Conectar
Countries face challenges in maternal and newborn care (MNC) regarding costs, workforce and sustainability. Organising integrated care is increasingly seen as a way to address these challenges. The evidence on the optimal organisation of integrated MNC in order to improve outcomes is limited.
(1) To study associations between organisational elements of integrated care and maternal and neonatal health outcomes, experiences of women and professionals, healthcare costs and care processes and (2) to examine how the different dimensions of integrated care, as defined by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, are reflected in the literature addressing these organisational elements.
We included 288 papers and identified 23 organisational elements, grouped into 6 categories: personal continuity of care; interventions to improve interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination; care by a midwife; alternative payment models (non-fee-for-service); place of birth outside the obstetric unit and woman-centred care. Personal continuity, care by a midwife and births outside obstetric units were most consistently associated with improved maternal and newborn outcomes, positive experiences for women and professionals and potential cost savings, particularly where well-coordinated multidisciplinary care was established. Positive professional experiences of collaboration depended on clear roles, mutual trust and respectful interdisciplinary behaviour. Evidence on collaboration interventions and alternative payment models was inconclusive. Most studies emphasised clinical and professional aspects rather than organisational integration, with implementation barriers linked to prevailing biomedical system orientations.
Although the literature provides substantial evidence of organisational elements that contribute to improved outcomes, a significant gap remains in understanding how to overcome the barriers in sustainable implementation of these elements within healthcare systems. Interpreted through a systems and transition science lens, these findings suggest that strengthening integrated maternity care requires system-level changes aligning with WHO policy directions towards midwifery models of person-centred care.
by Lian Trapman, Lea M Dijksman, Jan C. Grutters, Saskia C.C.M. Teunissen, Everlien de Graaf
BackgroundProgressive pulmonary fibrosis is a lethal disease with a survival of 3–5 years with optimal medication treatment. Palliative care and advance care planning are therefore receiving increasing attention in the literature. However, structural implementation in clinical practice is still lacking. The aim of this study was to explore the needs, facilitators, and barriers for communication on the topic of end-of-life preferences of patients from the perspective of healthcare professionals.
MethodsA generic qualitative study was performed with focus groups and individual semi structured interviews with healthcare professionals. Data collection and analysis were performed iteratively. A thematic analysis was performed, following the methods of Braun and Clarke.
ResultsThree focus groups and seven individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. Three themes were generated: (1) a lack of vision on palliative care, resulting in different approaches within the same clinic and showing the need for optimization of collaboration; (2) the importance of a learning-driven environment to support healthcare professionals skills and knowledge; and (3), the central role of the individual professional in developing skills and knowledge.
Conclusions/discussionThis study underscores the importance of behavioral and organizational change in palliative care to optimize conversations exploring values, preferences, and needs for end-of-life care for patients with pulmonary fibrosis. Leveraging the shared motivation of healthcare professionals to provide optimal care, integrating these findings into training and coaching programs can further enhance patient-centered approach in palliative care.
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed operations in the paediatric population and can be performed according to two approaches: open or laparoscopic. At present, decisive evidence about the best treatment strategy is lacking and consequently, there is an ongoing debate about the most (cost-)effective treatment for the paediatric inguinal hernia. The aim of the Hernia Endoscopic oR opeN repair In chIldren Analysis—trial (HERNIIA2-trial) is to estimate the (cost-)effectiveness of the laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) technique compared with open repair in children aged 0–16 years with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia.
A national multicentre randomised controlled trial will be performed including 464 children aged 0–16 years with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Patients will be randomised between the open or PIRS technique. The primary outcome is the number of reoperations within 2 years after primary surgery. Secondary outcome measures are: operative and postoperative complications, total duration of surgery, postoperative pain, length of admission, time to normal daily activities, cosmetic appearance of the scar, social and healthcare costs and health-related quality of life. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness will be assessed from a societal and healthcare perspective.
The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Hospital. Informed consent will be obtained by parents and, if possible, according to age, by patient. The study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) and Good Clinical Practice. Study findings will be disseminated through scientific publications, conferences and patient-friendly materials. The national study network of participating centres will facilitate rapid dissemination and implementation within the Netherlands and potentially abroad.
ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (ID NCT06451432).
FreshRSS 