FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Establishing criteria for emergency department-based episode of care definitions: a modified Delphi study

Por: Kocher · K. E. · Myers · A. D. · Urech · T. H. · Asch · S. · Admon · A. · Fuehrlein · B. S. · Gettel · C. J. · Patel · N. · Pines · J. M. · Potochny · N. S. · Sabbatini · A. K. · Vanneman · M. · Ward · M. J. · Vashi · A.
Objective

Design

Traditional encounter-based analyses overlook downstream costs and complications that follow emergency department (ED) care. To enable more comprehensive evaluations, we developed standardised episode of care definitions for five common, high-cost conditions: chest pain, congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and suicidality.

A two-round modified Delphi panel study was conducted following a literature review and evidence synthesis. Using structured surveys with anonymous feedback, panellists rated candidate criteria. To be retained in the final episode definitions, criteria were required to meet a predefined validity threshold without panellist disagreement. Data were analysed descriptively, and meeting deliberations were recorded and reviewed thematically.

Setting

Virtual, supported by an online survey platform.

Participants

A multidisciplinary panel of 11 experts in emergency medicine and relevant clinical specialties with 9 members participating in each round.

Outcomes

Criteria to determine inclusion, exclusion (including pre-trigger, post-trigger and event exclusion) and risk-adjustment standards for constructing ED-based episodes of care.

Results

Candidate criteria were presented to the panel by condition: 30 for chest pain, 54 for CHF, 30 for COPD, 79 for pneumonia and 375 for suicidality. Following deliberations and re-rating, the number of valid criteria was reduced, primarily in the episode exclusion category. Thematic analysis highlighted trade-offs between episode exclusion criteria and the use of risk adjustment to account for heterogeneity.

Conclusions

Operational definitions for ED-based episodes of care for five conditions were established. These may support healthcare administrators, policymakers and researchers in evaluating variation in ED care delivery and its downstream cost and outcomes.

How can we improve low-volume paediatric emergency departments to enhance readiness?

Por: Goparaju · N. · Pines · J. M.

Commentary on:Michelson KA, Rees CA, Florin TA, et al. Emergency department volume and delayed diagnosis of serious pediatric conditions. JAMA Pediatr. 2024;178:362–8. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.6672

Implications for practice and research

  • Low-paediatric-volume emergency departments (EDs) can increase paediatric readiness by improving diagnostic tools, expanding paediatric expertise (eg teleconsultation) and using electronic clinical decision support.

  • Further research is needed to examine the costs and effectiveness of specific interventions to improve readiness in low-volume paediatric EDs.

  • Context

    Children sometimes have subtle illness presentations and symptom overlap with non-serious conditions.1 Young age also presents a communication barrier. The combination of these factors can lead to diagnostic delays and sometimes misdiagnosis, particularly in emergency department (EDs) that do not see high volumes of children. In the USA, one in three EDs sees fewer than five children daily. A prior study linked low-paediatric ED volume to diagnostic delays in...

    ❌