To describe prescription patterns, dosing and persistence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Singapore, and to identify factors associated with the use of quadruple therapy (ACE inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), β-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor).

Retrospective, observational cohort study.

Secondary and tertiary care settings across seven public hospitals in Singapore.

3999 adults hospitalised from 2020 to 2022 with a first heart failure-related admission and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%. Patients with absolute contraindications to specific GDMT classes were excluded from eligibility calculations.

Primary outcomes were the proportions of eligible patients prescribed each GDMT class and quadruple therapy at discharge. Secondary outcomes were 6-month prescription patterns, dose attainment and predictors of quadruple therapy use.

Among eligible patients, 80%–99% met criteria for each GDMT drug class, yet only 29% received quadruple therapy at discharge in 2022. Prescription rates for ACEi/ARB/ARNI (67%), beta-blockers (89%), MRAs (40%), and SGLT2 inhibitors (46%) remained suboptimal despite high eligibility. At discharge, over 90% of patients on ACEi/ARB/ARNI and beta-blockers received ≤50% of target doses. By 6 months, prescription rates declined by 16% for ACEi/ARB/ARNI, 26% for beta-blockers and 7% for MRAs, while SGLT2 inhibitor use increased. Older age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.98) and chronic kidney disease stage 3a–4 (OR 0.65 to 0.04) were associated with lower odds of receiving quadruple therapy, while significant institutional variation was observed.

Despite high eligibility, uptake and optimisation of GDMT remain poor in Singapore, with substantial treatment gaps driven by underprescription, inadequate dosing and discontinuation. Interventions targeting clinician awareness, postdischarge support and institutional practice variation may improve adherence to guideline-recommended therapy.

To adapt the Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG), Ariadne Labs, Massachusetts USA, to a local Singapore version and evaluate its acceptability.

Qualitative study using semistructured interviews.

49 participants (30 patients with serious illnesses, five family caregivers and 14 healthcare providers (HCP)) recruited from three public hospitals in Singapore.

Face-to-face or virtual indepth interviews.

Guided by the Heuristic Framework and Cultural Sensitivity model, we employed a multi-stage iterative design. Starting with the original SICG, we iterated the guide following three rounds of cognitive interviews among patients followed by expert consultation (n=4) to derive a local version, subsequently reviewed by caregivers and HCP. We assessed acceptability of the SICG using traffic light colour codes—red (unacceptable), orange (needs change) and green (no change) and gathered suggestions to rephrase them. Using content analysis, we compared acceptability of questions as proportion of red, orange and green responses at each interview round and inductively derived themes reflecting views towards the guide.

The original SICG showed low acceptability, and most questions received high proportions of red responses. Negative words and phrases dampening hope, lack of comprehension due to complex framing and cultural insensitivity to prognostic discussions were key themes reflecting low acceptability. Surface and deep structural revisions that centred around positive framing with hopeful language, focusing on current values and individualising conversations (‘use if appropriate’ prompts) significantly improved the guide’s acceptability.

We derived a local Singapore SICG that aligns with the core elements of the original guide and fosters cultural sensitivity. The adapted version could be further tested in other Asian countries.