Up to 30% of individuals with depression develop persistent depressive disorder (PDD), an often disabling and difficult to treat condition. The Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) is the only psychotherapy developed specifically for treating individuals with PDD. While several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated its efficacy in outpatient settings, evidence for its use in inpatient settings remains limited. Pilot studies of CBASP inpatient programmes in Germany have shown promising feasibility and effectiveness; however, no RCTs to date have systematically evaluated their outcomes. This study represents the first RCT to compare the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of CBASP with Behavioural Activation (BA), a first-line psychotherapy for depression, within an intensive multimodal inpatient setting.

In this prospective, multicentre, rater-blinded RCT with an active control group, we aim to recruit 396 adults (aged 18–70 years) with treatment-resistant PDD at eight German university hospitals. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either (1) CBASP or (2) BA within an intensive treatment programme consisting of 10 weeks acute treatment in an inpatient and/or day clinic setting, followed by 6 weeks of outpatient continuation treatment. Primary and secondary outcome assessments will be conducted at multiple time points: baseline (T0), treatment onset (T1), after 5 and 10 weeks of acute treatment (T2, T3), at the end of continuation treatment (T4, week 16) and every 2 months up to week 64 (T5, naturalistic follow-up).

The primary outcome measure will be the change in depression severity, as assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (24-item version), after 16 weeks of treatment (from T0 to T4). Secondary outcomes will include response, remission, deterioration and relapse rates, self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms and additional psychological variables. A cost-benefit analysis will evaluate the health-economic benefits of both interventions. Additionally, this RCT will explore personalised treatment selection and mechanisms of change, including potential moderators and mediators of treatment effects. The findings from this trial are expected to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance on choosing CBASP versus BA for inpatients with treatment-resistant PDD.

This study has received ethical approval from the ethics committees of all participating university hospitals. All participants will provide written informed consent before enrolment. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. We have involved people with lived experience from the earliest pilots onward, using their feedback to refine our study design. Ongoing consultation at conferences and public events has further ensured that our research remains grounded in patient perspectives.

NCT04996433.

Despite the availability of curative treatments, hepatitis C diagnosis and treatment coverage is suboptimal globally with few countries on track to achieve the WHO’s 2030 elimination targets. In 2022, an estimated 50 million people were living with hepatitis C, with 1 million new infections annually. Most people living with hepatitis C reside in low- and middle-income countries, and people who inject drugs are disproportionately affected by hepatitis C.

Continuing simplification of diagnostic pathways and treatment care models is required to improve linkage to care and reduce costs associated with hepatitis C treatment and cure.

This study is a multi-country non-randomised, quasi-experimental, prospective comparative two-arm trial. It aims to assess the feasibility of implementation, retention in hepatitis C care and achievement of cure and cost-effectiveness outcomes, comparing two simplified hepatitis C testing and treatment pathways.

Arm 1 is a standard simplified test and treat model of care following global guidance, and arm 2 is an innovative rapid, same-day treatment initiation model of care using a presumptive treatment approach based on shortened read-time of the point-of-care OraQuick hepatitis C antibody test result. Secondary outcomes include assessing the accuracy of the OraQuick hepatitis C antibody test in predicting viraemia and the acceptability of each pathway.

This study will be implemented in Armenia, Georgia and Tanzania. Treatment-naïve people who inject drugs aged over 18 years in each country will be eligible for enrolment.

Recruitment commenced in October 2024 in Armenia, June 2025 in Georgia and August 2025 in Tanzania and is anticipated to close by December 2026.

This trial has been reviewed by WHO Ethics Review Committee (ERC), Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (Australia) and local country ERCs. Alongside journal publications and conferences, the results from this study will be disseminated through summary reports and workshops with key stakeholders and with communities of people affected by HCV through relevant organisations/networks, including the global Community Advisory Board (CAB). The study results will inform national scale-up of simplified care models and inform potential pathways for further simplification of care models, including the potential for one-step diagnostic pathways and same-day treatment in particular scenarios for the three study countries, and other low- and middle-income countries globally.

NCT06159504.

Ensuring equity in medical specialist distribution is essential for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). This study explored the changes in the availability and distribution of medical specialists in Thailand from 2015 to 2024 and assessed the equity impacts on workforce.

A retrospective longitudinal analysis of national administrative workforce data.

Public and private hospitals across Thailand, covering 1471 facilities in 77 provinces.

The primary outcomes were specialist-to-population ratios and geographical equity measured using the Gini coefficient (G), where values closer to 0 indicate greater equity. Explanatory variables included specialty type, geographical region and the timing of major workforce policies, including mandatory service and specialty-specific legislative interventions.

Between 2015 and 2024, the GPs and specialists in Thailand expanded significantly, with improvements in both density and distribution. The Gini coefficient for GPs showed the largest equity improvement (G=0.42 in 2015 and G=0.22 in 2024), reflecting the impact of mandatory service programme and rural recruitment programmes. Among specialists, emergency and family medicine have shown rapid growth and significant reductions in distribution inequity, reflecting the success of legislative policies. Sustainability of workforce policies was challenged by the ‘leaking stock’ phenomenon due to attraction of career opportunities and economic drives.

Workforce targeted interventions have led to improvements in the availability and equitable distribution of GPs and medical specialists over the past decade. Further policy, such as retention incentives and assisted technology, is needed to achieve equitable distribution across all specialties, particularly in low-density fields. Thailand’s experience offers the lessons for other low- and middle-income countries as the evidence-based and equity-focused workforce policies for UHC advancement.

To adapt the SOCAV programme—originally developed for residential dementia care—for home care use, and to evaluate its feasibility and potential to foster behavioural change in nurses and informal caregivers supporting self-direction in people with dementia.

Development and feasibility study guided by the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions. Feasibility was evaluated using Bowen’s framework (demand, acceptability, practicality, implementation, limited efficacy). Data collection involved semistructured interviews, focus groups and reflective coaching diaries, as well as validated outcome measures (self-direction, quality of life and depressive symptoms) assessed at multiple time points. Qualitative data were analysed using qualitative content analysis (Bowen’s feasibility framework) and constant comparative analysis; quantitative data were analysed descriptively.

Two home care teams in different Dutch municipalities.

Development phase: 16 participants (4 people with dementia, 6 informal caregivers, 6 nurses). Feasibility phase: 59 participants (12 people with dementia, 14 informal caregivers, 33 nurses).

SOCAV-Home Care integrates person-centred communication training with reflective coaching for nurses and joint meetings involving people with dementia and informal caregivers. It aims to embed self-direction into daily care routines.

The programme was feasible and well-received, though demanding. Nurses reported increased reflection, more person-centred communication and greater professional confidence. Informal caregivers showed attitudinal shifts from control to autonomy-supportive care. Programme complexity, scheduling difficulties and emotional burden contributed to dropout. Quantitative trends showed reduced behavioural symptoms in people with dementia, though no statistical analysis was performed due to sample size.

SOCAV-Home Care shows potential to foster behavioural change in nurses and informal caregivers, promoting self-direction and relational care in dementia home care. Findings, grounded in rich reflective data, offer a valuable foundation for further evaluation. Simplifying delivery and enhancing flexibility are key to broader implementation. Future research should evaluate the sustainability strategies proposed and examine long-term outcomes in diverse home care contexts.

NCT07347639; Post-results.

Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) is a highly prevalent immune-mediated condition associated with substantial symptom burden, impaired quality of life and increased healthcare use. Emerging evidence highlights the role of the gut microbiome in immune regulation and allergic disease. Fermented foods may contain live microbes (when unpasteurised or uncooked) and bioactive postbiotic metabolites that can modulate immune responses. Despite growing interest in dietary strategies targeting the microbiome, no randomised controlled trial has compared fermented versus unfermented red cabbage for ARC.

This single-centre, randomised, controlled trial with a sensory-matched, unfermented cabbage comparator investigates the effects of daily consumption of fermented red cabbage for 8 weeks compared with an unfermented red cabbage control in young adults (18–35 years) with ARC. A total of 158 participants will be randomly assigned (1:1). The primary outcome is change in Total Nose and Eye Symptom Score from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes include daily symptoms and medication use captured via mobile ecological momentary assessments, quality of life, psychological well-being, gastrointestinal symptoms, systemic inflammatory markers, total IgE, immune cell profile and metagenomic characterisation of stool samples. A nested qualitative component explores participants’ experiences and acceptability of the intervention. Analyses will include mixed-effects models, time-series analyses incorporating daily pollen counts and comprehensive microbiome statistics. Safety outcomes and adverse events will also be assessed.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin (EA4/043/25) and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and a lay summary provided to participants. Anonymised datasets and analysis scripts will be made available in public repositories, and metagenomic sequencing data will be deposited in an international sequence archive to ensure transparency and reproducibility.

DRKS00036475.

Stress and burnout are pervasive among physicians. Academic physicians who are female and physicians who are under-represented in medicine (URM) face inequities in the workplace and beyond. Understanding their experiences is crucial for workforce sustainability and diversity, especially given the disproportionate effects on these individuals and overall workforce capacity.

To qualitatively explore the perspectives of academic female and URM physicians and identify key themes affecting their careers and well-being.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 physicians at an urban academic health system. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using a general inductive approach. Interview guides were informed by prior literature and constructs.

None.

Female and URM physicians from a large, academic medical centre were recruited via email. Participants self-reported demographic information, including sex, race, ethnicity and tenure.

The primary outcomes encompassed the main themes identified through the analysis of interviews with female and URM physicians regarding their perspectives on well-being, mental health and academic medicine.

30 female or URM physicians were interviewed (27 (90%) female; 14 (47%) black, Asian or multi-racial). Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: physician identity (URM, female, family), well-being in the workplace (emotional health, staffing burden, non-clinical responsibilities), barriers to accessing well-being resources (workplace environment, culture, overgeneralisation) and facilitators to well-being (physician camaraderie, leadership support). Physicians discussed how their identities influenced their experiences of well-being. They highlighted emotional health challenges, staffing burdens and administrative tasks contributing to stress. Barriers to accessing resources included workplace culture and broad-based interventions, while supportive leadership and camaraderie were identified as facilitators of access.

Female and URM physicians face systemic challenges impacting their well-being and careers. These findings underscore the need to address systemic changes and specifically design programmes focused on promoting the well-being and inclusivity of female and URM physicians. Tailored interventions to these individuals, supportive leadership structures and collaborative working cultures are crucial for addressing these issues and sustaining a diverse physician workforce.

Optimising post-operative pain management is crucial for recovery in orthopaedic surgery. Methadone has attracted interest due to its long half-life, N-methyl-D-aspartate -receptor antagonism and potential to reduce post-operative opioid consumption. Existing reviews combine multiple surgical populations, limiting applicability to orthopaedic settings. This protocol outlines a systematic review assessing the analgesic efficacy and safety of peri-operative methadone in adult and adolescent orthopaedic patients.

This review will include randomised controlled trials evaluating intravenous peri-operative methadone vs placebo or standard analgesic regimens in orthopaedic surgery. Primary outcomes are post-operative rescue opioid consumption and pain intensity within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, mobility scores and the length of hospital stay. If available data permit, a methadone dose–response pattern may be investigated. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov without date restrictions. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. When appropriate, random-effects meta-analysis methods will be performed. Certainty of evidence will be assessed using Grading of recommendations assesment, development and Evaluation (GRADE).

As this study uses previously published data, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.

CRD42025616291.

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia (HH) repair is associated with a high recurrence rate. Repair reinforced with mesh lowers short-term recurrence but can cause dysphagia and visceral erosion. Results of the PRIME trial, in which non-absorbable mesh reinforcement of the posterior crural repair was investigated, showed equal recurrence compared with primary suture repair after 6 months. This study investigates the use of circular absorbable mesh reinforcement in primary HH repair.

Prospective double-blinded randomised controlled superiority trial comparing two laparoscopic procedures for HH repair (110 vs 110). Adult patients with proven HH Skinner types II–IV (defined by preoperative CT scan) are included. Patients are randomised to undergo a laparoscopic primary crural repair with sutures alone or suture repair augmented with biosynthetic absorbable, circular mesh at the hiatus. Radiologic integrity of the hiatal repair 1 year after surgery is the main endpoint. Secondary objectives are clinical recurrence of the hernia, development of postoperative reflux disease, postoperative side effects and satisfaction with surgical outcome. Outcome assessors are blinded to allocation. Data are collected at baseline, and follow-up includes interviews and digital questionnaires at 3, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, as well as CT scan at 12 and 60 months. All patients randomised will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Ethics approval has been obtained by the local ethics committee at Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands (Medical Ethics Review Committee (METc) Isala, study number: 190516). METc Isala is no longer active; all duties have been taken over by METc of the University Medical Center Groningen. The trial’s results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed international journal as well as (inter)national conferences.

Registered in the Dutch national trial registry: OMON (NL-OMON48062).

The functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) is increasingly used to analyse healthcare processes. FRAM uses four steps to analyse a process and its potential variability. We systematically reviewed studies using FRAM in healthcare on how the four steps in FRAM are reported, defined and supported by data.

Systematic review following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses 2020 guidelines.

Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, Dimensions and Lens were searched up to December 2025.

All peer-reviewed studies using FRAM in a healthcare context that presented a FRAM visualisation were included. The papers had to be written in English.

Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and subsequently the full text of selected papers. Data was extracted reporting on the steps of FRAM, how functions were supported by data, and the functions and couplings of the visualisations.

Sixty-eight papers were included, of which 20 (29%) reported at least one aspect of all four steps in FRAM. While most studies (85%) described how functions were supported by data, the methods used varied widely. Terminology was interpreted differently concerning variability, the output of variability and the effect of combined variability.

Most FRAM studies in healthcare do not report all steps of FRAM, and interpretations of key terms differ. FRAM studies should more clearly describe which steps of the method are conducted, and how data is collected and analysed. Refinement of FRAM guidelines, particularly on data use and terminology, would enhance consistency and comparability across studies.

CRD42024592858.

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of psychoeducation and emotional stabilisation (PES), together with eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) plus treatment-as-usual (TAU) in reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among adults with intellectual disabilities compared with TAU. Secondary objectives include: (1) determining whether PES/EMDR plus TAU is superior to TAU in improving mental health problems and quality of life (QoL) among adults with intellectual disabilities who had a diagnosis of PTSD and (2) completing a process evaluation to examine intervention implementation and acceptability.

This is a two-arm parallel single-blind randomised controlled trial comparing PES-EMDR+TAU to TAU including an internal pilot phase. Outcome data will be captured prior to randomisation, and at 4 (after PES), 8 (after EMDR) and 14 months postrandomisation by masked assessors. 144 adults with intellectual disabilities with a diagnosis of PTSD will be allocated (1:1) randomly using minimisation from National Health Service (NHS) community and inpatients services for adults with intellectual disabilities in England. Participants are eligible to take part in this trial if: (1) they are aged 18 or older, but younger than 66, (2) have a Full Scale IQ

The primary outcome will be assessed using an intention-to-treat analysis. Baseline characteristics will be compared between arms to determine whether any potentially influential imbalance occurred. The primary outcome will be analysed by analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline values of the outcome and any variables used in the randomisation process. Secondary outcomes will be analysed using linear or logistic regression models as appropriate reflecting the distribution of the outcome variable. The treatment effect will be estimated as an adjusted difference between sample means, presented with 95% CIs and p values. A complier average causal effect analysis will be considered should the data availability be sufficient to estimate the impact of non-compliance. A series of subgroup analyses on the primary outcomes will be considered considering differences in the Impact of Event Scale–Intellectual Disabilities scores at 14 months for (1) differing levels of general intellectual functioning and (2) PTSD versus complex PTSD.

This clinical trial was designed to allow for conclusions about whether PES/EMDR+TAU is efficacious in reducing symptoms of PTSD, relative to TAU, for adults with intellectual disabilities. A favourable ethical opinion has been received from an NHS ethics committee in the UK. The findings from this trial will be published within peer-reviewed journals and shared at national and international conferences. We will also aim to record and distribute podcasts detailing our findings together with our partners.

ISRCTN35167485.

This study investigates how lean management (LM) practices align with and contribute to strategic objectives in healthcare using the congruence model as a conceptual framework.

This study employed a qualitative research design, integrating both inductive and deductive approaches. Data were collected from multiple hospital departments using primary and secondary sources. Primary data included semi-structured interviews, guided by a standardised interview protocol. Secondary data consisted of reports on courses of action, annual reports, policy documents and findings from exploratory meetings. The analysis involved iterative cycles of open coding, axial coding and selective coding to systematically identify and refine themes, supporting thematic analysis.

Six departments: Kidney and vascular surgery, Care core movement, Clinical department, Systemic diseases, Oncology, Care core Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary disease (HPB), which were part of one business unit within a tertiary care institution, a University Medical Centre in the Netherlands.

22 respondents aged 18 years or older were purposefully selected based on their organisational roles and LM experience. Respondents had to be involved in LM practices, which meant they had to understand LM and have passed at least one LM training programme, or they should be enrolled in a training course during the research.

Interviewees identified several barriers to LM implementation, including insufficient management support for a culture of continuous improvement, limited time for LM projects, inadequate recognition from management and poor communication of strategic objectives. Despite positive individual experiences with LM projects, their contribution to strategic objectives was deemed limited due to these barriers. Specific challenges included an experienced lack of leadership commitment, inadequate follow-up on projects, insufficient resource allocation, limited access to training and leaders failing to acknowledge employee value. Facilitators of success were fostering a culture of continuous improvement, committed managers and providing training.

LM practices have the potential to contribute to strategic objectives in healthcare organisations by reducing waste, improving patient care quality and optimising processes. However, their impact is constrained by organisational barriers and misalignments. Challenges such as insufficient resources, poor project follow-up, lack of management support and the absence of a continuous improvement culture minimise LM’s effectiveness.

Postictal agitation (PIA) is a common adverse effect following electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Current pharmacological treatments for PIA have undesirable side effects, and interventions to prevent PIA are unsatisfactory. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of peri-interventional music on PIA for patients undergoing ECT. Additionally, the study will assess the impact of music on pretreatment anxiety and post-treatment cognitive impairment.

This multicentre, open-label, parallel randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to include 92 patients from two centres in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Participants will be randomised into two groups: a music intervention group and a control group. The music group listens to recorded music 30 min before and 12 min after each of the first six ECT sessions of the full ECT course, while the control group will receive standard care. The primary outcome is the presence of PIA, measured using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Secondary outcomes include the severity and duration of PIA, pretreatment anxiety, recovery duration, peri-treatment medication requirements, cognitive impairment and depression severity. Data will be analysed according to an intention-to-treat principle.

This study protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethical Review Committee of the Erasmus Medical Centre on 28 January 2025 (MEC-2024–0467) and subsequently received local approval at Antes Parnassia group. The trial will be carried out following the Declaration of Helsinki principles. Study results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines.

NCT06817330.

To analyse demographic trends and decision-making patterns regarding prenatal diagnosis (PND) in couples at risk for hereditary haemoglobinopathies at the Thalassemia and Rare Haematological Disease Centre in Turin over a 40-year period.

Retrospective observational study analysing demographic and clinical data from 1983 to 2023.

Tertiary care genetic service Centre in Orbassano (TO), Northern Italy.

Couples seeking genetic counselling and PND for hereditary haemoglobinopathies. Selection criteria included couples at risk of having children affected by β-thalassaemia major or Sickle Cell Disease (SCD).

Primary outcomes included acceptance rates of PND and pregnancy termination (TOP). Variables analysed included couples’ age at first consultation, age at first PND, birthplace, employment status, specific haemoglobinopathy risk and number of pregnancies.

The analysis identified three main factors influencing PND and TOP decisions: nationality, type of haemoglobinopathy risk and number of previous pregnancies. Age showed no significant correlation with decision-making patterns. The impact of education level and employment status could not be definitively determined due to unavailable or unfit data.

The 40-year analysis of prenatal diagnosis for haemoglobinopathies in Turin shows evolving trends influenced by immigration patterns, improved medical treatments and cultural factors, leading to increased acceptance of affected pregnancies in recent years, particularly after 2015, due to better disease management and comprehensive healthcare support. This comprehensive analysis of our centre’s experience provides valuable insights that can serve as a model for similar institutions worldwide in supporting couples through carrier screening and PND processes.

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed operations in the paediatric population and can be performed according to two approaches: open or laparoscopic. At present, decisive evidence about the best treatment strategy is lacking and consequently, there is an ongoing debate about the most (cost-)effective treatment for the paediatric inguinal hernia. The aim of the Hernia Endoscopic oR opeN repair In chIldren Analysis—trial (HERNIIA2-trial) is to estimate the (cost-)effectiveness of the laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) technique compared with open repair in children aged 0–16 years with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

A national multicentre randomised controlled trial will be performed including 464 children aged 0–16 years with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Patients will be randomised between the open or PIRS technique. The primary outcome is the number of reoperations within 2 years after primary surgery. Secondary outcome measures are: operative and postoperative complications, total duration of surgery, postoperative pain, length of admission, time to normal daily activities, cosmetic appearance of the scar, social and healthcare costs and health-related quality of life. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness will be assessed from a societal and healthcare perspective.

The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Hospital. Informed consent will be obtained by parents and, if possible, according to age, by patient. The study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) and Good Clinical Practice. Study findings will be disseminated through scientific publications, conferences and patient-friendly materials. The national study network of participating centres will facilitate rapid dissemination and implementation within the Netherlands and potentially abroad.

ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (ID NCT06451432).

This study aimed to assess construct validity against commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), test–retest reliability and responsiveness of seven Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerised adaptive testing (CATs) in Dutch adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and assess their acceptability in healthcare providers and people with T2D.

A cross-sectional observational study in people with T2D and qualitative study involving both people with T2D and healthcare professionals.

Participants with T2D were recruited from the ongoing Hoorn Diabetes Care System cohort in the West-Friesland area of the Netherlands. Additionally, people with T2D and advanced chronic kidney disease were recruited at the outpatient clinics of Amsterdam University Medical Centre and ‘Niercentrum aan de Amstel’, both in the Amsterdam area of the Netherlands. The healthcare professionals involved in the qualitative part were recruited at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre.

314 people with T2D (age 64.0±10.8 years, 63.7% men).

Participants completed seven PROMIS CATs (assessing (1) Physical Function, (2) Pain Interference, (3) Fatigue, (4) Sleep Disturbance, (5) Anxiety, (6) Depression and (7) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities), and PROMs measuring similar constructs. After 2 weeks and 6 months, participants completed the CATs measures again, together with seven Global Rating Scales (GRS) on perceived change in each domain. Construct validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlations. Test–retest reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Measurement error was assessed by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Responsiveness was assessed by correlations between change scores on the PROMIS CAT and GRS. Acceptability was assessed through focus groups and interviews in healthcare providers and people with T2D.

Except for Fatigue, all PROMIS CAT domains demonstrated sufficient construct validity, since ≥75% of the results was in accordance with a priori hypotheses. All seven PROMIS CATs showed sufficient test–retest reliability (ICCs 0.73–0.91). SEM and MDC ranged from 2.1 to 2.7 and from 5.7 to 7.4, respectively. Responsiveness was rated as insufficient in this study design as there was almost no change in participants’ own rating of their health compared with 6 months ago according to a global rating of change.

During the focus groups and interviews, healthcare providers and people with T2D agreed that CATs could serve as a conversation starter in routine care, but should never replace personal consultations with a doctor. If implemented, participants would be willing to spend 15 min to complete the PROMIS CATs.

The PROMIS CATs showed sufficient construct validity and test–retest reliability in most domains in people with T2D. Responsiveness needs to be evaluated in a population with poorer diabetes control or in a study design with longer follow-up. The CATs are well accepted to be used in care to identify relevant topics, but should not replace personal contact with the doctor.

Dysphagia, or difficulty in swallowing, significantly impacts the quality of life of the affected individuals. Diagnostic approaches, including video fluoroscopic swallowing studies and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, are the most commonly used methods for assessing swallowing function. Recent advancements have led to the development of artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), which will provide innovative approaches to dysphagia diagnosis and treatment planning. There is a limited synthesis of literature on AI tools in dysphagia. There is an urgent need for a more rigorous and structured scoping review that can address the existing gaps, provide a more comprehensive evidence synthesis, and establish clearer guidelines for the clinical implementation of AI in assessments and management of dysphagia. This review will include studies focusing on AI tools such as ML, DL and computer vision for assessing and managing dysphagia. The context will be clinical or therapeutic settings, and all language articles will be considered for the review. Studies not involving AI technologies, those without clinical outcomes and ethical approval, and those focusing solely on the paediatric population will be excluded. This scoping review will systematically map and synthesise the existing literature on the use of AI tools for the assessment and management of dysphagia.

This scoping review will follow JBI methodology and PRISMA ScR guidelines. Information to be searched from January 2000 to May 2025 will include MEDLINE (via Ovid), Scopus, CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library, JBI Evidence Synthesis, ProQuest and Google Scholar. The titles, abstracts and full texts will be screened by two independent reviewers. Data extraction will use a study-specific customised form, with descriptive analysis employed to categorise studies by AI tools and outcomes.

Ethical approval is not mandatory for this scoping review as it does not entail the collection of any individual patient data. Secondary data from publicly accessible research papers will be used. All the data sources will be appropriately cited. The findings will be propagated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific presentations.

Open Science Framework: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/DYCE9.

Value-based healthcare (VBHC) strives to improve the healthcare system by focusing on value of care, that is, patient relevant outcomes relative to the costs for achieving these outcomes. Within VBHC, patient participation is crucial to identify patient relevant outcomes and value improvement potential. However, patient participation in VBHC initiatives remains limited. Therefore, we aimed to improve patient participation within VBHC teams with the ultimate aim to develop a practical guide for patient participation in VBHC.

An action research study.

This study was conducted in seven collaborating Dutch hospitals from March 2023 to November 2024.

Seven VBHC teams were selected to participate in the cyclical action research steps, that is, orientation, planning, implementation, and evaluation, in which patient participation was implemented or improved. These included the following patient groups: prostate cancer, vulnerable elderly, breast cancer, diabetes, maternity care, colorectal cancer and chronic kidney disease.

Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Qualitative data included observations and minutes of meetings with the intervention teams. Quantitative data included responses to the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) by multiple members of the intervention (n=7) and control teams (n=94) at three time points (T1=6 months, T2=12 months, T3=end of study). Qualitative data were thematically analysed and quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Finally, the data were triangulated to create an overview of lessons learnt in improving patient participation.

Patient participation goals varied across teams, leading to diverse actions, such as establishing a diabetes patient panel and distributing questionnaires to patients with colorectal cancer. PPEET results show that 71% of intervention team members reported that patient participation had an impact on the team’s outcomes compared with 44% in control teams (T3). Furthermore, 80% of the intervention team members initially wanted training in patient participation (T1), which dropped to 29% at T3. Overall, 22 lessons in improving patient participation in multidisciplinary project teams were identified and compiled into a practical guide.

The action research process improved the process and impact of patient participation in the intervention teams. Furthermore, the results indicate that the action research process enhanced the team members’ knowledge and skills on patient participation. The practical guide developed in this study can be used to support implementation of patient participation in VBHC.

Couples diagnosed with unexplained subfertility are advised to start mild ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination (MOH-IUI) as a primary treatment. Natural feedback mechanisms and hormone release are affected by artificially stimulated cycles and induced ovulation. Additional luteal support could positively affect progesterone patterns in the luteal phase. The LUMO study evaluates whether the addition of exogenous progesterone in the luteal phase following MOH-IUI treatment cycle will improve pregnancy and live birth rates.

A multicentre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial will be conducted in Dutch fertility clinics, academic and non-academic hospitals. There are two treatment arms: group A progesterone luteal phase support; group B placebo, without crossover. All initiated MOH-IUI cycles within 6 months after randomisation are included (study period). Participants will start study medication, applying a daily dosage of 2dd 300 mg progesterone (Utrogestan) or 2dd 300 mg placebo in vaginal capsules on the second day after the IUI procedure. Treatment is continued until the onset of menstruation, a negative pregnancy test (IUI+14 days), a miscarriage or until 7 weeks of gestation in case of a viable pregnancy. Follow-up ends at 12 months after the end of study period (18 months after study randomisation). The primary outcome is cumulative pregnancy rate, achieved within 6 months after randomisation, leading to live birth. A total of 1008 patients (504 patients in each group) will be included.

The study was approved by the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects on 30 January 2023. All participating sites have the approval of the local Board of Directors to participate in the LUMO study. An informed consent form will be signed by all participants. Study results will be presented at (inter)national conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. It is expected that the results of this trial will be used to draft national guidelines on this issue.

The study is registered in the EU CTIS trial register (2022-501534-33-00), the Dutch trial registry (registration number: LTR 24508), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05080569) and the WHO registry (universal trial number: U1111-1280-9461).