton · C. · Fresselinat · A. · Robert · G. · Imbault · J. · Nesseler · N. · Ouattara · A.
Introduction

Cardiac surgery remains a high-risk procedure for bleeding despite advances in patient blood management. Conventional centrifugation-based autotransfusion devices primarily recover red blood cells, losing platelets and coagulation factors. The SAME autotransfusion device (i-SEP, Nantes, France) introduces an innovative filtration-based approach, recovering erythrocytes, leucocytes and platelets to enhance perioperative haemostasis. The main objective is to determine whether the filtration-based SAME device reduces significant perioperative bleeding compared with the centrifugation-based system in high-risk cardiac surgery patients.

Methods and analysis

The Centrifugation-based vs filtration-based intraOperative cell saLvage on qualiTy of peRioperAtive haemostasis iN cardiac surgEry (COLTRANE) trial is a multicentre, parallel-group, single-blinded, superiority-randomised clinical trial. Conducted over 19 months in 10 French hospitals, the study will target patients at high risk of bleeding undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery via sternotomy. A total of 570 patients (285 per group) are required to achieve 80% statistical power for detecting clinically significant differences. Eligible patients will be randomised to either a centrifugation-based or filtration-based autotransfusion group. Both groups will follow standardised perioperative and cardiopulmonary bypass management, with the devices used only intraoperatively. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with clinically significant perioperative bleeding defined as classes 2 to 4 of the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding. The secondary outcomes include device efficiency and safety, perioperative haemostasis, lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays, early postoperative morbidity and 30-day all-cause mortality. Ancillary studies will be performed to evaluate cell recovery and washing performance, the viscoelastic properties of retransfused blood (Quantra Qplus; Stago, Asnières-sur-Seine, France), and the effect of salvaged leucocytes on postoperative inflammation and immune function.

Ethics and dissemination

This trial has received a favourable opinion from the Committee for the Protection of Persons and authorisation from the French authorities (Comité de protection des personnes Nord Ouest, IDRCB: 2023-A02566-39). Protocol V.1.1 was approved on 22 January 2024. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06425614). The findings will be disseminated through oral communications at national and international scientific meetings and peer-reviewed journal publications. Individual participant data will be made available on reasonable request to qualified researchers, following review and approval by the study sponsor and ethics committee.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06425614.

Ambivalence During Transition: Adult Children's Narratives When Their Elderly Parent Transfers From Home to a Nursing Home

ABSTRACT

Aim

To explore the narrated experiences of adult children during the initial phase of their transition process when their elderly parent transfers from home to a nursing home.

Design

The article describes part of a qualitative study with a narrative, longitudinal, prospective design.

Methods

Narrative interviews were conducted with a sample comprising eight adult children at three time points between February and July 2022. Narratives from the first interviews obtained during the initial transition phase are presented. This article explores the narratives of one woman and one man. The data were analysed using a thematic narrative approach. A constructed timeline gave a narrative chronology and facilitated the generation of three storylines and a unifying plot.

Results

The narratives provide insight into a complex, emotionally demanding, and morally challenging initial transition phase. This generated the following three storylines: doubting the decisions, a shift in the filial responsibilities and an emotional roller coaster. These storylines were closely intertwined, and they shaped the unifying plot of experiencing persistent ambivalence.

Conclusion

Adult children encounter significant burdens due to shifting roles and experiences of intergenerational ambivalence during the initial transition phase when their elderly parent transfers from home to a nursing home. Informal caregivers are crucial for maintaining and developing a sustainable health-care service, which makes it necessary to allocate resources and provide systematic support to enable adult children to continue their care responsibilities.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

Nurses and other health-care personnel need to acknowledge the challenges and heavy burdens experienced by adult children when their elderly parent transfers from home to a nursing home. This should be addressed through systematic follow-up and dialogue with adult children.

Impact

This study provides knowledge that will enable health-care personnel to recognise adult children in this situation and support them during this phase.

Reporting Method

Reporting was performed in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). There were no patient or public contributions.

❌