Telerehabilitation (TR) programmes are increasingly recognised for their feasibility and potential benefits, such as eliminating travel time, reducing costs and providing a more comfortable rehabilitation experience at home. However, the comparative efficacy of remote physiotherapy compared with traditional in-person sessions for individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effects of TR compared with in-person physiotherapy in individuals with PD, focusing on both motor and non-motor outcomes.

This is a randomised, single-blind clinical trial with a mixed-methods approach. A total of 22 individuals diagnosed with PD will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The experimental group will receive TR, consisting of remote physiotherapy sessions conducted once a week for 1 hour over a 4-month period. The control group will receive the same interventions in person. Interventions will include global muscle strengthening exercises, balance training, gait and motor coordination exercises, and cognitive training. The primary outcome will be motor function, measured using part III of the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes will include cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), gait (Functional Gait Assessment), mobility (Timed Up and Go Test) and quality of life (Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire). Data will be analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance to compare outcomes between groups across four assessment points (baseline, midpoint, postintervention and 2 months follow-up). Additionally, a qualitative phase will explore participants’ perceptions and experiences regarding TR and in-person interventions, with assessments carried out 2 months after the completion of the 24-week interventions, through semistructured interviews that will be analysed using Bardin’s Content Analysis technique.

This protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (approval number: 5.553.701). All participants will provide written informed consent before inclusion. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and communication with participants and healthcare professionals.

RBR-6h5knrj.

Heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are highly prevalent conditions that often coexist. Using electronic health records (EHRs), we evaluated the 1-year risk of all-cause death, major cardiovascular and kidney events in patients with HF, CKD, ASCVD and with combinations of these conditions, compared with an unselected control population aged ≥75 years.

Retrospective cohort study based on EHR data.

Integrated primary and secondary health unit located in the North of Portugal. Eligible adult patients were identified using EHRs from 2008 to June 2022.

Eight cohorts were defined: (1) control: patients with ≥75 years; (2) ASCVD alone; (3) HF alone; (4) CKD alone; (5) cardiorenal syndrome (CRS): combined HF+CKD; (6) atherosclerotic HF: combined ASCVD+HF without CKD; (7) atherosclerotic CKD: combined ASCVD+CKD without HF and (8) combined ASCVD+CRS. The risk of these conditions was compared with controls using propensity score age-sex matching. We identified 19 129 patients with ASCVD alone, 13 640 patients with HF alone, 40 545 with CKD alone and 10 499 with CRS. The control group comprised 36 532 patients aged 75 years or older.

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The main secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, HF hospitalisations and end-stage renal disease.

The 1-year mortality rate was 0.65% in the control cohort, 5.6% for patients with ASCVD alone, 6.05% for patients with HF alone and 3.53% for patients with CKD alone. Adjusted risk of all-cause death was significantly increased in the ASCVD-alone (HR: 8.42, 95% CI 7.12 to 9.95), HF-alone (HR: 9.19, 95% CI 7.75 to 10.9) and CKD-alone (HR: 5.35, 95% CI 4.62 to 6.19) cohorts, compared with control population; however, patients with the combination of all three conditions (ie, ASCVD+CRS) had the highest mortality risk (HR: 14.18, 95% CI 11.62 to 17.3). A similar association pattern was observed for cardiovascular death, HF events and end-stage renal disease.

Our results support the concept of an atherosclerotic cardiorenal phenotype, with a very high risk of mortality, cardiovascular and renal adverse events. Implementation strategies are required to target these conditions simultaneously.