Conectar
by Sanja Ljubičić, Vilko Petrić, Ljubomir Antekolović
Although it has been confirmed that overweight and obesity may have negative impact on jumping performance in school-aged children and adolescents, little evidence has been provided for pre-school children. The findings have provided inconclusive results, but mostly that overweight and obese pre-school children do not have an impaired jumping performance, in comparison to their normal weight peers. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to examine the differences between normal weight and overweight/obese pre-school children in jumping performance outcomes and their correlations with anthropometric indices. Four-hundred and eleven pre-school children with the mean (SD) age = 4.9 (1.1) years, height = 111.2 (9.3) cm, weight = 20.0 (4.2) kg, 53.5% girls were recruited from 34 kindergartens in four major cities. Anthropometric indices included body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Normal weight, overweight and obesity were classified according to international norms. Jumping performance was evaluated by the countermovement jump (CMJ) without and with arm swing with Optojump system. In general, pre-school children with overweight and obesity exhibited poorer performance in vertical jumping; they had shorter flight time and flight height, lower power relative to body mass and lower relative strength index (RSI), compared to normal weight children. The strongest correlations were observed between WHtR and jumping outcomes, where higher WHtR values led to shorter flight time and flight height, and lower power relative to body mass in both boys and girls. This study adds new information related to nutritional status and jumping performance in pre-school children. Thus, overweight and obesity need to be considered, when monitoring vertical jumping performance.Patients with metastatic oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are experiencing longer and uncertain trajectories of life-limiting illness due to advances in precision medicine. These advanced cancer survivors face new challenges related to living with uncertainty and desire more support to maximize their health and quality of life. Therefore, we developed a population-specific, blended palliative and survivorship care intervention to address the supportive care needs of patients recently diagnosed with advanced lung cancer and who are receiving targeted therapy for NSCLC with EGFR, ALK, ROS1 or RET driver mutations.
This study is a single-site, non-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention for patients with metastatic oncogene-driven NSCLC, Patient-centred, Optimal Integration of Survivorship and palliative carE (POISE) versus usual care. POISE consists of a brief series of structured visits with a trained palliative care clinician to address coping with uncertainty, increase prognostic awareness and promote healthy lifestyle behaviours. We will recruit 60 patients from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center. Patients will be randomised into a 1:1 ratio to the intervention arm or the usual care arm. Patients randomised to the intervention arm will complete four 60 min virtual or in-person visits with a palliative care physician. The usual care arm will receive standard oncology care. Patients in both arms will complete survey assessments at enrolment, 12 weeks and 20 weeks after enrolment, and patients in the intervention group will complete an exit interview. The primary outcome measure of this trial is feasibility, which will be defined by ≥60% enrolment among eligible patients, ≥70% completion of all sessions for participants in the intervention arm and ≥70% completion of all surveys for all study participants. Exploratory outcomes include acceptability, emotional coping with prognosis, self-efficacy for chronic disease management, prognostic awareness, quality of life, anxiety, depression, intolerance of uncertainty and documentation of goals and values discussions in the electronic health record.
This study was approved by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center’s institutional review board (protocol 20-722). The protocol is reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials guidelines, and the study will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials.
Most older adults living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) have at least one marker of potentially suboptimal prescribing. Pharmacists play a crucial role in medication management, with their effectiveness enhanced by using computerised decision support tools. The Pharmacists Review to Optimise Medicines in Residential Aged Care (PROMPT-RC) study aims to optimise medicine use by providing pharmacists in RACFs with an electronic medicine management app with integrated decision support (AusTAPER App/Pathway) to use as part of medication reviews they undertake.
The PROMPT-RC study is a parallel cluster randomised controlled trial design involving Australian RACFs. It will assess if pharmacists’ use of the AusTAPER App/Pathway for medication reviews improves medication regimens for RACF residents compared with usual care. Pharmacists in RACFs randomised to the intervention arm will be trained to use the AusTAPER App/Pathway, which flags potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) across a person’s entire medicine regimen. Pharmacists in RACFs randomised to the control arm will not have access to the AusTAPER App/Pathway—they will continue to provide usual care. The primary outcome is the difference in the number of regular medicines between treatment arms at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will measure the number of regular and pro re nata medicines, PIMs, medicine administration times, medicine regimen complexity, use of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and benzodiazepines, quality of life, mortality, instances of physical restraint, and the number of falls, hospitalisations and general practitioner/health professional visits. The cost-effectiveness of the AusTAPER App/Pathway compared with usual care will be calculated. Data collection will occur at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postrandomisation and 3 and 6 months prebaseline. We aim to recruit 668 participants to adjust for an estimated 10% loss to follow-up, giving 334 participants in each arm. Data analysis will follow an intention-to-treat approach using a linear mixed model.
Ethical approval was obtained from The University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 2024/ET000525; approved 14 August 2024). Reciprocal approval was also obtained in other states. This study is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://anzctr.org.au). Trial findings will be disseminated through national and international peer-reviewed publications and conferences.
ACTRN12624001409561.
To co-design a core outcome set with people living with dementia and other stakeholders that can be used to measure the quality of dementia care in home care and residential settings.
Multilevel modified Delphi consensus study. A priori consensus threshold of 70% was used to include or exclude outcomes.
Routine dementia care provided through home care and residential aged care facilities in Australia.
A stakeholder panel comprising people living with dementia, formal and family/informal carers of people living with dementia, advocates, policy experts, allied-health professionals, nurses and professionals working in the aged care industry. Round 1 included 10 panellists; subsequent rounds extended the number of participants to 24.
Seven outcome domains (Death, Physiological and clinical, Functional, Life impact, Resources, Adverse events and Education), encompassing 105 individual outcomes were considered by the panel over four rounds.
The 105 outcomes were distilled to 16 outcomes identified as important in home care and 15 in residential aged care. In both settings, nine outcomes (Dignity, Advanced care planning, Meaningful activities, Feeling safe and secure, Emotional wellbeing, Quality of Life, Resource utilisation, Safety incidents and Dementia-specific qualifications for care staff) were considered important.
Additionally, seven outcomes in the home care setting (Behavioural symptoms of dementia, Diagnosis of dementia, Hygiene, Importance of Relationships, Quality of carer and family lives, Dementia care navigation and Opportunities for unpaid carers) and six outcomes in the residential aged care setting (Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia, Pain, Hygiene and comfort, Medication safety, Staff carer morale and Adverse effects) were classified as important.
The outcomes identified during this modified Delphi consensus study provide a promising basis for the development of a meaningful, practical and measurable core outcome set that could be used in dementia care settings to improve the quality of routine care provided to people living with dementia.
Early detection of cardiovascular disease in primary care is a public health priority, for which the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-enabled stethoscope that detects left ventricular systolic dysfunction, atrial fibrillation and cardiac murmurs is unproven but potentially transformative.
TRICORDER is a pragmatic, two-arm, multi-centre (decentralised), cluster-randomised controlled trial and implementation study. Up to 200 primary care practices in urban North West London and rural North Wales, UK, will be randomised to usual care or to have artificial intelligence-enabled stethoscopes available for use. Primary care clinicians will use the artificial intelligence-enabled stethoscopes at their own discretion, without patient-level inclusion or exclusion criteria. They will be supported to do so by a clinical guideline developed and approved by the regional health system executive board. Patient and outcome data will be captured from pooled primary and secondary care records, supplemented by qualitative and quantitative clinician surveys. The coprimary endpoints are (i) difference in the coded incidence (detection) of heart failure and (ii) difference in the ratio of coded incidence of heart failure via hospital admission versus community-based diagnostic pathways. Secondary endpoints include difference in the incidence of atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease, cost-consequence differential, and prescription of guideline-directed medical therapy.
This trial has ethical approval from the UK Health Research Authority (23/LO/0051). Findings from this trial will be disseminated through publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentations at scientific meetings and conferences with local and national stakeholders.
FreshRSS 