Conectar
Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) contributes significantly to diabetes-related morbidity and amputation. In Barbados, where amputation rates are among the highest globally, the influence of socioeconomic factors on ulceration outcomes remains underexplored. Educational attainment, a social determinant of health, may influence health behaviours, engagement with healthcare services, and ultimately clinical outcomes. This study examines whether educational attainment is associated with diabetic foot ulcer severity, as measured by the SINBAD scoring system, and six-week healing outcomes among inpatients with DFU. A prospective observational study was conducted over 6 months at Barbados' sole public hospital. A total of 176 participants admitted with a diagnosis of DFU were recruited. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and ulcer characteristics were collected, and SINBAD scores were determined. Random forest modelling was employed to evaluate predictors of complete healing at 6 weeks and to assess ulcer severity stratified by educational attainment. Of the cohort, 17.5% reported primary education as their highest attainment level, compared with 2.9% of the general adult population. The mean SINBAD score was 2.45 among those with primary education and 2.51 among those with secondary education (p > 0.05). No statistically significant association was found between educational attainment and healing outcomes at 6 weeks. Educational attainment in this inpatient DFU cohort was lower than that of the general Barbadian population; however, it was not significantly associated with ulcer severity or six-week healing outcomes. In a universal healthcare setting, equitable access to care may attenuate the effect of educational attainment on clinical outcomes. These null findings highlight the need for future adequately powered studies incorporating health literacy assessment and key clinical confounders. Nonetheless, the observed disparity in educational attainment among DFU inpatients suggests that foot health education initiatives should be designed to be accessible to individuals across all educational levels.
Black and Asian women experience significantly higher rates of mortality and morbidity perinatally compared with white women and are more likely to lose their babies. These groups are also under-represented in clinical research, resulting in evidence that may not be generalisable. Tools have been developed to facilitate the inclusion of ethnic minority groups, but it is unknown to what extent representation and inclusion are considered in maternity trials.
To provide an overview of how ethnically diverse recruitment is considered and reported in maternity trials in the UK.
A scoping review was conducted, undertaking a systematic search to identify published trial protocols and their subsequent results papers, conducted within the UK, recruiting women during pregnancy or within 6 weeks postnatally between 2004 and 2024.
Data was extracted from protocols on whether representation of participants was considered in the study design and if specific recruitment and retention strategies were planned for ethnic minority groups.
Data extracted from results papers identified whether representation of participants was discussed and if recruitment strategies were discussed; these were compared against the protocol.
A total of 96 published protocols met the inclusion criteria; 8 mentioned specific recruitment strategies and 5 mentioned specific retention strategies. Only two included both recruitment and retention strategies. The most common strategies included providing different types of language support and adapting interventions to be culturally appropriate. Strategies were not evaluated.
67 results papers were available. Ethnicity was reported in 57 papers, with heterogeneity of categories between papers. Only 32 papers discussed representativeness of participants.
Few maternity trials report considerations on how they ensure they are recruiting and retaining ethnically representative participants. Minimal discussion is undertaken around the extent to which trial participants reflect the population to which findings will be applied.
Further work is needed to support implementation and evaluation of inclusive research guidance. Failing to ensure those from ethnic minority groups are included in research can exacerbate inequalities.
Individuals living with severe mental illness (SMI) are at a significantly higher risk of mortality. This mixed-methods systematic review identifies and explores factors, including access inequalities to annual health checks (AHCs), for people living with SMI sharing protected characteristics in the UK, as identified in Core20PLUS5.
Mixed-methods systematic review.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ASSIA, Google Scholar and the grey literature were searched from 1 January 2004 to 30 January 2025.
Inclusion criteria were adults >18 years of age living with SMI. We included studies of AHCs, short health screening interventions, health promotion interventions, considering or aiming to improve uptake and/or access to screening for people living with SMI. We included mixed-methods and quantitative studies: randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled studies, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies and process evaluations. We also included qualitative studies.
Two reviewers independently assessed the evidence for inclusion using the eligibility criteria at title, abstract and at full-text screening. Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies was used for methodological quality. Analysis used Levesque’s Conceptual Framework of Access as an a priori framework and dimensions of equality from Core20PLUS5 and PROGRESS PLUS. Separate and independent quantitative and qualitative narrative syntheses and integration of the evidence from both occurred.
36 studies were included. Five studies applied reasonable adjustments to increase access to AHCs but lacked evaluation, controls and comparisons. 26 studies failed to discuss deprivation or ethnicity and only 6 studies discussed barriers and facilitators of access to AHCs for people of different ethnic, linguistic or cultural backgrounds. There was no evidence for interventions improving access to AHCs. Access focused primarily on dimensions of services, over abilities to access AHCs for people living with SMI.
There are access inequalities to AHCs for people living with SMI sharing protected characteristics. Robust research is urgently needed to identify, modify and ameliorate barriers to the policy recommended AHCs.
CRD42023437905.
FreshRSS 