Outcome measures used in sciatica research lack standardisation, making it difficult to combine data for analysis. This scoping review identified and categorised Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) employed in randomised controlled trials investigating sciatica interventions, providing a foundation for developing a consensus-based core outcome set.

Scoping review.

A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central for research published between 1999 and 2024.

We included randomised controlled trials that involved patients with sciatica and used at least one PROM.

Screening and data extraction were performed independently by at least two reviewers. PROMs were categorised using the OMERACT Filter 2.0 framework, inductively sub-categorised into domains, and then the frequency was counted to identify patterns of use. Collection time points and intervention type were also assessed.

187 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies employed 69 different PROMs, collected 548 times across all papers. The Visual Analogue Scale for pain (n=115), Oswestry Disability Index (n=109) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (n=74) were most frequently used. PROMs predominantly addressed the pathophysiological (n=274) and life impact (n=262) domains, with minimal attention to resource use/economic impact (n=12). Injection-based interventions were the most studied treatment approach. Follow-up periods using the same PROMs varied considerably between studies, with trends by intervention type.

This review identified and categorised PROMs from numerous research studies, revealing substantial heterogeneity in outcome measurement for sciatica trials. This demonstrates the need for a standardised core outcome set. The predominance of use of non-sciatica-specific pain and disability measures suggests potential gaps in capturing sciatica-specific outcomes. Inconsistent follow-up durations and administration methods further highlight the requirement for standardisation.

To evaluate the patterns of abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) follow-up testing for the detection of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Australian general practices.

Retrospective, population-based observational study.

2 717 966 adults who visited a MedicineInsight participating general practice between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, had ≥1 serum creatinine measurement (with or without a UACR measurement) and did not have CKD at baseline.

‘Guideline-concordant follow-up’ was defined as having a record of a repeat eGFR or UACR testing (assessed separately) within 6 months following the abnormal (eGFR2; UACR≥2.5 mg/mmol in males, ≥3.5 mg/mmol in females) incident result. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient factors associated with receiving appropriate follow-up testing.

A total of 220 841 and 114 889 patients with an abnormal incident eGFR and UACR result, respectively, were identified. Nearly half (45.0%) of the patients with an abnormal eGFR result and over two-thirds (69.7%) of the patients with an abnormal UACR result did not have a follow-up test within 6 months. Patient factors associated with a higher likelihood of follow-up eGFR testing included indicators of poorer baseline health and greater CKD risk, such as comorbid diabetes (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.40) or more severe incident eGFR (adjusted ORs for eGFR categories 30–44, 15–29 and

In this large, population-based study, we observed substantial gaps in the follow-up of abnormal eGFR and UACR for the detection of CKD in primary care settings. Effective strategies to optimise follow-up testing for CKD detection are needed.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic condition of impaired membrane electrolyte transport and is characterised by defects in the production and function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. Ground-breaking CFTR modulator therapy has resulted in a notable shift in the clinical presentation and progressive nature of CF, across both pulmonary and extrapulmonary systems. Access to CFTR modulator therapies in people with CF is occurring in a staged, descending age process, with clinical trials focusing primarily on safety and efficacy. There is a lack of robust, real-world longitudinal data on CFTR modulator therapy in infants and young children where extrapulmonary outcomes such as growth, micronutrient status and pancreatic function are the key focus.

Pancreatic, nutritional and clinical outcomes in children 0–5 years with CF during the first 2 years of CFTR modulator therapy (PaNC) is a prospective cohort study involving all eight tertiary paediatric CF centres in Australia. Infants and children 4 months to 5 years of age who are eligible for elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) or ivacaftor (IVA) meet the inclusion criteria for PaNC, with a total eligible cohort of 303 children at the commencement of recruitment. The primary outcomes are change in weight-for-length/body mass index z score and change in serum micronutrient status, at 6–12 monthly intervals, during the first 2 years of treatment with ETI or IVA. Secondary outcomes include change in exocrine pancreatic function, measured by faecal elastase-1, change in the use and dose of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, nutritional and gastrointestinal therapies and change in sweat chloride levels. Linear mixed modelling will be used to analyse primary and secondary endpoints. This protocol is reported in accordance with ‘The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement’ reporting guidelines.

Overarching governance and ethics approval has been granted by Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee, in addition to all eight sites receiving site-specific authorisation approvals prior to the commencement of recruitment. Opportunities for CF consumers to be involved in targeted dissemination plans will be initiated via CF Australia at the completion of the study period. Additionally, a summary of non-identifiable results will be provided to CF consumers and CF healthcare providers via scientific and lay conferences and via peer-reviewed journals.

ACTRN12624001185550; Pre-results.