In individuals at-risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to investigate how joint tenderness and patient-reported joint pain (PRJP) relate to ultrasound abnormalities and assess whether these exploratory results could be used to assist future evaluation of symptom/signs-guided ultrasound scanning approaches in this population.

This is a cross-sectional analysis from a Leeds (UK) cohort of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) positive individuals with new musculoskeletal complaints and no clinical arthritis. Assessments included physical examination, a mannequin where participants ticked joints that were painful and ultrasound scans of wrists, metacarpo-phalangeal joints 1–5 (MCPs1-5), proximal interphalangeal joints 1–5 (PIPs1-5), elbows, knees, ankles, metatarso-phalangeal joints 1–5 (MTPs1-5), finger flexor tendons (2-5) and extensor carpi ulnaris. Grey scale (GS), power Doppler (PD), tenosynovitis and erosions were assessed. A generalised estimating equations model was used to evaluate potential associations between tenderness/PRJP and ultrasound findings at the joint-level, adjusting for age and sex. Positive and negative predictive values for ultrasound changes were calculated.

323 participants were analysed. Joint tenderness was associated with ultrasound abnormalities, predominantly PD in wrists, MCPs, PIPs, elbows, knees and MTPs. GS and erosions were also associated with tenderness, but to a lesser degree. Association of PRJP with ultrasound abnormalities was more inconsistent and mostly for GS in the feet (all p≤0.05). Absence of symptoms and signs had a negative predictive value between 97% and 100% in all joints, except in wrists; which was slightly lower.

In anti-CCP positive individuals at risk of RA, tenderness, predominantly in the small joints, was associated with local inflammatory changes on ultrasound. The association of PRJP and ultrasound was limited. In the absence of tenderness, the presence of PD, tenosynovitis or erosions was uncommon. These findings may inform future studies evaluating symptom/sign-guided ultrasound assessment approaches in at-risk populations.

NCT02012764.

To synthesise evidence on the association between any diagnosed or self-reported mental health problems prior to pregnancy (pre-existing mental health problems) and birth outcomes including preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal unit (NNU) admission and mode of birth (instrumental birth, planned or unplanned caesarean section).

Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO in December 2024 for studies examining the association between any pre-existing mental health problems and PTB, LBW, SGA, NNU admission and mode of birth. Only articles published in English were included with no restriction on year of publication. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to pool crude and adjusted ORs (aORs) and risk ratios (aRR) with 95% CIs. ORs and RRs were analysed separately. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic.

Of 15 467 records screened, 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Women with any pre-existing mental health problems had higher odds and risks of adverse birth outcomes, including PTB (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.56) (aRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.51), LBW (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.33) (aRR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.68), SGA (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.51) (aRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.51) and NNU admission (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.74). Adjusted estimates were based on multivariable models that commonly controlled for maternal age, parity and socio-demographic factors. No consistent associations were observed between pre-existing mental health problems and mode of birth.

Pre-existing mental health problems were associated with increased risks and odds of several adverse birth outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of early identification and targeted support for women with mental health problems before pregnancy to strengthen preconception and maternity care planning.

CRD42023485834.

Mental health problems among undergraduate medical students are a major global public health concern that emerge early during training and are shaped by demanding educational environments, emotional stressors and organisational pressures. Although research has expanded rapidly, the literature remains fragmented across themes, regions and methods. This scoping review aims to map the global quantitative literature on medical students’ mental health and identify gaps in scope, geography, methodology and equity.

This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We will include quantitative studies assessing mental health among undergraduate medical students. MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science (Clarivate), the Cochrane Library (Wiley) and PsycINFO (Ovid) will be searched without date or language restrictions using a keyword-based search strategy. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts and extract data using a standardised form. Data will include publication year, country, study design, sample size, mental health measures, thematic domains and patterns of collaboration. Mental health domains will be classified using an a priori thematic framework encompassing psychological symptoms and distress, psychological resources, academic environment, social support and physical health and lifestyle factors. Equity-related variables (sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status) will be operationalised based on analytical use. Results will be synthesised descriptively using tables and visualisations.

Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through publication and presentations. The dataset and code will be openly available on publication.

Protocol registration will be made available online via the Open Science Framework (doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/2EHNU).

Older people living in care homes are at increased risk of harm during acute hospital admissions. In England, care home residents have more than twice as many emergency department (ED) attendances as people of the same age living at home. Up to 40% of emergency hospital admissions of older care home residents may be avoidable with different models of care within their homes.

In 2023, National Health Service England introduced the updated Enhanced Health in Care Homes (EHCH) framework, a set of recommendations to support ‘joined up’ and enhanced care for people living in care homes. A stated aim of the framework is to reduce ED attendances and inpatient admissions of residents. There is limited available evidence regarding how implementation of the EHCH framework differs regionally and whether variation in implementation may impact on hospitalisations of care home residents.

We aim to explore regional differences in care elements developed from the EHCH framework and assess how these differences may contribute to variation in hospitalisations of care home residents over the age of 65.

This is a comparative qualitative case study of six care home-containing postcode districts in England embedded within three Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). ICBs are regional organisations responsible for commissioning healthcare services in England. Case study districts and ICBs were selected due to contrasting case-mix adjusted admission rates and other characteristics (eg, deprivation). Data will be collected through semistructured interviews. We will interview health and social care professionals who are responsible for commissioning, overseeing and delivering enhanced care in care homes, care home professionals, residents over the age of 65 and their family and friends. Interview data will be analysed through a framework approach, with comparisons drawn within cases, across cases and across ICBs. Through our analysis, we will characterise the EHCH framework care elements and identify differences in implementation that may cause variation in hospital admissions. We will also identify perceived appropriate, effective and replicable enhanced care models.

Patients and the public have informed the design of this study, and will advise the research practice, support the analysis of data and guide dissemination plans.

This study has received Social Care Research Ethics and Health Research Authority Approval (25/IEC08/0014). All participants will be required to provide informed consent. The findings will inform a national survey of ICBs to map appropriate and effective enhanced care in England. Findings will be shared with key stakeholders and academic audiences.

Acute pain is an expected symptom for adolescents after outpatient surgery. In the USA, postoperative analgesic regimens frequently include prescription opioids. Increasing attention from clinicians, patients and other healthcare leaders has been directed toward non-opioid strategies, such as combining non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) plus acetaminophen, as potential first-line options for managing postoperative pain. However, the effectiveness and safety of home regimens that include versus exclude opioids for adolescents are unclear. The Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after surgery for Kids study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of NSAIDs plus acetaminophen alone (NSAID regimen) versus NSAIDs and acetaminophen plus a low-dose opioid regimen (opioid regimen).

This study is a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial recruiting 900 patients aged 12–20 years undergoing three common outpatient surgeries (tonsillectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, knee arthroscopy) across four health systems. We will recruit patients prior to surgery and individuals will be randomised 1:1 with stratification to receive prescriptions for either the NSAID regimen or the opioid regimen. The primary effectiveness outcome is patient-reported pain intensity, while the primary safety outcome is adverse medication-related symptoms both assessed over the first 2 weeks after surgery. Secondary outcomes include quality of recovery, healthcare-related quality of life and rates of problematic substance use and chronic prescription opioid use, assessed up to 1 year after surgery.

The study incorporates stakeholder collaboration, including patient partners, surgeons, professional organisations., and health insurance payors, to ensure ethical conduct and relevance. This study is overseen by a single institutional review board with certificate of confidentiality. Findings will be disseminated through academic publications, conferences and community outreach to inform patients, parents, surgical teams and policymakers about optimal pain management strategies for adolescents after surgery.

NCT06671002.

Global increases in armed conflict, forced displacement, pandemics and economic instability have contributed to rising levels of psychological distress worldwide, placing relevant segments of the population at increased risk of developing mental health conditions. This burden is particularly pronounced in humanitarian and low-resource settings where access to specialist mental health services is limited. Scalable, low-intensity, evidence-based psychological interventions are therefore urgently needed. In response, the WHO has developed transdiagnostic programmes, including Self-Help Plus (SH+) and Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWMS). Although these interventions are increasingly implemented across humanitarian and public health contexts, evidence for their effectiveness and implementation has not yet been systematically synthesised.

This preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration standards and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We will include randomised controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of SH+ or DWMS, alongside qualitative and mixed-methods studies examining their implementation among stressor-exposed individuals of any age. Outcomes will include symptoms of depression and anxiety, general distress and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Moreover, we will examine effects on well-being, psychosocial functioning, adverse events and implementation outcomes (eg, acceptability, feasibility, fidelity). We will search Cochrane CENTRAL, APA PsycNet, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase and Scopus for records published from 2016 onwards. Searches will be supplemented by hand-searching preprint repositories and citation tracking. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and a customised appraisal tool for studies on implementation. Quantitative data will be synthesised using random-effects multilevel meta-analyses, with meta-regression models applied to examine moderators. Bayesian meta-analyses will be conducted where appropriate as sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the findings. Certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through an open-access peer-reviewed publication, a plain-language summary, and the Open Science Framework, where all materials will be made publicly available.

CRD420251168521.

To examine virtual health service (VHS) device usage patterns and identify factors associated with VHS engagement among Indigenous Australian adults with chronic conditions.

Cross-sectional survey.

An Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation providing primary healthcare services across rural and remote Queensland, Australia.

74 consenting Indigenous Australian adults with at least one chronic condition who were registered VHS users.

Participants completed surveys assessing their use of four Bluetooth-enabled monitoring devices (pulse oximeter, blood glucose monitor, blood pressure monitor, weight scale) over a 2-week recall period. The primary outcome was VHS device usage status, categorised as active versus inactive users. Active users were defined as participants who reported any frequency of device use, while those reporting no use were classified as inactive users. All participants had access to Indigenous health coach support as part of the VHS model. Binary logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic and geographical factors associated with VHS engagement.

Sixty-four per cent (n=47) were active users, with 73% of these using all four devices concurrently. Among active users, blood pressure monitors showed the highest utilisation (98%), followed by weight scales (91%), blood glucose monitors (89%) and pulse oximeters (86%). Three factors were significantly associated with VHS usage using binary logistic regression: residing in medium rural towns (adjusted OR 4.71, 95% CI 1.23 to 17.94, p=0.02), age 18–65 years (adjusted OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.05 to 12.22, p=0.04) and having multiple chronic conditions (adjusted OR 10.95, 95% CI 1.25 to 95.87, p=0.03) compared with those in more remote areas, aged ≥66 years and with single condition, respectively.

Indigenous-led VHS achieve substantial engagement through culturally grounded health coach support. However, addressing digital connectivity in remote areas, age-appropriate support for older adults and Indigenous workforce development is essential to ensure equitable access and sustained engagement

Oncology nurses are pivotal to delivering high-quality cancer care; yet, the uptake of evidence-based practices (EBPs) remains inconsistent. Though continuing professional education is widely used to support EBP uptake, persistent gaps remain, likely driven by the intricate and interrelated mechanisms that unfold differently across individual, organisational and system contexts.

To understand how, why, for whom and under what conditions continuing professional education interventions enhance (or fail to enhance) the uptake of EBPs among oncology nurses.

This realist review will adhere to the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards methodological standards. The Theoretical Domains Framework will guide the exploration of potential mechanisms. 33 initial programme theories, developed from the Theoretical Domains Framework, prior reviews, expert input and consultations with interested parties working in oncology (eg, oncology nurses, managers), will be refined through systematic searches (CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Google Scholar). These initial programme theories represent hypothesised Context-Mechanism-Outcomes Configurations that may influence the uptake of EBPs among oncology nurses. Eligible peer-reviewed and grey literature from high-income countries in English or French will be screened in duplicate. Data will be coded deductively and inductively in MaxQDA and synthesised into Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations. These configurations will be reviewed in collaboration with interested parties.

Findings will be disseminated through open-access, peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Key stakeholders, including various professional associations (eg, the Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology and the International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care), will be actively engaged to ensure the clinical relevance of the findings and to maximise their translation into nursing practice.

CRD420251133710.

To develop a core information set for induction of labour. Rates of induction of labour for childbirth are rising in many high-income countries. In England, a third of women have their labours induced. National guidelines recommend women receive information to make informed decisions about induction.

Two-stage consensus study using modified Delphi.

UK.

Pregnant people, parents and professionals.

Stage 1: A long list of information points was identified through a systematic review of reviews, reviewing patient leaflets, qualitative interviews and a stakeholder survey, with ongoing patient, public and professional involvement. Stage 2: Think-aloud interviews were undertaken to refine the Delphi survey before a two-round modified Delphi process where participants voted on the importance of the information items. Pre-specified criteria were used to select items taken forward to a consensus meeting.

199 information points were identified through systematic review (110), patient information leaflets (162), qualitative interviews (58) and a survey (93). 46 unique information items entered the first Delphi round after four think-aloud interviews, 2 items were added following round 2. 368 people (310 parents/58 professionals) participated in round 1 and 177 people (154 parents/23 professionals) in round 2. 44 items met inclusion criteria; one item excluded, and three items were carried forward for consensus meeting discussion where 12 overarching information points were agreed on.

This study has established a consensus-based core information set for induction of labour from a sample of the birthing population and staff providing their care. The resultant set has been populated with evidence in line with national guidelines. It can be used by women and clinicians as a standardised starting point from which to personalise discussions about birth.

COMET Initiative registration 2600: Developing a core information set for induction of labour.

To examine the association between navigational health literacy (HL), defined as the skills required to effectively navigate healthcare systems, access services and make informed decisions and healthcare utilisation among French adults with and without chronic health conditions.

Cross-sectional online survey.

National survey conducted in metropolitan France as part of the Health Literacy Survey (HLS₁₉) in 2020 and 2021.

A total of 2 003 individuals were included: 1103 without chronic condition and 900 with at least one chronic condition.

Number of general practitioner (GP) and specialist visits in the previous 12 months

The chronic condition group reported more frequent GP (4.3 vs 2.1/year) and specialist (2.8 vs 1.1/year) visits than the no chronic condition group. A high navigational HL was significantly associated with fewer GP (p=0.016) and specialist visits (p

High navigational HL was associated with less healthcare utilisation in individuals with no chronic condition. Among the chronic condition group, this aspect seemed less influential, likely due to greater healthcare system familiarity and structured care. Our findings highlight the importance of strengthening HL navigation skills early to improve healthcare use.

To assess the burden of diabetes and prediabetes in the educational sector in Bahawalpur City, Pakistan.

Cross-sectional study.

Teaching institutes of Bahawalpur, Pakistan, during January 2024 to December 2024.

A total of 955 participants from 15 universities, colleges and schools were included. Eligible participants were aged 18–75 years and employed as teachers or academic staff and enrolled using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Primary anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, smoking status and HbA1c levels were recorded. Prediabetes was defined as HbA1c 5.7–6.4% and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as HbA1c ≥6.5%.

Among 955 participants, 622 (65.1%) were male and 713 (74.7%) were teaching staff. The median age was 42 years, and median BMI was 27.3 kg/m². The prevalence of prediabetes and T2DM was 31.7% and 15.4%, respectively, with 8.5% newly diagnosed cases of T2DM. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis found that age (p=0.006), BMI (p=0.008) and family history of diabetes (p

This study highlights a significant prevalence of T2DM and prediabetes in the educational sector of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Increasing age, BMI and positive family history of diabetes were independent predictors of prediabetes/T2DM.