Conectar
by Linley P. Prado-Celis, Rodrigo Zamora-Cárdenas, Javier Alamilla, Enrique A. Sánchez-Pastor, Tania Ferrer, Eloy G. Moreno-Galindo, Ricardo A. Navarro-Polanco
Multiple investigations have shown that the different types of cannabinoids, phytocannabinoids, synthetic cannabinoids, and endocannabinoids, possess antiproliferative and anticancer properties. The cannabinoid type-2 receptor (CB2R) has been proposed as a central player in tumor progression and has been correlated with the aggressiveness of breast cancer. Using immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy, in the present work, we studied the expression level and subcellular localization of CB2R in two human triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines, corresponding to early (stage I, HCC-1395) and metastatic (MDA-MB-231) stages, and they were compared with a non-tumoral mammary epithelial cell line (MCF-10A). We found that although CB2R was detected at the plasma membrane, it was mainly localized intracellularly, with ~40-fold higher expression in both TNBC cell lines than in MCF-10A (P P P P PTo describe primary care providers’ (PCPs) experience and satisfaction with receiving risk communication documents on their patient’s breast cancer (BC) risk assessment and proposed screening action plan.
Descriptive cross-sectional study.
A survey was distributed to all 763 PCPs linked to 1642 women participating in the Personalized Risk Assessment for Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Integration and Implementation (PERSPECTIVE I&I) research project in Quebec, approximately 1–4 months after the delivery of the risk communication documents. The recruitment phase took place from July 2021 to July 2022.
PCPs.
Descriptive analyses were conducted to report participants’ experiences and satisfaction with receiving risk communication. Responses to two open-ended questions were subjected to content analysis.
A total of 168 PCPs answered the survey, from which 73% reported being women and 74% having more than 15 years of practice. Only 38% were familiar with the risk-based BC screening approach prior to receiving their patient risk category. A majority (86%) agreed with the screening approach and would recommend it to their patients if implemented at the population level. A majority of PCPs also reported understanding the information provided (92%) and expressed agreement with the proposed BC screening action plan (89%). Some PCPs recommended simplifying the materials, acknowledging the potential increase in workload and emphasising the need for careful planning of professional training efforts.
PCPs expressed positive attitudes towards a risk-based BC screening approach and were generally satisfied with the information provided. This study suggests that, if introduced in Canada in a manner similar to the PERSPECTIVE I&I project, risk-based BC screening would likely be supported by most PCPs. However, they emphasised the importance of addressing concerns such as professional training and the potential impact on workload if the approach were to be implemented at the population level. Future qualitative studies are needed to further explore the training needs of PCPs and to develop strategies for integrating this approach with the high workloads faced by PCPs.
FreshRSS 