Loneliness and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) constitute significant risk factors for mental disorders, with loneliness emerging as a serious global public health concern. Recent research highlights the role of loneliness as a potential link between early life adversities and current psychopathology. However, most studies have been conducted in high-income, highly individualistic countries. This cross-sectional study explores the interplay between loneliness, social network size, recalled ACEs and depressive symptoms in Ethiopia—a low-income and collectivistic cultural context.

The study included 125 psychiatric outpatients at Jimma University Medical Center in Southwest Ethiopia diagnosed with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder or psychotic disorders, as well as 131 non-clinical participants. Trained interviewers administered the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, the Social Network Index and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. We used Mann-Whitney U tests, partial correlation and mediation analysis for data analysis.

We found mild-to-moderate correlations between loneliness and ACEs (clinical group: rho=0.29, p1b₁=0.07, 95% CI (0.02 to 0.13); non-clinical group: indirect effect a₁b₁=0.03, 95% CI (0.01 to 0.07)). In contrast, social network size was neither correlated with ACEs nor did it mediate the association between ACEs and depressive symptoms in either group.

This study replicates previous findings that loneliness—rather than social network size—is associated with ACEs and mediates their impact on depressive symptoms. These results support the transcultural and transdiagnostic relevance of loneliness as a universal psychological mechanism, independent of societal structure.

Complexity leads to some dystonias being considered as rare diseases with scarce synthesised evidence. Despite the deficit of scientific evidence, deep brain stimulation (DBS) is currently an effective treatment for dystonias using different brain targets, providing significant improvement of dystonic symptoms regardless of their cause. However, there is considerable variability and non-response rate due to factors such as classification, semiology, duration, aetiology and genetic cause of the disease. This protocol presents the methodology of a planned systematic review to assess the efficacy of DBS as a treatment for monogenic dystonia symptoms, a broad spectrum of pathogenic dystonias due to variants in single genes not yet explored.

This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. With the aim to test the efficacy of DBS in monogenic dystonias, the research question in population, intervention, comparator and outcomes format will cover patients with monogenic dystonia treated with DBS with a minimum of 3 months' follow-up after surgery. The outcomes will be assessed using generic and specific scales to measure the efficacy and safety of the intervention. The search will be performed in generic and specific databases and bibliographic resources from 2000. We will include systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials and primary studies in English. In this protocol, the initial search strategy in MEDLINE is presented. Additionally, the protocol provides a description of the prospective assessment of the risk of bias in the selected studies. If studies appear homogeneous and the sample of patients is sufficiently large, a meta-analysis and a subgroup analysis are planned.

Ethics committee approval is not required. The results of the review will be published through an open access journal.