Conectar
Three-quarters of mental health problems start before the age of 25. However, young people are the least likely to receive mental healthcare. Some young people (such as those from ethnic minorities) are even less likely to receive mental healthcare than others. Long-term impacts of mental health problems include poorer physical health, relationships, education and employment. We aim to elicit the views, experiences and needs of diverse young people (aged 16–24 years), to better understand (1) their experiences of under-representation, mental health and coping, (2) mechanisms that shape mental health trajectories and (3) how online arts and culture might be made engaging and useful for young people’s mental health. We also aim to do this with autistic young people.
Narrative inquiry will be employed as a tool for gathering young people’s perspectives for an iterative analysis. The narrative method proposes that critical insights and knowledge are distributed across social systems and can be discovered in personal stories and that knowledge can be relayed, stored and retrieved through these stories. Data will be transcribed and explored using a combination of thematic and intersectional analysis. Young people will be core members of the research team, shape the research and be involved in the coding of data and interpretation of the findings.
This study (IRAS project ID 340259) has received ethical approval from the HRA and Health and Care Research Wales (REC reference 24/SC/0083). The outputs will identify touch points and refine the logic model of how online arts and culture might support the mental health of those from under-represented backgrounds. We will share knowledge with young people, policy makers, health professionals, carers, teachers, social workers and people who work in arts and culture. We will produce research papers, blogs, newsletters, webinars, videos and podcasts.
The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) can improve patient outcomes through checks and enhancing the safety climate, provided the team engage. Patients are central to that team and may be awake during part or all of many procedures. Their greater inclusion in the SSC process could enhance its checking objectives by using patient knowledge of details relevant to proposed procedures, and its objective of improving culture by emphasising patient identity, seeing patients as individuals rather than items on a production line. We aimed to evaluate SSC use, including clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives, in cardiothoracic operating rooms (CTORs) and cardiac catheterisation laboratories (CCLs), and to identify opportunities to refine its use in these spaces.
We undertook a multimethod study based on positivism and interpretivism, with evaluation of SSC administration and interviews. We evaluated SSC administration during 20 Sign Ins, 20 Time Outs and 20 Sign Outs in CTORs and 20 Time Outs in CCLs (11 coronary angiography and 9 electrophysiology cases) using the WHO Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (WHOBARS, 1–7, where higher scores indicate better practice). We additionally interviewed 10 clinicians and 17 patients about their experiences and perceptions of safety and SSC use. We undertook thematic analysis of interview data.
CTORs and CCLs in an Auckland public hospital.
We observed 171 clinicians during 20 cases. We interviewed 10 clinicians (Pakeha/New Zealand/European n=6; male n=5; doctor n=5). We interviewed 17 patients (Pakeha/New Zealand/European n=12; male n=10; age range 45–81 years).
In CTORs, the SSC was used in full: median (IQR) WHOBARS score was 5.9 (5.2, 6.5). In CCLs, its use differed between electrophysiology and angiography CCLs: median (IQR) WHOBARS score was 4.50 (3.2, 5.6). In both CTORs and CCLs, high levels of carefulness and respect between team members were observed. Clinicians described the SSC as valuable and identified context-related reasons for variations in its use. Patients wanted to feel cared for and respected (including culturally). The SSC contributed positively to this. Clinicians expressed reservations about increasing patients’ involvement with the SSC. However, patients’ comments supported their increased engagement in the SSC process (including establishing their preferred names).
The SSC is used at Auckland City Hospital with some variation between services and with high levels of carefulness and respect. The SSC increased patients’ sense of being cared for. With modification (eg, by verifying their preferred name during the Sign In phase), the SSC could enhance patients’ perception of being seen as individuals, their cultural safety and the safety climate in operating and procedure rooms, and hence potentially improve patient outcomes. Our findings reinforce the value of regular evaluation and context-relevant modification of SSC for its effective use.
During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a notable decline in emergency department (ED) usage in many jurisdictions. This study assessed changes in ED use during this period and explored how the pandemic may have aggravated existing healthcare access inequities.
Our primary objective was to assess pandemic-related changes to ED visits and emergency hospitalisations for distinct demographic groups.
We conducted a retrospective observational study using population-based provincial administrative data.
We analysed data from all the 109 EDs and urgent care centres in Alberta, Canada, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (15 March 2020 to 30 June 2020), and during the corresponding (control) period 1 year earlier. We conducted subgroup analyses by age, First Nations status, sex, location and material deprivation. We repeated all analyses for pre-selected life-threatening emergency diagnoses.
We examined outcomes for a priori subgroups, including female and ‘other’ sex patients, paediatric patients (age 0–17 years), seniors (age 65 years and older), patients living in remote areas (greater than 200 km from an urban centre), First Nations members and patients living in materially deprived postal codes falling into the two most deprived Pampalon Index quintiles.
Primary outcomes were number of ED visits, number of ED visits with admission to hospital and number of ED visits resulting in patient death in the ED. A secondary outcome was change in ED use for life-threatening diagnoses (eg, cardiac conditions and hepatic disease).
ED visits in the COVID-19 period decreased by 34% (Poisson means test p
Reductions in critical emergency care and emergency hospital admissions were unequally distributed across demographic groups during the COVID-19 period. Study methods could be used to monitor and support equitable access to emergency care among distinct populations.
To evaluate the implementation process of a novel program focused on improving interactive (dialogic) feedback between clinicians and students during placement.
Quantitative cross-sectional hybrid type 3 effectiveness–implementation study driven by a federated model of social learning theory and implementation theory.
From June to November 2018, feedback approaches supported by socio-constructive learning theory and Normalisation Process Theory were enacted in four clinical units of a healthcare facility in southeast Queensland, Australia. The study involved 16 clinical instructors/supervisors, 94 bedside nurses, and 85 final-year nursing students. Engagement was evaluated using the Normalisation Measure Development survey. Situated learning encounters were constructed based on the needs of each group.
Survey results of the four Normalisation Process Theory constructs identified variable adoption by participant groups. Engagement in situated learning encounters that facilitate dialogic feedback was greatest in clinical instructors/supervisors, followed by students. Bedside registered nurses, while indicating they understood purposeful feedback behaviours, did not demonstrate them in practice.
The extent to which each group practiced dialogic feedback depended on their perceptions of their influence, whether they saw it as part of their role, and the effort and time required, regardless of the activity's importance, role statements, and codes of conduct.
Understanding the norms that shape communication, engagement, and nurses' role priorities is crucial for guiding practice and ongoing engagement with feedback.
The research provides valuable insights for leaders aiming to enhance the integration of evidence into practice. It guides leaders to understand that participants prioritise the reach, relevance, and resources of evidence over formal role descriptions, responsibilities, policies, and codes of conduct. This research encourages leaders to scrutinise existing beliefs, norms, and routines when implementing evidence-based practices.
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) reporting guidelines were used.
None.
Commentary on: Aspinall C, Slark J, Parr J, et al. The role of healthcare leaders in implementing equitable clinical academic pathways for nurses: An integrative review. J Adv Nurs. 2024: 1-15. doi: 10.1111/jan.16043
Implications for practice and research All levels of leadership need to engage with and support ‘clinical-academic positions’ to realise the potential these positions offer clinical practice improvement. It is imperative that clinical-academic nurses develop leadership skills to engage with policy and influence executive decisions relevant to advancing clinical practice.
Clinical-academic positions have been developed to advance the nursing profession. The intent of these positions is to lead the continuous generation and adoption of strong evidence into clinical practice that improves healthcare provision; and thereby, strengthening professional credibility. These positions bridge the clinical academic space through drawing on their expertise, research and understanding of implementation science to foster partnership and...
The harmful health effects of children’s exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) are well established. Most SHS exposure now occurs in the home, in low-income households. Previous research suggests that using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the home can help with temporary smoking abstinence and could reduce smoking indoors. This pilot randomised controlled trial tests the feasibility of providing parents, carers and relatives with posted-to-home nicotine replacement therapy alongside fortnightly telephone support to reduce children’s exposure to SHS.
100 participants are being recruited through existing National Health Service (NHS) Lanarkshire initiatives and social media. Parents/carers who are at least 18 years old, smoke in the home and care for one or more children aged 0–16 years are eligible to take part. Participants are randomised to either the intervention (Group A) or control (Group B) arm. Group A receives NRT posted to their home for 12 weeks free of charge, alongside fortnightly telephone calls and materials to support them in reducing children’s exposure to SHS. Group B is signposted to the Scottish Government’s ‘Take it Right Outside’ website which provides interactive advice on creating a smoke-free home. To quantify the child’s exposure to SHS, participants instal an air quality monitor to measure fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations in their living room for 7 days at baseline and 12-week follow-up and/or collect and post saliva samples from their youngest child (age 5 or over) for cotinine analysis. Qualitative interviews explore intervention experience, NRT use and adherence and changes to home-smoking behaviours/smoking-related expenditure. Descriptive data analyses will be performed to address the feasibility of recruitment, randomisation, retention and adherence, data collection and intervention delivery. Analysis will also include pre/post changes (paired t-test) in both child’s salivary cotinine and PM2.5 levels to provide preliminary data on intervention effectiveness and difference between the intervention and control arms of the study. Health economics and resource use data will be collected and assessed for completeness, to test the process of data collection and estimate mean cost of both study arms.
NHS ethical approval has been obtained by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Service (15 December 2023, ref 23/WS/0153; 13 December 2024, ref AM01). The findings will be disseminated to participants, funders, NHS Lanarkshire and other health services, and in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences. Findings will inform new approaches that are timely and important, providing valuable evidence to help reduce children’s exposure to SHS in the home in Scotland and elsewhere.
Variations in mental health and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes of girls/women (cisgender and transgender) and gender-diverse (nonbinary, Two-Spirit, gender fluid, agender, queer, gender neutral) youth with intersectional identities exist and have largely been ignored in the literature. There is a lack of information on how these health services meet the health needs of girls/women and gender-diverse youth with intersectional identities and the quality of such services. The objective of this global realist review is to identify how, why, for whom, in what contexts and to what extent mental health and SRH services meet the health needs of girls/women (cisgender and transgender) and gender-diverse youth (10–25 years) with intersectional identities.
The protocol has been registered with PROSPERO and will follow Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses Quality Standards for Realist Reviews. We will identify the programme theory and implementation determinants of mental health and SRH services for girls/women (cisgender and transgender) and gender-diverse (nonbinary, Two-Spirit, fluid, agender, queer, gender neutral) youth (10–25 years). The scope of the review will be defined in the first stage and will include consultations with youth Advisory Group members and initial programme theory development. An iterative search of scholarly bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, IBSS) in addition to a grey literature search will take place in the second stage. The third stage will include evidence extraction and synthesis. In the final stage, the narrative will be developed and refined in consultation with Youth Advisory Group members, and findings will be disseminated.
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (2023/153). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, youth-friendly materials and webinars and national and international conferences.
CRD42024532422.
Women with severe mental illness (SMI) face barriers to cervical cancer screening, leading to lower participation and poorer outcomes. This research aimed to develop and test an informed-choice tool to help women with SMI make informed decisions about screening attendance.
The tool was developed using a realist review of physical health interventions and a systematic review of informed-choice tools for people with SMI. A mixed-methods approach informed its development. Usability and acceptability were assessed through semistructured interviews and the think-aloud method with service users (n=18), clinicians (n=16) and key informants. A preliminary proof-of-concept (n=25) evaluated the impact on decisional conflict—the uncertainty around making value-sensitive choices.
Conducted in two National Health Service (NHS) Mental Health Trusts (urban and rural). Participants included women with SMI accessing secondary mental healthcare, clinicians and service user groups. A key informants’ group guided clinical content.
A cervical screening informed-choice leaflet and an accompanying video.
The tool was usable and acceptable, especially for women overdue or never screened. It may reduce decisional conflict and increase screening uptake, potentially improving survival. An National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)-funded feasibility trial (Impr
Future research may involve further assessments of the real-world impact of the tool and its adaptation to other health-related decisions.
The tobacco and nicotine industry fuels tobacco-related addiction, disease and death. Indigenous peoples experience a disproportionate burden of commercial tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. Over the past two decades, significant progress has been made in reducing smoking prevalence among Indigenous peoples; however, smoking remains a leading contributor to the burden of death and disease. This review will summarise evidence on commercial tobacco resistance and/or eradication strategies, including policy reforms, in relation to Indigenous peoples across Oceania, the Pacific Islands and North America.
This review will follow guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews and will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. This review will consider academic and grey literature published since 1 January 2000. The following electronic databases will be searched for relevant primary research articles and commentaries: PubMed, Scopus, Informit, Web of Science and PsycINFO. Additional searches will be conducted in ProQuest to identify relevant grey literature. Papers will be screened by two reviewers to determine eligibility, followed by full-text data extraction. Findings will be synthesised descriptively for each review question and by region. Studies included in the review will be assessed against criteria for Indigenous engagement in research.
This protocol was led by Indigenous interests, needs and rights of Indigenous peoples, consistent with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and ethical practice. This review was conceptualised with Indigenous leadership and through engagement, including but not limited to the Indigenous lived experience of the authors (MK, E-ST, HC, PNH, PH, SAM, AW, SW and RM). This review supports the global goal of eradicating commercial tobacco-related harms – reframing commercial tobacco use as a structurally imposed harm sustained by colonial and commercial forces rather than personal choice. Findings from this review will be shared with Indigenous partners and communities who requested this work and will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication.
Open Science Framework https://osf.io/wxqcb
FreshRSS 