Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are effective interventions to support patient involvement in health decisions and have the potential to impact favourably on health inequities by reducing gender bias in clinical practice. The aim was to explore sex and gender reporting and differences in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PtDAs for adults making treatment or screening decisions.

Secondary analysis of the Cochrane review of PtDAs of RCTs that reported sex and/or gender. The original review searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and EBSCO from journal inception to March 2022. Two team members independently screened citations, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. For this secondary analysis, we only included primary outcomes from the original review. We assessed appropriate use of terminology for sex (biological attribute) and gender (social construct). When terms were used interchangeably, it was considered inaccurate. Findings were synthesised descriptively, and we used meta-analysis when two or more RCTs were conducted with females/women or males/men using similar outcome measures.

Informed values-choice congruence and the quality of the decision-making process (eg, knowledge, accurate risk perceptions, feeling informed, clear values, participation in decision making, undecided) and adverse events (eg, decision regret, emotional distress) by sex and gender.

Of 209 RCTs in the original review, 206 reported sex and/or gender, with 35 (17%) using accurate terminology. Of 206 RCTs, 70 were with females/women only, 27 males/men only, 12 analysed by sex/gender and 97 RCTs did not disaggregate findings by sex or gender. Meta-analysis comparing RCTs for females/women to usual care and RCTs for males/men only compared with usual care showed similar mean differences in knowledge scores (10.84 vs 9.38 out of 100; p=0.44). Males/men had significantly higher self-reported participation in decision making compared with females/women (RR 3.16 vs 0.95; p

In PtDA RCTs, sex and gender terms are used interchangeably and 6% analysed outcomes by sex or gender. Meta-analysis of males/men only given PtDAs showed higher self-reported decision making participation in clinical practice compared to usual care versus females/women only compared with usual care. Researchers must improve reporting sex and gender in PtDA RCTs to assess how it influences health inequities.

Childhood overweight and obesity pose a growing public health problem with increasing prevalence both in Europe and globally. Reasons can be found in behavioural factors such as a sedentary lifestyle, eating habits or low exercise levels and to a lesser extent in a genetic predisposition or a metabolic disorder. Preventing children with obesity and overweight to grow into obese teenagers is therefore of high importance. However, there are currently no established care and prevention programmes in Germany for the early reduction of overweight and prevention of obesity in children aged 3–6 years. fruehstArt aims to close this gap with a cross-sector outreach and family-centred personal counselling approach, where parents receive support from paediatricians and trained coaches who conduct consultations in the home of the family. The main research question is whether the fruehstArt programme reduces overweight and obesity in children aged 3–6 years within 12 months, as measured by the body mass index-standard deviation score (BMI-SDS).

fruehstArt has been developed as a new form of care, which includes a family intervention with motivational interviews provided by paediatricians and individual home-based counselling provided by a trained coach on eating behaviour, exercising, sleeping behaviour and age-appropriate use of electronic devices. fruehstArt will be accompanied by an efficacy study (summative evaluation of change in BMI-SDS). In addition to German, the project is also offered in Turkish in order to reach families with a migration background and language barriers. 812 children with overweight or obesity and their families in the region North Rhine will be included and observed over 12 months. Recruitment of children occurred from December 2023 to April 2025 with the final visits scheduled for April 2026. The study is conducted as a randomised controlled trial with a social-ecological intervention approach, considering children in their living environment and conditions. Moreover, a formative evaluation at the process level, and the system level will be carried out and complemented by a health economic analysis. Those are carried out to provide information about the intervention’s success and relevant costs. Thus, fruehstArt is realised in the form of an effectiveness–implementation hybrid design that combines the analysis of effectiveness with an evaluation of the implementation process.

The study received ethics approval in a coordinated procedure from the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty University hospital of Cologne and the ethics committee of the North Rhine Medical Association. For all collected data, the relevant national and European data protection regulations will be considered. All personal data (contact details) will be removed for the data analysis in order to ensure pseudonymisation. Dissemination strategies include reports and quality workshops for organisations, peer-reviewed publications and the presentation of results at conferences.

The aim of the unique form of care fruehstArt is to improve the care of preschool children with overweight or obesity through innovative home-based counselling, cross-sectoral service integration and to address the cultural needs of Turkish families.

DRKS00030749 (29-09-2023)

Despite the benefits of early diagnosis, most cancers in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries are diagnosed at an advanced stage due to late presentation of symptoms, inadequate referral systems and poor diagnostic capacity. Health communication interventions have been used extensively in high-income countries to increase people’s awareness of cancer symptoms and encourage timely help-seeking. However, in SSA, there is still limited evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions and existing evaluations are mainly focused on communicable diseases rather than cancer.

A randomised, multisite, controlled community trial will evaluate a culturally tailored health infographic toolkit delivered in rural and urban settings in the Western Cape Province in South Africa and Harare and surrounding provinces in Zimbabwe. Participants will be randomised to receive one of three African aWAreness of CANcer and Early Diagnosis (AWACAN-ED) cancer awareness tools, coproduced with local communities, comprising health communication infographics with descriptions of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer symptoms plus messages to encourage consultation with primary care providers if symptoms occur, all presented in English and four local languages. We will recruit 144 participants in each of the three intervention groups (N=432). The primary outcome will be recall of symptoms and the secondary outcomes will be (1) intention to seek help, (2) emotional impact and (3) acceptability of the toolkit. Outcomes will be measured preintervention and at two points postintervention: after 15 min and 1 month.

Ethical approval was obtained in both participating countries, South Africa (148/2025) and Zimbabwe (363/2021). All participants will be required to provide written informed consent prior to participation. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and the AWACAN-ED programme website.

PACTR202505475803308.

The WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) has been implemented in diverse settings to improve the quality and safety of intrapartum care, but implementation strategies and their relationship with adoption and fidelity remain heterogeneous and incompletely described.

To describe the landscape of SCC implementation, map the implementation strategies used and explore how these strategies were reported in relation to adoption and fidelity.

We included primary studies reporting SCC implementation in healthcare settings that described at least one implementation strategy, with no restrictions on country or language. Studies that did not report implementation strategies or did not involve SCC use in real-world care settings were excluded.

We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health and Global Index Medicus (June 2024), screened reference lists and consulted grey literature for the period 2009–2024.

This scoping review followed JBI methodology (Peters et al) and was reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. We extracted study characteristics and implementation findings, coded strategies using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy and grouped them by clusters. Adoption (initial uptake) and fidelity (adherence to core components) were categorised following Proctor’s implementation outcomes. We created a descriptive implementation intensity score and conducted exploratory analyses (tertiles, boxplot).

34 studies described 19 SCC implementation projects across 16 countries. We identified 24 distinct ERIC strategies, with most projects using 5–11 strategies. Frequently reported strategies included educational meetings, audit and feedback, supervision, contextual adaptation and leadership or champions. Exploratory analyses did not show consistent associations between implementation intensity and adoption or fidelity. ‘Change infrastructure’ strategies (such as record system or equipment changes) were variably defined and warrant cautious interpretation. Adaptations (eg, translation and alignment with national guidelines) were common and aimed at improving local fit, but heterogeneous reporting limited cross-study comparability.

SCC implementation has relied on diverse, multicomponent strategies, yet reporting—especially of strategy content and adaptations—remains insufficient, constraining comparison and synthesis across settings. As a pragmatic bundle, implementers may prioritise brief team training, unit-level champions and leadership signals, point-of-care audit and feedback, light-touch SCC adaptation that preserves core content and structured supervision or peer coaching, combined with systematic inclusion of women and families through codesign and companion-mediated prompting. Using theory-informed frameworks (such as Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research [CFIR]) and standardised reporting tools (eg, Proctor’s outcomes; Template for Intervention Description and Replication / Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies [TIDieR/StaRI]) can make SCC implementation strategies more transparent, comparable and scalable.

Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RWY27.

To assess the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and Primary Trauma Care (PTC) with standard care on patient outcomes.

This was a pilot pragmatic three-armed parallel, cluster randomised, controlled trial conducted between April 2022 and February 2023. Patients were followed up for 30 days.

Tertiary care hospitals across metropolitan areas in India.

Adult trauma patients and residents managing these patients were included.

ATLS or PTC training was provided for residents in the intervention arms.

The outcomes were the consent rate, loss to follow-up rate, missing data rates, differences in the distribution between observed data and data extracted from medical records, and the resident pass rate.

Two hospitals were randomised to the ATLS arm, two to the PTC arm and three to the standard care arm. We included 376 patients and 22 residents. The percentage of patients who consented to follow-up was 77% and the percentage of residents who consented to receive training was 100%. The loss to follow-up rate was 14%. The pass rate was 100%. Overall, the amount of missing data for key variables was low. The data collected through observations were similar to data extracted from medical records, but there were more missing values in the extracted data.

Conducting a full-scale cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of ATLS, PTC and standard care on patient outcomes appears feasible, especially if such a trial would use data and outcomes available in medical records.

NCT05417243.

Telerehabilitation (TR) programmes are increasingly recognised for their feasibility and potential benefits, such as eliminating travel time, reducing costs and providing a more comfortable rehabilitation experience at home. However, the comparative efficacy of remote physiotherapy compared with traditional in-person sessions for individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effects of TR compared with in-person physiotherapy in individuals with PD, focusing on both motor and non-motor outcomes.

This is a randomised, single-blind clinical trial with a mixed-methods approach. A total of 22 individuals diagnosed with PD will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The experimental group will receive TR, consisting of remote physiotherapy sessions conducted once a week for 1 hour over a 4-month period. The control group will receive the same interventions in person. Interventions will include global muscle strengthening exercises, balance training, gait and motor coordination exercises, and cognitive training. The primary outcome will be motor function, measured using part III of the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes will include cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), gait (Functional Gait Assessment), mobility (Timed Up and Go Test) and quality of life (Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire). Data will be analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance to compare outcomes between groups across four assessment points (baseline, midpoint, postintervention and 2 months follow-up). Additionally, a qualitative phase will explore participants’ perceptions and experiences regarding TR and in-person interventions, with assessments carried out 2 months after the completion of the 24-week interventions, through semistructured interviews that will be analysed using Bardin’s Content Analysis technique.

This protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (approval number: 5.553.701). All participants will provide written informed consent before inclusion. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and communication with participants and healthcare professionals.

RBR-6h5knrj.

Advancements in technology for treating diabetes mellitus (DM) are progressing rapidly. With the growing availability and use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), glucose regulation is improved in individuals with DM, which will lead to less long-term complications and reduce the overall disease burden on patients with DM. Collecting vast amount of biomedical data, these devices combined with clinical outcome data provide more insight into the development and treatment of the disease. The objective of the DIABASE initiative is to collect and examine real-world data from medical devices and clinical practice in a registry.

The ongoing study is structured as an observational study registry. Clinical data and real-world data from diabetes wearable devices, such as CGM and CSII, are aggregated in the database. Clinical data is automatically extracted from the hospital’s electronic health record. Data from wearables is periodically collected manually from the various online data platforms for sharing and automatically added to the database.

This study is exempted from ethics approval by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U) since participants are not subject to procedures and are not required to follow rules of behaviour (approval ID: AW23.009/W20.197). The execution of this study has been approved by the board of the study site Hospital Group Twente (ZGT) (ZGT20-40). Results will be shared through scientific meetings and publications and through articles for the general public.

NCT05584293; Pre-results.

To assess the incidence of delirium and its predictors among adult patients admitted to the intensive care units of comprehensive specialised hospitals in the Amhara region of northwest Ethiopia from 18 October 2024 to 20 February 2025.

A multicentre prospective observational study was conducted.

Four comprehensive specialised hospitals in the Amhara region of northwest Ethiopia, from 18 October 2024 to 20 February 2025.

A total of 351 patients were included in the final analysis during the study period.

The primary outcome measure of this study was the incidence of delirium. Additionally, the study investigated the factors associated with delirium incidence among adult patients admitted to intensive care units.

The incidence of delirium among adult patients in intensive care units was 42.17% (95% CI: 37.08 to 47.42). Pain (adjusted HR (AHR) = 4.74; 95% CI: 2.38 to 9.44), mechanical ventilation (AHR = 2.96; 95% CI: 1.56 to 5.63), age 65 years or older (AHR = 2.18; 95% CI: 1.48 to 3.21) and agitation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) ≥1) (AHR = 3.26; 95% CI: 2.09 to 5.09) were statistically significant factors associated with delirium.

In the present study, more than one-third of patients developed delirium. Pain, mechanical ventilation, age 65 or older and agitation (RASS≥1) were significantly associated with delirium occurrence. To reduce the incidence of delirium, the current study recommends treating or preventing pain and agitation. Additionally, special attention should be given to patients receiving mechanical ventilation and those aged 65 or older during care.