FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Methods and baseline results of the Cohort of Health-Related Outcomes in Chronic Illness Care in General Practice in Denmark (CHRONIC-GP)

Por: Larsen · H. H. · Willadsen · T. G. · Prior · A. · Lyhnebeck · A. B. · Waldorff · F. B. · Holm · A.
Purpose

The Cohort of Health-Related Outcomes in Chronic Illness Care in General Practice was established using data collected as part of a cluster-randomised trial. This aims to support the trial’s follow-up and enable further examination of the interplay between chronic disease, multimorbidity (MM), polypharmacy (PP) and quality of life (QoL) in a Danish general practice setting.

Participants

The cohort comprises 35 977 adult patients from 250 general practices participating in a cluster-randomised trial and had a response rate of 22.4%. Participants were either registered as chronic care patients or had attended an annual chronic disease consultation. They completed a comprehensive questionnaire on self-reported chronic conditions, medication use, QoL, treatment burden and patient-centred care. Additionally, 431 general practitioners (GPs) from the participating practices completed a questionnaire about managing patients with complex MM.

Findings to date

Among participants, 51.9% were female, the mean age was 65.6 (SD 12.9) years, 93.1% had education beyond basic schooling, and half were retired. Conditions from more than one organ system-based disease group were reported by 82.2%, and 94.6% used one or more prescription medications. The main challenges reported by the participating GPs in managing patients with complex MM were keeping time and obtaining an overview of the patient’s health status.

Future plans

Cohort data will be linked with Danish registries to improve the detection and treatment of chronic conditions and PP in general practice.

Registration

The cluster randomised trial (MM600) is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05676541.

Impact of dextroamphetamine substitution on the use of illicit amphetamines in adults with amphetamine dependence: a study protocol for the multicentre double blind randomised controlled trial ATLAS4Dependence

Por: Chalabianloo · F. · Fadnes · L. T. · Mordal · J. · Spigset · O. · Loberg · E.-M. · Halmoy · A. · Lid · T. G. · Andersen · C. D. · Daltveit · J. T. · Assmus · J. · Erga · A. H. · K Solli · K. · Askjer · J. F. · Hansen · M. A. K. · Ohldieck · C. · Ezard · N. · Lintzeris · N. · Johansson · K
Introduction

There is limited evidence on how to effectively treat individuals from marginalised populations with dependence on amphetamine and/or methamphetamine (collectively referred to hereafter as amphetamine dependence). The disease burden is extremely high in this population, especially related to psychiatric comorbidities, cardiovascular complications, injection-related infections and poor social functioning. ATLAS4Dependence is a multi-centre randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial that will investigate the effectiveness and safety of substitution treatment with dextroamphetamine compared with placebo in people with amphetamine dependence.

Methods and analysis

The trial will recruit 226 adult patients in several outpatient clinics in Norway.Inclusion criteria comprise individuals with amphetamine dependence, defined as use on three or more days per week during the past 28 days, who currently inject or have formerly injected drugs. This includes individuals both with and without comorbid opioid dependence, as well as those currently receiving or not receiving opioid agonist treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either dextroamphetamine or placebo for 12 weeks. Flexible doses within the range of 30–120 mg daily will be provided based on individual assessments. The participants in both arms will be offered standard psychosocial and medical follow-up in accordance with current clinical practice. The endpoint assessments will be conducted at 12 weeks with weekly self-reports and safety assessments and a follow-up assessment at 52 weeks. The primary objective of the study is to assess the impact of 12 weeks daily prescribed oral dextroamphetamine versus placebo on the use of illicit amphetamines as well as on the total amount of amphetamines used (including both illicit and prescribed sources). Secondary outcomes are the differences between the groups at 12 weeks regarding psychological distress, symptoms of psychosis, quality of life, cardiovascular risk factors, injection-related infections, executive functioning, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder-related symptoms, sleep, violence risk, fatigue, symptoms of craving and withdrawal, treatment retention, days of use of illicit amphetamines and use at 4 weeks and 8 weeks during the intervention period, use of other illicit substances and alcohol, as well as a cost-effectiveness analysis (using private economy, criminal activity and health service utilisation) and a qualitative approach to assess overall experiences with the study intervention. Analysis and reporting will follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. All tests will be two-sided. Descriptive results and the estimated effectiveness will be presented with 95% CIs. The difference between the groups at the primary time point (at the end of the 12-week trial) will be assessed using 2 test (for use of illicit amphetamines measured by monthly urine tests) and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) (for weekly self-reported total amount of amphetamines). Analyses for the primary endpoint will be undertaken on an intention-to-treat basis and reported on as such, but sensitivity analyses with per protocol analyses will also be presented.

Ethics and dissemination

The study is approved by European Medicines Agency, Clinical Trial Information System (CTIS). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. Study results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals.

Trial registration number

CTIS 2023-510404-44-00.

Healthcare utilisation and barriers to healthcare after violence and rape in the Norwegian population: a cross-sectional, multimethod study

Por: Skauge · A. D. · Aakvaag · H. F. · Strom · I. F. · Nissen · A. · Seifert · L. C. · Överlien · C. · Dale · M. T. G.
Objectives

Despite the important role of healthcare services in trauma recovery, many survivors of violence do not seek help. This study aims to examine rates of healthcare utilisation, including differences for physical violence versus rape, gender and physical injury (vs no injury) and obstacles to seeking care within 6 months following incidents of physical violence and rape.

Design and setting

The participants were randomly chosen from the National Population Registry in Norway and invited to participate in a telephone survey on violence exposure and health between June 2021 and June 2022 (N=4299, 49% women).

Participants

The sample included 1768 violence-exposed individuals. Of the women (n=749), 82.1% had experienced physical violence and 40.3% had experienced forcible rape. Of the men, most had experienced physical violence (98.6%) and a small percentage had experienced rape (3.5%).

Outcome measures

Logistic regression models were used to investigate whether healthcare seeking differed by gender, type of violence (rape vs physical violence) and severity (physical injury). Barriers to accessing healthcare were also investigated using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

Results

Healthcare seeking rates were low after rape (16.9%) and physical violence (24.2%), with somewhat higher rates among individuals experiencing both types of violence (39.9%). There were no statistically significant differences in the odds of healthcare utilisation between the three types of violence exposures when we controlled for gender, physical injury, violence characteristics and sociodemographic factors. Men were more likely than women to have sought healthcare (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.37, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.85, p=0.042). Physical injury was strongly associated with greater healthcare utilisation (aOR: 6.39, 95% CI: 4.85 to 8.41, p

Conclusions

Few victims seek healthcare shortly after experiencing rape or physical violence. Quantitative and qualitative findings indicate that many seek healthcare exclusively for severe physical injury. These results emphasise the need to improve health services’ outreach to victims of violence, who are at heightened risk of mental health issues and chronic illnesses.

What are the factors associated with alcohol, cigarette and marijuana use among adolescents in Africa? Evidence from the Global School-based Health Survey

Por: Pokothoane · R. · Argefa · T. G. · Tsague · J. D. · Mdege · N. D.
Objectives

To provide comprehensive estimates of the prevalence of psychoactive substance use, specifically alcohol, cigarettes and marijuana, and factors associated with their use among school-going adolescents in 25 African countries.

Design and methods

We used a pooled cross-sectional dataset from the publicly available Global School-based Health Survey (GSHS) from 25 African countries. We used descriptive statistics to estimate the prevalence of alcohol, cigarette and marijuana use as well as their dual use among adolescents aged 11–16 years. Additionally, we used logistic regressions to model factors associated with the use of each substance, with adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) and their 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) as the measures of association.

Setting and participants

The study focused on school-going adolescents aged 11–16 years in 25 African countries that have conducted the GSHS between 2003 and 2017.

Outcome measures

The key outcome measure is the proportion of adolescents who have used a specific substance in the past 30 days. These substances include: (1) alcohol, (2) cigarettes, (3) marijuana, (4) alcohol and cigarettes, (5) cigarettes and marijuana and (6) alcohol and marijuana.

Results

The prevalence of alcohol use among adolescents was 9.5% (95% CI 8.4% to 10.7%), that of cigarette smoking was 6.2% (95% CI 5.0% to 7.6%), and it was 3.4% (95% CI 2.7% to 4.2%) for marijuana. The prevalence of dual use of alcohol and cigarettes was 3.1% (95% CI 2.4% to 3.9%), that of alcohol and marijuana was 2.0% (95% CI 1.5% to 2.5%), and it was 1.4% (95% CI 1.1% to 1.8%) for cigarettes and marijuana. The prevalence of cigarette smoking was significantly higher among boys than girls. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of alcohol or marijuana by sex. Having parents who smoke any tobacco products, being bullied, missing school without permission and experiencing sadness and hopelessness were positively associated with being a current user, irrespective of substance type.

Conclusions

There is a need for comprehensive, current data on substance use among adolescents. Interventions that tackle bullying, reduce school absenteeism, build resilience against difficult situations and increase self-efficacy to resist the use of these substances have the potential to curb substance use among adolescents in Africa.

❌