Conectar
by Jonas Österlind, Johan Birnefeld, Elin Birnefeld, Magnus Hultin, Sara Qvarlander, Anders Wåhlin, Petter Holmlund, Laleh Zarrinkoob
BackgroundMaintaining cerebral perfusion during anesthesia and intensive care is critical, yet the relationship between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) remains poorly defined. In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), pharmacologically induced hypertension is commonly applied to support cerebral perfusion, but its effects are uncertain.
MethodsThis protocol describes two parallel clinical studies using identical methodology. The first study population includes adults undergoing elective general anesthesia (MAP-ANE), and the second comprises sedated intensive care patients with aSAH (MAP-SAH). In both study populations, MAP will be increased stepwise with norepinephrine (NE) infusion under continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring, and CBF measured with phase-contrast MRI (PCMRI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL), while near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) will be performed in parallel to evaluate its validity as a surrogate marker. The primary outcome is the change in total CBF between baseline and elevated MAP, directly testing whether induced hypertension increases CBF. Secondary outcomes include ASL perfusion changes, the slope of the MAP–CBF relationship, systemic–cerebral hemodynamic correlations, and NIRS responses.
Expected impactThese studies test the hypothesis that pharmacological MAP augmentation does not predictably increase CBF. By combining quantitative MRI with invasive monitoring, it aims to clarify MAP–CBF interactions, define the physiological basis of induced hypertension, and assess whether NIRS can serve as a clinically useful proxy. Findings are expected to inform safer and more individualized blood pressure management in perioperative and neurocritical care. The studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (MAP-ANE: NCT06855407; MAP-SAH: NCT06033378).
Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, MAP-ANE NCT06855407, MAP-SAH NCT06033378
The rise of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) has introduced new challenges to tobacco control and regulation, particularly among young adults, raising questions about their safety. This umbrella review aimed to synthesise existing systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses to evaluate the health impacts of ENDS.
We conducted a systematic literature search via the PICO strategy across multiple databases, focusing on e-cigarettes, ENDS and e-liquids, while excluding non-nicotine e-cigarette and nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs). Health outcomes include a range of clinical diseases and physiological changes. Quality assessment was performed via assessing the methodoligcal quality of systematic reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), and the findings were synthesised narratively and in tables, prioritising the highest-rated reviews. The meta-analyses used R software (V.4.3) random effects models, and evidence quality was assessed via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.
Of the 5055 records, 69 systematic reviews were included. Systematic reviews have indicated increased risks of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, mental health issues and substance abuse with ENDS use, especially among adolescents. Cardiovascular risk factors included increased heart rate (mean difference (MD) 1.41, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.01, I2=91%) from 25 studies; increased blood pressure (MD for systolic blood pressure=0.51 mm Hg, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.75, I2=89%; MD for diastolic blood pressure=0.59 mm Hg, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.83, I2=82%) from 23 studies; endothelial dysfunction and increased platelet activity. Respiratory risk factors included reduced lung function and a higher incidence of asthma in nine studies (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.55; I2=43%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mental health concerns, such as depression and suicidality, were also prevalent among adolescent ENDS users. Nine studies reported a negative effect of ENDS on periodontal health. Evidence of carcinogens has been found in the urinary examinations of ENDS users in some studies. The adverse events reported in seven randomised controlled trials with 2611 participants were similar between ENDS and NRT (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.54, I2=12%).
Exposure to ENDS is harmful to various organ systems, especially cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Comprehensive regulatory measures and public health strategies are necessary to curb the use of ENDS, particularly among young people.
FreshRSS 