Telerehabilitation (TR) programmes are increasingly recognised for their feasibility and potential benefits, such as eliminating travel time, reducing costs and providing a more comfortable rehabilitation experience at home. However, the comparative efficacy of remote physiotherapy compared with traditional in-person sessions for individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effects of TR compared with in-person physiotherapy in individuals with PD, focusing on both motor and non-motor outcomes.

This is a randomised, single-blind clinical trial with a mixed-methods approach. A total of 22 individuals diagnosed with PD will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The experimental group will receive TR, consisting of remote physiotherapy sessions conducted once a week for 1 hour over a 4-month period. The control group will receive the same interventions in person. Interventions will include global muscle strengthening exercises, balance training, gait and motor coordination exercises, and cognitive training. The primary outcome will be motor function, measured using part III of the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes will include cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), gait (Functional Gait Assessment), mobility (Timed Up and Go Test) and quality of life (Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire). Data will be analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance to compare outcomes between groups across four assessment points (baseline, midpoint, postintervention and 2 months follow-up). Additionally, a qualitative phase will explore participants’ perceptions and experiences regarding TR and in-person interventions, with assessments carried out 2 months after the completion of the 24-week interventions, through semistructured interviews that will be analysed using Bardin’s Content Analysis technique.

This protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (approval number: 5.553.701). All participants will provide written informed consent before inclusion. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and communication with participants and healthcare professionals.

RBR-6h5knrj.

Haemophilia is a rare inherited bleeding disorder with complex support and costly treatment. Comprehensive care for people with haemophilia (PwH) must take place in structured and continuously evaluated treatment centres. The aim of the Public Assistance for People with Haemophilia in Brazil Project (PATCH Project) is to assess the infrastructure, human resources and healthcare delivery processes of Brazilian Blood Centres (BC) involved in the provision of haemophilia care.

This is a nationwide cross-sectional study involving 98 BC across Brazil’s 26 states and the Federal District, focusing on the care provided to PwH. A self-administered structured questionnaire was prepared, based on national and international recommendations for management, treatment and outcomes assessment in PwH. The criteria of the World Federation of Haemophilia and the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders will be used to define standards of quality.

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Goiás, the coordinating centre (protocol CAAE 53863221.8.0000.5078), and subsequently by all participating institutions. Written informed consent is obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at international scientific conferences. Research data will be managed in accordance with ethical and legal standards and will be made available on reasonable request to support future investigations.

Not applicable

The aims of this study were (1) To investigate the availability of NHS funded in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment for individuals affected by Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH) from all Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) across England and (2) To assess the ethical implications of piecemeal funding for those with MRKH.

This was a mixed-methods study containing both quantitative and qualitative data. We filed freedom of information (FOI) act requests on 01/06/2023 for all 42 ICBs across England via secure email.

The study focused on England.

All 42 ICBs across England were contacted.

The FOI requests asked for information concerning the provision of funded IVF for uterine factor infertility, and if this included individuals with MRKH. Where assistance was available, we recorded what it comprised along the IVF cycle. If IVF was not offered, we recorded the rationale provided by the ICB.

Responses were received from all 42 ICBs across England. Seven stated that they would fund IVF and cryopreservation of embryos to women with MRKH and other absolute uterine factor infertility diagnoses (NHS Humber and North Yorkshire, NHS Dorset, NHS Devon, NHS Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, NHS Buckinghamshire, Oxford and Berkshire, NHS South Yorkshire and NHS West Yorkshire). However, the number of cycles, the length of cryopreservation and whether they would fund embryo transfer into a surrogate differed between ICBs.

Of the remainder, three (NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland, NHS Greater Manchester and NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight) described some provision of fertility preservation (cryopreservation of oocytes or embryos) for women with uterine factor infertility, two of whom suggested their policy may include women with MRKH (NHS Greater Manchester and NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight). Two ICBs (NHS Gloucester and NHS Bedford, Luton and Milton Keynes) explained that individual funding applications would be considered when made by clinicians on the patient’s behalf, but no information was provided on how many times requests had been made and granted. The remaining 30 ICBs explained that no part of a surrogacy pregnancy would be funded, owing to concerns around commercial surrogacy, which is illegal in the UK.

This work has revealed that only a small proportion of ICBs (7/42, 17%) treat women with MRKH like any other woman applying for NHS fertility treatment. The study revealed that decisions by ICBs not to fund IVF treatments based on concerns about commercial surrogacy create significant inequities. It unfairly penalises individuals with MRKH who require surrogacy as part of their fertility treatment. These individuals face a unique set of reproductive challenges, and denying them access to NHS-funded IVF treatments exacerbates existing inequalities. Furthermore, if individuals with MRKH accept that the expenses of the surrogate will be met by them rather than the ICB, it is unjustifiable to deny them the IVF component of the treatment if they meet all the other criteria for eligibility. Moreover, the fact that some ICBs do fund IVF for individuals with MRKH indicates that legal concerns regarding surrogacy are unfounded and inconsistently applied. This discrepancy highlights the need for a standardised approach that ensures equitable access to fertility treatments across all regions.

Elevated lipid profiles increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Despite the availability of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), adherence to therapy and achievement of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) target levels remain suboptimal. Coronary artery disease (CAD) presents substantial public health challenges, with LDL-C goal attainment rates reported to be between 30.0% and 54.0%. The EDHIPO MARCA (Evaluación De adherencia a la terapia HIPOlipemiante en pacientes de Muy Alto Riesgo CArdiovascular) study aims to evaluate LDL-C target achievement among Colombian patients with CAD.

This is a retrospective and multicentre study aiming to evaluate LDL-C target achievement within 12 months of coronary angiography across multiple Colombian institutions. Data will be retrospectively extracted from medical records corresponding to the years 2011, 2012, 2016, 2017, 2021 and 2022, which were selected to correspond with the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guideline updates. Inclusion criteria included patients ≥18 years old with confirmed CAD and LDL-C reports recorded during outpatient follow-up. The study will evaluate a minimum sample size of 5000 patients, with data collected through medical records and managed using the REDCap platform. Statistical analyses will be conducted to assess LDL-C target achievement, associated factors and temporal trends using mixed-effects models. Uncertainty will also be explored through sensitivity analysis. The EDHIPO MARCA study will provide key insights into LDL-C target achievement in Colombia, contributing to both regional and global CAD management. Its findings will be used to help shape public health policies and serve as a foundation for future prospective research and interventions aimed at mitigating the burden of cardiovascular disease.

This study was approved by the Comité de Ética en Investigación Biomédica of Fundación Valle del Lili, the coordinating institution and creator of the study protocol. Each participating centre will obtain approval from its local ethics committee prior to data collection. Data will be collected in a de-identified manner, ensuring confidentiality. In accordance with Colombian Resolution 8430, this study is classified as 'no-risk', and informed consent was not required. The findings will be disseminated through scientific events and published in international peer-reviewed journals to contribute to cardiovascular disease management and public health policies.

Around 75 000 people suffer from hip fractures yearly in the United Kingdom (UK) leading to significant mortality and morbidity. Although mortality has dropped from 8% to 5% between 2013 and 2023 after hip fractures, those undergoing surgery for hip fractures have a 30-day readmission rate which has remained stagnant at around 11% over the same decade in the UK.

This study protocol describes a mixed-methods investigation (The ARTHUR Study—avoiding readmission after hip fracture) which aims to understand and offer solutions to prevent avoidable 30-day readmission after hip fracture surgery. The study will focus on two hospitals in acute and community settings in a large urban and ethnically diverse city in the UK.

We describe two work packages.

Work Package One (WP1) involves analysis of 5 year’s worth of routinely collected health data provided by PIONEER, a Health Data Research UK data hub in Acute Care for our local population. Work Package Two (WP2) will involve semistructured interviews with patients, carers or family members as well as non-participant observations of hospital processes to understand systems-based issues related to readmissions after hip fracture surgery. Although recruitment may be an issue, our timeline for recruitment reflects this. We also aim to recruit a diverse population, which has often been under-represented in studies into hip fractures and aim to explore relevant interventions which can be widely generalisable.

This protocol was submitted via IRAS: 330074 and obtained UK NHS REC approval via the West Midlands Coventry and Warwickshire Research Ethics Committee (REC 23/WM/0242) on 25 January 2024. The results of this study will be published in relevant scientific journals and presented at orthopaedic, fragility fracture and geriatric specialty conferences and scientific meetings. A lay summary of the findings will be publicly available on the HRA website.