Conectar
To explore peer volunteers' experiences of delivering online support through SMART to at-risk mothers during the perinatal period, to inform future improvements to mobile-health-application (mHealth app) based peer-support interventions.
Descriptive qualitative research.
The study was conducted between February 2024 and June 2025 in a tertiary public healthcare institution in Singapore. Twenty peer volunteers were recruited via convenience and snowball sampling and participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
Four themes were identified: (a) Giving and receiving: the inner world of peer volunteers; (b) Navigating relational complexity in digital peer support; (c) Facilitating connection and continuity in digital peer support; and (d) Building better connections through supportive ecosystems.
Peers reported experiencing reciprocal benefits, such as a sense of fulfilment and achievement, while supporting mothers. Shared experiences and psychosocial vulnerabilities enhanced relatability, reassurance and rapport, which sustained supportive relationships. Challenges encountered by peers highlighted the need for strengthening both intervention design and peer training.
Regular check-ins by programme facilitators, alongside clear information, flexible guidelines and reassurance, can improve peer volunteers' motivation and resilience, thereby ensuring consistent and sustainable support for at-risk mothers.
Examined peer volunteers' experiences in providing online perinatal support to mothers with diverse psychosocial vulnerabilities. Peers offered emotional, informational and practical support, while mothers benefited from learning how peers had coped with their psychosocial vulnerabilities. Shared experiences fostered confidence and reassurance among mothers that they, too could overcome similar adversities. Valuable in providing both medically accurate perinatal information and meaningful social support to perinatal mothers.
The reporting of the study adheres to the standards outlined in the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.
Mothers and peer volunteers contributed valuable insights and suggestions that helped in the design of the intervention.
by Awole Seid, Zelalem Debebe, Abebe Ayelign, Bilal Shikur Endris, Mathewos Assefa, Ahmedin Jemal
BackgroundNutrition impact symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and taste alterations are common side effects of chemotherapy and can lead to malnutrition. There is a paucity of data regarding the nutritional challenges faced by cancer patients, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of nutrition impact symptoms among patients undergoing chemotherapy at a major cancer center in Ethiopia.
MethodsAn interpretative phenomenological analysis was conducted from November 11–29, 2024, involving 26 cancer patients treated at the Oncology Center of Tikur Anbesa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Both data and thematic saturation were employed to determine the sample size. Participants were selected using heterogeneous sampling, and data were collected through in-depth interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim in Amharic, followed by a contextual translation into English. The data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach with the aid of MAXQDA24 software.
ResultsThree themes were identified: symptom burden and coping, individualized food choices, and unmet nutritional support needs. Symptoms were particularly severe during the early stages of treatment, disrupting typical dietary patterns and leading to physical limitations, negative emotional responses, and decreased productivity. The finding also revealed financial barriers to accessing nutritious foods, nutritional misinformation, and unsatisfactory experiences with hospital food.
ConclusionSymptoms vary in onset, severity, and pattern among individuals, significantly impacting their quality of life. Nutritional support is a pressing need for cancer patients. The findings underscore the critical need for dietitian-led, patient-centered nutritional interventions, along with socioeconomic support for patients undergoing chemotherapy in Ethiopia.
Platelet and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions are routinely employed in the management of severe dengue. Previous research has indicated a potential link between ABO blood groups and susceptibility to dengue, with evidence suggesting that mosquito vector feeding preferences may be influenced by host blood type. These factors could potentially impact transfusion demands during outbreaks. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between ABO blood groups and transfusion requirements in patients with dengue.
Retrospective study.
The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Kerala.
Clinical and laboratory data were reviewed for 199 patients confirmed with dengue who received blood component transfusions and compared with two control groups: 200 randomly selected patients with dengue who did not require transfusions and 200 patients without dengue who required transfusions, over a period spanning January 2015 to March 2023.
Among transfused dengue cases, blood groups O (41.71%), A (28.14%) and B (23.12%) were most prevalent; however, no statistically significant association was observed between ABO blood group and transfusion requirement. Furthermore, the total volumes of FFP and platelet transfusions did not differ significantly across ABO groups among patients with dengue. Notably, platelet transfusions were significantly more frequent in dengue cases (92.0%) compared with transfused patients without dengue (35.5%), whereas FFP transfusions were more common in non-dengue transfused cases (84.5%) than in patients with dengue (44.7%). Patients with dengue also received significantly higher mean volumes of both FFP and platelets.
Despite earlier reports linking ABO blood types to dengue susceptibility, this study found no significant association with transfusion requirements, warranting confirmation through larger multicentre studies.
To examine the perinatal experiences of at-risk mothers and their engagement with mobile-health-based care.
A qualitative descriptive study.
One-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 at-risk mothers, defined as those who were single, had low income, were at risk of depression, had adverse childhood experiences, gave birth to a baby with congenital disorders, or had a history of mental health conditions. Participants were purposively sampled at 6 months postpartum from a tertiary public hospital in Singapore between February and September 2024. Interviews continued until data saturation was achieved, were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
The study identified four overarching themes: (a) Me and my baby versus the world, (b) navigating vulnerability and strength in motherhood, (c) generational tensions in modern parenting and (d) reimagining perinatal care for every mother. Across the perinatal period, both intervention and control group mothers reported social isolation, emotional and physical strain and challenges balancing traditional family expectations with modern parenting practices. While mothers in the intervention group described receiving holistic support through the SMART program, those in the control group relied on ad hoc sources of support, such as social media platforms.
At-risk mothers experienced significant challenges during the perinatal period, and those who used a mobile-health-based perinatal intervention felt supported through its peer support and multimedia educational resources.
Mobile-health-based interventions can be integral aspects of standard nursing care. Future researchers must ensure that support rendered to at-risk mothers is culturally compatible and specific to the psychosocial vulnerabilities they experience. Increased contact and funding are vital, whereas artificial intelligence, multiple shared access and health monitoring trackers can shape future perinatal interventions.
A mobile-health-based perinatal intervention can have an enormous positive impact on the psychological well-being of vulnerable mothers worldwide.
This study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration ID: NCT06363019). Registered 4/12/23, first recruitment on 26/02/2024.
The purpose of this article is to share insights from the National Institute for Health and Care Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) in delivering research for Multiple Long Term Conditions (MLTC) and to highlight lessons of wider relevance across the research ecosystem.
Designing health and care systems to be more responsive to the needs of people living with MLTC requires a considerable evidence base. When compared with research focused on a single disease area, research relating to MLTC raises unique considerations at the stages of planning, placing, and delivering research studies. Our article describes challenges associated with MLTC research outcomes and outlines different types of interventions to target MLTC, along with related research delivery considerations. Our article also raises important considerations for placing research in the most appropriate setting and highlights the vital role of robust feasibility studies, informed by the lived experience of patients and carers with MLTC, for ensuring that studies are conducted, recruited to, and completed in a timely and appropriate way.
Increasing the evidence base for the prevention and management of MLTC is a necessity for our health and care system. This presents novel challenges that require collaboration between multiple stakeholders. The UK benefits from a unique research infrastructure, including support for the stages of planning and delivery of health and care research. As the health and care system moves towards bringing care closer to patients and service users, the appropriate selection of the health and care settings and research sites in which to deliver MLTC research, in addition to understanding and removing barriers to recruitment and participation for people with MLTCs, are important considerations to enable us to collectively respond to this challenge.
Primary care nurses (PCNs) are the second largest workforce in primary care and play a critical role in facilitating access to coordinated care and reducing health disparities. There is renewed interest in team-based primary care as a solution for health workforce challenges. Some team models enable PCNs (ie, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, licensed/registered practical nurses) to leverage one another’s expertise to work to optimal scope; the extent to which this happens depends on multiple context-dependent factors. We will conduct an umbrella review to synthesise and compare international knowledge syntheses focused on scope of practice enactment (ie., roles and activities) of PCNs in primary care.
We will conduct the umbrella review according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines, and using the Nursing Care Organization Framework as guidance. We will search a wide range of scientific electronic databases and grey literature sources, and consider articles published in English and French by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and designated key partner countries for inclusion, with no publication date limits. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles, and any disagreements will be resolved through discussion or by a third reviewer. We will use the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews to assess the quality and risk of bias in the included systematic and scoping reviews.
Results will be presented in a PRISMA Scoping Review flow diagram. We will synthesise data from included studies in a detailed literature review table and develop visual aids to communicate the shared and unique roles and activities of PCN scope of practice. We will disseminate the results of the review through peer-reviewed publications and conferences related to this field. Ethics approval is not required.
Marginalised populations—such as racialised groups, low-income individuals, newcomers and those in rural areas—disproportionately experience severe diabetes-related complications, including diabetic foot ulcers, retinopathy and amputations, due to systemic inequities and limited access to care. Although community-based programmes address cultural and accessibility barriers, their isolation from mainstream healthcare systems leads to fragmented care and missed opportunities for early intervention.
Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered technologies can enhance accessibility and personalisation, particularly for underserved populations. However, integrating AI into community settings remains underexplored, with socioethical concerns around inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility requiring urgent attention.
This realist review aims to examine how, why and under what circumstances AI applications can be effectively integrated into community-based diabetic care for marginalised populations. The review will develop a programme theory to guide ethical, inclusive and effective AI implementation to ensure AI-driven innovations address health disparities and promote culturally sensitive, accessible care for all.
Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Reviews guidelines, this realist review will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane library, Google Scholar and Scopus, alongside grey literature. A two-stage screening process will identify eligible studies, and data extraction will use a developed tool. Synthesis will employ realist logic, analysing relationships between contexts (eg, organisational capacity), mechanisms (eg, AI functionalities) and outcomes (eg, reduced disparities).
Ethics approval is not required for conducting this realist review. Ethics approval will be obtained from the University of Toronto; however, following the completion of the realist review for patients and community members’ engagement to support knowledge mobilisation and dissemination to ensure practical application and reciprocity.
This protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42025636284).
(1) To investigate the vulnerability of nurses to experiencing professional burnout and low fulfilment across 5 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) To identify modifiable variables in hospital leadership and individual vulnerabilities that may mitigate these effects.
Nurses were at increased risk for burnout and low fulfilment prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Hospital leadership factors such as organisational structure and open communication and consideration of employee opinions are known to have positive impacts on work attitudes. Personal risk factors for burnout include symptoms of depression and anxiety.
Healthcare workers (n = 406 at baseline, n = 234 longitudinal), including doctors (n = 102), nurses (n = 94), technicians (n = 90) and non-clinical administrative staff (n = 120), completed 5 online questionnaires, once per month, for 5 months. Participants completed self-report questionnaires on professional fulfilment and burnout, perceptions of healthcare leadership, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Participants were recruited from various healthcare settings in the southeastern United States. The STROBE checklist was used to report the present study.
Both at baseline and across the 5 months, nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic reported increased burnout and decreased fulfilment relative to doctors. For all participants, burnout remained largely steady and fulfilment decreased slightly. The strongest predictors of both burnout and fulfilment were organisational structure and depressive symptoms. Leadership consideration and anxiety symptoms had smaller, yet significant, relationships to burnout and fulfilment in longitudinal analyses.
Burnout and reduced fulfilment remain a problem for healthcare workers, especially nurses. Leadership styles and employee symptoms of depression and anxiety are appropriate targets for intervention.
Leadership wishing to reduce burnout and increase fulfilment among employees should increase levels of organisational support and consideration and expand supports to employees seeking treatment for depression and anxiety.
FreshRSS 