Conectar
Older adults transitioning to nursing homes face challenges in adapting to a new environment and imposed lifestyle changes. This study aimed to identify factors associated with poor nursing home adjustment and to assess their impact on 1-year mortality.
This study is a secondary analysis of the KArukera Study of Ageing in ‘Établissement d'Hébergement pour Personnes Agées Dépendantes’ (EHPAD) (KASEHPAD) cohort, a prospective observational study conducted over 1 year in six nursing homes in the French Caribbean.
159 older adults (aged 60 years or older) living in nursing homes who were able to complete the self-administered adaptation scale.
Nursing home adjustment was assessed at baseline using the adaptation scale for older adults to their residence (EAPAR). Bivariate analysis was used to assess associations between adjustment status and sociodemographic or clinical characteristics at baseline. Poisson regressions were used to assess the relationship between 1-year mortality and adjustment status.
A total of 159 older adults (mean age: 79.6 years; male/female ratio: 84/75) were included. The mean length of stay was 4.1 years. Among older adults, 78 (49.1%) were classified as poorly adapted. Age, gender, education level, dependency, cognition and comorbidities were not significantly associated with poor adjustment. In contrast, depressive symptoms, lower social support, lower health-related quality of life, lower subjective quality of life, malnutrition and sleep disturbances were associated with poor adjustment. After 12 months, 14 deaths (17.9%) occurred in the poor adjustment group, compared with 4 (4.9%) in the no major adjustment difficulties group (adjusted relative risk for age, gender and baseline activities of daily living score=4.64 (95% CI 1.53 to 17.5; p=0011).
In a sample of older adults with moderate cognitive impairment, poor adjustment to nursing home was associated with depressive symptomatology and increased 1-year mortality. The issue of adjustment in nursing homes represents an emerging research area that warrants further investigation through dedicated interventional studies.
Military personnel are a unique population with heightened vulnerability to sexually transmitted infections (STIs), often exhibiting higher prevalence rates than civilians due to demographic, environmental and occupational factors. These vulnerabilities underscore the need for global prevalence estimates to guide effective, evidence-based interventions. This study aims to quantify the global burden of STIs among military personnel, providing a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment.
This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Guidelines (2020). Using the CoCoPop (Condition, Context, and Population) framework, a comprehensive search strategy will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health and Scopus to retrieve peer-reviewed records published between January 2010 and June 2025. Eligible studies will report numerical STI prevalence data among military personnel. Studies with insufficient information to calculate prevalence or those relying on self-reported STI data will be excluded. Data extraction will include study details, military descriptors, STI prevalence and diagnostic methods. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical assessment tool for prevalence and incidence studies. Prevalence estimates with 95% CIs will be reported for each STI and, where appropriate, pooled for curable STIs. Subgroup analyses will stratify prevalence by geographic region, service status, deployment status and socioeconomic factors. Heterogeneity will be evaluated within predefined subgroups using the I² statistic. Data will be presented in comprehensive tables and visualised with graphical tools, including forest plots for subgroup analyses and pooled estimates.
Ethical approval is not required for this review. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
CRD42023472113.
Cardiac surgical procedures are associated with a high incidence of postoperative infection, a risk attributed to their inherently invasive nature and extended duration. The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) compared with standard dressings in preventing sternal scar dehiscence in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via complete vertical midline sternotomy, comparing a 3 day change system (NPWT 3/7 d) versus a 7 day wear system (NPWT 7d) versus standard dressings.
The PRISTER study is a prospective open-label multicentre, randomised, controlled, three-arm trial. Patients aged ≥18 years and meeting all the following inclusion criteria: patients undergoing scheduled or semiurgent cardiac surgery, with or without extracorporeal circulation, and patients managed by complete vertical median sternotomy will be recruited. Total sample size will consist of 660 patients. The primary outcome, surgical wound dehiscence after complete median sternotomy, expressed as occurrence or non-occurrence during the first 30 postoperative days, will be assessed by tablet calibrated photos analysed by an independent blinded staff. The secondary outcomes will be the number of dressing repairs between D7 (excluding initial protocol) and D90, length of initial hospital stay, occurrence of surgical site infection and its classification collected on day 90 (D90), use of an anti-infectious treatment and its duration, incidence of postoperative mediastinitis defined by dehiscence of the sternum with positive sternal samples, incidence of surgical revision for dehiscence of the surgical wound at D90 and collection of all operations involving surgical revision of the sternotomy wound, number of rehospitalisations (including hospital consultations) and their duration (evaluated at D90). Medicoeconomic assessment will be assessed by evaluation of hospital and extrahospital costs (number of days in hospital, consultations, rehospitalisations, imaging, biology and drugs), dressing costs and patient quality of life by EQ-5D-5L.
The study was approved by the French Agency for the Safety of Health Products (ANSM, Agence National de Sécurité du Médicament) as well as by the Ethics Committee (CPP Ile de France VIII) N°ID-RCB: 2023-A01782-43. Recruitment began in April 2024 and ended on 26 May 2025.
clinicaltrials.gov NCT06207630.
To explore Australian and New Zealand nursing and midwifery educators' planetary health knowledge, views, confidence and teaching practices.
A cross-sectional survey design.
An online survey was sent to Australian and New Zealand nursing and midwifery educators across the 45 Schools of Nursing and Midwifery between July and September 2023. The online survey consisted of 29 open- and closed-ended questions about nursing and midwifery educators' planetary health knowledge, views, confidence and teaching practices.
There was a total of 127 responses to the first open-ended question. A total of 97 nursing and midwifery educators then completed the remaining questions. While educators had mostly positive views about integrating planetary health into their teaching, they lacked the knowledge and/or confidence to do so effectively.
Australian and New Zealand nursing and midwifery educators acknowledge that planetary health should be included in nursing and midwifery curricula, but most reported a deficit in knowledge and/or confidence to integrate these complex concepts into their teaching. When considering planetary health, most educators focussed on climate change, which demonstrates their limited understanding of the concept of planetary health.
All nurses and midwives need to understand how the health of the planet and human civilization are interconnected and be prepared to address complex global health challenges now and in the future. Across the world, key healthcare organizations have called upon nursing and midwifery educators to prepare the healthcare workforce to practice in a more sustainable way, including supporting decarbonization of healthcare. However, our study has demonstrated that nursing and midwifery educators do not feel ready to respond due to a lack of required knowledge and/or confidence.
We used the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).
No patient or public contribution.
To achieve consensus on the knowledge and skills that undergraduate/pre-licensure nursing students require to steward healthcare towards a more sustainable future.
A two-phase real-time Delphi study.
Phase 1 included the generation of Planetary Health, climate change and sustainability knowledge and skill statements based on a review of relevant literature. Phase 2 consisted of a real-time Delphi survey designed to seek consensus on the proposed statements from a panel of 42 international experts.
Of the 49 survey statements, 44 (90%) achieved ≥75% consensus and 26 (53%) achieved ≥80% consensus. Three were removed and 32 were modified to improve clarity of language.
The knowledge and skills statements that emerged through this Delphi study can serve as a guide for incorporating Planetary Health, climate change and sustainability into nursing education programs.
Incorporating Planetary Health and climate change education into nursing programs has the potential to produce more environmentally conscious and socially responsible nurses.
The absence of consensus on the essential knowledge and skills expected of nursing students has hindered the advancement of curricula and impacted educators' confidence in teaching Planetary Health and climate change. This study has resulted in a meticulously crafted framework of knowledge and skill statements that will be beneficial to educators, the future nursing workforce, and, ultimately, the individuals and communities whom nurses serve.
This paper adheres to the Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) reporting guideline.
No patient or public contribution.
Depressive symptoms are common in the growing geriatric surgical population and are associated with important patient-centred surgical outcomes, including postoperative delirium, discharge to postacute care facility and decline in functional status. Few interventions have been developed to address depressive symptoms in the perioperative setting.
We designed a feasibility and acceptability study of a nine-session problem-solving therapy (PST) telehealth perioperative intervention aimed at reducing postoperative functional decline and depressive symptoms among at-risk older adults undergoing major surgical procedures. Acceptability will be evaluated using a patient-centred five-question survey, assessing participant satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the perioperative intervention. A feasibility assessment will rely on objective measures including ease of participant recruitment, frequency and timing of delivery of intervention sessions and retention of participants throughout the duration of the intervention. With respect to the efficacy of the proposed PST intervention, the primary outcome of interest is postoperative functional status, as measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 at the 6-month postoperative time point. The secondary outcome of interest is the degree of depressive symptoms as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 at both 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. The broader goals of this study include: (1) assessing the feasibility of implementing a PST perioperative intervention for older surgical patients at risk of postoperative functional decline, (2) demonstrating the acceptability of the PST intervention and (3) assessing the preliminary impact of the PST intervention on postoperative functional status and depressive symptoms.
The study received ethical approval from the University of California San Francisco Institutional Review Board. Results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals with further dissemination at local institutional meetings and professional conferences.
by Ugo Picciotti, Giuseppe Francesco Racaniello, Marianna Ivone, Pasquale Trotti, Angela Assunta Lopedota, Paolo Damiani, Francesca Garganese, Nunzio Denora, Francesco Porcelli
Predation on Aphrophoridae and other olive tree pests makes Zelus renardii a candidate for biocontrol actions to limit Xylella fastidiosa infections while mitigating other olive tree pests. The opportunity drives the search for an effective mass rearing method of Z. renardii. Predator rearing on artificial diets greatly benefits from feed-effective formulation, preparation, storage, preservation, and delivery. Given the several oligidic, meridic, and holidic available formulations, we face the challenge of a proper diet processing for delivery. To understand how to obtain a large number of preservable and sterile diet portions while avoiding microbial contamination, we explore prilling/vibration techniques to rear Z. renardii. Prilling or vibrating the diets yields multicore microbeads or monocore microcapsules; water domains exist, whose arrangements are well-documented by the cryo-SEM study and represented in corresponding false-color images. Issues include the density interplay between low- or high-density alginate and the liquid diet formulation during prilling/vibration. Other options relate to alginate stickiness or consistency, which makes it difficult to disperse the diet domains in the microbeads or to obtain a single diet domain per microcapsule because of unpredictable wall thickness and core lateralization. We suggest options to make microbeads and microcapsule portions available for up to one year for predators, stored in cold, pure water.To meet the elevated nutritional requirements of very low birthweight (
This is a three-arm, pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, randomised clinical trial of 615 human milk–fed infants born either (1) ≤1250 g or (2)
Ethical approval was obtained from Clinical Trials Ontario (CTO) and local research ethics boards that are not CTO members. Study findings will be disseminated to clinicians at seminars and conferences and in peer-reviewed publications.
Emergency departments (EDs) suffer from crowding due to patients with low urgency whose treatment is often inappropriate in many cases. Crowding in the ED may indicate inefficiencies in the primary care infrastructure. According to the literature, it is associated with individual and system-related factors, such as younger age, convenience of visiting the ED and a negative perception of care outside the hospital. However, patients’ motives driving decision-making for non-urgent visits to the ED in this post-pandemic period require further exploration. Therefore, this study aims to describe the proportion of potentially avoidable, non-urgent ED visits and to explore the associations between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, patients’ motives, and potentially avoidable, non-urgent visits to the ED.
This multicentre cross-sectional study will be conducted in the ED of seven public hospitals in the South Tyrolean Health Service in the northern Italian Province of Bolzano-Bozen. A consecutive sample of 1000 adult patients (≥18 years) with clinical conditions that are triaged as ‘non-urgent’ (ie, Manchester Triage System priority level ‘blue’ or ‘green’) and consent to participate in the study will be included. Data will be collected in each ED over two full working weeks (24 hours, weekdays and weekends) between 1 September 2024 and 30 November 2024. For each patient, triage nurses and medical doctors will fill out a data collection sheet, including the triage code, diagnosis at discharge and avoidability of the ED visit. Patients will be surveyed using a structured questionnaire with standardised instruments (eg, the Patient Activation Measure and Mental Health Inventory) and self-developed items (eg, motives for ED visits and previous use of community care services). Data analysis will involve descriptive and inferential analyses (ie, 2 tests) to determine group differences. Multivariate multilevel modelling will be applied to explore the associations between individual, system and cultural factors and potentially avoidable, non-urgent visits.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the South Tyrolean Health Service (Nr. 41-2024). The results will be published in relevant scientific journals and communicated to the public and relevant institutions through dissemination activities, including press releases and stakeholder meetings. The findings will inform recommendations aimed at refining health policies and optimising access to primary and emergency care services.
ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN17355506).
The Validating Outcomes by Including Consumer Experience (VOICE) project is developing patient reported experience measure (PREM) tools to collect consumer feedback for Indigenous primary healthcare (IPHC) services’ accreditation and quality improvement processes. This study aimed to explore the views of health service staff about: (1) optimising the feasibility of collection, analysis and interpretation of findings; and (2) resourcing requirements for implementation of the PREM.
A participatory action research qualitative study design, guided by an Indigenous advisory group. Our team of Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers conducted semistructured focus groups and individual interviews with IPHC staff. Focus groups and interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Multiple sense-making meetings were conducted with the Indigenous advisory group.
Eight partner IPHC services across four Australian states and territories.
All staff were eligible and invited to participate in the study via purposive and snowball sampling. Administrative staff (eg, receptionist, programme facilitator), clinicians/practitioners (eg, general practitioner, nurse, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers and practitioners) and service managers (eg, CEO, practice manager) from partner health services participated.
63 staff participated; 44 attended across 13 focus groups, with the remainder participating in individual interviews. The majority of participants were between 35 years and 55 years old (52%), female (66%) and working in frontline IPHC service delivery roles (56%). Equal numbers identified as Indigenous (50%) and non-Indigenous (50%). Many had worked in the Indigenous health and well-being sector for over 10 years (40%). ‘Culturally safe care’ and ‘accountability’ were identified as primary themes and key reasons for gathering consumer feedback. Subthemes identified were ‘Relationships’, ‘trust and respect’, ‘communication about consumer feedback’, ‘timing and frequency of requesting consumer feedback’, ‘health service systems’, ‘health service and staff capacity’, ‘staff skills’ and ‘structure and administration of the PREM’. All themes and subthemes need to be considered for the successful design and implementation of PREMs in IPHC settings.
Many of the issues identified are not currently considered in the process of collecting PREM data for accreditation yet, if addressed, would likely improve the quality and relevance of data collected. The findings from this study will inform the co-design and validation of Indigenous-specific PREM tools to collect consumer feedback. Critically, service and community input will ensure the PREM tools meet service needs for continuous quality improvement and accreditation and reflect the priorities and values of Indigenous peoples.
This study aimed to explore the direct and indirect effects of secondary traumatic stress (STS) on nurses' perceived work ability and the effect of these two variables on job satisfaction, organisational turnover intention and intention to leave the nursing profession.
A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to November 2023.
Data were collected by sending an online survey to a convenience sample of nurses. Instruments for data collection included a 37-item questionnaire divided into three sections: (i) socio-demographics, job satisfaction, organisational turnover intention, and intention to leave the profession; (ii) perceived work ability assessed through the Work Ability Index (WAI); (iii) STS measured with the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale.
Two hundred seventy-one nurses completed the questionnaire. STS negatively and statistically impacted on WAI, and it was a direct determinant of intention to leave the nursing profession. WAI showed a direct, positive and significant impact on job satisfaction and it was a significant partial mediator in the relationship between STS and job satisfaction. Job satisfaction mediated between WAI, the intention to leave the nursing profession, and the organisational turnover intention.
STS negatively impacted nurses' work ability, influencing their job satisfaction through the mediation of WAI, whereas job satisfaction independently affected nurses' organisational turnover intention. Moreover, STS was a positive and direct determinant of the intention to leave the nursing profession.
Nurses, as helping professionals, are exposed to extreme stressful events resulting from the traumatic experiences of patients. STS in nurses can lead to emotional exhaustion, turnover intention, job dissatisfaction and reduced work ability. The findings from this study offer insights that can help shape organisational health policies aimed at reducing STS, preserving nurses' work ability, enhancing job satisfaction and mitigating turnover intentions within and outside the nursing profession.
This study followed the STROBE checklist guidelines for cross-sectional studies.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
We evaluated the performance of risk models that incorporate ambulatory ECG data and clinical information for prediction of healthcare expenditures related to heart failure (HF) and stroke events in treated and untreated patients.
A retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients who underwent Zio XT ambulatory monitoring in the USA was conducted between 2014 and 2020.
14-day ambulatory ECG data and claims data were evaluated in the study sample which included 89 923 patients in the HF hospitalisation group, 75 870 in the new-onset HF group and 90 159 in the stroke hospitalisation group. Predictive models for new-onset HF, HF hospitalisation and stroke hospitalisation were generated using LASSO Cox regression with ambulatory ECG variables and components of the CHA2DS2-VASc. For each outcome, we scored patients using standardised linear predictors from three composite risk models, and we evaluated the association between risk score and total Medicare cost.
The following hazard ratios per one SD increase in the new risk score were observed for the model that included all CHA2DS2-VASc components and ECG variables: HF hospitalisation in treated 2.94, 95% CI 2.75 to 3.15; new-onset HF in treated 1.84, 95% CI 1.75 to 1.93; HF hospitalisation in untreated 3.51, 95% CI 3.23 to 3.82; and new-onset HF in untreated 1.92, 95% CI 1.85 to 2.00. Risk scores generated by the model were also predictive of Medicare cost in both treated and untreated patients, with patients in the high-risk category for all outcomes having the greatest Medicare costs during 1 year of follow-up.
Integrating arrhythmia data from ambulatory ECG monitoring into clinical risk models allows for better prediction of healthcare utilisation and cost in both treated and untreated patients at high risk for HF and stroke events.
by Adedapo Olufemi Bashorun, Larry Kotei, Abdoulie F. Jallow, Ousubie Jawla, Emmanuel U. Richard-Ugwuadu, Muhammed Jagana, Lamin Bah, Amadou Tijan Bah, Karamo Conteh, Mamadou S.K. Jallow, Mehrab Karim, Bai Lamin Dondeh, Anne Segonds-Pichon, Gary M. Clifford, Iacopo Baussano, Bruno Pichon, David Jeffries, Ed Clarke
Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a primary cause of preventable deaths from cervical cancer, a condition of profound inequality with approximately 90% of deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. In May 2018, the WHO Director-General declared a Joint Global Commitment to Cervical Cancer Elimination, highlighting the critical role of HPV vaccines in achieving this goal. However, there is a lack of systemically collected data on HPV prevalence in The Gambia, and impact data from high-income countries may not be reliably extrapolated to West African settings due to geographical variation in HPV types and distinct behavioural, biological, and sociodemographic exposures. The Gambia introduced a two-dose HPV vaccination schedule in 2019, but coverage has been very low, interrupted mainly by the COVID-19 pandemic. This presents a key opportunity to generate vital baseline data on HPV prevalence in the population before potential scale-up of vaccination efforts. The PHASE survey, a multi-stage cluster survey, aims to establish the baseline, population prevalence estimates of high-risk and low-risk, vaccine-type and non-vaccine-type HPV infection in 15- to 49-year-old females in The Gambia by measuring urinary HPV-DNA. The survey will also quantify the effects of various exposures on HPV prevalence, including sexual behaviour, the presence of other sexually-transmitted infections (STIs) - Neisseria gonorrhoea (NG), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Trichomonas vaginalis (TV), Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), syphilis, as well as blood borne viruses, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and hepatitis C; obstetric history, socio-demographic characteristics, and cervical cancer screening and/or treatment. Additionally, the study will provide important antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data for NG and MG in sub-Saharan Africa, a region poorly represented in global surveillance programs. This data is needed to guide regional treatment guidelines and advocate for new solutions, including gonococcal vaccines. The AMR data are expected to immediately influence recommendations regarding the appropriate choice of antibiotics for syndromic STI management in West Africa and hence to address an important driver of AMR in the sub-region. Leveraging on the Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia funded Health Demographic Surveillance system (HDSS) as its sampling frame, the survey will utilize validated diagnostic assays and culturally sensitive data collection methods, to ensure both scientific rigor and local relevance. Tools such as Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing (ACASI) technology, developed in consultation with local community advisory boards, are included to reduce social desirability bias in reporting sexual behaviour. This approach aims to maximize both the reliability and cultural appropriateness of the findings. This study directly addresses the critical need for baseline epidemiological data on HPV in a West African setting to accelerate vaccine impact and drive new interventions towards cervical cancer elimination. By understanding other factors that influence HPV (like other STIs, sexual behaviour, etc.), the study aims to ensure that, when the vaccine’s impact is measured later, changes in other confounding factors that may impact on HPV prevalence can be accounted for. The study will also establish the population prevalence of the measured STIs and their relationship to common symptoms and other adverse health outcomes related to STIs.Children with limited access to dental care can be negatively impacted by reduced frequency of oral health monitoring, delays in diagnosis of dental disease and increased waits for dental care, resulting in them experiencing more disease (extent and amount). Smartphone-based intraoral photography has been cited as having the potential to improve oral health monitoring for children through screening; however, it has not been well evaluated, and its limitations are unclear. The picture-perfect study aims to assess diagnostic accuracy, feasibility and acceptability to determine whether remote photographic monitoring can be effectively integrated into pathways of dental care for children aged 6-16 years.
Observational, cross-sectional, mixed-methods study with three workflows: Workflow 1: development of user-friendly, comprehensive guidance to help parent/carers (parents) take high-quality intraoral photographs of their children’s mouths. The guidance will be codesigned with parents and healthcare professionals. Workflow 2: diagnostic accuracy using intraoral photographs taken by a parent of their children will be evaluated by comparing clinicians' diagnoses from the photographs to gold-standard clinical visual-tactile examinations. Parent–child dyads (n=110) will be recruited to capture intraoral photographs using positioning aids, guidance and smartphones provided by the research team. The diagnoses will focus on plaque accumulation, gingival health, restoration status and dental caries. Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve. Workflow 3: assessment of feasibility and acceptability will be through task completion rates, photograph quality and participant feedback. Qualitative interviews and an online survey will capture parents’ and children’s experiences. Observational data will provide insights into practical challenges.
This study, approved by the National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee (Integrated Research Application System [IRAS]: 24/EE0137), will be conducted in adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participating parents, with age-appropriate assent from children prior to enrolment. Participants have the right to withdraw at any time without explanation, and their data will be anonymised to ensure privacy and confidentiality. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and reports to relevant stakeholders.
The study protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WX29D.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living with disability have unequal access to health and disability support services. The impacts of colonialism and the deficit-based, Western medical model of disability have been identified as barriers to services in remote Aboriginal communities. This study explored different perceptions of disability and identified strategies to help bridge the gap between Aboriginal community members in the Fitzroy Valley and Western health and disability support services.
Aboriginal Participatory Action Research approach with in-depth interviews. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Preliminary results were presented to community representatives for contextualisation, validation and to co-design recommendations.
Fitzroy Valley in the Kimberley region, Western Australia.
Aboriginal community members with lived experience of disability (n=7) and health and disability support service providers (n=12).
Eight themes were identified: (1) Aboriginal kinship systems are a community strength and support for people living with disability; (2) Aboriginal people from the Fitzroy Valley perceive disability as a social construct; (3) Western medical model of disability differs from Aboriginal perceptions of disability; (4) Aboriginal people from the Fitzroy Valley perceive different types of disabilities in various ways; (5) good awareness of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder in the Fitzroy Valley, but more education is wanted; (6) focus on functional needs and supports for disability; (7) barriers to disability services and (8) decolonise disability services. Community co-designed recommendations focus on centring the Aboriginal worldviews of disability in the Fitzroy Valley.
Decolonising disability services is needed to improve access for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. This should involve adapting the current Western medical model of services to enable strengths-based diagnostic and support services that align with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander kinship systems, cultures and ways of being. Community leadership must play a central role in this shift.
High quality handover is critical for patient safety and care continuity. Existing practice is based on a weak evidence base in which the patient voice is poorly captured. The aim of this study was to identify outcomes of importance to patients, families and carers regarding interventions to improve in-hospital handover between healthcare practitioners.
A rapid systematic review of qualitative literature was carried out after prospective registration with PROSPERO and was reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research guidelines.
The Ovid MEDLINE database was searched.
Qualitative or mixed-methods studies reporting patient, family or caregiver perspectives on in-hospital handovers were eligible for inclusion.
Synthesis was informed by the best-fit framework approach using a published taxonomy of handover-related outcomes and the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy. Outcomes were reported according to two distinct types of handover: bedside (patient-involved) and provider-focused (patient-uninvolved).
A total of 34 studies, including 1262 participants across a range of specialties and predominantly high-income settings, were analysed. 53 bedside and 31 provider-focused handover outcomes were identified according to four domains; adverse events, quality of patient care, quality of handover and patient/caregiver satisfaction. Bedside handover studies frequently reported outcomes relating to patient engagement and communication with healthcare staff. One study was carried out in a low income country; however, outcomes identified were broadly similar.
These findings expand the known outcomes for evaluating handover interventions and highlight the importance of prioritising the patient and public perspective in research. This work will contribute to developing a core outcome set for trials in surgical handover but can also be applied to handover practices for any other discipline within the hospital environment.
CRD42023493367.
The Surrey Communication and Language in Education Study (SCALES) cohort was established to estimate prevalence, persistence and impact of developmental language disorders on cognition and mental health, using newly established international consensus diagnostic criteria.
A population sample of 7267 children aged 4–5 years (59% of eligible children), who started state-maintained school in Surrey, England in 2011–2012 for whom teacher-rated screening data on language, behaviour and early learning goals were available. A subsample of monolingual children enriched for language difficulties completed intensive assessments in year 1 (age 5–6, n=529), year 3 (age 7–8, n=499), year 6 (age 10–11, n=384) and year 8 (age 12–13, n=246). Screening data for 7013 children has been linked to the UK Department of Education National Pupil Database data on special educational needs provision and academic progress.
Language disorders are more prevalent than other neurodevelopmental conditions (such as autism) and more common in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage. Language is a highly stable trait. Language status at school entry is therefore strongly predictive of long-term education progress, the need for specialist support, general cognitive abilities and increased risk for poor mental health, through its effects on social and emotional development.
The SCALES cohort will leave compulsory education in 2025 and we are planning to track academic qualifications and post-18 destinations. SCALES data are publicly available via the UK Data Service: DOI: 10.5255/UKDA-SN-8967-1 and DOI:
Vaccine hesitancy remains a critical public health challenge, especially in high-income countries. Gender differences in vaccine hesitancy can significantly affect vaccination rates and public health outcomes. The aim of this research is performing an umbrella review and meta-analysis to systematically investigate gender disparities in vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19 in high-income countries, as well as the quality, potential biases and dependability of epidemiological evidence.
The study will systematically search, extract and analyse data from reported systematic reviews and meta-analyses that focus specifically on gender differences in vaccine hesitancy. The search will include CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Epistemonikos for studies published from 2019 onward. The inclusion criteria will encompass systematic reviews and meta-analyses of non-interventional studies conducted in high-income countries. The identified factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy will be categorised based on demographic, psychological, social and economic dimensions. The methodological quality of the included meta-analyses will be assessed using the "Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses" tool.
Ethical approval is not required for this umbrella review. These results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
CRD42024572978.
FreshRSS 