by Juliana Ju Yun Hoo, Shumetha Sidhu, Kok Wei Tan
Rapid urbanization has increased disconnection from nature, especially in cities. While research on restorative environments has largely focused on non-tropical regions, little is known about the restorative potential of tropical urban green spaces (UGSs). This study assessed the perceived restorativeness of tropical UGSs in Malaysia using 120 environmental stimuli from nature, urban, and mixed urban-nature settings. 87 participants were randomly assigned to one of the three modalities: audio-only, visual-only, or bimodal. Each participant rated a subset of 30 stimuli on perceived restorativeness. Results showed that nature and mixed urban-nature scenes were in general rated as more restorative than urban scenes. An interaction effect indicated that, in the visual-only modality, mixed urban-nature scenes were perceived as more restorative than nature scenes, while no significant differences were observed in the audio-only and bimodal modalities. Moreover, perceived restorativeness for nature scenes was comparable across bimodal, visual-only, and audio-only presentations. These findings suggest that small pockets of urban nature (e.g., tree-lined streets, rooftop gardens) can offer greater psychological restoration than wild, untamed forests. In addition, high-quality nature sounds (e.g., birdsong, flowing water) can provide restorative benefits comparable to visual exposure when access to green views is limited. Such insights can inform urban planning strategies to design more restorative and liveable cities.by Omar Muhumed Maidhane, Omran Salih, Abdisalam Hassan Muse, Abdirahman Omer Osman, Muse H. Abdi, Mahdi Hashi Hassan, Nur Mohamud Ali, Shacban Abdilahi Elmi
BackgroundAccess to adequate sanitation remains a critical public health challenge in Somalia, where a large portion of the population relies on unimproved facilities due to persistent conflict, climate shocks, and political instability. This reliance contributes to a high burden of waterborne diseases. This study aimed to assess the spatial distribution of unimproved sanitation and identify its individual and community-level determinants using recent national data to inform targeted interventions.
MethodsThis study is a secondary analysis of the 2022 Somalia Integrated Household Budget Survey (SIHBS), which included 7,212 households. The primary outcome was the use of unimproved sanitation facilities, categorized according to the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) definitions. We employed a multilevel logistic regression model to identify individual and community-level determinants associated with unimproved sanitation. To analyze the spatial patterns of unimproved sanitation, we used Global Moran’s I for spatial autocorrelation and the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic for hotspot analysis.
ResultsOverall, 36.87% of Somali households use unimproved sanitation facilities. There are significant disparities across residence types, with the highest prevalence among nomadic populations (83.28%), followed by rural (51.10%) and urban (23.88%) residents. The multilevel analysis revealed that households in permanent/formal housing (AOR: 3.42) and those with IDP status (AOR: 3.18) had significantly higher odds of using unimproved sanitation. At the community level, urban residence was paradoxically associated with higher odds of unimproved sanitation (AOR: 7.99) compared to rural areas, while nomadic populations had significantly lower odds (AOR: 0.04), likely reflecting a high prevalence of open defecation not captured as a “facility.” Spatial analysis identified significant hotspots of unimproved sanitation in the Hiraan (90.65%) and Bay (80.39%) regions, and cold spots in Banadir (5.37%) and Lower Shabelle (3.70%).
ConclusionThe findings highlight deep inequalities in sanitation access across Somalia, driven by geographic location, socioeconomic status, and population group. The high prevalence of unimproved sanitation, especially among nomadic, rural, and displaced populations, calls for urgent, geographically-targeted interventions. A multi-pronged approach is necessary, focusing on the specific needs of different communities and addressing the underlying structural and individual-level drivers of poor sanitation to advance public health and sustainable development goals in the region.
Parental psychological challenges and poor well-being are key factors in shaping both the quality of parent-child interactions and child development. Specifically, maternal psychological distress is a central determinant of child development. Elevated levels of distress in mothers are associated with poorer child cognitive, behavioural and social-emotional outcomes, with effects persisting into adolescence and adulthood. While this highlights the critical importance of early prevention and intervention efforts to support parents, postpartum mental healthcare remains limited, despite ongoing and evident needs.
This protocol outlines a 2-year longitudinal follow-up study investigating the impact of a secondary perinatal programme (ie, Toi, Moi, Bébé), completed by mothers during pregnancy, and its impact on children’s cognitive and social-emotional functioning at 24 and 48 months. Further, the study aims to explore whether maternal self-efficacy and emotion regulation may serve as potential mediators or moderators of the relationship between programme participation and child development outcomes. The research aims to leverage the Toi, Moi, Bébé programme, by recruiting mother-child dyads (n=250) in which the mothers participated in the programme during pregnancy. Mothers were randomly assigned to complete the parenting well-being intervention either independently or with added telephone support. Participants who consent will be invited to take part in a two-wave follow-up at 24 months (T1) and 48 months postpartum (T2). At both time points, mothers will complete demographic questionnaires and standardised measures assessing maternal well-being (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Perceived Stress Scale), child cognitive functioning (Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 and MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory), child social-emotional functioning (Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Social Emotional—second Edition-2 and Child Behaviour Checklist for Ages 1.5–5), maternal emotion regulation (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire) and maternal self-efficacy (Parental Cognitions and Conduct Towards the Infant Scale & Me as a Parent Scale). Parents’ perceptions of their parenting experience will be measured using the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. Mother-child interaction, parenting quality and cognitive stimulation in the home environment will be measured using a brief virtual interview (StimQ2-Toddler) and a naturalistic observation assessment (Parenting Interactions with Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcomes). Using RStudio, linear mixed models will be used to assess the impact of the intervention (online intervention only vs only with telephone support) on child cognitive and social-emotional development at T1 and T2. In parallel, separate models will be conducted to examine associations between maternal emotion regulation and self-efficacy on the child development outcomes at the same timepoints. Exploratory analyses will be conducted to examine potential moderating effects of child sex and group assignment on the associations between maternal emotion regulation and self-efficacy and child developmental (cognitive and socioemotional) outcomes, using causal inference models.
The current study has been registered, reviewed and approved (MP-37-2025-10894) by the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board. Findings from this research will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open access publications, and presentations at national and international conferences.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer in the UK and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a non-invasive home-based test used for both symptomatic assessment and population-based screening. However, approximately 30% of screening FIT kits and 10% of symptomatic FIT kits are never returned. Under-served populations, including ethnic minorities, socioeconomically deprived communities and those with mental health conditions, experience particularly low FIT return rates, contributing to health inequalities in CRC outcomes. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions to improve FIT returns in both asymptomatic screening and symptomatic populations, with particular focus on under-served communities.
We will conduct a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence. We will search Scopus, MedLine via Ovid, CINAHL via Ebsco and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from September 2010 onwards, supplemented by reference screening and trial registry searches. Eligible studies will include randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, qualitative studies, mixed-methods studies and implementation studies examining FIT interventions in screening or symptomatic populations. Two reviewers will independently screen search results for eligible studies. Data extraction will capture study characteristics, population demographics, intervention components and outcomes including FIT return rates, acceptability, feasibility and implementation factors. Quantitative data will undergo systematic tabulation and meta-analysis where appropriate, with narrative synthesis for heterogeneous studies. Qualitative data will be analysed using framework-based thematic analysis, mapping findings to both the theoretical domains framework and theoretical framework of acceptability. A mixed-methods synthesis will integrate quantitative and qualitative findings to identify intervention characteristics, implementation strategies and contextual factors associated with improved outcomes across different population groups.
Ethics approval is not required as this systematic review will analyse published studies. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
CRD420251111663.
Nutrition counselling is recommended after pancreatic cancer surgery given the complex nutritional problems patients experience. In practice, access and delivery of nutrition counselling after pancreatic surgery varies across settings. To address this gap, our study team developed the Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance (STRONG) programme, an implementation strategy that addresses common barriers to nutrition care delivery in oncology.
The STRONG programme includes a standardised protocol to specify the timing and amount of nutrition counselling that should be delivered and patient-mediated implementation strategies including collection of patient-reported information, an educational brochure summarising common nutrition problems and recommended dietary strategies after pancreatic surgery and a question prompt list for the patient-dietitian encounter. A pilot randomised controlled trial will be conducted to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the STRONG programme compared with usual care in pancreatic cancer surgery patients after hospital discharge (n = 80). The trial is designed to be pragmatic and integrated into existing workflows and clinic teams. The primary goal will be to compare feasibility and acceptability outcomes against pre-planned benchmarks. Data will be collected from patients and caregivers and healthcare providers who assist with STRONG implementation. Secondary goals include collecting preliminary data on effectiveness and implementation outcomes that will support a future definitive hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial.
This study was approved by the Moffitt Cancer Center Institutional Review Board of Record, Advarra (Pro00071143). Participants will be required to provide written consent prior to enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through plain language summaries, conference abstracts and peer-reviewed publications.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06001268. Registered on 21 August 2023, prior to participant enrolment.
To assess the prevalence of depression or depressive symptoms among engineering students.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence surveys using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
PubMed, Index Medicus Global, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO were searched from 1 January 2003 to 28 June 2024.
Studies were included if they: (1) reported the prevalence of depression or depressive symptoms among engineering students, (2) used a validated instrument with defined cut-off points to assess depression or depressive symptoms and (3) were published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Two researchers independently extracted data using a standardised spreadsheet, collecting information on country of data collection, survey years, year of training, sample size, mean age of participants, number and percentage of male participants, assessment instrument, cut-off points and prevalence estimates. Discrepancies were resolved by a third researcher. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias for Studies of the Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders tool. Prevalence estimates were synthesised using random-effects meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with ² tests and the I² statistic. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to severity cut-off points, and meta-regression was used to explore the influence of study-level characteristics on prevalence estimates.
23 studies involving 12 758 students across 11 countries were analysed. All studies used validated scales with cut-off points to assess depression or depressive symptoms. The overall pooled prevalence was 42.6% (95% CI 32.7 to 53.1) for studies using symptom severity cut-off points at mild or above, and 33.1% (95% CI 25.2 to 42.0) for studies using symptom severity cut-off points at moderate or above. Meta-regression indicated a progressive annual increase in prevalence (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.28, p=0.034) across studies conducted from 2014 to 2024.
Prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms is high among engineering students, at levels comparable to medical students. Given the substantial impact, further research should investigate risk factors and evaluate preventive, early detection and treatment strategies tailored to engineering students.
CRD42024571131.
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in critically ill patients is often undetected. However, it is unclear whether ultrasound surveillance for early detection of DVT in high-risk medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients improves patients’ outcomes. The DETECT trial (Diagnosing deep-vein thrombosis early in critically ill patients) evaluates the effect of twice-weekly bilateral lower limb ultrasound compared to usual care on 90-day mortality of critically ill adult patients admitted to medical, surgical and trauma ICUs.
The DETECT trial is an international, parallel-group, open-label, randomised trial, which will recruit 1800 critically ill adults from over 14 hospitals in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Eligible patients will be allocated to twice-weekly bilateral lower limb ultrasound or usual care. The primary outcome is 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include lower limb proximal DVT, pulmonary embolism and clinically important bleeding. The first patient was enrolled on 21 March 2023. As of 8 April 2025, 711 patients have been enrolled from 14 centres in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. The first interim analysis was conducted on 14 May 2025. We expect to complete recruitment by December 2026.
Institutional review boards (IRBs) of each participating institution approved the study. We plan to publish the results in peer-reviewed journals and present the findings at international critical care conferences.
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05112705, registered on 9-11-2021.
This study aimed to assess the psychosocial determinants of psychological distress among people with disabilities in Ethiopia.
A cross-sectional study was conducted at an institution from 01 to 30 May 2021, using a census sampling approach.
A total of 269 individuals aged 18 and older with disabilities were present at the University of Gondar in Ethiopia.
The Kessler psychological distress scale (K10), the multidimensional scale of perceived social support, the actual help-seeking behaviour and the stigma scale for chronic illness-8 were used to assess the dependent and independent variables, respectively. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed; a p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant at a 95% CI.
In this study, the prevalence of psychological distress was 34.6% with a 95% CI (29.40 to 40.10). Factors, such as older age (adjusted ß=1.09; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.15), low perceived social support (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.83; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.89), experiencing stigma (AOR=2.50; 95% CI 1.12 to 5.61) and cognition problems (adjusted ß=0.73; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.85), were significantly associated with increased psychological distress. Of the participants with psychological distress, professional help-seeking behaviour was 7.5%.
Psychological distress was notably high among individuals with disabilities, while professional help-seeking remained very low. This underscores the urgent need for targeted mental health interventions to reduce stigma, strengthen social support and improve access to appropriate psychological care.
This study aims to assess the level of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and its associated determinants among hypertensive patients in Jigjiga, Somali Region, Ethiopia using the WHO 10-year CVD risk score.
An institution-based cross-sectional study design was employed.
Hypertensive patients aged 40–74 years in two public hospitals in Jigjiga, Somali Region, Ethiopia, from 20 December 2023 to 20 February 2024.
Randomly selected 344 hypertensive patients aged 40–74 years with a duration of 1 year or more from the time of diagnosis and at least having 6-month follow-up.
10-year CVD risk level was assessed by using WHO 10-year CVD risk score. Risk levels were categorised as low (
Associated factors influencing CVD risk.
The study included 341 hypertensive individuals, with a 99.1% response rate. Of the respondents, 58.9% were men. The overall prevalence of CVD risk within the coming 10 years was 134 (39.3%; 95% CI: 34.1% to 44.5%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified age, khat chewing, smoking and comorbid conditions as significant independent predictors of CVD risk. Specifically, individuals aged 60–69 years had an adjusted OR (AOR) of 3.97 (95% CI: 1.94 to 8.16) and those aged 70–74 years had an AOR of 2.99 (95% CI: 1.57 to 5.71). Khat chewers had an AOR of 2.58 (95% CI: 1.22 to 5.46), smokers an AOR of 3.44 (95% CI: 1.59 to 7.48) and individuals with comorbidities an AOR of 2.42 (95% CI: 1.47 to 3.99).
There is a significant increase in 10-year CVD risk among hypertensive patients in the study area. Age, khat chewing, smoking and comorbidities were independent predictors. Regular CVD risk screening for older patients, focused health education to reduce khat and tobacco use and integrated management of comorbidities are essential to lower future cardiovascular risk.
To develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML)-based frailty risk prediction model that combines real-time health data with validated scale assessments for enhanced decision-making and targeted health management in integrated medical and older adult care institutions (IMOACIs) in central China.
Mixed-methods, cross-sectional study.
13 IMOACIs across seven cities in Hunan province, central China, from 8 to 16 July 2022.
Five healthcare experts and two data scientists participated in the requirements analysis stage. A total of 586 older adults were included in the assessment data collection stage, and 15 participants (10 healthcare professionals and five data scientists) were involved in the model evaluation stage.
A collaborative requirements analysis involving healthcare professionals and data scientists guided the design of an interpretable frailty risk prediction model. Five machine learning models were developed and evaluated: logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM), random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and a multimodel ensemble approach. Hyperparameter optimisation was performed using stratified fivefold cross-validation with grid search, incorporating class-weighted loss functions to address class imbalance and model-specific regularisation techniques to maximise performance while preventing overfitting. To enhance interpretability, the model incorporated Shapley Additive Explanations. The final model was integrated into a user-facing platform and validated using cross-sectional standardised assessment data collected from 13 IMOACIs. A mixed-methods evaluation approach combined quantitative performance metrics with qualitative user experience assessments.
The dataset (n=586) was randomly split into training (n=468) and validation (n=118) sets (4:1 ratio). Among models, XGBoost demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.89 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89 on the training set. On the validation set, the XGBoost model achieved a precision of 0.76, recall of 0.72, F1 score of 0.74, accuracy of 0.83 and AUC of 0.80, outperforming other models. User experience surveys yielded high mean ratings for satisfaction (4.20/5), perceived accuracy (4.20/5), interpretability (4.30/5) and application value (4.10/5). Qualitative analysis of user feedback identified six key themes: practical and application value, performance and data analysis, interpretability and comprehensibility, impact and integration into practice, limitations and areas for improvement, and future development and innovation prospects, highlighting the model’s strong potential for practical implementation.
This novel, interpretable ML-based frailty risk prediction model can enhance decision-making in the care of older adults by providing transparent predictions and identifying crucial factors associated with frailty. It establishes a foundation for targeted management and broader ML applications in healthcare systems, such as IMOACIs, particularly in developing regions.