Conectar
To investigate whether patient safety culture is associated with nurses' turnover intention and to examine correlational sequential pathways involving burnout and job satisfaction, drawing on Conservation of Resources theory.
A descriptive, correlational design.
This study used data collected during 2023 from a hospital-wide patient safety culture survey conducted in four hospitals in South Korea. The sample comprised 3082 nurses from diverse units. Relationships among patient safety culture, burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention were examined using a mediation model within a structural equation modelling framework (WLSMV estimator with probit link), controlling for age and hospital tenure.
Patient safety culture was associated with lower burnout and higher job satisfaction. Burnout was associated with lower job satisfaction and with a higher likelihood of turnover intention, whereas job satisfaction was associated with a lower likelihood of turnover intention. When burnout and job satisfaction were considered together, the association between patient safety culture and turnover intention was explained through these two factors rather than by a direct pathway.
Patient safety culture functions as an organizational resource that relates to reduced burnout and enhanced job satisfaction, which together relate to lower intention to leave.
Strengthening patient safety culture—alongside efforts to reduce strain and foster positive job attitudes—may support nurse well-being and improve retention, thereby supporting continuity and safety of patient care.
This study addresses persistent nurse turnover intention in hospitals and identifies patient safety culture as an organizational lever that operates through reduced burnout and improved job satisfaction. The findings can guide nurse leaders and policymakers in hospitals to implement culture-focused strategies that support staff well-being, enhance retention, and sustain safe patient care.
STROBE guidelines were followed.
No patient or public contribution.
For large primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), drainage or simple aspiration are the two first-line treatment options. Outpatient ambulatory strategies have a success rate of almost 80% with few complications. New French recommendations suggest that an outpatient strategy should be preferred if an appropriate care network is in place. However, establishing this care network remains the main obstacle to the use of this strategy. Thus, outpatient management of PSP remains rare, which is neither optimal for the patient, with a likely impact on quality of life (QOL) and satisfaction with care, nor for the healthcare system, with increased costs. We hypothesise that outpatient treatment of PSP compared with usual inpatient management could improve quality of care and represent a more efficient, generalisable and sustainable strategy.
In this multicentre, cluster-controlled, randomised interventional study with stepped wedge implementation, patients aged 18–50 presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a first episode of large PSP will be enrolled in seven university hospitals in France. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact on changes in QOL of an ambulatory strategy for the management of large PSP in the ED compared with usual inpatient management. The primary outcome is the difference in QOL as measured by SF-36 score, between drain placement and 6 months. Clinical criteria (pulmonary expansion at 6 days, pain, dyspnoea, complications, recurrence), perceived quality of care (satisfaction, patient preference, anxiety) and ease of implementation of the care pathway will also be assessed. A cost-utility analysis will be carried out to evaluate the incremental cost-utility ratio at 1 year, defined as the difference in costs divided by the difference in utility estimated by the EQ-5D scores.
Ethics approval has been obtained by the Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest III N° 2024-36. Study findings will be disseminated by publication in a high-impact international journal. Results will be presented at national and international emergency healthcare meetings, and participating patients notified of the main conclusions.
This trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry NCT06471608. The trial protocol and statistical design are fully described in this study protocol. Additional data can be provided on reasonable request to the sponsor. Protocol version: V2.1 - 21/11/2024.
To evaluate the patterns of abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) follow-up testing for the detection of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Australian general practices.
Retrospective, population-based observational study.
2 717 966 adults who visited a MedicineInsight participating general practice between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, had ≥1 serum creatinine measurement (with or without a UACR measurement) and did not have CKD at baseline.
‘Guideline-concordant follow-up’ was defined as having a record of a repeat eGFR or UACR testing (assessed separately) within 6 months following the abnormal (eGFR2; UACR≥2.5 mg/mmol in males, ≥3.5 mg/mmol in females) incident result. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient factors associated with receiving appropriate follow-up testing.
A total of 220 841 and 114 889 patients with an abnormal incident eGFR and UACR result, respectively, were identified. Nearly half (45.0%) of the patients with an abnormal eGFR result and over two-thirds (69.7%) of the patients with an abnormal UACR result did not have a follow-up test within 6 months. Patient factors associated with a higher likelihood of follow-up eGFR testing included indicators of poorer baseline health and greater CKD risk, such as comorbid diabetes (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.40) or more severe incident eGFR (adjusted ORs for eGFR categories 30–44, 15–29 and
In this large, population-based study, we observed substantial gaps in the follow-up of abnormal eGFR and UACR for the detection of CKD in primary care settings. Effective strategies to optimise follow-up testing for CKD detection are needed.
Dyspnea is a common chief complaint leading to emergency department (ED) visits. Multiple conditions may cause or be associated with dyspnoea, including bacterial pneumonia, acute heart failure (AHF), exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma and pulmonary embolism. Each of these diagnoses has a specific treatment recommended by international guidelines. Inappropriate treatment in the ED is more frequent among elderly patients and is independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Point-of-care ultrasound is immediately available at the bedside. Lung and cardiac ultrasound (LuCUS) offers excellent diagnostic accuracy for bacterial pneumonia, AHF and COPD exacerbations, even in elderly patients. The primary objective of the LUC REED trial is to evaluate the impact of a LuCUS-guided strategy versus standard care on reducing inappropriate treatment of dyspnoea in elderly ED patients.
The LUC REED trial is a prospective, interventional, multicentre, stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial designed to assess the superiority of a LuCUS-guided strategy over standard care in ensuring treatment appropriateness for dyspnoea in elderly ED patients. The study will include 504 patients over 2 years. Patients aged >65 years presenting with acute dyspnoea and signs of severity (respiratory rate ≥22 or SpO2
Ethics final approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of France—Est IV on 4 April 2025 (2024-A01678-39). Results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals.
FreshRSS 