FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Triple-drug therapy with Goreisan, tranexamic acid and carbazochrome sodium sulfonate hydrate to prevent recurrence after chronic subdural haematoma surgery: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial protocol

Por: Negishi · H. · Hirata · K. · Aiyama · H. · Fujita · K. · Komatsu · Y. · Kato · N. · Shibata · Y. · Tsuda · K. · Yamazaki · T. · Sato · M. · Watanabe · S. · Sugii · N. · Konishi · T. · Mathis · B. J. · Ohigashi · T. · Endo · M. · Ishikawa · E. · Matsumaru · Y. · The Triple Study Investigato
Introduction

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition in older adults, with a recurrence rate of approximately 7.1–13% after burr-hole drainage. Although surgical adjuncts such as subdural drains and middle meningeal artery embolisation may reduce recurrence, these are not suitable for all patients. Pharmacological strategies, including tranexamic acid, Goreisan and carbazochrome sodium sulfonate hydrate, have shown potential, but high-level evidence remains lacking. A prior retrospective study suggested that a triple oral regimen combining these agents may reduce recurrence. This randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

Methods and analysis

This is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial conducted across six hospitals in Ibaraki, Japan. A total of 180 patients undergoing first-time burr-hole surgery for CSDH will be randomised 1:1 to receive either triple therapy (Goreisan 7.5 g/day, carbazochrome sodium sulfonate hydrate 90 mg/day and tranexamic acid 750 mg/day for up to 90 days) or standard postoperative care. The primary outcome is recurrence requiring reoperation within 90 days. Secondary outcomes include time to recurrence and haematoma volume reduction on serial CT imaging. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle, using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models and mixed-effects models.

Ethics and dissemination

Written, informed consent will be obtained from all participants at each participating hospital by trained staff from that hospital. The trial protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of the University of Tsukuba Hospital (approval no. TCRB23-025) and the Institutional Review Boards of all participating centres. Study findings will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals. A summary of the results will also be provided to participating institutions and made publicly available in accordance with the BMJ Open data sharing policy.

Trial registration number

jRCTs031240007.

Association between obesity and mortality from hematological malignancies among Japanese adults: The Japan Collaborative Cohort study

by Hana Wakasa, Satoshi Sunohara, Takashi Kimura, Takaya Ichikawa, Akiko Tamakoshi

Obesity is a growing global health concern and has been associated with increased mortality from various cancer types, including hematological malignancies. However, evidence for this association in Asian populations, particularly among Japanese adults, remains limited. Thus, this study aimed to examine the association between obesity and mortality due to hematological malignancies. Data from 97,073 participants in the Japan Collaborative Cohort (JACC) Study were analyzed. The participants were followed for a mean duration of 17 years. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using self-reported height and weight and categorized as underweight (

Public Health Nurses' Time Allocation in Local Government Nursing Settings: A Self‐Reported Prospective Time Study

ABSTRACT

Aim

To clarify how public health nurses allocate their time across various tasks and compare time-use patterns between prefectural and municipal public health nurses in Japan, where distinct administrative mandates define their roles.

Design

A self-reported, prospective time study.

Methods

Public health nurses from two municipalities and one prefecture recorded their daily practices and time allocations using Kintone. Time allocation differences by administrative level and job position were analysed using linear mixed-effects models.

Results

Overall, 121 participants contributed 9502 person-days of data. Participants spent an average of 463.6 min/workday on work-related activities. Municipal public health nurses dedicated more time to application paperwork (64.0 min), health examinations (57.6 min), and individual coordination (48.3 min). Prefectural public health nurses allocated more time to business management and organisational operations (69.0 min) and traveliing, particularly in rural contexts. Managers spent less time on direct care and more on administrative tasks.

Conclusion

This study provides the first quantitative, self-reported evidence of task distribution among public health nurses across administrative levels and positions. The findings reflect structural differences in role expectations and underscore the need to reallocate workloads to better align with each level's mandate.

Implications for the Profession

Task prioritisation, information and communication technology tool integration, and administrative support are essential in optimising public health nurses' contributions to community health. These strategies can reduce non-clinical workload and enable public health nurses to focus on high-impact, value-added public health services that promote health equity.

Impact

This study closes a longstanding gap by quantifying PHNs' time allocation, revealing the hidden burden of administrative work, and providing critical insights for workforce planning and sustainable public health service delivery.

Reporting Method

This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guideline.

Patient or Public Contribution

No Patient or Public Involvement.

Trial Registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000051509 (https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000058761; August 1, 2023)

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to assess the efficacy and safety of antibiotic faecal microbiota transplantation in patients with Parkinsons disease (FLORA-PD): a study protocol

Por: Takeshige-Amano · H. · Igami · E. · Okuzumi · A. · Kamo · R. · Iseki · M. · Tsuyama · K. · Wakamori · R. · Okada · H. · Taniguchi · D. · Ueno · S.-I. · Oji · Y. · Ishikawa · K.-i. · Nishikawa · N. · Orikasa · M. · Odakura · R. · Koma · M. · Maruyama · T. · Nomura · K. · Ishikawa · D. · Shibu
Introduction

The intestinal microbiota of people with Parkinson’s disease (PwP) differs significantly from that of healthy individuals. Given that altered microbiota may play a role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proposed as a potential therapeutic approach. However, the efficacy of FMT in improving motor symptoms in PwP has been inconclusive in some pilot randomised controlled trials (RCT). Previous RCTs on PwP employed simple FMT, but our modified approach—pretreatment with antibiotics before FMT (A-FMT)—has been shown to improve the engraftment rate of given species and the beneficial effects of FMT. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of A-FMT for PwP, particularly in those with motor fluctuations.

Methods and analysis

This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with an 8-week observation period following a single A-FMT. Thirty clinically established PwP with prominent motor fluctuation episodes will be randomised 1:1 to FMT or placebo. Participants in both groups will receive antibiotic treatment prior to colonoscopy for FMT or placebo treatment. Primary and secondary endpoints will include subjective and objective evaluations of motor and non-motor symptoms and will be evaluated before and after antibiotic treatment and at 4 and 8 weeks after the procedure. Exploratory endpoints will include blood and faecal sample analyses, advanced brain MRI and pharmacokinetic assessment of levodopa concentrations during a levodopa challenge test.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has been approved by the ethical committee of Juntendo University in August 2024 (J24-005) and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Clinical Trials Act and related laws and regulations. All patient data will be anonymised to protect privacy and used solely for study purposes. Results will be published in academic journals and presented at conferences.

Trial registration number

jRCTs031240344.

Dose-averaged LET escalation with multi-ion therapy for head and neck cancers: a phase I study protocol for a prospective, open-label, single-arm, single-centre trial (MULTI-ION-HN-I)

Por: Ikawa · H. · Shinoto · M. · Koto · M. · Masuda · T. · Inaniwa · T. · Takiyama · H. · Isozaki · T. · Yamada · S. · Ishikawa · H.
Introduction

The standard treatment for unresectable head and neck cancer typically involves radiotherapy (RT) alone or chemoradiotherapy (chemo-RT). Non-squamous cell carcinomas exhibit relatively low radiosensitivity, limiting the efficacy of conventional photon RT. Carbon-ion (C-ion) RT, characterised by high linear energy transfer (LET) and high relative biological effectiveness (RBE), has shown promising outcomes in treating radioresistant head and neck cancers. However, local recurrences still occur, and further improvements in treatment outcomes are needed. To enhance the local control rate, an increase in dose-averaged LET (LETd) to the tumour was considered.

Following a simulation study, a clinical trial was conducted to optimise LETd using only C-ion therapy, and its safety was confirmed. However, in this clinical trial, LETd could only be increased to approximately 70 keV/μm. To further escalate LETd, multi-ion therapy using ions heavier than carbon was developed. Simulation studies demonstrated that multi-ion therapy incorporating carbon, oxygen and neon ions could increase LETd up to 90 keV/μm, regardless of tumour size, while maintaining high-dose uniformity within the tumour. Based on these results, a clinical study was planned to evaluate the safety of escalating LETd from 70 keV/μm to 90 keV/μm using multi-ion therapy. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of escalating LETd to the tumour using multi-ion therapy for head and neck cancer, with the secondary goal of identifying the maximum tolerated LETd.

Methods and analysis

This is a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1 study focused on LETd escalation. A maximum of 18 patients with histologically confirmed inoperable head and neck malignancies will be enrolled. All patients will receive multi-ion therapy using helium, carbon, oxygen or neon ions, either alone or in combination, at an RBE-weighted dose ranging from 57.6 to 70.4 Gy, delivered in 16 fractions (4 fractions per week) over 4 weeks. The specific dose will be determined according to histology. LETd escalation will begin at 70 keV/μm and will increase by 10 keV/μm increments, reaching a maximum of 90 keV/μm. The safety of multi-ion therapy will be assessed based on the frequency and severity of dose-limiting toxicities, monitored up to 90 days after the initial irradiation. Patients will be followed up according to the protocol for 180 days after the initial multi-ion therapy irradiation.

Ethics and dissemination

The study protocol has been approved by the National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology Certified Review Board (#L24-002). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a scientific conference.

Trial registration number

jRCTs032240451.

Investigation of prophylactic clip haemorrhage control for colorectal cold snare polypectomy in patients taking antithrombotic drugs (PERCOLD): study protocol--a multicentre prospective parallel-group non-inferiority RCT phase 3 trial

Por: Okimoto · K. · Matsumura · T. · Taida · T. · Ishikawa · T. · Koshibu · Y. · Shu · N. · Ozeki · Y. · Furuya · M. · Mamiya · Y. · Nakazawa · H. · Ohyama · Y. · Takahashi · S. · Horio · R. · Goto · C. · Kurosugi · A. · Sonoda · M. · Kaneko · T. · Ohta · Y. · Matsusaka · K. · Inaba · Y. · Kato · J.
Introduction

The effect of prophylactic clipping for colorectal cold snare polypectomy (CSP) on delayed bleeding (DB) in patients with antithrombotic drugs remains unverified. The aim of the PERCOLD study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of DB rates in cases without prophylactic clips compared with cases with prophylactic clips in patients taking antithrombotic drugs for colorectal CSP through randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Methods and analysis

This study is a multicentre prospective parallel-group RCT phase 3 trial that is being conducted at 14 institutions in Japan at the time of writing this manuscript. After providing consent, patients will undergo screening and assessment for study enrolment eligibility. Patients taking antithrombotic drugs (aged 20 years or older at the time of consent and who have agreed to participate in this study) will be selected if they have a preoperative suspected adenoma (including sessile serrated lesion) with an endoscopic diameter of

Ethics and dissemination

The trial protocol has been approved by the Chiba University Certified Clinical Research Reviewer Board (CRB3180015), which serves as the central ethics committee, and registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials. The current protocol V.1.7, dated 4 October 2024. Written informed consent for participation in the study will be obtained from all participating patients. All participating institutions have formally agreed to conduct the study in accordance with this central approval, and local site permissions were obtained as required by each institution. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed journals and the key findings will be presented at international scientific conferences.

Trial registration number

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1032230086).

Intensive care with endovascular catheter rewarming for accidental severe hypothermia (ICE-CRASH II): a protocol for a randomised controlled study

Por: Takauji · S. · Hayakawa · M. · Yokobori · S. · Kano · H. · Shimizu · K. · Horikoshi · Y. · Shimazaki · J. · Tachino · J. · Inoue · A. · Moriyama · T. · Sawano · H. · Fukushima · H. · Sugiyama · K. · Sunada · D. · Toyohara · T. · Sawamoto · K. · Isokawa · S. · Morikawa · M. · Suzuki · G. · Om
Introduction

Accidental hypothermia (AH) can occur in mild-to-severe cases; however, its management is crucial in severe cases as it can cause ventricular fibrillation and lead to death. Among various rewarming therapies for AH, endovascular catheter rewarming has been the focus of recent studies as a minimally invasive alternative to invasive internal rewarming, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, no study has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of endovascular catheter rewarming therapy. This study aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of endovascular catheter rewarming for patients with AH.

Methods and analyses

The intensive care with endovascular catheter rewarming in accidental severe hypothermia (ICE-CRASH II) study is a multicentre, randomised study of patients with AH. This study will include patients with AH (age ≥65 years, core temperature

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the Hokkaido University Certified Review Board (approval number: 024-00013). Written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants or their legally acceptable representatives. The results will be disseminated through publications and presentations.

Trial registration number

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1012240051).

Perampanel for alleviation of secondary injury in traumatic brain injury (PEACE-TBI): a protocol for a phase-II multicentre randomised clinical trial

Por: Yamamoto · R. · Tamura · R. · Morimoto · Y. · Nakaya · M. · Terao · S. · Shoji · T. · Kanazawa · T. · Sasao · R. · Inaba · M. · Shimizu · M. · Kuranari · Y. · Katayama · M. · Ueno · K. · Oishi · Y. · Nakamura · A. · Kikuo · Y. · Murakami · R. · Homma · K. · Wakahara · S. · Ishikawa · K. · Kosu
Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often causes permanent neurological dysfunction. Although no medication has been validated yet to prevent secondary injury of brain tissue, recent animal studies have reported that perampanel, a glutamine receptor antagonist, could improve the neurological functions of animals with TBI by mitigating the abnormal calcium influx and cell death around the site of primary injury. The present study aims to elucidate the efficacy of perampanel administration in improving the neurological function of patients with TBI.

Methods and analysis

The perampanel for alleviation of secondary injury in TBI trial is a multicentre, phase-II, open-label randomised controlled trial targeting patients with mild-to-moderate TBI. This trial will include adult TBI patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9–14 from five tertiary centres. Patients with epilepsy as a comorbidity, delayed presentation of symptoms (>24 hours after injury) or Injury Severity Score of ≥25 will be excluded. The study participants will be randomly assigned to either the perampanel group (2 mg/day) or the control group (fosphenytoin administered at a dose of 15–18 mg/kg/day, followed by 5–7.5 mg/kg/day of fosphenytoin). In both groups, the medication will be initiated within 12 hours of the TBI diagnosis and continued for 7 days. The antiepileptic drugs can be increased, changed or added as necessary if early post-traumatic seizures are observed. The primary outcome is favourable neurological outcome, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score of ≥5 at 90 days after the TBI diagnosis, which will then be compared between the groups through an intention-to-treat analysis.

Ethics and dissemination

The present study has been approved by the Certified Review Board of Keio at the principal institution (approval number: N20240004). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants or their legal representatives. The results will be disseminated via publications and presentations.

Trial registration number

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031250067).

❌