Anxiety and depression are among the top contributors to disability in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), but little is known about their economic impact. This study estimates the economic burden of moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety and depression among adults in KSA.

A cross-sectional survey was administered via a web panel. Participants were asked to fill out the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) for themselves and on behalf of other household members to capture prevalence rates. Those who reported at least moderate symptoms of anxiety or depression filled out a longer survey with questions on healthcare utilisation and productivity losses due to symptoms. These responses were monetised using prevalence rates and population estimates to calculate per-person and total annual costs.

Prevalence estimates are based on responses from 1164 participants on behalf of 3202 Saudi adults. Of these, 269 individuals with symptoms completed the longer survey.

Prevalence of anxiety and depression; healthcare utilisation (medications, outpatient, inpatient) and productivity losses due to absenteeism and presenteeism.

In total, 26.2% reported at least moderate symptoms consistent with anxiety and/or depression. Among those with symptoms, direct healthcare costs due to anxiety and depression averaged Saudi riyal (SAR) 3431.95 per person annually. Indirect costs via absenteeism and presenteeism averaged SAR 9702.87 and SAR 24 577.28 per person assuming that anxiety and/or depression episodes last for 6 months. Summing up the healthcare costs and productivity losses yields a total annual economic burden of SAR 163.3 billion. Absenteeism accounts for 24.8% of this total (SAR 40.5 billion), presenteeism accounts for 62.8% (SAR 102.5 billion) and healthcare resource utilisation accounts for 12.4%(SAR 20.3 billion).

The overall prevalence of anxiety and depression in KSA is estimated at 26.2%. The economic burden associated with these symptoms amounts to SAR 163.3 billion or 4.1% of GDP. Absenteeism and presenteeism costs account for the vast majority of the total, but a large percentage (nearly 60%) also report emergency department visits and unplanned hospital admissions. Evidence-based interventions should be considered to address the health and economic burden of these conditions in KSA.

There is an absence of real-world evidence, especially from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), on the implementation successes and challenges of COVID-19 Test and Treat (T&T) programmes. In 2022, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was provided as standard of care for mild to moderate COVID-19 treatment in eight LMICs (Ghana, Kenya, Laos, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda and Zambia). This manuscript describes a research protocol to study novel drug introduction during the COVID-19 health emergency, with implications and learnings for future pandemic preparedness. The goal of the study is to provide simultaneous programme learnings and improvements with programme rollout, to fill a gap in real-world implementation data on T&T programmes of oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 and inform programme implementation and scale-up in other LMICs.

This multiple methods implementation research study is divided into three components to address key operational research objectives: (1) programme learnings, monitoring and evaluation; (2) patient-level programme impact; and (3) key stakeholder perspectives. Data collection will occur for a minimum of 6 months in each country up to the end of grant. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics for each country and then aggregated across the programme countries. Stakeholder perspectives will be examined using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research implementation science framework and semistructured interviews.

This study was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board (Pro00111388). The study was also approved by the local institutional review boards in each country participating in individual-level data collection (objectives 2 and 3): Ghana, Malawi, Rwanda, Nigeria and Zambia. The study’s findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through dialogue events, national and international conferences and through social media.

NCT06360783.

Modern healthcare is delivered by an increasingly multidisciplinary team, complicating workforce management. Patient safety inquiries have led to reports such as the Francis and Berwick reports (2013), which consistently emphasise the need for proper staffing to ensure patient safety. While nursing has seen progress with safe staffing guidelines, there remains a significant gap in guidance for medical staff. In the UK, consultants are the senior members of the medical profession who have achieved a Certification of Completion of Training (CCT) and are able to practice independently. The number of required consultants is based on population needs, and future consultant numbers are used to determine the number of doctor training positions. However, this approach often overlooks the specific staffing needs of individual hospitals, particularly regarding patient safety. Although a named consultant is responsible for patient care, the medical workforce that handles day-to-day operations in acute hospitals consists of a diverse group of staff who require varying degrees of supervision based on their competency and seniority. This group includes medical associates, such as physician associates, and resident doctors (formerly known as junior doctors) who themselves are a heterogeneous group needing different levels of oversight. As a result, the previous focus solely on consultant staffing requirements must be broadened to address the realities of patient care. At present, no single resource provides a comprehensive summary of staffing recommendations that includes all groups within the non-consultant medical workforce. This research aims to identify existing guidance for this part of the medical workforce to support healthcare management. The objectives of this study are, therefore, to identify guidance and recommendations for safe staffing levels from a patient safety perspective for non-consultant medical staff in UK acute hospitals.

A scoping literature review was conducted and is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.

This used five search strategies: internal website searches, Google Scholar searches, general Google searches, medical database searches via Ovid and a snowballing strategy.

English-language resources published from 2015 to 2024 that provide specific guidance on safe medical staffing levels for National Health Service acute hospitals in the UK.

Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns in the diverse guidance discovered, using a hybrid approach that combined human and AI methods. The benefits and limitations of this method are discussed.

The review yielded 10 703 resources, of which 10 met all eligibility criteria for analysis. Identified themes include staffing requirements, staffing recommendations and a tiered system approach.

Medical staffing is complex due to the varying roles and competencies involved. While some guidance exists, there is a clear need for more comprehensive recommendations that go beyond specific specialities. Future research should focus on developing a medical safe staffing tool and addressing the barriers to comprehensive guidance, both of which would enhance patient care.

To determine prognostic factors of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS), that is, (1) identify determinants of the dynamics of disability progression; (2) study the effectiveness of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs); (3) merge determinants and DMTs for creating patient-centred prognostic tools and (4) conduct an economic analysis.

Individuals registered in the French Observatoire Francais de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP) database were included in this OFSEP-high definition cohort if they had a diagnosis of MS, were ≥15 years old and had an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score

A cohort of 2842 individuals, 73.4% women, mean (SD) age of 42.7 (11.6) years, median disease duration of 8.8 years, has been recruited from July 2018 to September 2020. The course of MS was relapsing remitting in 67.7%, secondary progressive in 11.9%. The mean annual relapse rate was 0.98. The disease-modifying treatment received was highly effective therapy in 50.3% and moderately effective therapy in 30.7%.

The participants will be followed until December 2026. Disease course up to four landmarks will be examined as predictors of disease progression: (1) diagnosis of MS; (2) relapse activity worsening and independent progression; (3) any recent disease activity and (4) any visit with absence of disease activity in the past 5 years. The marginal effectiveness and tolerability of treatments will be assessed. Stratified algorithms will be proposed for medical decision-making. Economic evaluation of disease cost and cost-effectiveness of new DMTs will be conducted from a public payer perspective.

NCT03603457.