To develop and user-test a patient decision aid for people diagnosed with degenerative cervical myelopathy and who are considering surgery.

Mixed-methods study describing the development of a patient decision aid.

A draft decision aid was developed by a multidisciplinary steering group (including study authors with degenerative cervical myelopathy, health professionals and researchers) informed by the best available evidence, authorship consensus and existing patient decision aids.

Patient-participants and health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy were recruited through social media and the steering group’s research and practice network. Quantitative questionnaires were used to gather baseline data, descriptive feedback, refine the decision aid and assess its acceptability. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted online to gather feedback on the decision aid and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

We conducted 32 interviews: 19 patient-participants and 13 health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy (neurosurgeons, neurologists, physiotherapists, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners, rehabilitation and pain specialists and consultant occupational physicians and chiropractors). Participants were from 10 countries (Australia, Canada, Cyprus, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and USA). Most participants rated the decision aid’s acceptability as good-to-excellent and agreed with most aspects of the decision aid (eg, defining degenerative cervical myelopathy, management recommendations, potential benefits and harms, questions to consider asking a health professional).

Our patient decision aid was rated as an acceptable tool by both health professional-participants who treat degenerative cervical myelopathy and patient-participants with lived experience of degenerative cervical myelopathy. This decision aid can be used by clinicians and people with degenerative cervical myelopathy to help with shared decision making following a diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy. A study testing the potential benefits of this decision aid in a clinical setting is recommended.

Suicide is a major public health concern among youth in Canada and worldwide. The most rapid increases in suicidal ideation, self-harm, and suicide attempts have been observed among adolescent girls, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent studies report disproportionately high rates of emergency department visits and hospitalisations for suicide-related concerns among adolescent girls. Despite these concerning trends, limited evidence exists on the life trajectories, needs, and service pathways of adolescent girls who attempt suicide. This protocol describes a qualitative suicide audit focused on adolescent girls aged 12–17 who were hospitalised following a suicide attempt in two regions of the province of Québec, Canada. The aim is to understand developmental trajectories, document services received and identify individual, relational and systemic factors influencing these trajectories to generate recommendations that inform suicide prevention.

Using a narrative qualitative design and a community-based research approach, data will be collected from semi-structured interviews with adolescents and parents, parent questionnaires and hospital health records. These data will be integrated to develop anonymised case vignettes. A multidisciplinary panel, including clinicians, health system stakeholders, community partners and individuals with lived experience, will review each case to identify gaps and strengths in care and generate case-level and cross-case recommendations for clinical practice, health policy and professional training.

Ethics approval was obtained from the research ethics committee (REC) of the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, which serves as the reviewing REC, with administrative reviews underway at two other health authorities. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and collaborative knowledge-mobilisation activities with clinical and community partners, including practice-oriented tools and accessible materials for adolescents and parents.

Outcomes for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) patients are limited by delayed and missed diagnoses, driven in part by poor professional awareness. Despite DCM being the most common cause of adult spinal cord injury, it remains under-recognised and undertaught in clinical education. Lessons from other common pathology like stroke and acute myocardial infarction highlight the potential of education to improve early diagnosis. This study will develop a professional education strategy to improve early DCM diagnosis. It will define key audiences and identify an effective delivery method, laying the groundwork for a sustained, targeted intervention.

The study aims to define who needs to know about DCM, what they need to know and how they can learn it. This will be carried out in three phases: phase 1—who and what: to establish the target population and to define core competencies for the educational intervention; phase 2—how: to create and review the educational intervention; phase 3—evaluation: to test whether the framework is an improvement to existing strategies.

Ethical approval is in place from the University of Cambridge (HBREC.2024.24). Results from the study will be disseminated through scientific publication, conference presentation, blog posts and podcasts.

CRD42023461838

This study was to estimate the potential social value and net benefit of OpenUp, a 24/7 text-based online counselling service for youth in Hong Kong, and draw policy-relevant conclusions for service provision.

A retrospective, model-based cost–benefit analysis using social return on investment (SROI) methods. Adopting a societal perspective, service, health and social outcomes were valued over a 1-year period, and productivity gains associated with avoided suicide deaths were valued over a 10-year period. Costs are reported in 2022 HK dollars (HK$; US$1=HK$7.8). Reporting was guided by Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement.

A text-based, synchronous online emotional support counselling platform in Hong Kong was accessible through WhatsApp, Facebook, SMS and the official web portal.

A total of 19 543 users aged 11–35 years accessed OpenUp services during the study period (1 December 2020 to 31 May 2022).

These included total social value (HK$), net social benefit (social value minus investment) and the SROI ratio. The secondary outcomes included monetised savings in medical and social services and productivity gains from avoiding suicide attempts and death.

The total social value was estimated to be HK$226 119 729 against an investment of HK$47 655 000 (SROI=4.74). Suicide risk reduction (productivity gains from avoided attempts and deaths) accounted for 75.4% of the social value. Deterministic one-way sensitivity analyses yielded SROI values ranging from 3.62 to 6.99 aggregated across the three groups, with results being most sensitive to assumptions about the duration of productivity impacts for avoided attempts and avoidable mortality.

Based on conservative assumptions, OpenUp can generate potential social value by providing an online emotional support service. Given the study’s reliance on modelling and proxy monetisation, these estimates should be interpreted with caution. Further integration of offline services with online intervention strategies requires continuous investment and evaluation.

Climate change has led to extreme heat events, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. Heat stress during pregnancy is linked to adverse health outcomes, yet the biological mechanisms remain poorly understood. This research study aims to investigate the effect of environmental heat on maternal, fetal and infant health and examine the biological pathways linking heat stress to adverse pregnancy outcomes.

This prospective cohort study will recruit 6000 pregnant women from three districts in Sindh, Pakistan. Eligible participants ≥18 years old, will have a minimum of five scheduled visits from

The study has received ethical approval from the Aga Khan University (AKU) (Ref: 26249) and the Pakistan National Bioethics Committee (Ref: 1065/23/1736). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrolment. Referral pathways to healthcare facilities will be established to ensure timely management of pregnancy complications. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences, and engagement with policymakers and public health stakeholders to inform climate-resilient maternal health strategies. Results will also be shared with participants and communities through meetings and informal sessions to raise awareness and support evidence-based heat adaptation.

NCT01234567.

To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-ophthalmologist-led diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS) at health and wellness centres (HWCs) and offline artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted community-based screening, using specialist grading as the reference standard in India.

Pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study in primary healthcare settings. The settings included HWCs and community-based screening sites in rural Block Boothgarh, Mohali District, Punjab, India. A total of 600 people with diabetes aged ≥30 years were enrolled across three screening models: (1) non-ophthalmologist-led DRS at the HWC, (2) AI-assisted smartphone-based DRS in the community and (3) standard referral-based care. Retinal images were captured using non-mydriatic fundus cameras and independently graded by two masked human graders; a senior retina specialist resolved any disagreements. The AI was assessed for its ability to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) and referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR). Diagnostic performance metrics were reported.

The non-ophthalmologist-led model demonstrated 86.4% sensitivity (95% CI 65.1% to 97.1%) and 94.3% specificity (95% CI 88.5% to 97.7%) for DR detection, with an ungradability rate of 8%. For RDR, sensitivity reached 95.8% (95% CI 78.9% to 99.9%) and specificity was 93.1% (95% CI 88.0% to 96.5%). The offline AI-assisted model achieved 93.3% sensitivity (95% CI 68.1% to 99.8%) and 85.1% specificity (95% CI 76.9% to 91.2%) for RDR, but with a higher ungradability rate (38%), mainly due to cataracts and poor image quality. Both approaches effectively identified referable cases; however, the non-ophthalmologist-led model demonstrated greater accuracy and operational feasibility.

This study demonstrates that non-ophthalmologist-led DRS at HWCs can enhance access to primary care. Offline AI-enabled screening demonstrates potential for community use but is currently limited by image quality and binary classification outputs. Integrating both approaches may strengthen DRS coverage in resource-limited settings.

CTRI/2022/10/046283.

The use of bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) has greatly increased quality of life for lower limb amputees. However, the long-term frequency of skeletal fractures and the need for arthroplasty surgery in the lower extremities following BAP use is scarce.

The current study aimed to investigate the frequency of fractures and arthroplasties in the lower limb after BAP surgery with the Osseointegrated Prosthesis for the Rehabilitation of Amputees (OPRA) system.

Retrospective cohort study using the OPRA database and medical record review for data collection.

A single-centre study at a tertiary hospital.

All patients with a transfemoral BAP (OPRA system) who underwent surgery between 1999 and 2019, and had completed at least 2 years of follow-up were included in the study. Patients with bilateral transfemoral amputations were excluded. A total of 100 patients were included.

The primary outcome measure was to identify patients who had a fracture or had undergone arthroplasty surgery in the lower extremities after BAP surgery.

Of the 100 patients included, 16 patients (16%) had an event in their lower limb. 11 patients (11%) had a fracture, all of the femur, and six patients (6%) underwent arthroplasty surgery due to osteoarthritis. Long-term prosthetic use was not affected by the occurrence of an event.

Patients with BAP may be at a higher risk for femur fractures and arthroplasty surgery than the general population. Although encouraging that prosthetic usage is not affected after a fracture or arthroplasty surgery, prospective studies on larger cohorts and control groups need to be conducted.

Women living with HIV (WLHIV) face a higher risk of developing cervical cancer. India carries a significant burden of HIV, with an estimated 2.5 million people living with HIV in 2023. While the introduction of more effective antiretroviral therapy has improved the life expectancy of WLHIV, it has also extended the risk window for persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical disease progression. Cervical cancer prevention through HPV vaccination and regular screening remains the cornerstone of public health efforts. This study specifically aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various cervical cancer screening strategies (at different intervals) among WLHIV in India.

The study will be conducted in three interlinked components. First, a meta-analysis will be undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different screening strategies in detecting cervical lesions in WLHIV. Second, primary data collection will be carried out to estimate the treatment costs of cervical cancer and HIV among WLHIV. This phase will also include the collection of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data, to inform utility estimates for the modelling component. A total of 135 participants will be enrolled for cost data assessment. Of these, a subset of 71 participants will also be included for HRQoL assessment. This data collection will be undertaken in four tertiary public sector hospitals located across four Indian states, that is, Mizoram, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. Lastly, a decision analytical model will be developed to simulate the process of screening, diagnosis and treatment for cervical cancer in a hypothetical cohort of WLHIV. A structured comprehensive review of literature will be undertaken to inform model input parameters related to the natural history of cervical disease, progression and mortality among WLHIV. Model calibration will be performed using a likelihood-based approach to ensure consistency with empirical epidemiological data. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis will also be conducted to assess the impact of joint parameter uncertainty on model outcomes.

Ethical approval has been obtained from Ethics Committees of Indian Council of Medical Research–National AIDS Research Institute (NARI), Pune (Protocol No. NARI/EC/Approval/2024/716); B. J. Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune (Ref. No. BJGMC/IEC/Pharmac/ND-0824297-297); Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai (Ref. No. IEC/2024/Nov-07); the Mizoram State Cancer Institute, Zemabawk, Aizawl (Ref. No. D.12016/2/2013-MSCI/IEC) and the KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka. The study findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals.

The objective of this scoping review is to identify and describe factors that affect access to post-sepsis care. Considering the burden faced by sepsis survivors, it is important to understand the facilitators and barriers to accessing post-sepsis care to facilitate the design and implementation of patient-centred and equitable pathways to care.

This scoping review will include studies that consider individuals who have experienced sepsis and any factors that may affect access to care, including comorbidities, discharge setting and social determinants of health. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, HealthSTAR and Scopus will be conducted. The extracted data will be summarised and presented thematically.

Approval from a research ethics board is not required for this review as it is a synthesis of information from studies where the primary investigators have already received approval from their respective ethics boards. Once complete, the review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and the findings will be shared to local and national forums.

This review has been uploaded and registered under Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JMFW2

The COmmunity HEalth System InnovatiON (COHESION) project (2016–2019) was a 4-year collaboration between research teams from Mozambique, Nepal, Peru and Switzerland. It conducted formative health system research using tracer chronic conditions, non-communicable diseases (diabetes and hypertension) and one neglected tropical disease per country (schistosomiasis in Mozambique, leprosy in Nepal and neurocysticercosis in Peru).

Findings guided the co-creation of interventions to improve diagnosis and management through a participatory approach with communities, primary healthcare workers and regional health authorities.

As a continuation of this effort, the research team initiated the COHESION Implementation project (COHESION-I) with two objectives: (1) implement and evaluate the context-specific co-created interventions in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru (Component 1) and (2) adapt the COHESION approach to India, a country that did not benefit from a formative phase previously (Component 2). This protocol manuscript focuses on Component 1.

A mixed-methods, pre–post quasi-experimental design will be used, including quantitative, qualitative, economic and process evaluations. Each country will have three arms: (1) co-created and co-designed interventions; (2) only co-designed intervention and (3) the usual care arm. Data will be collected longitudinally over 18 months to assess the effect of the interventions. The main outcomes include patient satisfaction (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form), health system responsiveness (WHO responsiveness domains) and quality of life (EuroQol 5 dimensions 5 levels). The qualitative evaluation will explore how satisfaction is perceived among service users with chronic conditions and healthcare workers. Other outcomes per type of evaluation will be considered such as perceived value of health services, cost estimation and acceptability of the intervention components, among others.

Approvals were obtained from Ethics Committees of Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (Peru), Universidade Eduardo Mondale (Mozambique) and Nepal Health Research Council (Nepal). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences.

NCT06989502.

Neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs) represent an unprecedented public health burden. These disorders are clinically heterogeneous and therapeutically challenging, but advances in discovery science and trial methodology offer hope for translation to new treatments. Against this background, there is an urgent unmet need for biomarkers to aid with early and accurate diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring throughout the care pathway and in clinical trials.

Investigations routinely used in clinical care and trials are often invasive, expensive, time-consuming, subjective and ordinal. Speech data represent a potentially scalable, non-invasive, objective and quantifiable digital biomarker that can be acquired remotely and cost-efficiently using mobile devices, and analysed using state-of-the-art speech signal processing and machine learning approaches. This prospective case–control observational study of multiple NDDs aims to deliver a deeply clinically phenotyped longitudinal speech dataset to facilitate development and evaluation of speech biomarkers.

People living with dementia, motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease are eligible to participate. Healthy individuals (including relatives or carers of participants with neurological disease) are also eligible to participate as controls. Participants complete a study app with standardised speech recording tasks (including reading, free speech, picture description and verbal fluency tasks) and patient-reported outcome measures of quality of life and mood (EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level, Patient Health Questionnaire 2) every 2 months at home or in clinic. Participants also complete disease severity scales, cognitive screening tests and provide optional samples for blood-based biomarkers at baseline and then 6-monthly. Follow-up is scheduled for up to 24 months. Initially, 30 participants will be recruited to each group. Speech recordings and contemporaneous clinical data will be used to create a dataset for development and evaluation of novel speech-based diagnosis and monitoring algorithms.

Digital App for Speech and Health Monitoring Study was approved by the South Central—Hampshire B Ethics Committee (REC ref. 24/SC/0067), NHS Lothian (R&D ref. 2024/0034) and NHS Forth Valley (R&D ref. FV1494). Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Data from the study will be shared with other researchers and used to facilitate speech processing challenges for neurological disorders. Regular updates will be provided on the Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic web page and social media platforms.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06450418 (pre-results).

To assess the comparative effectiveness of educational interventions in neurological disease for healthcare workers and students.

Systematic review.

Medline, Embase and Cochrane through to 1 June 2025.

Studies evaluating neurological disease educational interventions with a comparator group (observational cohort/randomised controlled trial (RCT)) were included.

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review was conducted (PROSPERO: CRD42023461838). Knowledge acquisition and educational methodologies were collected from each study. Study outcomes were classified using the Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick four-level model (learner reaction, knowledge acquisition, behavioural change, clinical outcome).¹ Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomised studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs.^{2 3}

A total of 67 studies involving 4728 participants were included. Of these, 36 were RCTs, and 31 were observational studies. Virtual interventions were the most common (67.2%, n=45 studies), primarily targeting either medical students (46.3%, n=31 studies) or specialists (40.3%, n=27 studies). Overall, 70.1% (n=47) of studies demonstrated outcomes in favour of the intervention. However, few studies used K&K level 3/4 outcomes, with two studies evaluating behaviour change (level 3) and three assessing clinical outcomes (level 4 combined with other levels). No study exclusively assessed level 4 outcomes. Meta-analysis of 22 RCTs with calculable standardised mean differences (SMDs) (n=1748) showed a significant benefit of interventions (SMD 0.75, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.27, p=0.0056).

This review highlights a growing body of research particularly focusing on virtual techniques, specialist audiences and treatment-oriented content. Few studies assessed changes in practice or patient care. Non-specialists remain underrepresented. Future studies should prioritise assessing the clinical impact of educational interventions within non-specialist audiences.

Depressed mood is a psychological state characterised by sadness or loss of interest in activities, is a common symptom that accompanies most major mental disorders. It is therefore reasonable to consider it as a transdiagnostic target, which when addressed, may improve the functioning and quality of life of persons with lived experience of mental disorders. However, there is limited understanding of the depressed mood as a transdiagnostic target across major mental disorders. Therefore, this scoping review aims to synthesise knowledge on depressed mood, its measurement and interventions among persons with anxiety and/or psychosis.

This scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley’s framework. Peer-reviewed articles and grey literature published from January 1988 to April 2024 were searched in the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Africa-Wide Information, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, Humanities International Complete, Sabinet, Open Grey and Google Scholar. Articles were screened at title, abstract and full article levels. Data extracted were analysed using thematic analysis and reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We also consulted stakeholders such as lived experience experts, clinicians and researchers to contextualise our findings.

We screened 245 full articles out of the 4039 hits and included 28 articles in this review. Although depressed mood is conceptually different from clinical depression, the terms are used interchangeably in the literature. The prevalence of depressed mood in psychosis was 7.3–33.3%, with no prevalence studies specific to anxiety disorders. Commonly used outcome measures included Beck’s Depression Inventory (n=6) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (n=5). Psychosocial conservative interventions such as cognitive–behavioural therapy were the most common interventions. Other interventions, including yoga, pharmacotherapy and Ecology Momentary Interventions, were also reported. All interventions were reported to improve depressed mood, and most were implemented in high-income settings. Stakeholders, including lived experience experts, concurred on the importance of using depressed mood as a transdiagnostic target, viewing it as a ‘window’ for early identification and management of many common mental disorders.

There is a need to clarify the definition and diagnostic cut-off points on common outcome measures of depressed mood. There is also a need for increased research on depressed mood as a viable transdiagnostic target in anxiety and/or psychosis with a special focus on low-to-middle income countries.

Depressed mood is an important and prevalent transdiagnostic target with great promise for early management in anxiety and/or psychosis. Valid diagnostic and measurement tools are developing, and so are the targeted interventions in the context of anxiety and/or psychosis.

Preventable hospital patient harm events disproportionally affect certain patient populations. For some, harm extends beyond physical injury to include cultural, emotional or spiritual impacts. While these disparities are linked to socio-demographics (eg, race, education), they are driven by structural factors (eg, procedures and policies). Patient safety monitoring systems (eg, incident reporting, patient concerns) were not originally designed to identify equity-related harms and may inadvertently obscure or reinforce the injustices they should address. This study will examine how equity is currently considered within hospital incident reporting and patient concerns systems across Canada and will identify opportunities to strengthen these systems’ responsiveness to inequities in patient safety.

This 3-year exploratory sequential mixed-method study began in September 2024. Phase one involves qualitative interviews with patient safety and equity leads, patients/families/caregivers and leaders of innovative initiatives to explore current practices, gaps and innovations in how equity-related factors are identified and addressed within incident reporting and patient concerns systems. Findings will inform Phase 2, a modified Delphi process with patient safety and equity experts and persons with lived experience of equity-related harm events to refine and reach consensus on key equity-promoting features, considerations and recommendations for these systems. In Phase 3, consensus items will be used to develop a national cross-sectional survey assessing the extent to which equity is integrated into hospital incident reporting and patient concerns systems in Canada. A patient advisory committee will inform data collection, interpretation of findings and dissemination.

Ethics approval has been received for Phase 1, with subsequent approvals to be sought for later phases. Dissemination plans include peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences and knowledge exchange activities to inform patient engagement, the design of incident reporting and patient concerns systems and policy development.

Psychiatrists’ first exposure to patient suicide often occurs during residency training. Previous research shows that experiencing a patient’s death by suicide during residency can have significant impacts on trainees’ well-being, self-esteem and approach to practice. However, existing research on this topic is mostly limited to survey-based data, which does not facilitate nuanced exploration. This study will use a qualitative approach to gain an in-depth understanding of Canadian psychiatry residents’ experiences of a patient’s death by suicide and the types of supports that may help trainees to process this loss and integrate this experience into their professional identity formation.

This study will conduct 15–25 semistructured qualitative interviews with psychiatry resident physicians across Canada to explore their experiences of patient loss by suicide during training. Interview data will be transcribed verbatim and analysed using the principles of Constructivist Grounded Theory.

The study findings will be reported and accessible to residency training programmes, the academic community, the media and the public.

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Protocol Identifying Number 2024/125).

Metacognitive strategy training is a crucial approach for addressing metacognitive deficits and enhancing metacognitive abilities, which can help mitigate age-related cognitive decline and optimise cognitive functioning. The present scoping review aims to systematically examine and synthesise the existing evidence on metacognitive strategy training programmes designed for both neurotypical adults and individuals with cognitive-communication disorders (CCDs).

A scoping review following the JBI methodology.

A literature search was conducted systematically across PubMed, Embase and Web of Science between June and August 2024.

Studies involving metacognitive strategy training for neurotypical adults or individuals with CCDs, measuring cognition, communication or metacognitive skills.

Two reviewers independently screened studies in a two-step process, that is, title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening. Data extraction included study characteristics, participant demographics, intervention details and outcome measures.

A total of 32 studies met the selection criteria, revealing diverse metacognitive training approaches that varied in component and dosage. The most frequently used approaches are the Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance approach and the Multicontext approach. The reported outcome measures included cognitive outcomes, metacognitive outcomes, well-being measures and feasibility measures. The majority of interventions targeted occupational goals, followed by cognitive skills, with fewer studies addressing cognitive-communicative skills. Studies have focused primarily on individuals with CCDs, with only a few targeting neurotypical adults.

Studies examining the efficacy of metacognitive strategy training are heterogeneous in terms of population, intervention approaches, and outcome measures. There is significant potential to expand the focus of these interventions to include neurotypical adults, aiming to counteract age-related cognitive-communicative disorders. The limited research within the field of speech-language pathology presents a valuable opportunity for speech-language pathologists to broaden the application of metacognitive strategy training, particularly in enhancing cognitive-communicative abilities.

To compare costs and health consequences and to assess the cost-effectiveness of using low-dose oral long-acting morphine in people with chronic breathlessness.

Within-trial planned cost-consequences and cost-effectiveness analysis of data from a multisite, parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of low-dose, long-acting morphine.

11 hospital outpatients across the UK.

Consenting adults with chronic breathlessness due to long-term cardiorespiratory conditions.

5–10 mg two times a day oral long-acting morphine with a blinded laxative for 56 days.

Mean and SD of healthcare resource use (HRU) by trial arm; mean differences and 95% CI of costs between trial arms.

Mean differences in 28- and 56-day quality-adjusted life years (QALYs based on EuroQol five-dimension five-level score), Short Form-six dimensional scores and ICEpop CAPability-Supportive Care Measure scores; cost-utility of long-acting morphine for chronic breathlessness.

143 participants (75 morphine and 67 placebo) were randomised; 140 (90% power, males 66%, mean age 70.5 (SD 9.4)) formed the modified intention-to-treat population (participants receiving at least one dose of study medication). There were more inpatient and fewer outpatient services used by the morphine group versus the placebo. In the base-case analysis at 56 days, long-acting morphine was associated with similar mean per-patient costs and QALYs. There was an increase of £24 (95% CI –£395 to £552) and 0.002 (95% CI –0.004 to 0.008) QALYs. Hospitalisations were the main driver of cost differences. The corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £12 000/QALY, with a probability of cost-effectiveness of 54% at a £20 000 willingness-to-pay threshold. In the scenario analysis that excluded costs of adverse events considered unrelated to long-acting morphine by site investigators and researchers, the probability of cost-effectiveness increased to 73%.

Oral morphine for chronic breathlessness is likely to be a cost-effective intervention provided adverse events are minimised, but the effect on outcome is small and cautious interpretation is warranted.

ISRCTN87329095.