To validate the Workplace COVID-19 Knowledge and Stigma Scale (WoCKSS) using item response theory (IRT), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Cross-sectional psychometric validation.

Manufacturing companies registered in Malaysia.

A total of 137 factory workers participated in the exploratory phase and 300 in the confirmatory phase. Inclusion criteria were Malaysian nationality and ability to read Malay.

The knowledge domain was examined using the two-parameter logistic IRT model in two stages: an exploratory IRT analysis in phase 1 to screen items and a confirmatory IRT analysis in phase 2 to evaluate the final item set. The stigma domain was analysed using EFA followed by CFA. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega (). The development process and content and face validity results were previously published.

14 knowledge items were retained after exploratory IRT and formed the final knowledge scale evaluated in confirmatory IRT. For these final items, discrimination parameters ranged from 0.77 to 3.17 and difficulty values from –4.47 to 0.23, with unidimensionality supported (p=0.644). EFA supported a three-factor stigma structure (stereotype, fear, prejudice), and CFA confirmed excellent model fit (²=8.91, df=11, p=0.630; root mean square error of approximation=0.00; Comparative Fit Index=1.00; Tucker-Lewis Index=1.00; standardised root mean square residual=0.021). Composite reliability by McDonald’s omega ranged from 0.691 to 0.893.

WoCKSS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing workplace COVID-19 knowledge and stigma in industrial sectors in Malaysia.

Stroke is one of the top causes of disability in Malaysia, yet caregivers have limited access to structured, culturally tailored education to support poststroke care.

To develop and validate the CaknaStrok Education Package (CEP), a blended learning intervention comprising a printed guidebook and a trilingual mobile health application for informal stroke caregivers in Malaysia.

Methodological study involving the development and validation of a caregiver education programme guided by the Analyse, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate (ADDIE) instructional design framework.

Development and validation were conducted in Malaysia between January 2022 and December 2023. Both experts and caregivers were recruited from two tertiary hospitals on the East Coast of Malaysia, with caregivers identified from inpatient wards and outpatient clinics at these hospitals.

Content validation involved 10 multidisciplinary experts. Face validation involved 14 informal stroke caregivers who met eligibility criteria, and all completed the study.

CEP was developed based on prior needs assessment and expert input. Content validation was undertaken using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and face validation using the Face Validity Index (FVI), both assessed on a four-point Likert scale. Qualitative feedback was also obtained from the participants.

CEP consists of six modules delivered via a printed guidebook and a trilingual app with videos, assessment tools and local resources. Experts rated the content highly valid (Scale-level (S)-CVI/the average method (Ave): 0.97–0.99 across domains). Caregivers reported strong acceptability (S-FVI/Ave: 0.95–0.99). Qualitative feedback from experts and caregivers informed refinements to content clarity, usability and presentation, including improved navigation, consistent language use and enhanced visual design. Suggestions requiring substantial structural changes were documented for future iterations.

The CEP shows strong content and face validity as a blended caregiver education tool. By combining printed and digital formats, CEP addresses cultural and access challenges and provides a scalable model for stroke caregiver education in Malaysia. Further pilot or feasibility studies are warranted to evaluate usability, engagement and implementation in real-world settings prior to effectiveness evaluation.

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are rapidly escalating in developing countries and social factors such as the dynamics of the family play an important part in the lifestyle choices that lead to the onset and maintenance of chronic illness. There remains a gap in Malaysia as the majority of the studies were focused on the normal population rather than directly towards persons having NCDs. This study aimed to examine emerging risk factors such as family functionality and its association with NCD.

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a multistage random sampling method.

Urban residential areas in Selangor, Malaysia.

A total of 2542 adults residing in urban areas of Selangor were recruited.

Family functionality was measured using the APGAR (Adaptation, Participation, Gain or Growth, Affection and Resources) scale and multiple logistic regression was performed to measure the association between emerging risk factors and NCD.

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension was 10.8% and 6.1%, respectively. Widowed/separated status (adjusted OR (AOR) 41.53, 95% CI 19.06 to 90.48, p value=0.001) was reported to be a predictor of diabetes. As for hypertension, familial functionality (AOR 4.2, 95% CI 1.11 to 14.50, p value

There is a growing concern that family functionality is an emerging risk factor for NCDs. Future family-centred health promotion programmes should be incorporated to improve self-management behaviours and health outcomes.

To determine the prevalence of internet addiction and examine its association with psychological factors specifically depression, anxiety and loneliness among Malaysian public university students.

Cross-sectional study.

All public universities in Malaysia, 20 universities.

The study included 7278 students from 20 public universities in Malaysia.

Statistical analyses were performed usingSTATA V.17 software. Descriptive statistics summarised participants’ demographic characteristics, prevalence of internet addiction and psychological distress (depression, anxiety and loneliness). Pearson’s correlation was used to assess bivariate relationships between internet addiction and psychological variables, while multiple logistic regression identified independent factors associated with internet addiction after adjusting for significant confounders.

The study found that 38.6% of the students showed signs of internet addiction, along with a high level of psychological distress; 24.8% had depressive symptoms, 32.4% experienced anxiety and 35.5% reported loneliness. Moderate positive correlations were observed between internet addiction and depression, anxiety and loneliness (p

The findings indicate significant associations between internet addiction and psychological factors such as depression, anxiety and loneliness. A comprehensive, multifaceted approach is essential to address psychological distress among university students and reduce the risk of internet addiction.

To examine the association between workplace sexual harassment and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms among nurses in southeast Iran.

Cross-sectional study.

Four teaching hospitals affiliated with Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

A total of 283 female nurses with at least 1 year of clinical experience participated in the study.

Data were collected using convenience sampling and assessed using a demographic questionnaire, the Nurses’ Sexual Harassment Questionnaire, and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). Non-parametric tests, Spearman’s rho correlation and multivariate logistic regression were used for analysis.

Overall, 39.1% of nurses reported experiencing sexual harassment sometimes to always. A total of 13.4% screened positive for PTSD. Sexual harassment was significantly associated with PTSD symptoms (OR: 1.26; 95% CI 1.164 to 1.364). Younger, single and less experienced nurses reported higher harassment levels, though sociodemographic variables were not associated with PTSD.

Workplace sexual harassment was significantly associated with increased PTSD symptoms among nurses. While demographic factors were related to harassment exposure, they were not linked to PTSD. Findings highlight the importance of preventive organisational strategies to mitigate harassment and protect nurses’ mental well-being.

The effectiveness of humanitarian health and nutrition programmes in Somalia is critically dependent on seamless collaboration and coordination among a diverse array of actors. While existing literature acknowledges broad challenges to coordination such as insecurity, resource competition and fragmentation, a significant gap remains in understanding how these barriers and their corresponding enablers actively manifest in the daily operations and decision-making processes of frontline practitioners.

This study aims to provide a systematic, in-depth exploration of the barriers and enablers influencing collaboration and coordination mechanisms from the perspective of those directly involved in the response.

A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Data were analysed using a deductive thematic approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

The study was conducted across the entire territory of Somalia, encompassing its five member states, the capital city Mogadishu, and the self-declared independent state of Somaliland.

A total of 26 participants, including executive directors, health and nutrition programme managers, coordinators from international and national non-governmental organisations (NGOs), government officials and community members, were interviewed.

Key barriers included poor adaptability and high complexity related to collaborative initiatives (intervention characteristics); armed conflicts, climatic shocks, deeply ingrained sociocultural practices and restrictive government policies (outer setting); inadequate information technology infrastructure and hierarchical communication (inner setting); high staff turnover (individual characteristics). Key enablers included strong inter-agency partnerships (outer setting); supportive organisational culture (inner setting); competent and motivated staff (individual characteristics); and robust planning, engaging and evaluation processes (process).

The study highlights the complex contextual factors that impact the effectiveness of collaboration and coordination mechanisms among humanitarianorganisations operating in Somalia. Policymakers should unify governance, agencies prioritise localisation and donors allocate quotas to local NGOs to enhance aid delivery.

Epilepsy prevalence varies widely across Nigeria, with rates ranging from 3.1 to 37.0/1000 population. There have been no studies on epilepsy prevalence and treatment gap in the Northeast Region of Nigeria. This study aimed to study epilepsy prevalence and the epilepsy treatment gap (ETG) in an urban and a rural community in Northeast Nigeria.

Cross-sectional, community-based survey.

Epilepsy screening of residents in two communities in Northeast Nigeria using a WHO screening tool and a validated study questionnaire from 1 March to 10 June 2022.

8599 community residents aged ≥2 years.

Prevalence of epilepsy, active epilepsy, ETG and associated factors.

We screened 8599 residents, of whom 88 had epilepsy. Crude epilepsy prevalence was 10.2 per 1000 and was three times higher in the rural than in the urban community (18.5 vs 6.4; ²=26.79, p2=0.087, p=0.768). Logistic regression analysis showed that the ETG was associated with a lack of counselling (OR 15.8, 95% CI 3.5 to 70.7, p

The prevalence of epilepsy in Bauchi State was within the range reported in Nigeria but three times higher in the rural than in the urban community. A high ETG was associated with poor counselling of people with epilepsy. Epilepsy counselling, health education and wider access to neurology services could reduce the burden of epilepsy in Northeast Nigeria.

Despite efforts to improve feeding practices globally, 48% of children do not meet the recommended minimum meal frequency. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess minimum meal frequency and its associated factors in children aged 6–23 months in cash crop districts of Kercha, Southern Ethiopia.

A community-based cross-sectional design was used to conduct this study from 29 February 2024 to 29 March 2024.

Kercha district, Southern Ethiopia

A total of 543 children aged 6–23 months were selected using a multistage sampling technique.

The primary outcome of this study was minimum meal frequency, defined as the percentage of children aged 6–23 months who consumed solid, semisolid or soft foods (including milk for non-breastfed children) at least the required number of times for their age in the previous day.

The secondary outcome of this study was factors associated with minimum meal frequency. Bivariable and multivariable multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression analyses were performed to find factors related to minimum meal frequency. Adjusted ORs (AORs) with 95% CIs and p values

A total of 539 (99.3%) children aged 6–23 months and their mothers participated in this study. The prevalence of minimum meal frequency was 62.3% (95% CI 58.1% to 66.4%) among children in the cash crop district of Kercha. The final model yielded an intracluster correlation coefficient of 7.3%, reflecting unexplained variations in the prevalence of minimum meal frequency among children at the kebele level. Factors associated with higher odds of meeting minimum meal frequency included being a first-born child (AOR 2.91, 95% CI 1.06 to 8.05), mothers (AOR 2.66, 95% CI 1.48 to 4.76) and fathers (AOR 3.43, 95% CI 1.98 to 5.95) with primary education, having mother attending postnatal visits (AOR 2.74, 95% CI 1.52 to 4.94), introducing additional food at 6 months (AOR 4.71, 95% CI 2.79 to 7.94), good maternal knowledge on child feeding (AOR 1.98, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.22) and living in the household with medium (AOR 2.98, 95% CI 1.59 to 5.53) and rich (AOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.37 to 4.18) wealth status.

The study revealed that only three-fifths of children met the recommended minimum meal frequency. Birth order, introducing additional foods at 6 months, parental education, maternal postnatal visits, good maternal knowledge on child feeding and wealth were linked to minimum meal frequency. To improve child nutrition, it is crucial to enhance maternal education, increase access to postnatal healthcare and educate parents about the importance of introducing additional foods at 6 months.

This study aimed to translate and validate the Malay version of the Patient Measure of Safety-10 (M-PMOS-10) for use in Malaysian healthcare settings. The study also sought to establish its content and face validity to ensure cultural relevance, psychometric validity and reliability in assessing patient perceptions of safety.

A cross-sectional validation study.

The study was conducted in tertiary-level care at a teaching hospital in Kelantan, Malaysia.

30 hospitalised patients participated in face validity assessment, while another 100 patients were involved in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for construct validation. Eligible participants were adults aged 18–60, fluent in Malay, clinically stable and without a formally diagnosed psychiatric illness.

The primary outcome was the psychometric validation of the M-PMOS-10, assessed through CFA and internal consistency reliability (Raykov’s rho). Content validity was determined using expert evaluations, and face validity was assessed through cognitive interviews with patients. Secondary outcomes included descriptive statistics of patient safety perceptions.

The M-PMOS-10 demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Raykov’s rho=0.929) and strong factor loadings (majority >0.70). CFA supported a revised single-factor structure (Comparative Fit Index=0.986, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.067). Scale-Level Content Validity Index/Average method (Ave) (0.96) confirmed the relevance of the translated items, while Scale-Level Face Validity Index/Ave (0.87) indicated that patients found the questionnaire items clear and comprehensible. The mean total M-PMOS-10 score was 42.98 (SD=6.14), indicating positive patient safety perceptions, though communication regarding care plans showed room for improvement.

The validated M-PMOS-10 is a reliable and culturally appropriate tool for assessing patient safety perceptions in Malaysia. Its strong content and face validity reinforce its utility in patient safety research and clinical applications. Implementing this tool can help healthcare institutions identify safety gaps, refine staff training and improve communication strategies. Future studies should explore its applicability in different healthcare settings and assess its responsiveness to interventions to enhance patient safety.

To evaluate temporal trends in the epidemiology of hip osteoarthritis (OA) in the USA from 1990 to 2019, with stratification by sex and geographic region.

Cross-sectional time-series analysis using secondary data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study.

US population-based analysis, stratified by the four US Census Bureau regions: Northeast, Midwest, South and West.

De-identified, aggregate population-level data representing all adults in the USA from 1990 to 2019, drawn from the GBD database.

Age-standardised rates per 100 000 population for years lived with disability (YLDs), prevalence and incidence of hip OA. Outcomes were stratified by sex and region. Statistical significance was defined as p

Between 1990 and 2019, hip OA in the USA increased by 23.91% in YLDs, 24.67% in prevalence and 25.22% in incidence. In 2019, the mean YLDs were 28.30 in women versus 25.48 in men; prevalence was 49.55 versus 41.08; and incidence was 919.29 versus 818.10 (all p

There has been a substantial rise in the burden of hip OA in the USA over the past three decades. Women and residents of the Northeastern USA are disproportionately affected. These findings underscore the need for targeted public health strategies that account for geographic and sex-based disparities in hip OA burden.

Lower gastrointestinal symptoms attributed to colorectal disease are common. Early diagnosis of serious colorectal disease such as colorectal cancer (CRC), precancerous growths (polyps) and inflammation is important to ensure the best possible outcomes for a patient. The current ‘gold standard’ diagnostic test is colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure. Some people struggle to cope with it and require intravenous sedation and/or analgesia. It is also resource-intensive, needing to be performed in specialist endoscopy units by a trained team. Across the UK, the demand for colonoscopy is outstripping capacity and the diagnosis of colorectal disease is being delayed. A colon capsule endoscope (CCE) is an alternative colorectal diagnostic. It is a ‘camera in a pill’ that can be swallowed and which passes through the gastrointestinal tract, obtaining visual images on the colon. There is now established experience of CCE in the UK. CCE might provide a less invasive method to diagnose colorectal disease if found to be accurate and effective and provide a means by which to increase the National Health Service (NHS) diagnostic capacity.

The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CCE when compared with colonoscopy in representative and clinically meaningful cohorts of patients. An evaluation of the experiences of CCE for the patient and clinical team and an assessment of cost effectiveness will be undertaken.

We will undertake three research workstreams (WS). In WS1, we shall perform a paired (back-to-back) study. Each participant will swallow the CCE and then later on the same day they will have a colonoscopy. The study has been designed in collaboration with our Patient Advisory Group and as closely mirrors standard care as is possible. 973 participants will be recruited from three representative clinical contexts; suspected CRC, suspected inflammatory bowel disease and postpolypectomy surveillance. Up to 30 sites across the UK will be involved to maximise inclusivity. Measures of diagnostic accuracy will be reported along with CCE completion rates, number of colonoscopy procedures potentially prevented and adverse events, such as capsule retention. A nested substudy of intraobserver and interobserver agreement will be performed. WS2 will develop models of cost-effectiveness and WS3 will evaluate the patient and clinician experience, with reference to acceptability and choice.

The study findings will provide the evidence base to inform future colorectal diagnostic services.

The study has approval from the North East—Tyne and Wear South research ethics committee (REC reference 24/NE/0178, IRAS 331349). The findings will be disseminated to the NHS, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, other clinical stakeholders and participants, patients and the public.

ISRCTN16126290.

Transitions from the emergency department (ED) to home are high-risk periods for medication-related harm. Pharmacist-led interventions during this period may improve medication safety and care continuity, yet co-design approaches to develop such interventions remain underused. The aim of this study is to co-design a pharmacist-led transition of care programme for patients discharged from the ED.

This study will be conducted at a 371-bed secondary-care teaching hospital in Qatar and will follow two sequential phases using qualitative and participatory methods. Phase I will involve focus groups and semistructured interviews with key stakeholders (clinical pharmacists, physicians, nurses and patients or patient representatives). Phase II will consist of an intervention co-design workshop with decision makers (leaders, policymakers and representatives from Phase I). Participants will be recruited using purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data will be analysed using an inductive-deductive approach, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework, the Care Transitions Framework and the APEASE (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness/cost-effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects/safety, Equity) criteria for evaluation of intervention feasibility.

The anticipated outcome is a prototype intervention detailing target recipients, core components, workflow, implementation strategies and supporting tools. This prototype will be pilot-tested to assess feasibility and inform further refinement.

The study was approved by the Medical Research Centre of Hamad Medical Corporation-Qatar (MRC-01-24-699) and Qatar University Institutional Review Board (QU-IRB 009/2025-EM). Written informed consent will be obtained from all study participants prior to participation. Research findings will be disseminated through institutional stakeholder briefings, presentations at national and international scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Patient representatives will contribute throughout the intervention development process.

Admission to a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) following major surgery is associated with a number of discomforts, not only related to the disease itself but also to the care provided or the ICU environment itself (lights, sounds, pain, sleep deprivation, thirst, etc). This discomfort is real and can be associated with psychological consequences. We hypothesised that the use of immersive virtual reality (IVR) with HypnoVR is feasible and can help reduce discomfort in intensive care.

The ZION trial is a prospective, monocentric trial randomising 194 patients admitted to a surgical ICU after a major surgery. The inclusion criterion is patients admitted to a surgical ICU for at least 48 hours following major surgery (cardiac, thoracic or major abdominal surgery). Patients will be allocated to the intervention group (n=97) or the control group (n=97). In the intervention group, patients will receive IVR using HypnoVR two times a day during the ICU stay (2–5 days). In the control group, postoperative care will be conducted according to standard care without IVR. The primary endpoint will be the 18-item IPREA (Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation) questionnaire on the day of ICU discharge. The secondary endpoints will include intensity of discomfort symptoms (anxiety, pain, dyspnoea, thirst and sleep deprivation); the 18-Item IPREA Questionnaire assessed daily from randomisation to the V1 follow-up visit (ICU discharge); incidence of delirium; cumulative morphine consumption at ICU discharge; length of ICU stay and anxiety or depression at 1 month after discharge from intensive care and patient experience of device use.

Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board of the University Hospital of Amiens (Registration number ID: 2024-A01528-39) in January 2025.

NCT06830369.

Marginalised populations—such as racialised groups, low-income individuals, newcomers and those in rural areas—disproportionately experience severe diabetes-related complications, including diabetic foot ulcers, retinopathy and amputations, due to systemic inequities and limited access to care. Although community-based programmes address cultural and accessibility barriers, their isolation from mainstream healthcare systems leads to fragmented care and missed opportunities for early intervention.

Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered technologies can enhance accessibility and personalisation, particularly for underserved populations. However, integrating AI into community settings remains underexplored, with socioethical concerns around inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility requiring urgent attention.

This realist review aims to examine how, why and under what circumstances AI applications can be effectively integrated into community-based diabetic care for marginalised populations. The review will develop a programme theory to guide ethical, inclusive and effective AI implementation to ensure AI-driven innovations address health disparities and promote culturally sensitive, accessible care for all.

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Reviews guidelines, this realist review will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane library, Google Scholar and Scopus, alongside grey literature. A two-stage screening process will identify eligible studies, and data extraction will use a developed tool. Synthesis will employ realist logic, analysing relationships between contexts (eg, organisational capacity), mechanisms (eg, AI functionalities) and outcomes (eg, reduced disparities).

Ethics approval is not required for conducting this realist review. Ethics approval will be obtained from the University of Toronto; however, following the completion of the realist review for patients and community members’ engagement to support knowledge mobilisation and dissemination to ensure practical application and reciprocity.

This protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42025636284).