Conectar
To analyse the completeness of the COVID-19 vaccination schedule and identify factors associated with vaccine uptake.
Cross-sectional study.
Data were collected through face-to-face interviews conducted in all 26 Brazilian state capitals and the Federal District between 2022 and 2023, using a sequential sampling approach.
A total of 1392 individuals aged 18 years or older experiencing homelessness for at least 6 months were included.
The primary outcome was the completeness of the COVID-19 vaccination schedule (complete vs incomplete), based on self-reported vaccination status. Secondary analyses examined sociodemographic, institutional and behavioural factors associated with vaccine uptake using binary logistic regression.
Completion of the vaccination schedule was positively associated with receiving government aid (OR: 1.58; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.30), visits from street clinic health agents (OR: 3.19; 95% CI 1.95 to 5.36), prior COVID-19 diagnosis (OR: 5.77; 95% CI 3.17 to 11.15), support for mandatory vaccination (OR: 3.76; 95% CI 2.48 to 5.76), trust in vaccine efficacy (OR: 3.92; 95% CI 2.63 to 5.89), seeking information from community sources (OR: 1.91; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.88) and trust in federal authorities (OR: 1.57; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.31).
This study identified structural, social and individual factors associated with complete COVID-19 vaccination among people experiencing homelessness in Brazil. Although overall coverage was substantial, gaps in vaccination completeness persisted. Social support, healthcare outreach and trust in vaccines were associated with higher uptake, highlighting important barriers and facilitators to vaccination in socially vulnerable populations.
by Patricia Fiorino, Luigi Fernandes Rosa Cauduro, Danielle Silberspitz Konig, Leonardo Fernandes Rosa Cauduro, Caio de Araujo Santos, Juliana Alves Kavai, Isadora Durigan Duarte, Anna Laura Viacava Américo
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) are widely used as models in cardiovascular research due to their rapid development, optical transparency, and genetic similarity to humans. However, the lack of standardized experimental conditions, particularly regarding developmental stage and microenvironmental parameters, limits reproducibility across studies. This study aimed to characterize cardiovascular function in Zebrafish larvae and evaluate the impact of developmental stage and environmental factors. Wild-type AB embryos were maintained under standard conditions, and heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and ejection fraction (EF) were measured at 24, 30, 48, 52, 56, 72, 78, and 80 hours post-fertilization (hpf). The effects of variations in temperature (27.0, 27.5, and 28.0 °C) and pH (7.0, 7.4, and 8.0) were also assessed. Results showed a progressive increase in HR from 24 to 72 hpf, stabilizing thereafter. CO exhibited two phases of elevation: an early rise between 24–48 hpf and a stronger increase between 48–56 hpf. EF remained generally stable, with a transient reduction at 48 hpf. Cardiovascular performance reached a physiologically stable state after 72 hpf, defining a reliable window for functional studies. Environmental conditions modulated these parameters: temperature variation induced approximately 20% difference in HR and reduced EF, while CO was minimally affected. In contrast, pH variations within the physiological range had no significant impact on HR, CO, or EF. These findings highlight developmental and environmental variables that may influence cardiovascular measurements in Zebrafish larvae and support the development of more consistent experimental approaches in cardiovascular and toxicological research.Accurate chronic wound classification is essential for appropriate management, yet diagnostic variability persists in routine practice. Transparent, rule-based decision-support tools may improve standardisation but require validation against expert judgement under clearly defined conditions. To evaluate inter-expert agreement, agreement between a rule-based algorithm and an expert-consensus reference standard, diagnostic accuracy as a complementary measure, exploratory comparison with a non-expert nurse, and expert agreement with algorithm-generated therapeutic recommendations. Thirty anonymised standardised clinical cases were classified by the algorithm and one non-expert nurse. Thirty wound-care experts, including 26 nurses, three physicians, and one researcher, were organised into six independent panels of five and classified case subsets, yielding 150 ratings. A consensus reference diagnosis was defined a priori as agreement by at least 3/5 experts. The primary outcome was algorithm–consensus agreement using Cohen's κ. Expert reliability was assessed using Krippendorff's α and Fleiss' κ. Recommendation agreement was dichotomised and analysed exploratorily. Expert agreement was low to moderate (Krippendorff's α = 0.26–0.60), highest for pressure ulcers/injuries and venous leg ulcers, and lowest for mixed or unknown leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. Consensus was reached in 29 of 30 cases. The algorithm achieved 86.2% accuracy (25/29) and substantial agreement (κ = 0.70, 95% CI 0.46–0.94). Nurse accuracy was 72.4% (21/29, p = 0.219). Experts endorsed 85.2% of therapeutic recommendations. The algorithm showed promising agreement under controlled conditions, supporting further prospective validation in larger, balanced real-world datasets.
To explore women’s expectations and experiences of care and support from pregnancy to childbirth in Burkina Faso, with a focus on the role and impact of companions and providers.
An exploratory qualitative study based on in-depth interviews with purposively sampled participants and employing reflexive thematic analysis.
Two public hospitals in urban Burkina Faso having implemented the ‘QUALIty DECision-making by women and providers for appropriate use of caesarean section’ intervention.
24 purposively selected postpartum women with variation in terms of parity, mode of birth, labour companionship experiences, education level and occupation were interviewed before discharge from the hospital.
The two themes generated from the analysis elucidate how women rely on providers and companions to navigate uncertainty and vulnerability experienced during pregnancy and childbirth. Women viewed providers as essential for managing the biomedical risks of childbirth and voiced their need for care at critical moments. They expected companions to enhance the non-clinical aspects of their experiences by providing spiritual support and alleviating feelings of loneliness. However, participants also expressed ambivalence about companions witnessing intimate aspects of their birth experience and valued the ability to choose a companion as means to preserve personal integrity.
Both providers and labour companions play an essential role in enhancing women’s experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in Burkina Faso. Additional research and programmatic efforts are needed to support women’s equitable participation in patient–provider interactions and operationalise the notion of choice of a labour companion in a contextually appropriate manner.
To explore the enablers of and barriers to implementing advanced practice nursing in primary health care in Germany and Brazil.
A qualitative cross-country comparative study.
Nine focus groups were conducted: 4 in Brazil and 5 in Germany with 48 participants (23 primary health care policy stakeholders and 25 nurses practicing in primary health care and general practitioners) between May 2022 and June 2023. The data were analysed by content analysis using a deductive–inductive approach.
Our findings reveal a need for clarity around the concept, specific roles and responsibilities of advanced practice nurses in primary health care. Although there is still no regulation in place for practising advanced practice nursing in either country, clear drivers can be observed, with Germany strengthening community health nursing and Brazil following clinical protocols in nursing practice. Dialogue among stakeholders—at both the policy and practitioner levels—is essential to bridge communication gaps. Additionally, involving patients in the implementation process is crucial for the holistic integration of advanced nursing roles.
Political, organisational and financial barriers persist, such as the need to establish both legal foundations and regulatory frameworks, enhance political participation within the nursing profession, and involve stakeholders in dialogue and consensus-building efforts. Giving advanced practice nursing a higher priority on political and research agendas—with policy adjustments and input from practitioners—can help integrate advanced practice nursing into primary health care.
Our findings highlight that actively involving nursing as an equal partner in political discourse is seen by stakeholders as crucial to drive the implementation process forward sustainably.
This study addresses the lack of data on the enablers and barriers to implementing advanced practice nursing in primary health care in Germany and Brazil. It underscores the need for clearer definitions of advanced practice nursing in primary health care, as well as sufficient regulation and funding. Dialogue is essential to bridge gaps and foster mutual understanding. The findings support future practice development and research, especially in countries that have introduced advanced nursing practice roles in primary health care.
The COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ).
No involvement of patient and public contribution.
Our study highlights the growing adoption of expanded nursing responsibilities even in countries that have not yet formally implemented advanced practice nursing roles.
To conduct a concept analysis of ‘safe mobility’, with specific application in hospitalised older adults, identifying its defining attributes, antecedents and consequences.
The promotion of safe mobility is essential for maintaining the functionality of hospitalised older adults. However, this idea is not yet clearly defined in the scientific literature, requiring a conceptual analysis for better understanding and applicability in nursing practice.
Concept analysis.
The concept analysis methodology of Walker and Avant was employed, consisting of eight steps. Sources from the scientific literature (BDENF/VHL, Scopus, CINAHL/EBSCO, Embase, Web of Science, PEDro, MEDLINE/PubMed and CAPES Thesis and Dissertation Catalogue, as outlined in a scoping review previously published by the authors) and terminologies from dictionaries and nursing practice, such as SNOMED CT, ICNP, NANDA, NIC and NOC, were analysed.
The concept of ‘safe mobility’ does not have a consolidated definition but was identified through three defining attributes: active movement, prevention of fall-related harm and prevention of immobility-related harm. The antecedents include the older adults' conditions, adaptation of the hospital environment, training of the multidisciplinary team, patient behaviour and family involvement. The consequences involve the maintenance of functionality, improvement of quality of life, reduction of hospital length of stay and costs, as well as a decrease in rates of readmission, referrals to long-term care institutions and mortality.
The concept analysis revealed that safe mobility involves promoting active movement and preventing harm related to both immobility and falls.
Strategies based on this concept can improve the quality of life of older adults, reduce complications and optimise hospital costs.
This concept analysis examines existing literature and does not require patient-related data collection. The methodological approach does not necessitate collaboration with the public.
Adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes (APPOs), including pre-term birth, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes, can result in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, parental anxiety and increased healthcare costs. A better understanding of the causes of APPOs is essential to inform lifestyle and pharmaceutical interventions for their prevention and management. Given the difficulty of undertaking randomised controlled trials in pregnant women, triangulating evidence from across methods with different sources of bias may improve causal inference for APPOs. The purpose of the Mendelian randomisation in pregnancy (MR-PREG) collaboration is to support such triangulation using genetic (eg, Mendelian randomisation (MR)) and non-genetic (eg, partner negative controls) approaches to investigate the causal effects of maternal exposures on a comprehensive set of APPOs.
The MR-PREG collaboration includes individual participant data from three birth cohorts (two from the UK and one from Norway) and UK Biobank, as well as summary data from FinnGen and publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Data have been harmonised across studies and currently include information on up to 35 APPOs in up to 707 797 women.
The main aims of MR-PREG are to strengthen the evidence base for (1) prevention, by advancing understanding of maternal lifestyle factors on APPOs, (2) the role of pre-conceptional health, by improving understanding of the effect of maternal pre-existing conditions on APPOs, and (3) treatments, by evaluating the efficacy and safety of existing medications used for pre-existing conditions, and by identifying and testing novel or repurposed therapies for APPOs. To date, our published work has mainly addressed aims 1 and 3. Examples include triangulation of evidence from MR, conventional multivariable regression and paternal negative control, showing that higher maternal body mass index increases the risk of multiple APPOs, as well as the identification of maternal circulating metabolites and proteins that may influence birth weight.
Future priorities include increasing diversity within the MR-PREG collaboration by expanding representation of participants from non-European ancestries. We are also integrating molecular data, including circulating protein levels and placental transcriptomics, to better characterise the molecular mechanisms underlying APPOs. Additionally, we are using whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing to identify novel causal genes and to inform the prioritisation of candidate therapeutic targets for APPOs.
The aim is to explore co-design facilitators’ perspectives and experiences of using co-design to improve intrapartum care in four sub-Saharan African settings. The inquiry focuses particularly on how they fostered engagement, built trust and mitigated unintended consequences during the co-design process.
Qualitative interview study with reflexive thematic analysis.
Sixteen public and private not-for-profit hospital-based maternity units in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda (four per country).
A total population sample of 10 co-design facilitators involved in a hospital-based co-design project implemented in maternity units in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda were interviewed. Semistructured interviews were conducted between December 2022 and January 2023.
Co-design facilitators viewed co-design as a collaborative process to develop contextually relevant solutions. Our findings elucidate their role in facilitating consensus-building and fostering stakeholder ownership amidst significant power divides. They described approaches co-design facilitators take to maintain ongoing stakeholder engagement and manage misaligned expectations in a trusting and collaborative environment, while being mindful of existing tensions and power imbalances. They also highlighted key challenges faced, including navigating norms, power imbalances and unintended consequences.
This study underscores the importance of power-sharing, fostering ownership and engaging end users equitably and continuously in co-design efforts, while also being aware of how to address its potential unintended consequences. Further research is needed to understand co-design facilitators’ impact on co-design and how to address unintended consequences for stakeholders during and after co-design activities in intrapartum interventions in low-resource settings.
To identify obstacles faced by nurses when using health technologies in Intensive Care Units (ICUs).
Systematic review following PRISMA and registered in PROSPERO.
Six databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies and appraised methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Data were synthesized narratively.
Eight studies met eligibility criteria. Barriers clustered around limited training and technical competence, shorter professional experience, increased workload with multiple devices, organizational culture, and reduced direct patient contact, which may undermine patient-centered care. Heterogeneity of study designs precluded meta-analysis.
Obstacles to technology use in ICUs arise from individual and organizational factors. Addressing these barriers requires structured education, mentoring for novice nurses, workload management, and supportive policies that integrate technology without displacing bedside care.
Nursing leaders and educators should implement ongoing, ICU-specific technology training and mentoring. Managers and policymakers must ensure adequate staffing and promote Health Technology Assessment to align device implementation with clinical needs, safeguarding patient safety and the human dimensions of care.
To analyse predictors of burnout in nursing professionals during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Cohort study.
A two-phase study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic's peak (2020) and post-vaccination period (2022). Data from nursing professionals of four hospitals in southern Brazil included sociodemographic, occupational, lifestyle, and health variables, and Maslach Burnout Inventory responses. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of burnout syndrome. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (approval no. 4.152.027).
A sample of 163 participants were assessed at two distinct time points. In 2020, 9.2% of nursing professionals experienced burnout syndrome, decreasing slightly to 7.4% in 2022. As for the burnout dimensions, emotional exhaustion was reported by 27% of professionals in 2020 and 26.4% in 2022. Depersonalisation affected 28.2% during the pandemic and 25.2% afterward. Low professional accomplishment was identified in 29.4% of professionals in 2020, increasing to 30.1% in 2022. Distinct predictors were identified for overall burnout and its specific dimensions. The main predictors included: perceiving a mental health impact from the pandemic, previous mental health issues, recent medical leave, and working directly with COVID-19 patients.
Burnout syndrome remained stable post-pandemic. Key predictors were identified, highlighting the need for preventive mental health interventions.
Identifying predictors of burnout in nursing professionals supports the development of targeted interventions to protect mental health, improve job satisfaction, and enhance the quality of patient care during and after health crises.
This study fills a gap in post-pandemic research by identifying predictors of burnout in nursing professionals. It supports the development of policies and interventions to protect mental health and improve working conditions in Brazilian hospitals.
STROBE guidelines for cohort studies.
Participants contributed only through data collection.
This scoping review aims to map evidence or literature on improvement strategies used by health leaders and professionals to strengthen the safety climate in the operating room.
A scoping review was performed on the basis of the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and applied to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extension.
16 academic and grey literature data sources were searched using search terms on 17 January 2025, namely, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online via Pubmed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences via the Virtual Health Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, WorldCat, Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Brazilian Association of Surgical Center Nurses, Center for Material and Sterilization and Anesthetic Recovery, Association of Portuguese Operating Room Nurses, Association of PeriOperative Registered Nurses, Institute for Healthcare Improvement, WHO and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Study selection, data extraction and synthesis were based on the following eligibility criteria based on the acronym PCC (participants, concept, context): participants (health leaders and professionals), concept (strategies to improve the safety climate) and context (operating room). This scoping review considered studies published from 2009 onwards.
Information on the objective, method and findings addressing improvement strategies employed to strengthen the safety climate in the surgical centre was retrieved. The findings are presented in tables and in a qualitative thematic summary.
A total of 26 studies were analysed, published between 2009 and 2024, with the USA as the country of origin of the publications with the highest number (11 studies). As for the methodological approach, intervention and quasi-experimental studies stand out. When the studies in this review were mapped, strategies that strengthened the safety climate in the operating room were identified and grouped into two main axes that are interrelated: communication tools and training programmes.
It is evident that the implementation of tools that promote communication and training programmes enhances safe surgical care, as they contribute substantially to the domains of the safety culture. The use of communication protocols in the operating room is recommended as a perioperative safety tool.
This scoping review adhered to a protocol previously published in this journal and that is registered on the Open Science Framework website (https://osf.io/zg8nu/).
To analyse the comfort needs of patients following renal transplantation, guided by Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort.
A qualitative design was employed.
This study was conducted at a Brazilian university hospital's renal transplant outpatient clinic. Forty-six post-transplant patients were purposively sampled by age, transplant time and clinic attendance. Face-to-face interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and conducted using a semi-structured script. Data were analysed through thematic content analysis, guided by Kolcaba's Comfort Theory and relevant literature.
Participant narratives were categorised according to the contexts outlined by Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort: Physical, Environmental, Sociocultural and Psychospiritual. In the physical context, pain was identified as a major factor diminishing comfort after renal transplantation. In the environmental context, elements such as light, odour, sound, temperature and uncomfortable furnishings contributed to discomfort. In the sociocultural context, family support was highlighted as essential. In the psychospiritual context, religiosity played a key role in enhancing the comfort of transplant recipients.
Spirituality, strengthened social support networks and non-pharmacological comfort measures are essential for promoting comfort among patients following renal transplantation. These findings underscore the importance of integrated care approaches that address physical, emotional and social aspects to improve quality of life for this population.
Conceptual models in nursing provide a critical perspective for care and support the delivery of effective, evidence-based interventions. By identifying the multidimensional comfort needs of post-renal transplant patients, this study informs the development of targeted, holistic strategies for nursing and multidisciplinary practice in outpatient settings.
This study examined the multidimensional comfort needs of post-renal transplant patients and found that comfort is shaped by physical, environmental, sociocultural and psychospiritual factors. The results may guide global nursing and multidisciplinary outpatient care by informing integrated approaches that enhance the quality of life of transplant recipients.
This study was reported according to the COREQ framework.
No patient or public contribution.
Drug-related hospital admissions (DRAs) are prevalent among older adults, with a substantial proportion deemed preventable. Despite their frequency, little is known about the prognosis of DRAs in this population, particularly concerning mortality and hospital readmissions. The objectives were to assess the prognosis of DRAs in older patients, focusing on 6-month mortality and unplanned readmissions.
Prospective cohort study.
A 20-bed acute-care geriatric unit within an academic hospital.
All patients aged 75 years or older hospitalised in the unit during 2023.
The primary outcome was 6-month all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was the rate of unplanned hospital readmissions, including emergency department visits, within 6 months. DRAs were identified using a two-step standardised review process. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality. Fine and Grey competing risk models were applied for the analysis of unplanned readmissions. Multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, medication count, activities of daily living score, long-term care residency and prior hospitalisations.
Among 483 patients included (median age 86 years [IQR 81–91]), 207 (43%) were admitted for a DRA. At 6 months, mortality was significantly lower in patients with DRAs compared with those without (19% [n=39] vs 37% [n=102]; p
DRAs have a distinct prognosis as compared with other causes of admission among older patients. Identifying and managing DRAs are crucial for minimising preventable complications in this vulnerable population.
Healthcare workers (HCWs) report overwhelming demands and experience crisis levels of burnout and unique challenges that further impair their mental health. Promotion of mental health among HCWs using information and communication technology (ICT) has received little empirical research attention and interventions for improving mental health resilience in HCWs are not well established.
Scoping review to map existing evidence and identify gaps for future research regarding the main barriers and facilitators of the acceptance of ICT-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health among HCWs working in all healthcare settings.
This protocol was developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive bibliographic search will be conducted between October 2024 and October 2025 in Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Library and CINAHL Ultimate (MedicLatina, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection), with the assistance of a qualified research librarian, to retrieve studies describing data on the main barriers and facilitators to the acceptance of ICT-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health among HCWs working in healthcare settings. There will be no restrictions based on date of publication or language. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be defined for each element of the PICO(D) framework, and both quantitative and qualitative data will be extracted. Quality will be assessed using the mixed methods assessment tool. Two independent investigators will perform the eligibility assessment and data extraction, and any disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. The main results will be narratively synthesised and analysed.
Since secondary data will be analysed, no ethical approval is required. The results will be disseminated through publications subject to peer review.
Parkinson’s disease is a neurological disease with a rising incidence and prevalence. Patients with Parkinson’s disease may receive antipsychotics, for example, due to Parkinson’s disease psychosis. Parkinson’s disease psychosis is characterised by visual hallucinations and other psychotic symptoms. To date, no systematic review has evaluated the effects of antipsychotics in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Therefore, this review aims to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of antipsychotics for Parkinson’s disease.
This is a protocol for a systematic review. A search specialist will perform a search in major medical databases (eg, MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database), CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials)) and clinical trial registries. Published and unpublished randomised clinical trials comparing antipsychotics to any control (placebo, standard care or other antipsychotics) in patients with Parkinson’s disease will be included. Two review authors will independently extract data and conduct risk of bias assessments with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool—V.2. Primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality, serious adverse events and significant falls. Secondary outcomes will be hospitalisations, non-serious adverse events, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale total score and psychotic symptoms using any valid symptom scale. Data will be synthesised by aggregate meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis. Several subgroup analyses are planned. An eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations) and CiNeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) approach.
This protocol does not include results, and ethics approval is not required for the project. The findings from the systematic review will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals.
PROSPERO ID: CRD42025633985. Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025633985.
To understand the social representations of bedside milk expression (BME) among mothers of preterm newborns in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
Qualitative descriptive study.
The study was conducted from July to August 2024 in two NICUs of a referral maternity hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil. Nineteen mothers of hospitalised premature newborns participated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and subjected to thematic content analysis.
Mothers perceived BME as a meaningful act of protection and bonding, though some were unfamiliar with the practice. Emotional ambivalence was common, shaped by prior breastfeeding experiences and the context of prematurity. Discomfort related to privacy and shared spaces was noted. Support from healthcare professionals was essential to promote understanding and adherence.
Social representations of BME are shaped by emotional, social and institutional experiences. Anchored in prior breastfeeding experiences and cultural meanings of maternal care, the practice is objectified through both gestures of affection and tangible barriers.
Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive training to support mothers in BME. Structural improvements, privacy and emotional support are essential for fostering maternal autonomy and confidence.
This study highlights the barriers to BME, emphasising the role of healthcare support and the need for better infrastructure, privacy and training to enhance maternal confidence and breastfeeding.
The study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.
None.
This paper highlights the pivotal role of healthcare professional support in overcoming barriers to BME and promoting breastfeeding practices.
Fresh breast milk is considered the gold standard for reducing complications and improving survival in preterm infants. BME is recommended as an effective strategy to ensure the availability of fresh breast milk. Mothers' social representations of this practice remain underexplored within the neonatal intensive care context.
Explores mothers' social representations of BME in NICUs, addressing a significant gap in qualitative research. Reveals how emotional, social and institutional factors shape mothers' perceptions, motivations and challenges related to BME. Highlights the need for targeted professional support, improved infrastructure and privacy to enhance maternal autonomy and adherence to milk expression practices.
Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive specialised training to provide technical guidance and emotional support, enhancing mothers' confidence and autonomy in BME. Improving infrastructure and ensuring privacy in NICUs are crucial to creating supportive environments that facilitate milk expression and strengthen maternal–infant bonding. Institutional policies should integrate maternal-centred strategies to support breastfeeding continuity and promote humanised neonatal care.
Acute pain in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery is mostly treated with opioid analgesics. However, with the risk of adverse reactions and complications, strategies which do not involve opioid analgesics can be considered, such as aromatherapy. This systematic review aims to analyse the effectiveness of aromatherapy in relieving pain in post-cardiac surgery patients.
Two researchers will independently and simultaneously conduct searches and select studies from the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane (Library) and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.com), with no language or publication date restrictions. Randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials on the use of aromatherapy for pain relief in postcardiac surgery patients will be included. Then, two researchers will independently examine the studies based on inclusion criteria, extract data from the included studies and assess the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool from Cochrane. Data will be synthesised using Review Manager software. The strength of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The literature search, study selection, review and meta-analysis stages will be conducted from early October 2025 to April 2026.
This study is based on secondary data, and therefore ethical approval from a research ethics committee was not required. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
CRD42024568532.
FreshRSS 