The transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable stage in the patient pathway. Patients and carers often report unmet information needs regarding diagnoses, medication changes, follow-up arrangements and escalation pathways during the post-hospital discharge period. Digital information interventions—such as electronic health records, patient portals or remote communication systems—have been proposed to improve discharge pathways. However, evidence on their impact is unproven. The aim of this review is to understand what works for whom, how, why and in what circumstances in relation to digital information interventions during the hospital-to-home journey.

Pawson’s realist review approach will be used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and reporting standards will also be followed. The review will follow five steps: (1) Development of the initial programme theory; (2) evidence search; (3) selection and appraisal of data; (4) extraction and organisation of data and (5) data synthesis and analysis. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid); Embase; PsycINFO; Web of Science and Cochrane Library and supplemented with citation tracking, grey literature, relevant organisational websites, programme evaluation reports and through consultation with stakeholders. The realist review will be an iterative process, and the initial realist programme theory will be tested (confirmed, refuted or refined) in response to the data searches and stakeholder discussions. Patient and public involvement and engagement will be embedded throughout the review. Patients, carers and health and care stakeholders will contribute to refining the initial programme theory, interpreting emerging programme theory and co-developing dissemination outputs to ensure findings remain grounded in lived realities.

Ethical approval is not required for this review as it involves secondary analysis of published literature. The review will be conducted in accordance with principles of research integrity, transparency and responsible stakeholder involvement. Findings will inform the co-design of future digital discharge interventions and contribute to national priorities around digital transformation, safety and equity in transitional care. Dissemination will include conference presentations, a peer-reviewed journal article and accessible summaries co-developed with stakeholders to support equitable implementation and impact.

Epic MyChart, used as a patient portal or within Epic Healthy Planet programmes, is integrated with the Epic electronic health record system, enabling secure access to health information, communication with clinicians and self-management tools. Despite increasing portal adoption in the UK and internationally, there is fragmented and unclear evidence demonstrating impact on clinical outcomes, engagement, safety, experience, efficiency and equity. This scoping review will map existing research on Epic MyChart, identify barriers and facilitators to uptake, and explore technical and operational determinants influencing implementation.

We will conduct a scoping review guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, refined by Levac et al, and report according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and PRISMA-Equity guidelines. Eligible studies will include original research evaluating Epic MyChart or Epic Healthy Planet programmes, reporting outcomes related to patient-reported measures, clinical effectiveness, engagement, safety, efficiency or equity. Searches will cover MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, trial registries and grey literature. Two reviewers will independently screen records and extract data on study characteristics, outcomes, equity factors and implementation determinants. Quantitative findings will be synthesised narratively using synthesis without meta-analysis guidance; qualitative data will undergo thematic synthesis. Stakeholder consultations with health informatics experts, clinicians, data scientists and health system managers, alongside a patient and public involvement workshop, will support interpretation of findings. A logic model will illustrate relationships between portal features, implementation factors and outcomes. Although focused on Epic MyChart, the review will offer insights relevant to other patient portals, as many implementation and equity considerations are shared across digital health systems.

Ethical approval is not required as the review uses published data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conferences and stakeholder engagement to inform implementation of patient portals internationally.

The protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/5azdh/overview).

Postoperative neurocognitive disorders, including delirium and longer-term cognitive decline, are among the most common and costly complications of surgery in older adults, yet effective preventive strategies remain limited. Insomnia and sleep–circadian disruption are highly prevalent in this population, affecting up to one-third of older adults undergoing elective surgery and represent potentially modifiable risk factors that are rarely addressed in perioperative care. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is the first-line, evidence-based treatment for insomnia; however, its feasibility and efficacy have not been systematically evaluated for perioperative implementation. This protocol describes a pilot randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a condensed CBT-I intervention in the perioperative setting. The study will also explore its potential effects on insomnia and postoperative outcomes.

The SLEEP-BOOST study is a single-site, randomised controlled pilot trial conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital. The study will enrol 50 older adults (≥65 years) undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery with insomnia symptoms (Insomnia Severity Index≥10). Participants will be randomised 1:1 to either a condensed CBT-I intervention or a patient contact-matched Sleep Hygiene Education control group. All participants will complete 3 weeks of preoperative actigraphy and daily sleep diaries, with follow-up assessments at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The primary outcome is feasibility, assessed through adherence metrics, protocol engagement and acceptability. Secondary outcomes will be treated as exploratory including insomnia severity, sleep quality, actigraphy-derived sleep and circadian metrics, cognitive trajectories, postoperative pain, mood, functional status and incidence of postoperative neurocognitive disorders.

This protocol has received ethics approval from Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Review Board (Protocol #2024P000780). Dissemination is expected to include peer-reviewed journal articles, reports, conference presentations as well as websites or social media platforms of relevant sleep treatment organisations. Participants will receive a summary of the study results.

NCT06375265.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted the mental health of young people from minority ethnic communities, yet effective interventions such as mental health psychoeducational workshops, shown to work for other populations, have rarely been offered or investigated among this population.

This qualitative study examines the impact, challenges and benefits of mental health psychoeducational workshops co-created with and for 12-to-16-year-olds from black and mixed ethnic minority groups in London, UK.

12 (8 female: 3 male) black and mixed ethnic minority 12-to-16-year-olds (M=16, SD=1.55 years) currently attending a West London community centre co-created, participated in, and fed back on the impact of five mental health and life-skill workshops through one-on-one semi-structured interviews (M=10 min 8 s, range=3–16 min), which were transcribed verbatim.

Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the interviews revealed three superordinate themes, with a total of eight codes clustered: (1) workshop features promoting positive mental health, (2) positive mental health outcomes and (3) workshop features impeding positive mental health outcomes. Overall, young people perceived workshops to have a positive impact on their mental health and helped provide support in coping with the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study findings highlight the potential benefits and barriers to entry of mental health and life-skill workshops for young people from minority ethnic communities.

Community-based and co-produced workshops were perceived as beneficial to mental health by Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic young people, warranting greater consideration and implementation in practice.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in Thailand and imposes a growing burden on the health system, driven by limited nephrology capacity and high rates of unplanned dialysis. The kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) estimates the risk of progression to kidney failure (KF) on age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. This study aims to validate and, if required, recalibrate the four-variable KFRE for the Thai population and to assess the potential impact of KFRE-guided referral strategies on clinical care and health system performance.

We will conduct a retrospective cohort study using linked, de-identified national health databases covering approximately 70% of the Thai population. Adult patients with CKD stages 3–5 will be included. KFRE performance will be evaluated at 2 and 5 years for discrimination and calibration. If miscalibration is identified, the model will be recalibrated using Cox-based methods. Simulations (1000 iterations) indicated that approximately 920 KF events by 5 years would be required to achieve the target standard errors for the calibration slope. A subsequent impact analysis will compare KFRE-guided referral with current Thai CKD guideline criteria and real-world practice using a decision-tree and Markov modelling framework.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Institute for the Development of Human Research Protections, Thailand (COA No. IHRP2025110), Imperial College London and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the use of anonymised secondary data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and policy briefs to supplement evidence-based referral strategies and health system planning.

Remote consultations (video, telephone, text) have become integral to the delivery of primary care and are promoted by government initiatives. While many find these more convenient, they may also discriminate against those with lower digital literacy and present a barrier to empathy by removing some non-verbal communication. The aim of this realist review is to understand how therapeutic empathy can be effectively expressed during remote consultations in general practice across different situations and for different people.

This realist review will follow the methodological framework proposed by Pawson and colleagues, which includes the following five steps: (1) identify existing theories to develop an initial programme theory; (2) systematically search bibliographic databases to identify relevant literature; (3) select, extract and organise data; (4) synthesise evidence to develop context-mechanism-outcome configurations; (5) refine and finalise programme theory. This iterative process will be guided by a Content Expert Group consisting of patients, carers, clinical staff working in general practice and representatives from national stakeholder groups. The final programme theory will inform the development of evidence-based recommendations to help clinical staff working in general practice express empathy during remote consultations.

This review does not require ethics approval. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, national and international conferences and through relevant professional associations and primary care networks in the UK.

CRD420261306014.

Intersectionality, as applied to health, provides a framework for understanding how overlapping social identities, such as ethnicity, gender and socioeconomic status, shape differential health outcomes and healthcare experiences. Individuals who occupy multiple marginalised identities often experience compounded disadvantages. Ethnic minority (EM) populations, defined here as social groups who are numerically smaller and/or socially marginalised within a given national or regional context based on ethnicity, race, culture, language, ancestry, or related heritage (often overlapping with racialised identities), frequently experience systemic exclusion, racism and structural barriers that also contribute to persistent disparities in morbidity, mortality and healthcare access. However, much health research relies on single-axis analyses, which can obscure within-group variation and may inadvertently reinforce inequities. Despite growing recognition of intersectionality, its empirical application to EM health remains limited. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on how intersectionality theory has been conceptualised and applied to understand health outcomes and healthcare utilisation among EM populations globally.

This systematic review will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the PRISMA-Equity Extension. Comprehensive searches of peer-reviewed databases and grey literature, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, Web of Science and ProQuest will identify quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method empirical studies published from 2000 to 2026. Eligible studies must implement intersectionality theory to EM health or healthcare utilisation outcomes. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Data extraction will also be conducted independently and discrepancies will be discussed with input from a third reviewer. Guided by the PROGRESS-Plus equity framework, findings will be synthesised thematically, implementing a mixed-method convergent integrated synthesis design.

This review only analyses previously published data, thus it does not require ethical approval. Findings will be presented at relevant academic or professional conferences and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

CRD420251248887.

This study evaluated the associations between achieving treatment goals and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on advanced treatment.

Retrospective cohort analyses of deidentified data from an established registry.

US-based single-centre registry between 2003 and 2024.

Data from patients with RA in the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study registry were analysed using multivariable regression analyses. Patients were classified into four groups based on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores at baseline and 1 year (consistently at/not at target, gain or lose target). Patients who were consistently at target were further classified into remission, very low disease activity (LDA) and LDA subgroups.

PROs (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) overall, pain, fatigue scores) and HCRU (surgery rates, durable medical equipment (DME) use) were assessed over 2 years.

The primary endpoint compared MDHAQ PROs and surgery and DME HCRU among the four primary groups. The secondary endpoint assessed the association between maintaining LDA and achieving remission at follow-up with PROs and HCRU.

Among 637 patients with CDAI data, 257 (40%) had LDA at baseline; 57 (22%) lost target at 1 year. Of 380 (60%) patients with CDAI >10 at baseline, 115 (30%) attained LDA. Patients not attaining LDA had higher surgery risk, DME use and MDHAQ scores. Of 200 (31%) patients with LDA at baseline and 1 year, 89 (45%) achieved remission, 79 (40%) very LDA and 32 (16%) LDA. Remission was associated with reduced DME use (adjusted OR (AOR) 5.4 (95% CI 1.9 to 15.4) at year 1 and AOR 4.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 11.1) at year 2) and improved MDHAQ scores compared with LDA (overall unadjusted mean 0.07 vs 0.5 at year 1 and 0.09 vs 0.4 at year 2; p

Achieving and maintaining LDA is challenging for patients with RA but leads to better functional outcomes and reduced DME use. Patients who achieve remission have further improvements.

With an ageing population, understanding leading causes of hospitalisation in older adults is critical for care strategies. These leading causes may vary across residential settings and by seasonal patterns. This study examines the temporal trends of leading causes of hospitalisation among older adults in community-dwelling and nursing home settings, specifically comparing patterns during winter and summer seasons.

A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from Hong Kong public hospitals (2012–2018) was conducted for three million adults aged ≥65. Age-standardised and sex-standardised monthly hospitalisation rates and average annual percentage change (AAPC, representing the average yearly percentage change in rates) were examined for leading causes during summer and winter across settings.

Among community-dwelling individuals, the top five causes in 2018 were symptoms, signs and abnormalities not classified elsewhere (NEC), neoplasms, genitourinary, circulatory and respiratory diseases in winter, with digestive diseases replacing respiratory diseases in summer. Symptoms, signs and abnormalities NEC (AAPC: 2.7% (95% CI 1.8% to 3.6%) in winter; 3.4% (2.8% to 4.0%) in summer), neoplasms (2.4% (1.4% to 3.4%) in winter; 2.5% (1.6% to 3.4%) in summer), genitourinary (2.5% (2.1% to 2.9%) in winter; 2.4% (1.8% to 3.0%) in summer) and digestive diseases (2.5% (1.6% to 3.3%) in winter; 2.6% (1.7% to 3.5%) in summer) increased, while circulatory diseases decreased in winter. In nursing home residents, the top five causes in 2018 were respiratory diseases, symptoms, signs and abnormalities NEC, genitourinary, circulatory and digestive diseases in winter and summer. Symptoms, signs and abnormalities NEC increased (2.9% (0.9% to 5.0%) in winter; 2.9% (0.8% to 5.1%) in summer), while circulatory diseases declined across seasons. Genitourinary diseases remained stable across seasons, whereas digestive diseases declined in winter.

In Hong Kong’s ageing population, seasonal and temporal shifts in hospitalisation causes were observed. Symptoms, signs and abnormalities NEC emerged as the top two causes across settings, highlighting challenges for primary care and hospital management and need for enhanced prevention and care strategies.

Colchicine has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events and may improve outcomes in arteriovenous fistulas used for haemodialysis due to antiproliferative effects. However, it is often avoided in patients receiving dialysis. Therefore, a large trial assessing the potential benefits of colchicine in dialysis patients cannot begin without further data on feasibility. The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of carrying out future trials of colchicine in dialysis patients.

This is an open-label, single centre, single arm study with 100 participants. The primary outcome is feasibility and the decision to progress to a full-scale trial. This will be based on the consent rate and the colchicine discontinuation rate. Secondary objectives are testing the feasibility of data collection procedures relating to quality-of-life measures, vascular access interventions and safety. Other secondary objectives are to assess the utility of the electronic health record for collecting trial data and to explore patients’ and healthcare providers’ experiences and attitudes towards colchicine and a feasibility study.

The study has Research Ethics Committee approval (Wales REC 6; 24/WA/0277). It is intended that the results of the study will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

ISRCTN91308625.

Ensuring equity in medical specialist distribution is essential for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). This study explored the changes in the availability and distribution of medical specialists in Thailand from 2015 to 2024 and assessed the equity impacts on workforce.

A retrospective longitudinal analysis of national administrative workforce data.

Public and private hospitals across Thailand, covering 1471 facilities in 77 provinces.

The primary outcomes were specialist-to-population ratios and geographical equity measured using the Gini coefficient (G), where values closer to 0 indicate greater equity. Explanatory variables included specialty type, geographical region and the timing of major workforce policies, including mandatory service and specialty-specific legislative interventions.

Between 2015 and 2024, the GPs and specialists in Thailand expanded significantly, with improvements in both density and distribution. The Gini coefficient for GPs showed the largest equity improvement (G=0.42 in 2015 and G=0.22 in 2024), reflecting the impact of mandatory service programme and rural recruitment programmes. Among specialists, emergency and family medicine have shown rapid growth and significant reductions in distribution inequity, reflecting the success of legislative policies. Sustainability of workforce policies was challenged by the ‘leaking stock’ phenomenon due to attraction of career opportunities and economic drives.

Workforce targeted interventions have led to improvements in the availability and equitable distribution of GPs and medical specialists over the past decade. Further policy, such as retention incentives and assisted technology, is needed to achieve equitable distribution across all specialties, particularly in low-density fields. Thailand’s experience offers the lessons for other low- and middle-income countries as the evidence-based and equity-focused workforce policies for UHC advancement.

To describe prescription patterns, dosing and persistence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Singapore, and to identify factors associated with the use of quadruple therapy (ACE inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), β-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor).

Retrospective, observational cohort study.

Secondary and tertiary care settings across seven public hospitals in Singapore.

3999 adults hospitalised from 2020 to 2022 with a first heart failure-related admission and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%. Patients with absolute contraindications to specific GDMT classes were excluded from eligibility calculations.

Primary outcomes were the proportions of eligible patients prescribed each GDMT class and quadruple therapy at discharge. Secondary outcomes were 6-month prescription patterns, dose attainment and predictors of quadruple therapy use.

Among eligible patients, 80%–99% met criteria for each GDMT drug class, yet only 29% received quadruple therapy at discharge in 2022. Prescription rates for ACEi/ARB/ARNI (67%), beta-blockers (89%), MRAs (40%), and SGLT2 inhibitors (46%) remained suboptimal despite high eligibility. At discharge, over 90% of patients on ACEi/ARB/ARNI and beta-blockers received ≤50% of target doses. By 6 months, prescription rates declined by 16% for ACEi/ARB/ARNI, 26% for beta-blockers and 7% for MRAs, while SGLT2 inhibitor use increased. Older age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.98) and chronic kidney disease stage 3a–4 (OR 0.65 to 0.04) were associated with lower odds of receiving quadruple therapy, while significant institutional variation was observed.

Despite high eligibility, uptake and optimisation of GDMT remain poor in Singapore, with substantial treatment gaps driven by underprescription, inadequate dosing and discontinuation. Interventions targeting clinician awareness, postdischarge support and institutional practice variation may improve adherence to guideline-recommended therapy.

To investigate the association between longitudinal trajectories of metabolic risk clusters and the risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and major adverse kidney events (MAKEs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Prospective registry-based cohort study.

Secondary and tertiary care settings in Taiwan, using data from a multidisciplinary pre-ESKD care programme.

A total of 1494 adult patients with CKD stages 3b–5 enrolled in a structured pre-ESKD care programme.

Time to initiation of dialysis (primary outcome) and time to MAKE, defined as a composite of dialysis initiation or all-cause mortality (secondary outcome). Group-based multitrajectory modelling was used to categorise longitudinal trajectories of metabolic risk clusters, including systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.

Four trajectory groups were identified: Group I had controlled blood pressure and glucose but elevated LDL (dialysis incidence: 19.5 per 1000 person-years); Group II had borderline-high blood pressure and elevated glucose (33.6 per 1000 person-years); Group III had controlled glucose and low LDL but borderline-high blood pressure (38.8 per 1000 person-years) and Group IV had controlled glucose but elevated blood pressure and LDL (46.7 per 1000 person-years). Compared with the other groups, Group I exhibited significantly longer dialysis-free and MAKE-free survival (log-rank test, p

Longitudinal trajectories of metabolic risk cluster are associated with differential risks of CKD progression to ESKD and death. Our findings provide valuable insights into the monitoring of metabolic risk profiles over time in patients with CKD.

Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours (SITBs) represent a critical public and mental health challenge. Adolescents are disproportionately at risk for engaging in SITBs. Intervening early and addressing pathogenic and proximal risk/vulnerability factors is of critical importance for this vulnerable population. Digital Single-Session Interventions (D-SSIs) offer a promising solution to unmet need for accessible, scalable and engaging care. This pilot study aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the interventions and clinical trial protocol for Programme LIFT (Little Interventions for Teens), a newly developed suite of D-SSIs targeting emotional regulation, self-criticism, rumination and hopelessness as key risk processes involved in the maintenance of SITBs.

We aim to recruit 216 Australian adolescents aged 15–19 years who have experienced SITBs in the past 2 months into an online, 2x2 factorial randomised controlled trial to pilot the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention protocol (D-SSI+28 days of skill practice) and trial procedures, and establish study retention. Random allocation procedures will be used to test factors that may affect adherence to the intervention protocol (primary feasibility outcome), by testing the effect of: (1) intervention assignment method (free choice vs clinician prescribed), and (2) a postintervention brief, supportive phone check-in at 7 days postcompletion of the D-SSI (phone call vs no call). Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using online surveys at postintervention (T1) and 30 days follow-up (T3), along daily brief assessments of skill practice between T1 and T2 (T2). The trial and its protocol were developed and reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items for Interventional Trials checklist.

This study is approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC#9032). Results will be published in an open access peer-reviewed journal, and key study findings will be shared with participants and stakeholders within 3 months after completion of the study.

ACTRN12625000963426.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised cancer treatment through targeted disruption of the physiological pathways that maintain tissue tolerance, but which are co-opted by cancers to evade immunosurveillance. Thus, the resultant T-cell activity often causes immune-related adverse events including immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA). ICI-IA results in functional impairment that frequently persists, even after ICI discontinuation, with substantial quality-of-life impacts for cancer survivors.

A high-quality body of evidence to guide ICI-IA management remains an unmet need. Pharmacological treatment may be prolonged, typically begins with non-specific immunosuppression, including systemic steroids, and is usually only rationalised to more targeted therapy in resistant cases. Moreover, retrospective data suggest the high dose glucocorticoids sometimes used in new-onset ICI-IA may be associated with worse cancer outcomes.

Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibition strategies are well established with excellent efficacy and safety profiles in ‘spontaneous’ inflammatory arthritides including rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Mechanistic evidence from ex vivo and murine studies also supports the utility of anti-TNF therapy for steroid-refractory cases of ICI-IA. Although good clinical responses have been reported in this setting, the REACT trial (REmission induction of Arthritis caused by Cancer ImmunoTherapy) aims to provide randomised and robust clinical evidence for deploying targeted therapy earlier in ICI-IA management. It will test whether up-front anti-TNF therapy can more effectively and quickly control symptoms, reduce glucocorticoid exposure, prevent early ICI discontinuation and increase the frequency of drug-free ICI-IA remission.

REACT is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, superiority, two-arm, randomised controlled clinical trial to guide initial therapy for patients with ICI-IA. The trial will compare the current standard of care (initial prednisolone; Arm A) with the anti-TNF drug, adalimumab without glucocorticoids (Arm B).

The primary outcome is glucocorticoid-free arthritis remission rate at 24 weeks where remission is defined as: (i) No use of systemic or intra-articular glucocorticoids (except when used for adrenal insufficiency) within 4 weeks prior to assessment at 24 weeks; and (ii) absence of synovitis on clinical examination.

The protocol was approved by East Midlands—Leicester South Research Ethics Committee on 31-Oct-2024 (Ref: 24/EM/0202). Participants are required to provide written informed consent. The results of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

ISRCTN18217497.

To assess the levels of knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) toward skin cancer prevention among Malaysian adults and to examine differences in KAP across socio-demographic groups.

Cross-sectional online survey.

Community-based study conducted in Malaysia using social media recruitment.

A total of 386 adults aged ≥18 years residing in Malaysia. Most participants were young adults (86.3%), female (55.4%) and of Chinese ethnicity (65.5%). Healthcare professionals were excluded.

Primary outcomes were levels of knowledge, attitude and preventive practices toward skin cancer, measured using the validated KAP-SC-Q (Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Skin Cancer Questionnaire) and categorised as poor, moderate or good. Secondary outcomes included differences in KAP across socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, analysed using independent t-tests and ² tests.

Over half of participants demonstrated poor knowledge of skin cancer (56.0%) and the vast majority showed inadequate preventive practices (84.2%), while attitudes toward skin cancer were predominantly positive (62.4%). Significant differences in mean KAP scores and categorical levels were observed across several socio-demographic variables. Participants with tertiary education had higher knowledge (14.32 vs 12.61) and attitude scores (20.01 vs 15.95; p

Malaysian adults exhibited limited knowledge and very poor preventive practices toward skin cancer despite generally positive attitudes. These findings highlight substantial gaps between awareness and behaviour and support the need for targeted public health interventions to correct misconceptions, improve risk perception especially in high-risk groups and promote effective ultraviolet protection behaviours.

Since 1985, the international healthcare community has recommended the ideal rate of caesarean section (CS) to be 10%–15% at the national level. The literature has reported that overused CS without necessary medical indications can be harmful to both maternal and child health. To generate evidence to support policy on CS, this study evaluated the trend over time of CS in Thailand during January 2016 to October 2021 (which included the COVID-19 pandemic period) and explored predictors of CS use.

This study was a retrospective secondary data analysis of de-identified hospitalisation data under the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) from the National Health Security Office’s e-Claims database. Descriptive analyses were conducted to explore the number and rate of CS over time and across different characteristics (ie, age, hospital type, COVID-19 status and delivery day) including a multivariable logistic analysis to explore predictors of CS. Interrupted time series analysis was adopted to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on CS rate.

569 321 CS cases under UCS from 2016 to 2021.

The results showed an increasing trend of CS rate, from 30% in January 2016 to 35% in October 2021. Both clinical (eg, medical indication and age) and non-clinical (eg, region and day of delivery) factors were significantly associated with CS. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic had no significant effect on CS rate (level: –0.0016, 95% CI –0.0085 to 0.0053, p=0.66).

This study highlighted an increasing trend of CS in Thailand and could present supportive evidence that Thailand might have been facing an overuse of CS. More awareness and actions are warranted to ensure the movement towards reduction of unnecessary CS in Thailand.

Primary healthcare (PHC) workforce shortages remain a critical global and national challenge, threatening progress toward Universal Health Coverage. Limited research has examined career-stage-specific motivations and deterrents. This study explores how perceptions of PHC careers differ between final-year medical students and current PHC providers, offering insights for targeted recruitment and retention strategies.

We conducted semi-structured face-to-face and online interviews (November 2023 to December 2024) with final-year medical students and primary healthcare providers (PCPs) from Greater Bay Area institutions. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure diversity in key characteristics. Interviews continued until thematic saturation was reached. Data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s six-step framework.

Interviews with 17 PCPs and 13 students identified five themes: systemic and institutional factors, education and training, professional development, community perceptions and personal motivations and trade-offs. The analysis identified common barriers across the participant groups, including inadequate resources, fragmented health information systems, unstructured career pathways and inequitable pay-for-performance mechanisms. Career-stage differences were notable: students associated success with hospital-based specialisation and viewed PHC as a fallback option, influenced by limited PHC training exposure, unclear advancement pathways and prevailing stigma. In contrast, PCPs described professional fulfilment through developing niche expertise and fostering continuity of care, increasingly perceiving PHC as an innovative platform for specialised practice. PCPs with prior hospital experience described their transition from hospital settings as motivated by burnout and the pursuit of better work–life balance, an opportunity often overlooked in workforce planning.

Career-stage-specific recruitment strategies are essential to strengthen the PHC workforce. Policies that address early-career and mid-career needs, establish structured development pathways and enhance the societal value of PHC will be critical to building a resilient primary care system. Findings offer practical implications for health system reforms in China and other countries advancing toward Universal Health Coverage.

To assess the incidence and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in Taiwan.

Retrospective cohort study.

Secondary and tertiary care; data were collected from three affiliated hospitals in northern Taiwan.

A total of 7038 adult patients with clinically confirmed CKD stages 3–5 were included, of whom 14.09% had progressed to ESKD. Patients were identified from a multicentre database in northern Taiwan. Key exclusion criteria included age under 20 years, prior MACE, cancer or renal transplantation.

The primary outcome was the incidence of MACE during follow-up. Secondary analyses included time to MACE and subgroup comparisons by CKD stage and comorbid conditions (eg, diabetes, cardiovascular disease).

MACE occurred in 49.8% of patients with CKD and 64.1% of those with ESKD. After adjustment for covariates, the ESKD group had a significantly higher risk of MACE (HR=1.52; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.16) compared with the non-ESKD group. Relative to stage 3a, the adjusted HRs for MACE were 1.13 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.73) for stage 3b, 1.13 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.70) for stage 4, 1.82 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.81) for stage 5 (non-ESKD) and 2.32 (95% CI 1.51 to 3.57) for stage 5D (ESKD). Diabetes and cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with increased MACE incidence and shorter time to MACE, but their associations became non-significant after adjustment.

Based on a multicentre cohort from Taiwan, our findings provide insights into the prognosis of patients with CKD across disease stages and highlight the importance of targeted interventions and integrated care to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Paternal incarceration represents a significant stressor that disrupts family cohesion, undermines paternal identity and adversely affects children’s psychosocial well-being. While family-focused programmes show promise in improving outcomes for incarcerated parents and their children, culturally attuned prison-based parenting interventions remain underdeveloped and scarce, particularly in Asian contexts. To address this gap, a local parenting intervention grounded in the Double ABCX model of family resilience, the ‘Be My Hero’ programme, was designed for incarcerated fathers in Hong Kong, China.

A concurrent mixed-methods design will be used to evaluate the intervention. A convenience sample of 20–30 incarcerated fathers of children aged 3–11 will be recruited from three correctional facilities. Quantitative measures assessing paternal competence, father–child attachment, communication and resilience will be collected preintervention and postintervention. Qualitative data will be triangulated through semistructured interviews with participants, their children and social workers, supplemented by session logs documenting perceived shifts in paternal identity and programme feasibility. The intervention is expected to mitigate disruptions in paternal identity and strengthen father–child bonds. This may, in turn, reduce intergenerational disadvantage and improve overall family well-being.

This study has received ethical approval from The University of Hong Kong. Informed consent and assent will be obtained from the participants, their children and current guardians. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals or conferences to inform correctional rehabilitation practices, encouraging the integration of family-focused and resilience-based approaches. Stakeholders, including practitioners and policymakers, may adopt similar interventions to promote healthier re-entry outcomes and reduce intergenerational disadvantage.