The interfaces between the fields of communication, education and health have been indicated by international institutions such as the WHO and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. However, hegemonic scientific practices supersede dialogue between the three fields, isolating their practices. This fragmenting tendency is observed in scientific literature, which has created gaps in the dialogue and articulation between communication, education and health. Although health promotion requires both communicative and educational practices, the epistemological, historical, political, cultural and socioeconomic aspects have also engendered tensions between the fields. Communication is often seen as a mere instrument for other practices, rather than a phenomenon that (re)produces meanings and power dynamics. In opposing the reductionist and instrumentalising perspectives of knowledge fields, the primary objective of the scoping review is to map the scientific evidence on the interfaces between communication and education in health to indicate a conceptual framework that articulates communication and education practices within the context of health.

A transdisciplinary team developed this protocol based on the 2024 Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The procedures required to conduct the review were guided by the frameworks proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac et al and Peters et al. The study eligibility criteria were established based on the Problem, Concept and Context outlined in the research questions. Primary and secondary studies will be retrieved from nine sources, covering both conventional and grey literature. These sources include Embase, ERIC, LILACS, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, and the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. A categorised form will be used for data collection and subsequent analysis. The reporting of the review findings will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

The nature of the research and the use of secondary data sources do not require informed consent forms or approval from ethics committees in Brazil. The scientific findings from the review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences and other scientific communication channels.

The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z3CX7.

Nutrition counselling is recommended after pancreatic cancer surgery given the complex nutritional problems patients experience. In practice, access and delivery of nutrition counselling after pancreatic surgery varies across settings. To address this gap, our study team developed the Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance (STRONG) programme, an implementation strategy that addresses common barriers to nutrition care delivery in oncology.

The STRONG programme includes a standardised protocol to specify the timing and amount of nutrition counselling that should be delivered and patient-mediated implementation strategies including collection of patient-reported information, an educational brochure summarising common nutrition problems and recommended dietary strategies after pancreatic surgery and a question prompt list for the patient-dietitian encounter. A pilot randomised controlled trial will be conducted to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the STRONG programme compared with usual care in pancreatic cancer surgery patients after hospital discharge (n = 80). The trial is designed to be pragmatic and integrated into existing workflows and clinic teams. The primary goal will be to compare feasibility and acceptability outcomes against pre-planned benchmarks. Data will be collected from patients and caregivers and healthcare providers who assist with STRONG implementation. Secondary goals include collecting preliminary data on effectiveness and implementation outcomes that will support a future definitive hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial.

This study was approved by the Moffitt Cancer Center Institutional Review Board of Record, Advarra (Pro00071143). Participants will be required to provide written consent prior to enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through plain language summaries, conference abstracts and peer-reviewed publications.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06001268. Registered on 21 August 2023, prior to participant enrolment.